Biomedical subjects

Frank Claessens

Publications and source records attributed to Frank Claessens.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Interplay between two hormone-independent activation domains in the androgen receptor.

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a key role in prostate cancer development, as well as its treatments, even for the hormone-refractory state. Here, we report that an earlier described lysine-to-arginine mutation at position 179 in AR leads to a more potent AR. We show that two activation domains (Tau-1 and Tau-5) are necessary and sufficient for the full activity of AR and the intrinsic activity of the AR-NTD. Two alpha-helices surrounding the Lys179 define the core of Tau-1, which can act as an autonomous activation function, independent of p160 coactivators. Furthermore, we show that although the recruitment of p160 coactivators is mediated through Tau-5, this event is attenuated by core Tau-1. This better definition of the mechanisms of action of both Tau-1 and Tau-5 is instrumental for the design of alternative therapeutic strategies against prostate cancer.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Altered Vitamin D receptor-coactivator interactions reflect superagonism of Vitamin D analogs.

The active form of Vitamin D, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)], has potent antiproliferative actions on various normal and malignant cells. Calcemic effects, however, hamper therapeutic application of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) in hyperproliferative diseases. Two 14-epi-analogs of 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) namely 19-nor-14-epi-23-yne-1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) (TX522) and 19-nor-14,20-bisepi-23-yne-1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) (TX527), display reduced calcemic effects coupled to an (at least 10-fold) increased antiproliferative potency when compared with 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). Altered cofactor recruitment by the Vitamin D receptor (VDR) might underlie the superagonism of these 14-epi-analogs. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate their effects at the level of VDR-coactivator interactions. Mammalian two-hybrid assays with VDR and the coactivators TIF2 and DRIP205 showed the 14-epi-analogs to be more potent inducers of VDR-coactivator interactions than 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3). TX522 and TX527 require 30- and 40-fold lower doses to obtain the VDR-DRIP205 interaction induced by 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3) at 10(-8)M. Evaluation of additional 1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-analogs and their impact on VDR-coactivator interactions revealed a strong correlation between the antiproliferative potency of an analog and its ability to induce VDR-coactivator interactions. In conclusion, these data show that altered coactivator binding by the VDR is one possible explanation for the superagonistic action of the two 14-epi-analogs TX522 and TX527.

Cell Line↗

PubMed2005

Superagonistic action of 14-epi-analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D explained by vitamin D receptor-coactivator interaction.

Two 14-epi-analogs of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)(2)D(3)], 19-nor-14-epi-23-yne-1,25-(OH)2D3 (TX522) and 19-nor-14,20-bisepi-23-yne-1,25-(OH)2D3 (TX527), show enhanced antiproliferative (at least 10-fold) and markedly lower calcemic effects both in vitro and in vivo, compared with 1,25-(OH)2D3. This study aimed to evaluate their superagonistic effect at the level of interaction between the Vitamin D receptor (VDR) and coactivators. Mammalian two-hybrid assays with VP16-fused VDR and GAL4-DNA-binding-domain-fused steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (Tif2), or DRIP205 showed the 14-epi-analogs to be more potent inducers of VDR-coactivator interactions than 1,25-(OH)2D3 (up to 16- and 20-fold stronger induction of VDR-SRC-1 interaction for TX522 and TX527 at 10(-10) M). Similar assays in which metabolism of 1,25-(OH)2D3 was blocked with VID400, a selective inhibitor of the 1,25-(OH)2D3-metabolizing enzyme CYP24, showed that the enhanced potency of these analogs in establishing VDR-coactivator interactions can only partially be accounted for by their increased resistance to metabolic degradation. Crystallization of TX522 complexed to the ligand binding domain of the human VDR demonstrated that the epi-configuration of C14 caused the CD ring of the ligand to shift by 0.5 angstroms, thereby bringing the C12 atom into closer contact with Val300. Moreover, C22 of TX522 made an additional contact with the CD1 atom of Ile268 because of the rigidity of the triple bond-containing side chain. The position and conformation of the activation helix H12 of VDR was strictly maintained. In conclusion, this study provides deeper insight into the docking of TX522 in the LBP and shows that stronger VDR-coactivator interactions underlie the superagonistic activity of the two 14-epi-analogs.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of different androgen bioassays in the screening for environmental (anti)androgenic activity.

