Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Francis J Bova

Publications and source records attributed to Francis J Bova.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

A geometrically based method of step and shoot stereotactic radiosurgery with a miniature multileaf collimator.

Conventional methods of inverse planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) are generally based upon optimizing a set of beam fluence profiles according to a set of dose-volume constraints specified by a human planner. This optimization is generally carried out through an iterative approach that relies upon the optimization of a score, driving the plan's ability to satisfy the user-provided constraints. Following optimization of the fluence distribution, the non-trivial problem of converting the fluence distribution into a set of deliverable, intensity-modulated beams must be solved. A novel approach to solving this IMRS total inverse problem is presented in this paper. The proposed method uses a class solution that provides an optimized dose gradient and a method of designing a conformal plan based on an existing geometrically based optimization algorithm. After developing an optimal fluence distribution, the process then arranges the fluence into a set of simple and efficient MLC beam delivery sequences. The algorithm presented here offers several potential advantages for the application of intensity modulation to radiosurgery treatment planning. The geometrically based optimization process' simplicity requires far less human user input and decision making in the specification of dose and dose-volume constraints than do conventional inverse planning algorithms. This simplicity allows the optimization process to be completed much faster than conventional inverse-planning algorithms, literally seconds compared with at least several minutes. Likewise, the fluence conversion step is a simplified process (compared to conventional IMRT planning), which takes advantage of some simplifications uniquely appropriate to the problem at hand (IMRS). The converted, deliverable IMRS beams allow superior conformity and dose gradient relative to conventional IMRS planning or 3DCRT radiosurgery planning. Another benefit is that the number of beam intensity levels is greatly reduced, from hundreds to as few as a half-dozen intensity levels. Finally, since the treatment plan optimization process is based upon proven principles applicable to optimizing radiosurgery (rather than the general problem of optimizing fractionated radiotherapy plans), the plans generated and deliverable with this method of IMRS are potentially superior to those produced by conventional inverse-planning methods of IMRT/IMRS.

Algorithms↗

Optically guided patient positioning techniques.

Optical tracking determines an object's position by measuring light either emitted or reflected from the object. The hallmark of optical tracking systems is their high spatial resolution and measurement in real time; such systems can resolve the position of a point source within a fraction of a millimeter and report at a rate of 10 Hz or faster. Several systems have been developed for radiation therapy, all of which track infrared markers attached to the patient's external surface. The positions of the optical markers relative to the target volume, together with the desired marker positions relative to treatment isocenter, are determined during computed tomography simulation. In the treatment room, the real marker positions are measured relative to isocenter; rigid-body mathematics then determine marker displacements from their desired positions and hence target displacement from isocenter. Real-time feedback allows one to correct the patient's position. The first systems were used for intracranial stereotaxis radiotherapy; rigid arrays of optical markers were attached to the patient via a biteplate linkage. Subsequent systems for extracranial radiotherapy tracked external markers to determine patient position and/or gate the radiation beam based on patient motion. Lastly, optical tracking has been integrated with ultrasound or stereoscopic x-ray imaging to determine the position of internal anatomy targets relative to isocenter.

Humans↗

Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of osteosarcomas involving the distal portions of the limbs in dogs.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves precise delivery of a single large dose of radiation to a designated tumor target. This report describes use of SRS in combination with a frameless stereotactic localization system to treat 11 dogs with appendicular osteosarcomas. Five dogs were treated with SRS alone; 6 were treated with a combination of SRS and chemotherapy. Overall median survival time was 363 days (range, 145 to 763 days), with 6 dogs still alive 90, 142, 234, 367, 633, and 763 days after SRS. Limb function was good or excellent in all 6 dogs that were still alive. Results in these dogs suggest that SRS may be a viable option for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma, with the potential to provide long-term local tumor control and improvement in limb function, especially when combined with chemotherapy. Because of the destructive nature of osteosarcoma and limitations of SRS, dogs with tumors that are small and have caused minimal bone destruction would likely be the best candidates for this procedure.

Animals↗

A simple and reliable index for scoring rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans.

