Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fatih Atug

Publications and source records attributed to Fatih Atug.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences, if any, in outcomes with transperitoneal (TP) versus extraperitoneal (EP) approaches during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: We reviewed the data from 40 consecutive patients who underwent EP-RARP at our institution by the same surgical team. The outcomes were compared with those of 40 consecutive patients who underwent TP-RARP performed by the same team in a nonrandomized manner. The operative and postoperative parameters (total operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, robotic console time, and robotic anastomosis time), as well as complications and surgical margin status, were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The patient demographics were similar in both groups. Nerve sparing was performed in 35 and 36 patients in the TP and EP groups, respectively. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 14 and 12 patients in the TP and EP groups, respectively. The operative time was slightly longer with the TP approach at 236 minutes (range 111 to 360) compared with 229 minutes (range 143 to 382) in the EP group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.5722) between the two groups. Also, the differences in robot console time, anastomosis time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were not statistically significant between the two groups at the 5% significance level. The complication and positive surgical margin rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the EP approach is feasible with RARP. Our data suggest that the EP approach is comparable to the TP approach and produces favorable outcomes. Surgeon preference will likely play a significant role in the approach used.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy is a known risk factor for disease recurrence and may lead to adjuvant treatment. Our goal was to assess the incidence of positive surgical margins in our series of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and its relationship to our learning curve. METHODS: Between February 2003 and August 2005, 140 patients underwent RARP by the same surgical team at our institution. The records of our first 100 consecutive RARPs were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups based on the time of surgery: group I included the first 33 cases; group II included the second 33 cases; and group III comprised the last 34 cases. We compared the incidence and location of positive surgical margins among the groups. Additional variables evaluated included the patient's prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, preoperative/postoperative Gleason score, clinical/pathologic stage, and pathologic tumour volume. RESULTS: The positive margin rates were 45.4%, 21.2%, and 11.7% for groups I, II, and III, respectively. The difference in positive margin rates in the three groups was statistically significant (p=0.0053). Positive margin rates declined specifically at the apex and bladder neck when comparing the first 33 patients to the last 34 patients. Patient demographics and preoperative staging variables were comparable among all three groups, with no statistically significant differences among them. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that experience gained with time led to a decrease in the incidence of positive surgical margins. We do not feel that a selection bias affected our results because clinical and pathologic staging was evenly distributed within the three study groups. A steady reduction in positive surgical margin rates demonstrates a learning curve, of approximately 30 patients, associated with RARP, and suggests that oncologic outcome is affected by the experience of the robotic surgeon.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed2006

Long-term durability of laparoscopic decortication of symptomatic renal cysts.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term results of patient symptoms and radiologic outcomes of laparoscopic renal cyst decortication in the treatment of symptomatic simple renal cysts. Renal cysts are common in the adult population. Symptomatic renal cysts have traditionally been treated by percutaneous aspiration with or without injection of sclerosant agents; however, this has a high rate of recurrence. METHODS: From April 1994 through July 2005, 45 patients underwent laparoscopic decortication of symptomatic simple renal cysts with renal cyst wall excision and fulguration of the epithelial lining. Complex renal cysts were excluded. Of the 45 patients, 24 (53.3%) had undergone previous cyst aspiration with injection of sclerosant material for intended ablation. The Wong-Baker pain scale was used to assess the preoperative and postoperative pain scores. Radiologic success was indicated as no recurrence on the most recent computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Of the 45 procedures, 44 were completed laparoscopically. One patient (1.8%) underwent open conversion because of excessive bleeding. The mean operative time was 89 minutes (range 48 to 170). Symptomatic success was achieved in 91.1% of patients, with a median follow-up of 52 months (range 3 to 132), and radiographic success was achieved in 95.5% of patients, with a median follow-up of 39 months (range 3 to 96). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up has confirmed that laparoscopic cyst decortication is an effective and durable treatment option for symptomatic simple renal cysts during long-term follow-up. The greater and durable success rates of this minimally invasive technique may favor this treatment option over other treatment modalities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Prospective evaluation of concomitant lymphadenectomy in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: preliminary analysis of outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lymph-node staging is important in many patients with prostate cancer, as it influences adjuvant treatment and prognosis. However, lymphadenectomy adds to the operating time, cost, and potential for complications. Herein, we compared the effects of concomitant lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 145 consecutive RARPs. Patients were evaluated in two groups. Group I was patients who underwent RARP and concomitant lymphadenectomy (LAD)(N = 40), and group II consisted of patients who underwent RARP only (N = 105). Operative time (OT), length of hospital stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), cost, and complications were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: The mean number of lymph nodes removed per patient in group I was 14.08 (range 9-24). Lymph-node metastases were detected in 2 (5%) of the patients. There were no statistically significant differences in LOS, EBL, OT, operative charges, or hospital charges in the two groups. However, the mean OT increased 9.3% when LAD was performed. At a mean follow-up of 14.8 months (range 3-32 months), 16 complications had been observed in the entire series of patients (11.03%). According to the Clavien system, there were eight grade I complications, seven grade II complications, and one grade III complication. Four complications occurred in group I (10%) and 12 in group II (11.4%). There were no lymphoceles or deep venous thromboses (DVTs) in group I. Cost analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant impact of concomitant lymphadenectomy on LOS, EBL, charges, or complications when RARP was performed. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the OT will be slightly longer, as an additional procedure is being performed.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy can be performed via a retropubic, perineal, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Our goal was to evaluate the actual charges incurred at our institution with patients undergoing retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), perineal prostatectomy (RPP), and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all prostatectomy patients treated over a 22-month period (February 2002-December 2004). The case log included 78 RALPs, 16 RRPs, and 16 RPPs. Hospital charges were broken down into operative and nonoperative amounts. Operative times, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were all determined from the patient medical record. The robotic charges were divided further into the initial and final 20 cases. RESULTS: There were significantly higher overall charges for patients undergoing RALP. The operative charges encountered during the robotic "learning curve" were substantially higher than those during our most recent 20 cases. This reduction seemed to correlate directly with the decreasing operative time. The mean operative time for RALP was 262 minutes (range 150-679 minutes). The mean operative time decreased to 225 minutes for our last 20 cases. In contrast, the mean times for RRP and RPP were similar, 202 minutes (range 142-348 minutes) and 196 minutes (range 105-337 minutes), respectively. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted prostatectomy is associated with substantially higher operative and total hospital charges in addition to the capital expense incurred by the hospital in acquiring and maintaining the robotic system. The operative charges did decrease substantially (27%) once the learning curve had been overcome. Perineal prostatectomy, in experienced hands, remains the most cost-effective procedure, with lower operative costs and shorter times. There was no significant difference in the nonoperative charges in the three treatment groups secondary to the short hospital stay.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) present a treatment dilemma to urologists. Second-line therapies have previously been shown to fail at a higher rate than the initial therapeutic procedure. We report our experience with robotic-assisted, dismembered pyeloplasty in patients with secondary UPJO. Since November 2002, 44 robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasties (RALPs) have been performed at our institution. Of these, seven patients had undergone previous definitive treatment for UPJO. Anderson-Hynes-dismembered pyeloplasty was the preferred reconstructive technique in all patients. The patients were divided into two groups: primary pyeloplasty patients (group 1) and secondary pyeloplasty patients (group 2). Variables examined include operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS) and success rates. All operations were completed laparoscopically, and there were no conversions to open surgery in either group. Mean operative time was 60 min longer in the secondary pyeloplasty group compared with primary cases, but the EBL, LOS and success rates were similar. A patent UPJ was confirmed in both groups by renal scan and/or excretory urography (intravenous pyelogram) examinations. RALP is a viable option in select patients with recurrent UPJO after previous endoscopic or open surgical repair. As expected, operative times were longer in these patients due to a more challenging dissection (p < 0.05). However, the magnification afforded by the robot allows for a precise dissection, and subsequently, there was no significant increase in blood loss, hospital stay or perioperative morbidity in our series (p > 0.05).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Robotics in urologic surgery: an evolving new technology.

