Bases of cardiovascular and hematological effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Francisco Maduell.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Daily dialysis has shown excellent clinical results because a higher frequency of dialysis is more physiologic. On-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is a HDF technique that combines diffusion with high convection in which the dialysis fluid itself is used as a reinfusion solution. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the beneficial effect of the more effective dialysis schedule (daily dialysis) with the dialysis modality that offers the highest uremic toxin removal (on-line HDF). METHODS: Eight patients, six males and two females, on standard 4 to 5 hours three times a week OL-HDF (S-OL-HDF) were switched to daily OL-HDF (D-OL-HDF) 2 to 21/2 hours six times per week. Dialysis parameters were identical during both periods and only frequency and dialysis time of each session were changed. Tolerance, uremic toxin removal, urea kinetics, biochemical and anemia profiles, blood pressure, and left ventricular hypertrophy were evaluated. RESULTS: D-OL-HDF was well accepted and tolerated. The disappearance of postdialysis fatigue was rapidly reported by patients. Patients mantained the same [time average concentration (TAC) and weekly single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V)] throughout the study. However, equivalent renal urea clearance (EKR), standard Kt/V and weekly urea reduction ratio (URR) were increased during D-OL-HDF. Weekly urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, myoglobin, and prolactin reduction ratios were improved with D-OL-HDF. There was a significant decrease in predialysis plasma levels of urea, creatinine, acid uric, beta2-microglobulin and homocysteine over 6 months. Phosphate binders were reduced and antihypertensive drugs were stopped. A 30% regression of left ventricular mass was observed. CONCLUSION: The change from S-OL-HDF to D-OL-HDF was well tolerated. Disappearance of postdialysis fatigue, better dialysis adequacy, a higher removal of middle and large molecules, a reduction of phosphate binders, improvement of status nutritional, and an important reduction of cardiovascular risk factors were observed.
BACKGROUND: Removal of medium and large solutes is poor with low-flux (LF-HD) and limited with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). In clinical practice, there are few in vivo solute markers. Osteocalcin is a protein with a molecular mass of 5,800 daltons, and myoglobin is a large molecule with a molecular mass of 17,200 daltons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD. METHODS: Twenty-three patients (15 men, 8 women) were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. We compared 1.8-m2 polysulfone LF-HD and 1.8-m2 polysulfone HF-HD versus OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured. The percentage of reduction ratio for each solute was calculated. RESULTS: Mean values for predialysis osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin were 16.3 +/- 21 ng/mL, 27.4 +/- 5 mg/L, and 239 +/- 162 ng/mL in LF-HD, respectively. Urea and creatinine reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD and HF-HD and only 1.2% higher in OL-HDF. Osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, and myoglobin reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean osteocalcin reduction rates were 54.2% +/- 12% for HF-HD versus 63.5% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (reinfusion volume, 26.8 +/- 5 L/session; P < 0.01). Mean beta2-microglobulin reduction rates were 60.1% +/- 9% for HF-HD versus 75.4% +/- 9% for OL-HDF (P < 0.01). Mean myoglobin reduction rates were 24.5% +/- 6% and 62.7% +/- 9% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 5,800 daltons. OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in osteocalcin and beta2-microglobulin removal. Myoglobin extraction is nil with LF-HD, very low with HF-HD, and only adequate with OL-HDF.
AIM: The objective of the study was to determine the situation concerning mineral metabolism and bone disease in hemodialysis (HD) patients living in the community of Valencia (Spain), as well as the clinical practices for bone disease control in relation to the laboratory targets recommended in the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines. METHODS: In December 2003, a cross-sectional study was performed including 2392 patients (1485 males and 907 females) from 43 different centers in the council of Valencia (the entire HD population). Mean age was 65.8 +/- 14 yrs. Cut-off levels for the study of calcium, phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product (Ca x P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were performed following the recommendations of the K/DOQI guidelines. RESULTS: The mean values for calcium were 9.57 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, phosphorus 4.97 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, intact PTH (iPTH) 297 +/- 353 pg/mL, Ca x P 47.5 +/- 15 mg2/dL2. Hypocalcemia (<8.4 mg/dL) was present in 5% of patients, whereas 17.8% of patients presented hypercalcemia (>10.2 mg/dL), 60.3% of whom received vitamin D. Hypophosphoremia (<3.5 mg/dL) was present in 16% of patients, and 29% of patients presented hyperphosphoremia (>5.5 mg/dL). Ca x P was <55 mg2/dL2 in 73% of patients. Thirty one percent of patients presented secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPTH >300 pg/mL), being severe in 12% (>600 pg/mL); 43% of patients presented iPTH <150 pg/mL. Only 7.3% of patients achieved the four recommendations provided in the K/DOQI guidelines. Vitamin D treatment was administered in 48% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The population undergoing dialysis in the community of Valencia achieved targets based on the clinical recommendations of the K/DOQI guidelines as follows: 45% of patients achieved targets for calcium, 55% for phosphorus, 73% for Ca x P and 26% for iPTH levels. Surprisingly, only 7.3% of patients achieved all four targets.