Endocrine disruptors pose a growing threat to human and wildlife health. Validated test systems are required to study the mechanisms by which chemicals may interfere with the endocrine system. In order to identify compounds with (anti)androgenic activity, we used several in vitro bioassays, based on different androgen receptor (AR) functions, including AR transactivation and interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the ligand-binding domain. The AR activity assay, based on activation of the transcription of an androgen-responsive reporter gene in the presence of androgen, proved to excel in terms of high fold induction range and low minimal detection limit. The EC50 value, defined as the concentration that leads to half the maximal response and reflecting the potency of the synthetic androgen R1881 (methyltrienolone), was found to be 250 pM, consistent with the high affinity of this ligand to the human AR. A number of environmental samples were tested in the bioassay. The bioassay also could be used to detect antiandrogenic activity, because known AR-antagonists were able to inhibit R1881-mediated transactivation.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

Identification of an androgen response element in intron 8 of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein gene allowing direct regulation by the androgen receptor.

Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) are transcription regulators that play a pivotal role in intracellular lipid homeostasis. They are synthesized as inactive precursor proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they are retained by SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), a sterol sensing protein that in turn is linked to a retention protein complex. Low intracellular sterol concentrations weaken the interaction of SCAP with its retention proteins and allow translocation of the SREBP.SCAP complex to the Golgi compartment where SREBP is proteolytically cleaved and activated. Previous studies on the mechanisms by which androgens provoke a coordinated activation of lipogenic pathways in prostate cancer cells have suggested an alternative pathway of activation in which androgens increase the expression of SCAP and favor translocation of the SREBP.SCAP complex to the Golgi apparatus by disturbing the balance between SCAP and its retention proteins. Here we show that the SCAP gene contains an androgen-responsive region located in intron 8. This region interacts directly with the androgen receptor and confers androgen responsiveness to promoter-reporter constructs transfected in LNCaP cells. It contains a noncanonical androgen response element GGAAGAaaaTGTACC that interacts not only with the androgen receptor but also with the glucocorticoid receptor and that also confers glucocorticoid responsiveness. The identification of a steroid response element in intron 8 of the SCAP gene further supports the contention that SCAP is a direct target for steroid hormone action.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2004

Structural basis of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements.

Steroid receptors bind as dimers to a degenerate set of response elements containing inverted repeats of a hexameric half-site separated by 3 bp of spacer (IR3). Naturally occurring selective androgen response elements have recently been identified that resemble direct repeats of the hexameric half-site (ADR3). The 3D crystal structure of the androgen receptor (AR) DNA-binding domain bound to a selective ADR3 reveals an unexpected head-to-head arrangement of the two protomers rather than the expected head-to-tail arrangement seen in nuclear receptors bound to response elements of similar geometry. Compared with the glucocorticoid receptor, the DNA-binding domain dimer interface of the AR has additional interactions that stabilize the AR dimer and increase the affinity for nonconsensus response elements. This increased interfacial stability compared with the other steroid receptors may account for the selective binding of AR to ADR3 response elements.

Androgens↗

PubMed2004

A Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis.

Androgens control spermatogenesis, but germ cells themselves do not express a functional androgen receptor (AR). Androgen regulation is thought to be mediated by Sertoli and peritubular myoid cells, but their relative roles and the mechanisms involved remain largely unknown. Using Cre/loxP technology, we have generated mice with a ubiquitous knockout of the AR as well as mice with a selective AR knockout in Sertoli cells (SC) only. Mice with a floxed exon 2 of the AR gene were crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase ubiquitously or selectively in SC (under control of the anti-Müllerian hormone gene promoter). AR knockout males displayed a complete androgen insensitivity phenotype. Testes were located abdominally, and germ cell development was severely disrupted. In contrast, SC AR knockout males showed normal testis descent and development of the male urogenital tract. Expression of the homeobox gene Pem, which is androgen-regulated in SC, was severely decreased. Testis weight was reduced to 28% of that in WT littermates. Stereological analysis indicated that the number of SC was unchanged, whereas numbers of spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongated spermatids were reduced to 64%, 3%, and 0% respectively of WT. These changes were associated with increased germ cell apoptosis and grossly reduced expression of genes specific for late spermatocyte or spermatid development. It is concluded that cell-autonomous action of the AR in SC is an absolute requirement for androgen maintenance of complete spermatogenesis, and that spermatocyte/spermatid development/survival critically depends on androgens.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

DNA recognition by nuclear receptors.