Rapid technological developments in the past two decades have produced new inventions such as robots and incorporated them into our daily lives. Today, robots perform vital functions in homes, outer space, hospitals and on military instillations. The development of robotic surgery has given hospitals and health care providers a valuable tool that is making a profound impact on highly technical surgical procedures. The field of urology is one area of medicine that has adopted and incorporated robotic surgery into its armamentarium. Innovative robotic urologic surgical applications and techniques are being developed and reported everyday. Increased utilization and development will ultimately fuel the discovery of newer applications of robotic systems in urologic surgery. Herein we provide an overview of the history, development, and applications of robotics in surgery with a focus on urologic surgery.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2005

Delivery of dead fetus from inside urinary bladder with uterine perforation: case report and review of literature.

The incidence of cesarean sections has increased radically worldwide in the second half of the 20th century, especially in developing countries. Generally, a trial of labor after a cesarean section is safely accepted. However, a trial of labor may lead to serious complications, including unpredicted ones, such as rupture of the uterus during labor with concomitant injury to the bladder. We report the delivery of a dead fetus through the urinary bladder during labor.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

PURPOSE: Historically, open pyeloplasty has been the gold standard of treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric age group. The prospect of using technology such as the robot in this age group has been a concern. Several non-urological robotic procedures have been performed in children. We undertook a retrospective study to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients 6 to 15 years old underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our institution between June 2003 and November 2004. All patients underwent dismembered pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes). Variables analyzed included length of stay, estimated blood loss, operative time, anastomosis time and docked robotic time. RESULTS: Mean followup was 10.9 months (range 2 to 18). Mean length of stay was 1.2 days (range 1 to 3). Mean operative time was 184 minutes (range 165 to 204), with a mean robotic anastomosis time of 39.5 minutes (30 to 46). Mean estimated blood loss was 31.4 ml (range 10 to 50). Stent size varied from 3.8Fr to 6Fr. Six of the 7 patients have had followup studies demonstrating improved drainage, symptom resolution and no evidence of obstruction on diuretic renal scans or excretory urogram. The remaining patient is awaiting 3-month followup evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted pyeloplasty can be safely performed in the pediatric population. The precision in dissection, incision and suturing allows for comparable results to open pyeloplasty in this age group.

Child↗
PubMed2005

Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To present technical recommendations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and stone extraction, as patients with kidney stones proximal to a pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) present a technical challenge, and have traditionally been managed with open surgery or percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2002 to April 2005, 55 patients had RALP for PUJO; eight of these had concomitant renal calculi. Stone burden and location were assessed with a preoperative radiological examination. Before completing the PUJO repair, one robot working arm (cephalad one) was temporarily undocked to allow passage of a flexible nephroscope into the renal pelvis and collecting systems under direct vision. Stones were extracted with graspers or basket catheters and removed via the port. The surgical-assistant port in the subxiphoid area was used to introduce laparoscopic suction and other instruments. RESULTS: The Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was the preferred reconstructive technique in all patients. Operations were completed robotically with no conversions to open surgery. All patients were rendered stone-free, confirmed by imaging, and there were no intraoperative or delayed complications during a mean (range) follow-up of 12.3 (4-22) months. The mean operative time was 275.8 min, 61.7 min longer than in patients who did not have concomitant stone removal. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent stone extraction and PUJO repair can be successful with RALP. Operative times are longer than in patients with isolated PUJO repair, but this is to be expected as there is an additional procedure.

Adolescent↗