Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Federica Vagginelli

Publications and source records attributed to Federica Vagginelli.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Physiologic rationale for ventilator setting in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVES: To review the physiologic approach to setting mechanical ventilation in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search from 1979 to the present. DATA SELECTION: Personal selection of some articles we believe relevant for understanding acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome physiopathology and its physiologic management. DATA SUMMARY: Knowing the underlying pathology is key to estimating the potential for recruitment. The potential for recruitment is rather low when the consolidation of pulmonary units exceeds collapse, as in diffuse pneumonia. In contrast, when pulmonary unit collapse exceeds consolidation, as in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome from extrapulmonary origin, the potential for recruitment may be high. To exploit the potential for recruitment, a transpulmonary pressure greater than the opening pressure must be applied to the lung. To do so, chest wall elastance must be measured or estimated. To avoid collapse after recruitment, a positive end-expiratory pressure greater than the compressive forces operating on the lung and an alveolar ventilation sufficient to prevent absorption atelectasis must be provided. Indeed, avoidance of stretch (low airway plateau pressure) and prevention of cyclic collapse and reopening (adequate positive end-expiratory pressure and alveolar ventilation) are the physiologic cornerstones of mechanical ventilation in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. When considering all the randomized clinical trials reported so far, it is tempting to speculate that transpulmonary pressure and stresses, rather than tidal volume per se, are the key factors that may have an impact on mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physiologic, experimental, and clinical trial data converge on one simple concept: treat the lung gently.

Humans↗

Decrease in PaCO2 with prone position is predictive of improved outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gas exchange improvement in response to the prone position is associated with an improved outcome in acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients in the pronation arm of a controlled randomized trial on prone positioning and patients enrolled in a previous pilot study of the prone position. SETTING: Twenty-eight Italian and two Swiss intensive care units. PATIENTS: We studied 225 patients meeting the criteria for ALI or ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were in prone position for 10 days for 6 hrs/day if they met ALI/ARDS criteria when assessed each morning. Respiratory variables were recorded before and after 6 hrs of pronation with unchanged ventilatory settings. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured arterial blood gas alterations to the first pronation and the 28-day mortality rate. The independent risk factors for death in the general population were the Pao2/Fio2 ratio (odds ratio, 0.992; confidence interval, 0.986-0.998), the minute ventilation/Paco2 ratio (odds ratio, 1.003; confidence interval, 1.000-1.006), and the concentration of plasma creatinine (odds ratio, 1.385; confidence interval, 1.116-1.720). Pao2 responders (defined as the patients who increased their Pao2/Fio2 by > or =20 mm Hg, 150 patients, mean increase of 100.6 +/- 61.6 mm Hg [13.4 +/- 8.2 kPa]) had an outcome similar to the nonresponders (59 patients, mean decrease -6.3 +/- 23.7 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 3.2 kPa]; mortality rate 44% and 46%, respectively; relative risk, 1.04; confidence interval, 0.74-1.45, p =.65). The Paco2 responders (defined as patients whose Paco2 decreased by > or =1 mm Hg, 94 patients, mean decrease -6.0 +/- 6 mm Hg [-0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]) had an improved survival when compared with nonresponders (115 patients, mean increase 6 +/- 6 mm Hg [0.8 +/- 0.8 kPa]; mortality rate 35.1% and 52.2%, respectively; relative risk, 1.48; confidence interval, 1.07-2.05, p =.01). CONCLUSION: ALI/ARDS patients who respond to prone positioning with reduction of their Paco2 show an increased survival at 28 days. Improved efficiency of alveolar ventilation (decreased physiologic deadspace ratio) is an important marker of patients who will survive acute respiratory failure.

Aged↗