Biomedical subjects

Francesco Locatelli

Publications and source records attributed to Francesco Locatelli.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Inflammation and resistance to treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin.

Despite an increase in the use and average dose of recombinant human EPO (rh-EPO) over the last 15 years, a substantial percentage of patients still do not achieve hemoglobin targets recommended by international guidelines. The definition of rh-EPO resistance has been introduced to identify those patients in whom the target hemoglobin level is not attained despite a greater-than-usual dose of erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA). In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between dialysis, increased inflammatory stimulus, malnutrition, and ESA response. About 35% to 65% of hemodialysis patients show signs of inflammation that could be a cause of anemia through the suppression of bone marrow erythropoiesis by a number of cytokines. A large proportion of chronic kidney disease patients also have protein-energy malnutrition and wasting; low serum albumin levels, together with other more specific nutritional markers, are predictors of rh-EPO response. A diminished nutritional state could then be a feature of patients who are resistant to ESA treatment, with malnutrition probably being a consequence of a chronic inflammatory state. Starting from the hypothesis that anemia, partially attributable to a reduced response to ESA, could be the link among malnutrition, inflammation, and the poor outcome of chronic kidney disease patients, we designed a multicenter observational study, the Malnutrition-Inflammation-Resistance-Treatment Outcome Study (MIRTOS), aimed at evaluating the impact and possible causes of resistance to ESA in a large sample of hemodialysis patients. We hope the results of MIRTOS will represent a step forward toward a better understanding of the factors influencing the response to ESA in hemodialysis patients.

Anemia↗

PubMed2005

Foreword.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antibodies↗

PubMed2005

Once weekly treatment with epoetin-beta.

Studies have shown that both intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of epoetin-beta therapy are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of renal anaemia; however, the s.c. route provides enhanced efficacy with a lower dose compared with the i.v. route and it is more cost-effective. Epoetin dosing frequency is an important issue for health care professionals and patients. Recent studies have shown that epoetin-beta administered once weekly and once every 2 weeks can maintain stable target haemoglobin and haematocrit levels in dialysis patients. Such reduced dosing frequencies may improve patient satisfaction and compliance with treatment, and encourage patients to self-administer. Furthermore, less frequent dosing administration would be associated with economic benefits in terms of reduced nursing time in the clinic or out-patient setting. Where this is clinical practice, fewer injections and visits to the clinic should also improve patients' quality of life. A range of effective dosing regimens with epoetin-beta administered via either pre-filled syringes, multidose vials or injector pens allows physicians to tailor treatment to an individual patient's preference.

Anemia↗

PubMed2005

Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys?

BACKGROUND: On-line monitoring of chemical/physical signals during haemodialysis (HD) and bio-feedback represents the first step towards a 'physiological' HD system incorporating adaptive and logic controls in order to achieve pre-set treatment targets. METHODS: Discussions took place to achieve a consensus on key points relating to on-line monitoring and bio-feedback, focusing on the clinical applications. RESULTS: The relative blood volume (BV) reduction during HD can be monitored by optic devices detecting the variations in concentration of haemoglobin/haematocrit. BV changes result from an equilibrium between ultrafiltration and the refilling capacity. However, BV reduction has little power in predicting intra-HD hypotensive episodes, while the combination of the patient-dialysate sodium gradient, the relative BV reduction between the 20th and 40th minute of HD, the irregularity of the profile of BV reduction over time and the heart rate decrease from the start to the 20th minute of HD predict intra-HD hypotension with a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 73% and an accuracy of 80%. A bio-feedback system drives the relative BV reduction according to desired values by instantaneously changing the ultrafiltration rate and the dialysate conductivity. This system has proved to reduce the incidence of intra-HD hypotension episodes significantly. Ionic dialysance and the patient's plasma conductivity can be calculated easily from on-line inlet and outlet dialysate conductivity measurements at two different steps of dialysate conductivity. Ionic dialysance is equivalent to urea clearance corrected for recirculation and is a tool for continuously monitoring the dialysis efficiency and detecting early problems with the delivery of the prescribed dose of dialysis. Given the strict and linear relationship between conductivity and sodium content, the conductivity values replace the sodium concentration values and this permits the development of a conductivity kinetic model, by means of which sodium balance can be achieved at each dialysis session. The conductivity kinetic model has been demonstrated to improve intra-HD cardiovascular stability in hypotension-prone patients significantly. Ionic dialysance is also a useful tool to monitor vascular access function, as it can be used to obtain serial measurements of vascular access blood flow. On-line urea monitors provide detailed information on intra-HD urea kinetics and delivered dialysis dose, but they are not in widespread use because of the costs related to the disposable materials (e.g. urease cartridge). The body temperature monitor measures the blood temperature at the arterial and venous lines of the extra-corporeal circuit and, thanks to a bio-feedback system, is able to modulate the dialysate temperature in order to influence the patient's core body temperature, which can be kept at constant values. This is associated with improved intra-HD cardiovascular stability. The module can also be used to quantify total recirculation. CONCLUSIONS: On-line monitoring devices and bio-feedback systems have evolved from toys for research use to tools for routine clinical application, particularly in patients with clinical complications. Conductivity monitoring appears the most versatile tool, as it permits quantification of delivered dialysis dose, achievement of sodium balance and surveillance of vascular access function, potentially at each dialysis session and without extra cost.