The nuclear receptors constitute a large family of ligand-inducible transcription factors. The control of many genetic pathways requires the assembly of these nuclear receptors in defined transcription-activating complexes within control regions of ligand-responsive genes. An essential step is the interaction of the receptors with specific DNA sequences, called hormone-response elements (HREs). These response elements position the receptors, and the complexes recruited by them, close to the genes of which transcription is affected. HREs are bipartite elements that are composed of two hexameric core half-site motifs. The identity of the response elements resides in three features: the nucleotide sequence of the two core motif half-sites, the number of base pairs separating them and the relative orientation of the motifs. The DNA-binding domains of nuclear receptors consist of two zinc-nucleated modules and a C-terminal extension. Residues in the first module determine the specificity of the DNA recognition, while residues in the second module are involved in dimerization. Indeed, nuclear receptors bind to their HREs as either homodimers or heterodimers. Depending on the type of receptor, the C-terminal extension plays a role in sequence recognition, dimerization, or both. The DNA-binding domain is furthermore involved in several other functions including nuclear localization, and interaction with transcription factors and co-activators. It is also the target of post-translational modifications. The DNA-binding domain therefore plays a central role, not only in the correct binding of the receptors to the target genes, but also in the control of other steps of the action mechanism of nuclear receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The hinge region of the androgen receptor plays a role in proteasome-mediated transcriptional activation.

To investigate the function of the hinge region in transcriptional activation by the androgen receptor, we compared the actions of the wild-type receptor with a mutant receptor, deleted of amino acids 628-646 of the hinge. The role of the proteasome on the expression and activity of these two proteins was investigated. The deletion mutant demonstrated a threefold increase in transcriptional activity when compared to the wild-type receptor protein. Furthermore, we found that hormone-dependent stabilization of the receptor protein was more enhanced for the deletion mutant. In addition, experiments using the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, demonstrated that the deletion mutant is more sensitive to proteasome-mediated degradation than the wild-type receptor. However, inhibition of the proteasome had a negative effect on the transcriptional activity of the deletion mutant. Taken together, our results suggest that the hinge region not only plays an important role in controlling the transactivation potential of the androgen receptor but also in determining the influence of the proteasome on androgen receptor-mediated transcriptional activation.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Agonist-antagonist induced coactivator and corepressor interplay on the human androgen receptor.

The human androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. However, in contrast to other members of this family the amino-(N)-terminus of AR harbors the major transactivation function. Previously we have shown that hormone antagonists that bind to the carboxy-terminal ligand-binding domain repress AR through recruitment of corepressors that are recruited to the receptor N-terminus. Here we show by a modified mammalian two-hybrid system that both the AR interacting domains of the coactivator SRC1 and of the corepressor SMRT compete for interaction with the AR N-terminus. In contrast to other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily the LXXLL motifs of SRC1e are not required for this interaction, instead a stretch of 135 amino acids of the glutamine rich region (Qr) of SRC1e is essential to bind to the AR N-terminus. We show that the Qr-region of SRC1 is able to inhibit the interaction of SMRT with AR. Also, we demonstrate that the corepressor mediated repression decreases the antagonist-induced transactivation while, surprisingly, it increases the agonist-induced transactivation. This may indicate that coactivators and corepressors act in concert to dictate the overall receptor-mediated action dependent on the type of ligand.