PURPOSE: A simple and robust index for ranking rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans is presented. METHODS: The radiosurgery plan score index, CGI (Conformity/Gradient Index), is an average of a conformity score and a gradient score. Computation of the CGI score is simple, requiring only three pieces of data: (1) the total volume irradiated to the prescription isodose level, (2) the volume of the target, and (3) the total volume irradiated at half of the prescription isodose level. The overall CGI Index is a simple function of these three pieces of data. RESULTS: When multiple sets of rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans were ranked with respect to this single score index, the resulting plan rankings closely matched the plan rankings according to biologic indices (calculated nontarget brain normal tissue complication probabilities). CONCLUSIONS: The CGI is a simple and fast plan evaluation tool that can assist the radiosurgery planner in evaluating and optimizing multiple candidate radiosurgery plans.

Adult↗

Ultrasound-guided extracranial radiosurgery: technique and application.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for many intracranial lesions, but target mobility limits its utility for extracranial applications. We have developed a new technique for extracranial radiosurgery based on optically guided three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS). The 3DUS system provides the ability to image the target volume and critical structures in real time and determine any misregistration of the target volume with the linear accelerator. In this paper, we describe the system and its initial clinical application in the treatment of localized metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The extracranial stereotactic system consists of an ultrasound unit that is optically tracked and registered with the linear accelerator coordinate system. After an initial patient positioning based on computed tomographic (CT) simulation, stereotactic ultrasound images are acquired and correlated with the CT-based treatment plan to determine any soft-tissue shifts between the time of the planning CT and the actual treatment. Optical tracking is used to correct any patient offsets that are revealed by the real-time imaging. RESULTS: Preclinical testing revealed that the ultrasound-based stereotactic navigation system is accurate to within 1.5 mm in comparison with an absolute coordinate phantom. Between March 2001 and March 2002, the system was used to deliver extracranial radiosurgery to 17 metastatic lesions in 16 patients. Treatments were delivered in 1 or 2 fractions, with an average fractional dose of 16 Gy (range 12.5-24 Gy) delivered to the 80% isodose surface. Before each fraction, the target misalignment from isocenter was determined using the 3DUS system and the misalignments averaged over all patients were anteroposterior = 4.8 mm, lateral = 3.6 mm, axial = 2.1 mm, and average total 3D displacement = 7.4 mm (range = 0-21.0 mm). After correcting patient misalignment, each plan was delivered as planned using 6-11 noncoplanar fields. No acute complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A system for high-precision radiosurgical treatment of metastatic tumors has been developed, tested, and applied clinically. Optical tracking of the ultrasound probe provides real-time tracking of the patient anatomy and allows computation of the target displacement before treatment delivery. The patient treatments reported here suggest the feasibility and safety of the technique.

Aged↗

Commissioning and quality assurance of an optically guided three-dimensional ultrasound target localization system for radiotherapy.

Recently, there has been proliferation of image-guided positioning systems for high-precision radiation therapy, with little attention given to quality assurance procedures for such systems. To ensure accurate treatment delivery, errors in the imaging, localization, and treatment delivery processes must be systematically analyzed. This paper details acceptance tests for an optically guided three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound system used for patient localization. While all tests were performed using the same commercial system, the general philosophy and procedures are applicable to all systems utilizing image guidance. Determination of absolute localization accuracy requires a consistent stereotactic, or three-dimensional, coordinate system in the treatment planning system and the treatment vault. We established such a coordinate system using optical guidance. The accuracy of this system for localization of spherical targets imbedded in a phantom at depths ranging from 3 to 13 cm was determined to be (average +/- standard deviation) AP = 0.2 +/- 0.7 mm, Lat = 0.9 +/- 0.6 mm, Ax = 0.6 +/- 1.0 mm. In order to test the ability of the optically guided 3D ultrasound localization system to determine the magnitude of an internal organ shift with respect to the treatment isocenter, a phantom that closely mimics the typical human male pelvic anatomy was used. A CT scan of the phantom was acquired, and the regions of interest were contoured. With the phantom on the treatment couch, optical guidance was used to determine the positions of each organ to within imaging uncertainty, and to align the phantom so the plan and treatment machine coordinates coincided. To simulate a clinical misalignment of the treatment target, the phantom was then shifted by different precise offsets, and an experimenter blind to the offsets used ultrasound guidance to determine the magnitude of the shifts. On average, the magnitude of the shifts could be determined to within 1.0 mm along each axis.

Equipment Failure Analysis↗