Biofeedback, Psychology↗

PubMed2005

Mini-peritoneal equilibration test: A simple and fast method to assess free water and small solute transport across the peritoneal membrane.

BACKGROUND: Loss of ultrafiltration (UF) of peritoneal membrane is one of the most important causes of peritoneal dialysis failure. UF is determined by osmotic forces acting mainly across small pores (UFSP) and ultrasmall pores or free water transport. At present, only semiquantitative estimates or complicated computer simulations are available to assess free water transport. The aim of this study was to assess free water transport during a 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test lasting 1 hour. In this condition, sodium transport is mainly due to convection, allowing the estimate of ultrafiltration of small pores and then of free water transport (total UF - UFSP). METHODS: In 52 peritoneal dialysis patients we performed a 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test (4 hours) and a 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test (1 hour) and compared UF and small solute transports obtained with the two methods. RESULTS: During the 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test, UFSP and free water transport were 279 +/- 142 mL and 215 +/- 86 mL, respectively; free water transport well correlated to total UF during the 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test (r= 0.67). The groups of peritoneal transporters, categorized according to glucose dialysate ratio (D/D(0)) and to creatinine/plasma ratio (D/P(Creat)), were in good agreement for the two peritoneal equilibration tests (weighted kappa 0.62 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 3.86% mini-peritoneal equilibration test is a simple and fast method to assess free water transport. It also gives information about total UF and small solute transports and it is in good agreement with the 3.86% peritoneal equilibration test.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Relationship between urea clearance and ionic dialysance determined using a single-step conductivity profile.

BACKGROUND: On-line determination of ionic dialysance (ID) has been used to measure the clearance of small solutes like urea. However, attempts to determine the in vivo relationship between ID and urea clearance have led to discordant findings. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the mean values of repeated instantaneous determinations of ID throughout a dialysis session ((m)ID), obtained using a single-step inlet dialysate conductivity profile, and the mean values of urea clearance corrected for access recirculation (K(eu1)), total recirculation (access plus cardiopulmonary recirculation, K(eu2)), and the entire postdialysis urea rebound (K(wb)). METHODS: Eighty-two anuric patients on chronic thrice-weekly hemodialysis were studied using an Integra machine equipped with the Diascan module for the automatic determination of ID. The mean values of repeated ID measurements made at 30-minute intervals were compared with K(eu1) (available for only 31 patients), K(eu2), and K(wb). RESULTS: The results in all 82 patients were: (m)ID = 176 +/- 23 mL/min; K(eu2) = 181 +/- 25 mL/min; K(wb) = 159 +/- 22 mL/min. The mean (m)ID/K(wb) and (m)ID/K(eu2) ratios were, respectively, 1.11 +/- 0.06 and 0.98 +/- 0.06. The results in the 31 patients for whom K(eu1) values were available were: (m)ID = 179 +/- 24 mL/min and K(eu1) = 200 +/- 27 mL/min; the mean (m)ID/K(eu1) ratio was 0.90 +/- 0.05. CONCLUSION: The mean value of repeated ID determinations obtained using a single-step conductivity profile underestimates urea clearance corrected for access recirculation, and may be considered an adequate estimate of urea clearance corrected for total recirculation.

