Biomedical subjects

Faiez Zannad

Publications and source records attributed to Faiez Zannad.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Proteomic patterns according to ejection fraction: an EMPEROR-programme analysis.

AIMS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been incorporated as an inclusion criterion in HF trials. Patient's characteristics, event risk, and treatment response vary according to LVEF. A better understanding of the biological processes across LVEF is warranted. To study proteomic biomarker expression across LVEF using data from the EMPEROR-Programme. METHODS: Two thousand two hundred and fifty-four patients who had proteomic measurements available using 1134 proteins overlapping between the Explore 1536 and 3072 Olink® platforms were included. Main analyses were performed within the EMPEROR-Preserved dataset due to differences in entry criteria between EMPEROR-Preserved and EMPEROR-Reduced with higher entry N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels that varied by LVEF cut-offs in the latter. Protein concentrations were compared using ordinal logistic regression across LVEF categories: 41%-49%, 50%-59%, and ≥60%. The resulting β-coefficient indicates the change in the log-odds for the outcome of being in a lower LVEF category for every NPX unit in log2 scale. Analyses were adjusted for covariates and a false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction was applied. RESULTS: A total of 297 proteins exhibited a trend of expression across LVEF categories in EMPEROR-Preserved after adjustment for potential confounders and correction for test multiplicity. Of these, the top 10 proteins were: NT-pro BNP (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.27), Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (β = 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.61), sialomucin core protein 24 (β = 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-0.74), phospholipid transfer protein (β = 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.59), natriuretic peptides B (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.20), intercellular adhesion molecule 5 (β = 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.49), neural cell adhesion molecule 2 (β = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.70), neural cell adhesion molecule L1-like protein (β = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.71), interactor protein for cytohesin exchange factors 1 (β = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.19), and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, peroxisomal (β = 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.26). The correlation between these proteins and LVEF was generally weak (Rho ≤0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Within EMPEROR-Preserved, the top differentially expressed circulating proteins suggest that pathways related to natriuretic peptides, cell-adhesion, and clonal haematopoiesis are overexpressed at mildly-reduced ejection fraction, but none of the proteins passed the 5%FDR cut-off, and the correlation between circulating proteins and LVEF was weak. These findings suggest that circulating proteins may not be a good discriminant of ejection fraction.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Finerenone and quality of life in heart failure: component-level analyses and clinical relevance of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire.

AIMS: Finerenone was shown to improve overall health status, as measured by the aggregate 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). This study aimed to contextualize KCCQ changes in a manner that is relevant to patients and clinicians, thereby improving understanding of this metric in HFmrEF/HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of FINEARTS-HF, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in HFmrEF/HFpEF, we performed exploratory assessments of treatment effects on mean score changes from baseline to 12 months for each of the 23 KCCQ components (scaled from 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) using multivariable linear regression. We further compared the impact of finerenone on the KCCQ-overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) at 12 months with the expected decline per year. Of 6001 participants in FINEARTS-HF, 5006 completed the KCCQ both at baseline and 12 months (age: 72 ± 10 years, women: 45%, baseline KCCQ-OSS: 63.9 ± 22.0). Finerenone, compared with placebo, numerically improved all but one KCCQ component, with the greatest nominal improvement observed in lower limb oedema frequency (+2.5, 95% CI: 0.9-4.1), fatigue burden (+2.2, 95% CI: 0.9-3.5), fatigue frequency (+2.1, 95% CI: 0.7-3.6), and lower limb oedema burden (+1.8, 95% CI: 0.6-2.9). KCCQ-OSS at 12 months was inversely related to age, with finerenone shifting the age-KCCQ-OSS relationship by 4.7 (95% CI: 0.4-9.1) years. CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone was associated with modest improvements in health status-most notably lower limb oedema and fatigue-in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Racial outcomes in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy treated with an aldose reductase inhibitor: the ARISE-HF trial.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM) exist, with black and Hispanic participants showing poorer health status. It remains unclear whether these differences affect the natural progression of the disease. We aimed to evaluate disease progression in individuals with DbCM, as well as racial differences in the response to AT-001. METHODS: A total of 625 participants with DbCM were randomised to either placebo or AT-001 and followed for 15 months. The primary outcome was change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and secondary outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly scores. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity (black, Hispanic, white). RESULTS: Black and Hispanic participants who received placebo experienced greater declines in peak VO2 (-0.74 and -1.67 mL/kg/min, respectively) compared with white participants (-0.23 mL/kg/min, p=0.005). AT-001 demonstrated a non-statistically significant trend towards slower declines in peak VO2 in black and Hispanic participants (-0.31 and -0.62 mL/kg/min, p=0.29, respectively). Black participants who received placebo had the largest declines in most KCCQ scores. CONCLUSION: Black and Hispanic participants with DbCM experienced faster disease progression, with black participants showing the most pronounced functional and quality of life declines. The effect of AT-001 on peak VO2 changes was not statistically significant with similar effects between racial and ethnic groups (NCT04083339). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04083339.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Geographic Variation in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the FINEARTS-HF Trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

