Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fred Sheftell

Publications and source records attributed to Fred Sheftell.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Role of melatonin in the pathophysiology of migraine: implications for treatment.

The pineal gland and its secretory product, melatonin, have been implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine, as well as some of its comorbid disorders. Supporting this view, many migraineurs are susceptible to various environmental triggers that influence the secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland, and many prodromal symptoms are probably generated in the hypothalamus, a brain region that provides input into the pineal gland to modulate the secretion of melatonin. In addition, studies have shown abnormalities in melatonin secretion in patients who experience migraine and an improvement in migraine following administration of melatonin. However, the dysfunction in melatonin secretion in migraineurs may simply be a marker of hypothalamic dysfunction or neuronal hyperexcitability, leading to migraine susceptibility. It is also possible that abnormal melatonin secretion leads to decreased inhibitory neurotransmitter activity, decreased inhibition of the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from activation of the trigeminal system, or less analgesia. Whatever its role in the pathogenesis of migraine, melatonin may prove to be a useful therapy. Future studies are necessary to further elucidate whether melatonin is a well tolerated, beneficial therapy, and to determine the optimal dose and formulation of melatonin for use in migraine therapy.

Animals↗

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral eletriptan for treatment of acute migraine: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, consistency, safety, and tolerability of oral eletriptan in the acute treatment of three migraine attacks. BACKGROUND: Eletriptan is a selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist member of a class of agents known to be effective in the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: Thirteen hundred thirty-four patients were randomized to 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg of eletriptan, or placebo and could treat up to three attacks. The primary efficacy endpoint was 2-hour headache response for the first attack. Secondary endpoints included associated symptom relief, and pain-free, sustained pain-free, and consistency of response. RESULTS: Eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg achieved significantly (P <.0001) better headache response rates than placebo at 2 hours (47%, 62%, and 59%, respectively, versus 22%) and 4 hours (64%, 76%, and 79%, respectively, versus 25%). Headache response was observed to be rapid, showing improvement at 0.5 hour and 1 hour. Two-hour pain-free response rates for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg were 14%, 27%, and 27%, respectively, compared with 4% for placebo. Sustained pain-free response rates were significantly (P <.001) better for eletriptan 20 mg (10%), 40 mg (20%), and 80 mg (18%) compared with placebo (3%). Eletriptan had a higher consistency of intrapatient response than placebo in two of three (68% to 82%) and three of three attacks (32% to 60%) versus 16% and 8%, respectively. All eletriptan doses yielded significant functional improvement at 2 hours. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and transient, with eletriptan 20 mg having an adverse event profile comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Eletriptan is efficacious, displaying high consistency of response over multiple attacks, and is well tolerated for the acute treatment of migraine.

Acute Disease↗

Primary headaches: a convergence hypothesis.

After reviewing the historic differentiation between migraine and tension-type headache, the authors note that the similarities between these two types of primary headaches outweigh the differences, and so hypothesize that these headaches share a common pathophysiology. The convergence hypothesis for primary headaches links the clinical features of an evolving headache to current pathophysiological models. The authors suggest that successive symptoms experienced clinically reflect an escalating pathophysiological process, beginning with the premonitory period and progressing into tension-type headache and, if uninterrupted, finally into migraine. The clinical manifestations of other headache types, such as so-called sinus headache or temporomandibular headache, may also be explained by this model. A convergence hypothesis for primary headaches has important implications for earlier recognition, diagnosis, and treatment.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

The quality of headache treatment in the United States: review and analysis of recent data.

The methods and results of a recent large study of the quality of health care in the United States are reviewed with special emphasis on findings specific to headache care. The study's implications for educational and quality improvement efforts in the headache field are considered. These include (i) the need to teach and reinforce fundamental history-taking and physical-examination processes at all levels of medical education; (ii) the importance of recognizing serious problems of underuse and misuse of proven evaluation and treatment technologies; (iii) the desirability of shifting educational resources from simple messages that have been adequately absorbed toward more nuanced and targeted educational goals; and (iv) the value of novel and unorthodox educational strategies. Professional headache societies need to devote considerable resources to address the problem of widespread and important deficiencies in simple, fundamental care processes for headache.

Adult↗