Anuria↗

PubMed2005

Is it the agent or the blood pressure level that matters for renal and vascular protection in chronic nephropathies?

Over the recent years, it has been clearly documented that hypertension and proteinuria are the major factors responsible for progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, a target BP of at least 130/80 mm Hg has been suggested in order to reduce the rate of progression and cardiovascular mortality. Some antihypertensive agents, such as ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and perhaps calcium channel blockers (CCBs), may also be capable of reducing CKD progression because they halt some of the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in renal damage, some of which is unrelated to reduction of proteinuria, per se. Although this specific effect seemed to be partially independent of blood pressure reduction, it remains controversial whether these drugs are really superior to other antihypertensive agents when blood pressure values recommended by guidelines are achieved. This issue is still a matter of debate because in published trials, target and achieved blood pressure values were constantly higher than those recommended today. Nevertheless, available findings seem to indicate that the renoprotective effect of these agents is at least partially independent of a better BP control. The only way to definitely solve this issue would be a new randomized trial. However, the clinical relevance of this trial is debatable, considering that we need all the drugs available to reach these recommended BP values.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Clinical benefits of slowing the progression of renal failure.

End-stage renal disease is a social and economic threat worldwide. In this context, any medical intervention that may prevent the progression of chronic kidney disease becomes extremely important. Improving the cardiovascular status is another major objective in the management of this population, because cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients. Moreover, this is only the tip of the iceberg, because many patients die before reaching end-stage renal disease. Today, several interventions are available to delay the progressive loss of renal function and/or prevent the development of cardiovascular disease, but we are still far from being satisfied. These interventions include low protein diets, correction of calcium-phosphate disorders and anemia, blood pressure and proteinuria control, and smoking cessation. Other interventions, such as the administration of lipid-lowering agents, are emerging as particularly promising therapeutic approaches. Recently, growing attention has been paid to polytherapeutic approaches to chronic kidney disease, in order to control different causal factors involved in progression and reduce them as much as possible. However, larger prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trials are needed to demonstrate their actual usefulness. All the interventions are likely to be more effective if performed as early as possible in the course of the disease, because it has been widely demonstrated that early and regular nephrologic care is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality.

Anemia↗

PubMed2005

What are we expecting to learn from the MPO study?

High-flux membranes represented a major improvement in dialysis technique, but evidences supporting their clinical superiority over conventional low-flux dialysis are still inconclusive. Although several studies, most of which were observational, showed an association between high-flux dialysis and lower morbidity and mortality, the Hemodialysis (HEMO) study, the first large-scale randomized clinical trial specifically aimed at testing the effect of membrane permeability on patients' outcome, failed to demonstrate a statistical significant benefit of high-flux membranes on all-cause mortality. Although disappointing, these results should however be interpreted in light of some important limitations of the HEMO study, first of all the inclusion of both incident and prevalent hemodialysis patients, the exclusion of sicker patients and the allowance of dialyzer reuse. In this context, much is expected from the Membrane Permeability Outcome (MPO) study, a randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of high-flux membranes in a large population of incident hemodialysis patients across Europe. Inclusion of only incident patients, absence of severe exclusion criteria and no dialyzer reuse are all distinguishing features of this study. Analyses of the baseline data of the MPO study confirm the high burden of cardiovascular disease among incident dialysis patients, although comparison with the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study data provides further evidence of a positive selection of patients in clinical trials.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2005

A new initiative in nephrology: 'Kidney disease: improving global outcomes'.