Androgen Receptor Antagonists↗

PubMed2003

Implications of a polyglutamine tract in the function of the human androgen receptor.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor and belongs to the nuclear receptor family. The AR gene contains a long polymorphic CAG repeat, coding for a polyglutamine tract. In the full size AR, the deletion of the polyglutamine tract results in an increase in the transactivation through canonical AREs. However, this effect is clearly dependent on the response elements, since it is not observed on selective elements. In our assays, a deletion of the repeat positively affected the interactions of the ligand-binding domain with the amino-terminal domain as well as the recruitment of the p160 coactivator SRC-1e to the amino-terminal domain of the AR. This is reflected by an enhanced coactivation of the AR by SRC-1e.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

DNA recognition by the androgen receptor: evidence for an alternative DNA-dependent dimerization, and an active role of sequences flanking the response element on transactivation.

The androgen receptor has a subset of target DNA sequences, which are not recognized by any other steroid receptors. The androgen selectivity of these sequences was proposed to be the consequence of the ability of the androgen receptor to dimerize on direct repeats of 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like sequences. This is in contrast with the classical non-selective elements consisting of inverted repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' elements separated by three nucleotides and which are recognized by other steroid receptors in addition to the androgen receptor. We demonstrate that while the DNA-binding domain of the oestrogen receptor is unable to dimerize on direct repeats, dimeric binding can be rescued by replacing the second Zn finger and part of the hinge region by the corresponding fragment of the androgen receptor, but not the glucocorticoid receptor. In this study, we investigate the androgen receptor binding to all natural androgen-selective response elements described so far. We show that a 12-amino acid C-terminal extension of the DNA-binding domain is required for high-affinity binding of the androgen receptor to all these elements. For one androgen-specific low-affinity binding site, the flanking sequences do not contribute to the in vitro affinity of the androgen receptor DNA-binding domain. Surprisingly, however, they control the transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor in transient transfection experiments. In conclusion, we give evidence that the alternative DNA-dependent dimerization of the androgen receptor on direct repeats is a general mechanism for androgen specificity in which the second Zn finger and hinge region are involved. In addition, the sequences flanking an androgen-response element can control the activity of the androgen receptor.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Selective DNA recognition by the androgen receptor as a mechanism for hormone-specific regulation of gene expression.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the highly conserved group of the class I steroid hormone receptors, a subgroup of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-induced transcription factors. All class I receptors influence the expression of their target genes by binding three-nucleotide spaced partial palindromic repeats of the core 5'-TGTTCT-3' motif. The implication that all class I receptors activate transcription by binding similar DNA motifs, poses the problem of how the in vivo steroid-specificity of transcriptional control is achieved. The AR, however, is able to interact with DNA motifs that are divergent from the classical hormone response elements. We will describe this AR-specific DNA interaction in the context of the general mechanisms that dictate the sequence-specificity of DNA-binding and dimerization of the nuclear receptors. The androgen receptor is the only steroid hormone receptor that is able to interact with response elements that are essentially arranged as a direct repeat of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' monomer binding element. We propose that the DNA-binding domain of the AR can interact with these androgen-specific response elements in a head-to-tail conformation, similar to many other nuclear hormone receptors. The fact that subtle differences in the sequence of response elements can dictate androgen-specific responses is a new and intriguing finding. It creates new possibilities in the research on hormone-selective action and provides a new angle in the search for selective ligands or co-factors that might influence androgen receptor action via either type of DNA motif.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Dual function of an amino-terminal amphipatic helix in androgen receptor-mediated transactivation through specific and nonspecific response elements.

Steroid receptors are transcription factors that, upon binding to their response elements, regulate the expression of several target genes via direct protein interactions with transcriptional coactivators. For the androgen receptor, additional interactions between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions have been reported. The first amino acids of the amino-terminal domain are necessary for this amino/carboxyl-terminal interaction. Deletion of a FQNLF core sequence in this region blunts the interaction, as does a G21E mutation. We investigated the effect of the aforementioned mutations in the context of the full size androgen receptor on a series of selective and nonselective androgen response elements. Strikingly, the FQNLF deletion strongly reduced the androgen receptor capacity to transactivate through nonselective motifs but did not affect its activity on selective elements. Although the G21E mutation strongly impairs the amino/carboxyl-terminal interaction, it does not significantly influence androgen receptor activity on either selective or nonselective elements. Surprisingly, this mutation leads to an increased binding of the amino-terminal domain to the glutamine-rich region of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 of the p160 family. Taken together, these data suggest that the amino-terminal amino acids of the androgen receptor play a key role in determining its transcriptional activity by modulating the interaction with the ligand-binding domain as well as interaction with p160 coactivators.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2002

Characterization of the two coactivator-interacting surfaces of the androgen receptor and their relative role in transcriptional control.

