Biomedical subjects

Francis D Gibbons

Publications and source records attributed to Francis D Gibbons.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Predicting protein complex membership using probabilistic network reliability.

Evidence for specific protein-protein interactions is increasingly available from both small- and large-scale studies, and can be viewed as a network. It has previously been noted that errors are frequent among large-scale studies, and that error frequency depends on the large-scale method used. Despite knowledge of the error-prone nature of interaction evidence, edges (connections) in this network are typically viewed as either present or absent. However, use of a probabilistic network that considers quantity and quality of supporting evidence should improve inference derived from protein networks. Here we demonstrate inference of membership in a partially known protein complex by using a probabilistic network model and an algorithm previously used to evaluate reliability in communication networks.

Fungal Proteins↗

PubMed2004

Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra.

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has emerged as a cornerstone of proteomics owing in part to robust spectral interpretation algorithms. Widely used algorithms do not fully exploit the intensity patterns present in mass spectra. Here, we demonstrate that intensity pattern modeling improves peptide and protein identification from MS/MS spectra. We modeled fragment ion intensities using a machine-learning approach that estimates the likelihood of observed intensities given peptide and fragment attributes. From 1,000,000 spectra, we chose 27,000 with high-quality, nonredundant matches as training data. Using the same 27,000 spectra, intensity was similarly modeled with mismatched peptides. We used these two probabilistic models to compute the relative likelihood of an observed spectrum given that a candidate peptide is matched or mismatched. We used a 'decoy' proteome approach to estimate incorrect match frequency, and demonstrated that an intensity-based method reduces peptide identification error by 50-96% without any loss in sensitivity.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2004

SILVER helps assign peptides to tandem mass spectra using intensity-based scoring.

Tandem mass spectrometry is commonly used to identify peptides (and thereby proteins) that are present in complex mixtures. Peptide identification from tandem mass spectra is partially automated, but still requires human curation to resolve "borderline" peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs). SILVER is web-based software that assists manual curation of tandem mass spectra, using a recently developed intensity-based machine-learning approach to scoring PSMs, Elias et al. In this method, a large training set of peptide, fragment, and peak-intensity properties for both matched and mismatched PSMs was used to develop a score measuring consistency between each predicted fragment ion of a candidate peptide and its corresponding observed spectral peak intensity. The SILVER interface provides a visual representation of match quality between each candidate fragment ion and the observed spectrum, thereby expediting manual curation of tandem mass spectra. SILVER is available online at http://llama.med.harvard.edu/Software.html.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation.

We compare several commonly used expression-based gene clustering algorithms using a figure of merit based on the mutual information between cluster membership and known gene attributes. By studying various publicly available expression data sets we conclude that enrichment of clusters for biological function is, in general, highest at rather low cluster numbers. As a measure of dissimilarity between the expression patterns of two genes, no method outperforms Euclidean distance for ratio-based measurements, or Pearson distance for non-ratio-based measurements at the optimal choice of cluster number. We show the self-organized-map approach to be best for both measurement types at higher numbers of clusters. Clusters of genes derived from single- and average-linkage hierarchical clustering tend to produce worse-than-random results.

Algorithms↗