The burden of kidney disease: Improving global outcomes. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem with an increasing incidence and prevalence of patients requiring replacement therapy. There is an even higher prevalence of patients in earlier stages of CKD, with adverse outcomes such as kidney failure, cardiovascular disease, and premature death. Patients at earlier stages of CKD can be detected through laboratory testing and their treatment is effective in slowing the progression to kidney failure and reducing cardiovascular events. The evidence-based care of these patients are universal and independent of their geographic location. This paper describes the need to develop a uniform and global public health approach to the worldwide epidemic of CKD. It is to this end that a new initiative Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes' has been established. Some current and future activities of this initiative are described. They include among others modification of the classification of CKD, the development of guidelines on hepatitis C, the organisation of consensus conferences like on Renal Osteodystrophy, and the creation of a website allowing the comparison of the five main English language clinical practice guidelines in kidney disease worldwide.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2004

Dialysis dose and frequency.

BACKGROUND: From the beginning of the dialysis era, the issue of optimal dialysis dose and frequency has been a central topic in the delivery of dialysis treatment. METHODS: We undertook a discussion to achieve a consensus on key points relating to dialysis dose and frequency, focusing on the relationships with clinical and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Traditionally, dialysis adequacy has been quantified referring to the kinetics of urea, taken as a paradigm of all uraemic toxins, and applying the principles of pharmacokinetics using either single- or double-pool variable volume models. An index of dialysis dose is the fractional clearance of urea, which is commonly expressed as Kt/V. It can be calculated from blood urea concentration and haemodialysis (HD) parameters, according to the respective urea kinetic model or by means of simplified formulas. Similar principles are applicable to peritoneal dialysis (PD), where weekly Kt/V and creatinine clearance are used. Recommended minimal targets for dialysis adequacy have been defined by both American and European guidelines (DOQI and European Best Practice Guidelines, respectively). The question of how to improve the severe outcome of dialysis patients has recently come back to the fore, since the results of two recent randomized controlled trials led to the conclusion that, in thrice weekly HD and in PD, increasing the dialysis dose well above the minimum requirements of current American guidelines did not improve patient outcome. Daily HD (defined as a minimum of six HD sessions per week), in the form of either short daytime HD or long slow nocturnal HD, is regarded as a possibility to improve dialysis patient outcome. The results of the studies published so far indicate excellent results with respect to all outcomes analysed: optimal blood pressure control, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and amelioration of left ventricular performance, improvement of renal anaemia, optimal hyperphosphataemia control, improvement of nutritional status, reduction in oxidative stress indices and improvement in quality of life. The basis for these beneficial effects is thought to be a more physiological clearance of solutes and water, with reduced pre- and post-HD solute concentrations and interdialytic oscillation, compared with traditional HD. Apart from concerns regarding reimbursement and organizational issues, no serious adverse effects have been described with daily HD. However, the evidence accumulated is limited mainly to retrospective cohorts, with small patient numbers and no adequate controls in most instances. Therefore, large prospective studies with adequate controls are required to make daily HD accepted by reimbursing authorities and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Given the available observational and interventional body of evidence, there is no reason to reduce arbitrarily dialysis dose, particularly dialysis treatment time in HD patients treated three times weekly. Daily HD represents a very promising tool for improving dialysis outcomes and quality of life, although its impact on patient survival has not yet been proven definitively.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2004

Pure red-cell aplasia and epoetin therapy.