clinical trials↗

PubMed2026

EMPEROR-Preserved Risk Model and Outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF Trial: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) show substantial heterogeneity in prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of biomarker-driven prognostic models derived from the Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved) Trial in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to examine whether baseline risk modified the therapeutic effect of finerenone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, which was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries among adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF (LVEF) of 40% or greater. Patients were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023, and data analysis for this study was conducted from September to October 2025. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 32 (23-37) months. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: EMPEROR-Preserved risk scores for the outcomes of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were calculated in FINEARTS-HF using models incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, New York Heart Association functional class, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes, insulin use, and-depending on outcome-age, hemoglobin and albumin levels, HF duration, time from prior HF hospitalization, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor use. Estimated risks were compared with observed event rates, and model performance was assessed using Harrell C statistic. Treatment effects were evaluated across risk quintiles (Q1 to Q5) and across the continuous risk distribution. RESULTS: Among 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2732 [45.5%] women; 3003 randomized to finerenone and 2998 randomized to placebo), the EMPEROR-Preserved risk model estimated risk of outcomes, with Q5 vs Q1 hazard ratios (HRs) of 10.49 (95% CI, 8.14-13.52) for the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and 13.47 (95% CI, 8.79-20.64) for cardiovascular death. The model demonstrated good discrimination. The treatment effect of finerenone was consistent across risk quintiles for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (Q1: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.58-1.49]; Q2: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.43]; Q3: HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.62-1.07]; Q4: HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65-1.01]; and Q5: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.05]; P for interaction = .68) and remained uniform across the continuous risk spectrum. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The EMPEROR-Preserved risk models demonstrated good performance in FINEARTS-HF. Baseline risk did not modify the relative treatment effect of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of the Kidney Function-Based Finerenone Dosing Strategy Used in FINEARTS-HF.

BACKGROUND: Given that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have the potential to impair renal function and induce hyperkalemia, close monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum potassium levels is essential to ensure the safe administration of this therapy. OBJECTIVES: In this prespecified analysis, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the kidney function-based finerenone dosing strategy used in the FINEARTS-HF trial. METHODS: In FINEARTS-HF, patients with an eGFR of 25 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were stratified at randomization to the low-dose group and started on 10 mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 20 mg/d) or matching placebo, whereas those with an eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline were stratified to the high-dose group and started on 20 mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 40 mg/d) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the composite of total (first and recurrent) heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among 5,986 (99.8%) analyzable patients, 3,159 were assigned to the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum and 2,827 to the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum group. The mean ± SD achieved dose was 32.3 ± 9.1 mg (finerenone) and 34.4 ± 7.8 mg (placebo) in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum, and 15.6 ± 4.3 mg (finerenone) and 16.7 ± 4.0 mg (placebo) in the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum. The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across the 2 dosing strata (higher eGFR/high-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94] vs lower eGFR/low-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.03]; P for interaction = 0.34). Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Safety was also consistent between dosing strata, except for hypokalemia, where the reduction in the odds of hypokalemia with finerenone compared to placebo was greater in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum (P-interaction < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, an eGFR-based dosing strategy allowed effective and safe use of finerenone in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with a baseline eGFR as low as 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. We recommend that clinicians implement the trial-validated dosing strategy and incorporate appropriate uptitration to the target dose to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. (FINEARTS-HF [Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40%; NCT04435626).

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone-Related Risk of Hypotension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces clinical events in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/preserved ejection fraction; however, the implications of treatment-related hypotension are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated predictors of systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension and their associations with randomized treatment and clinical outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke]) trial. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in symptomatic patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%). Predictors of SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension were identified using Cox models. Associations between SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-updated Cox models. The primary outcome was a composite of total heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among the 5,815 participants with available data, post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg occurred in 899 (538 with finerenone vs 361 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.38-1.85) and investigator-reported hypotension in 364 patients (225 with finerenone vs 139 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34-2.08). Participants experiencing SBP <100 mm Hg had lower baseline SBP, were older, had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, a history of smoking, and no diabetes. Treatment-related risk of the primary endpoint was reduced in patients with no/before SBP <100 mm Hg (rate ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) and appeared to attenuate afterwards (rate ratio: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.70-1.39), although no formal statistical interaction was observed (Pinteraction = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, finerenone led to higher rates of post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension. Although hypotension should not prompt automatic treatment discontinuation, these patients should be carefully monitored. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF]; NCT04435626).