The androgen receptor interacts with the p160 coactivators via two surfaces, one in the ligand binding domain and one in the amino-terminal domain. The ligand binding domain interacts with the nuclear receptor signature motifs, whereas the amino-terminal domain has a high affinity for a specific glutamine-rich region in the p160s. We here describe the implication of two conserved motifs in the latter interaction. The amino-terminal domain of the androgen receptor is a very strong activation domain constituent of Tau5, which is mainly active in the absence of the ligand binding domain, and Tau1, which is only active in the presence of the ligand binding domain. Both domains are, however, implicated in the recruitment of the p160s. Mutation analysis of the p160s has shown that the relative contribution of the two recruitment mechanisms via the signature motifs or via the glutamine-rich region depend on the nature of the enhancers tested. We propose, therefore, that the androgen receptor-coactivator complex has several alternative conformations, depending partially on the context of the enhancer.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2002

Functional interplay between two response elements with distinct binding characteristics dictates androgen specificity of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer.

Many of the aspects involved in steroid-specific transcriptional regulation are still unsolved to date. We describe here the detailed characterization of the mouse sex-limited protein enhancer as a paradigm for androgen-specific control of gene expression. By deletion analysis, we delineate the minimal enhancer region displaying androgen sensitivity and specificity. We also show that each of the three hormone response elements (HRE), which constitute this minimal enhancer region, is essential but not sufficient for its functionality. When investigated as isolated elements, HRE1 is inactive and HRE3 is a potent androgen response element as well as GRE. Only the non-canonical HRE2 (5-TGGTCAgccAGTTCT-3') is capable of conferring an androgen-specific transcriptional response to a heterologous promoter. This finding is correlated with the fact that HRE2 is recognized in binding assays in vitro by the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the androgen but not the glucocorticoid receptor, while HRE3 is recognized by both DBDs. Differential binding of the androgen receptor to HRE2 in the context of the enhancer was analyzed in more detail in footprinting assays in vitro. In transient transfection experiments using chimeric receptors, the inability of the glucocorticoid receptor to transactivate via the slp-ARU as well as the isolated slp-HRE2 was rescued by the replacement of its DNA-binding domain with that of the androgen receptor. Our data suggest that the functional interplay between the weak, but highly androgen-specific HRE2 and the adjacent strong, but non-selective HRE3 is the major determinant in the generation of androgen specificity of transcriptional response via the sex-limited protein enhancer.

Androgens↗

PubMed2002

Comparative analysis of the influence of the high-mobility group box 1 protein on DNA binding and transcriptional activation by the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors.

We performed a comparative analysis of the effect of high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) on DNA binding by the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of the androgen, glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptors. The affinity of the DBDs of the different receptors for the tyrosine aminotransferase glucocorticoid response element, a classical high-affinity binding element, was augmented up to 7-fold by HMGB1. We found no major differences in the effects of HMGB1 on DNA binding between the different steroid hormone receptors. In transient transfection assays, however, HMGB1 significantly enhances the activity of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors but not the androgen or mineralocorticoid receptor. We also investigated the effect of HMGB1 on the binding of the androgen receptor DBD to a subclass of directly repeated response elements that is recognized exclusively by the androgen receptor and not by the glucocorticoid, progesterone or mineralocorticoid receptor. Surprisingly, a deletion of 26 amino acid residues from the C-terminal extension of the androgen receptor DBD does not influence DNA binding but destroys its sensitivity to HMGB1. Deletion of the corresponding fragment in the DBDs of the glucocorticoid, progesterone and mineralocorticoid receptor destroyed their DNA binding. This 26-residue fragment is therefore essential for the influence of HMGB1 on DNA recognition by all steroid hormone receptors that were tested. However, it is dispensable for DNA binding by the androgen receptor.

Animals↗