BACKGROUND: Between 1988 and 1998, antibody-associated pure red-cell aplasia was reported in three patients who had undergone treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin). Between 1998 and 2000, 13 such cases were reported from France--12 in patients who had received the Eprex formulation of epoetin alfa and 1 in a patient who had received Neorecormon (a formulation of epoetin beta); both are products that are marketed outside the United States. METHODS: We obtained reports of epoetin-associated pure red-cell aplasia from the Food and Drug Administration and from the manufacturers of Eprex, Epogen (another formulation of epoetin alfa), and Neorecormon. The numbers of case reports and estimates of exposure-adjusted incidence were analyzed according to the product, the cause of anemia, the route of administration, the country in which pure red-cell aplasia was identified, and the date on which pure red-cell aplasia was reported. RESULTS: Between January 1998 and April 2004, 175 cases of epoetin-associated pure red-cell aplasia were reported for Eprex, 11 cases for Neorecormon, and 5 cases for Epogen. Over half these cases had occurred in France, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Spain. Between 2001 and 2003, the estimated exposure-adjusted incidence was 18 cases per 100,000 patient-years for the Eprex formulation without human serum albumin, 6 per 100,000 patient-years for the Eprex formulation with human serum albumin, 1 case per 100,000 patient-years for Neorecormon, and 0.2 case per 100,000 patient-years for Epogen. After procedures were adopted to ensure appropriate storage, handling, and administration of Eprex to patients with chronic kidney disease, the exposure-adjusted incidence decreased by 83 percent worldwide. CONCLUSIONS: After the peak incidence of Eprex-associated pure red-cell aplasia was reached in 2001, interventions designed in response to drug-monitoring programs worldwide resulted in a reduction of more than 80 percent in the incidence of pure red-cell aplasia due to Eprex.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Clinical validation of glucose pump test (GPT) compared with ultrasound dilution technology in arteriovenous graft surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Blood flow (Qa) measurements are an important step in the surveillance protocol of haemodialysis vascular access (VA). The glucose pump test (GPT) is a new test for Qa measurement based on the dilution of a constant glucose infusion. The aim of this study is to verify the clinical accuracy of GPT in a graft surveillance protocol with sequential Qa measurements. METHODS: In 30 chronic haemodialysis patients with graft, we compared monthly sequential Qa measurements performed with GPT in pre-dialysis and the ultrasound dilution technique (HD01 device Transonic Systems Inc., USA) during dialysis. The colour Doppler ultrasonography study (CDU) was our reference standard for the diagnosis of stenosis. The endpoints were the graft thrombosis or PTA treatment. RESULTS: According to the K/DOQI guidelines we could identify the thrombosis high-risk grafts when Qa was <600 ml/min or <1000 ml/min with a decrease >25% in serial Qa measurements. HD01 yielded 27 of 112 high-risk Qa measurements (21 Qa <600 ml/min; mean 406+/-145 ml/min; 6 deltaQa >25%; mean 43+/-7%). In 12 of 27 cases the CDU control did not show haemodynamically significant stenoses (false positive); 15 of 27 cases were confirmed high-risk accesses by CDU and did PTAs (HD01 specificity 86%). GPT yielded 14 of 112 high-risk Qa measurements (8 Qa <600 ml/min; mean 404+/-135 ml/min; 6 deltaQa >25%; mean 38+/-8%) and all had severe stenoses and underwent PTA treatments showing a GPT specificity of 100%. The CDU study allowed us to correctly assess the Qa negative cases. HD01 method had 10 false negative cases (treated or clotted grafts with a Qa >600 ml/min and deltaQa <25%) with a sensitivity of 60%, while GPT had 11 false negative cases with a sensitivity of 56%. The diagnostic accuracy tested with the ROC curves was similar with both tests (area under the curve was 0.762 and 0.752 with GPT and ultrasound dilution, respectively; P = 0.985). The diagnostic efficiency (percentage of grafts with agreement between test result and factual situation) was 90 and 80% (P = 0.056) for GPT and HD01, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with HD01, the GPT had a lower false positive rate and similar diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. The clinical implication is a smaller number of unnecessary, invasive procedures (angiographies or PTAs), without increasing the thrombosis risk. This study has shown that GPT is an accurate, quick and economic test for Qa monitoring.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism with vitamin D and calcium in patients receiving dialysis is often complicated by hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia, which may contribute to cardiovascular disease and adverse clinical outcomes. Calcimimetics target the calcium-sensing receptor and lower parathyroid hormone levels without increasing calcium and phosphorus levels. We report the results of two identical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the calcimimetic agent cinacalcet hydrochloride. METHODS: Patients who were receiving hemodialysis and who had inadequately controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism despite standard treatment were randomly assigned to receive cinacalcet (371 patients) or placebo (370 patients) for 26 weeks. Once-daily doses were increased from 30 mg to 180 mg to achieve intact parathyroid hormone levels of 250 pg per milliliter or less. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with values in this range during a 14-week efficacy-assessment phase. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the cinacalcet group reached the primary end point, as compared with 5 percent of the placebo group (P<0.001). Overall, mean parathyroid hormone values decreased 43 percent in those receiving cinacalcet but increased 9 percent in the placebo group (P<0.001). The serum calcium-phosphorus product declined by 15 percent in the cinacalcet group and remained unchanged in the placebo group (P<0.001). Cinacalcet effectively reduced parathyroid hormone levels independently of disease severity or changes in vitamin D sterol dose. CONCLUSIONS: Cinacalcet lowers parathyroid hormone levels and improves calcium-phosphorus homeostasis in patients receiving hemodialysis who have uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Calcium↗

PubMed2004

Sodium removal and sodium concentration during peritoneal dialysis: effects of three methods of sodium measurement.

BACKGROUND: Sodium removal (NaR) may have a major impact on the survival of peritoneal dialysis patients. The dialysate/plasma sodium concentration ratio (D/P(Na)) is an indirect index of transcellular water transport by aquaporin channels, and thus of ultrafiltration. Sodium concentration can be assessed by means of flame photometry (F), and direct (D-ISE) or indirect ion-selective electrodes (I-ISE), but these methods have different properties. I-ISE is being used increasingly in clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate NaR and D/P(Na) using the three different measurement methods. METHODS: We performed peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) in 44 peritoneal dialysis patients and calculated the NaR. We also calculated D/P(Na) during the test; plasma and dialysate sodium concentrations were measured by F, D-ISE and I-ISE. RESULTS: NaR was lower (P<0.001) with D-ISE (69+/-29 mmol) than with F (81+/-29 mmol) or I-ISE (79+/-28 mmol). D/P(Na) was also lower at baseline (0.92+/-0.02 vs 0.95+/-0.02 and 0.95+/-0.02; P<0.001), after 60 min (0.87+/-0.03 vs 0.90+/-0.03 and 0.90+/-0.03; P<0.001) and at the end of PET (0.88+/-0.04 vs 0.92+/-0.04 and 0.92+/-0.04; P<0.001) when measured by D-ISE in comparison with F and I-ISE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NaR and D/P(Na) were lower when measured by the D-ISE method compared with the F and I-ISE methods. NaR and D/P(Na) were similar when measured by F or I-ISE. I-ISE can be used reliably in the evaluation of NaR and D/P(Na) in everyday clinical practice of peritoneal dialysis.

Clinical Chemistry Tests↗

PubMed2004

Hypertension and cardiovascular risk assessment in dialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Hypertension in patients affected by chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) has been recognized as one of the major classical CV risk factors in CRI from the very beginning of the dialysis era. However, its treatment is still unsatisfactory. METHODS: A discussion is employed to achieve a consensus on key points relating to the epidemiological, pathophysiological and clinical characteristics of hypertension in renal patients, in the light of global CV risk assessment. RESULTS: CV disease is accelerated by CRI, in particular by uraemia-specific risk factors. This is reflected by the fact that general population-based equations for calculating CV risk underestimate the real CV risk in CRI and dialysis patients. Hypertension in dialysis patients is clearly a major CV risk factor. Isolated systolic hypertension with increased pulse pressure is the most prevalent blood pressure (BP) anomaly in dialysis patients, due to stiffening of the arterial tree. BP should be assessed by clinical measurements on a routine basis, leaving 24 h monitoring for selected cases. The targets of BP control should be those recommended by the present guidelines, i.e. <140/90 mmHg, or the lowest possible values that are well tolerated. The pathophysiological cornerstone of hypertension in dialysis patients is extra-cellular volume expansion, which is typically sodium-sensitive, given the loss of renal function. Therefore, the principles of hypertension treatment in dialysis are an achievement of dry body weight, proper dialysis prescription with respect to dialysis time and intra-dialytic sodium balance, and dietary sodium and water restriction. Pharmacological treatment should only be the second option, after the adequate and complete application of all other means. No comparative pharmacological trials have specifically addressed the issue of hypertension control in dialysis patients. Therefore, this workshop group had to rely largely on data obtained in the general population. Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin system were felt to be the first choice, as they have widely been shown to interfere significantly with CV remodelling. Despite long-standing concerns, beta-blockers are being used increasingly even in patients with congestive heart failure and ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Other drug classes may be used in association or as first-line agents according to clinical requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension in renal patients has to be given particular and continued attention, and it should be adequately treated in light of the increased CV risk of this patient population. Research into the mechanisms of uraemic cardiomyopathy and cardiovascular remodelling should provide a precious new insight and lead to more precisely targeted and more effective therapies than in the past.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed2004

Epidemiology and prevention of cardiovascular complication in chronic kidney disease patients.

The risk for cardiovascular disease is significantly higher among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) than among the general population, considering that cardiovascular disease is the prominent cause of both morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. This is explained mainly by the considerable prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among CKD patients since the earliest stages of renal impairment, which include not only the so-called traditional risk factors, but also a number of additional risk factors that are specific to CKD and to the dialytic treatment itself. Considering the multiplicity of cardiovascular risk factors operating in CKD patients, as well as the crucial impact of their cardiovascular condition on long-term outcome, it is mandatory that all the available interventions aimed at the correction of all the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease are performed as early as possible in the progression of the disease. In particular, the results of several controlled clinical trials have shown that a timely correction of anemia and of calcium-phosphate disorders leads to a significant improvement in the cardiovascular conditions of CKD patients. Evidence also is growing regarding the benefits of intervention of newly recognized risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as inflammation and oxidant stress.

Anemia↗

PubMed2004

Anemia management and outcomes from 12 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: Data collected from nationally representative samples of HD patients (n = 11,041) in 2002 to 2003 were used to describe current anemia management for long-term HD patients at 309 dialysis units in 12 countries. Analyses of associations and outcomes were adjusted for demographics, 15 comorbid classes, laboratory values, country, and facility clustering. RESULTS: For patients on dialysis therapy for longer than 180 days, 23% to 77% had a hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration less than 11 g/dL (<110 g/L), depending on country; 83% to 94% were administered erythropoietin (EPO). Mean Hgb levels were 12 g/dL (120 g/L) in Sweden; 11.6 to 11.7 g/dL (116 to 117 g/L) in the United States, Spain, Belgium, and Canada; 11.1 to 11.5 g/dL (111 to 115 g/L) in Australia/New Zealand, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and France; and 10.1 g/dL (101 g/L) in Japan. Hgb levels were substantially lower for new patients with end-stage renal disease, and EPO use before ESRD ranged from 27% (United States) to 65% (Sweden). By patient, EPO use significantly declined with greater Hgb concentration (adjusted odds ratio, 0.61 per 1-g/dL [10-g/L] greater Hgb level; P < 0.0001), as did EPO dosage. Case-mix-adjusted mortality and hospitalization risk declined by 5% and 6% per 1-g/dL greater patient baseline Hgb level (P < or = 0.003 each), respectively. Furthermore, patient mortality and hospitalization risks were 10% to 12% lower for every 1-g/dL greater facility mean Hgb level. Patients were significantly more likely to have Hgb levels of 11 g/dL or greater (> or =110 g/L) if they were older; were men; had polycystic kidney disease; had greater albumin, transferrin saturation, or calcium levels; were not dialyzing with a catheter; or had lower ferritin levels. Facilities with greater intravenous iron use showed significantly greater facility mean Hgb concentrations. Mean EPO dose varied from 5,297 (Japan) to 17,360 U/wk (United States). Greater country mean EPO doses were significantly associated with greater country mean Hgb concentrations. Several patient characteristics were associated with greater EPO doses. Even in some countries with high intravenous iron use, 35% to 40% of patients had a transferrin saturation less than 20% (below guidelines). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate large international variations in anemia management, with significant improvements during the last 5 years, although many patients remain below current anemia guidelines, suggesting large and specific opportunities for improvement.

Anemia↗