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Baseline Kidney Function in Patients With Heart Failure: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone is known to reduce the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) events and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: The authors explored whether the benefit of finerenone among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction differs according to baseline measures of kidney function. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure) was a global, randomized clinical trial of finerenone vs placebo among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Finerenone was titrated to 20 mg/d if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 40 mg/d if eGFR was >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The authors used a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (<60%; ≥60%) and region, to assess for differential treatment effects on the composite of total HF events and CV death according to the baseline eGFR (continuous and categories [≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, <45 mL/min/1.73 m2] and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (<30 mg/g, 30 to <300 mg/g, ≥300 mg/g). RESULTS: The effect of finerenone to reduce the primary endpoint of total HF events and CV death did not significantly differ according to baseline eGFR (Pinteraction = 0.14 and 0.07 for continuous and categorical eGFR, respectively) with rate ratio 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65-1.06) for eGFR 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83-1.26) for eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The corresponding absolute event rates were 9.2 vs 12.5, 16.5 vs 19.9, and 28.0 vs 28.0 per 100 patient-years for finerenone vs placebo, respectively. Similar results were noted for total worsening HF events. Finerenone lowered the risk of the composite CV outcome similarly across baseline categories of UACR (Pinteraction = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: In the FINEARTS-HF trial (where the target dose of finerenone was determined by baseline kidney function), the effect of finerenone to reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and total HF events did not significantly differ across a range of baseline eGFR and UACR.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone According to Frailty in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with frailty are often perceived to have a less favorable benefit-risk profile for novel therapies and therefore may be less likely to receive these. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to frailty status in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF), conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Patients with HF with New York Heart Association functional class II through IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or higher, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from October 1 to November 30, 2024. INTERVENTION: Addition of once-daily finerenone or placebo to usual therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. Frailty was measured using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. RESULTS: Of the 6001 patients randomized in FINEARTS-HF, a frailty index (FI) was calculable in 5952 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 3241 [54.4%] male). In total, 1588 patients (26.7%) had class I frailty (FI ≤0.210 [not frail]), 2141 (36.0%) had class II frailty (FI 0.211-0.310 [more frail]), and 2223 (37.3%) had class III frailty (FI ≥0.311 [most frail]). Compared with patients with class I frailty, those with class II and III frailty had a higher risk of the primary outcome (unadjusted rate ratio [RR], 1.88 [95% CI, 1.54-2.28] for class II and 3.86 [95% CI, 3.22-4.64] for class III). The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome did not vary significantly by frailty class (class I: RR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.77-1.49]; class II: RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.83]; class III: RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76-1.07]; P for interaction = .77). Frailty class did not modify the effects of finerenone on the components of the primary outcome, all-cause death, or improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. The effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty class. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone reduced the risk of total worsening HF events and cardiovascular death, and it improved symptoms; these effects were not modified by frailty status. In addition, the effects of finerenone on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone and Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely intertwined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to the absence or presence of AF and the type of AF (paroxysmal vs persistent or permanent). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial. The trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 1, 2024. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of total HF events and cardiovascular death. New-onset AF or atrial flutter (AFL) was a prespecified exploratory outcome. RESULTS: Among 5984 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2724 [45.5%] female) with known AF status at baseline, 1384 (23.1%) had paroxysmal AF and 1886 (31.5%) had persistent or permanent AF. Patients with both types of AF were older and had worse HF status compared with those without AF (2714 patients [45.4%]). Both types of AF were associated with a higher unadjusted risk of the primary outcome compared with no AF (event rate per 100 person-years of follow-up, 20.3 [95% CI, 17.9-23.1] with paroxysmal AF, 19.8 [95% CI, 17.8-22.0] with persistent or permanent AF, and 11.9 [95% CI, 10.7-13.3] with no AF; rate ratio [RR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.37-1.92] with paroxysmal AF and 1.66 [95% CI, 1.43-1.93] with persistent or permanent AF vs no AF); however, the associations were attenuated after adjustment for known prognostic variables. The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome (overall RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]) was not modified by baseline AF status (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98] with no AF, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.65-1.06] with paroxysmal AF, and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.05] with persistent or permanent AF; P for interaction = .94). New-onset AF or AFL occurred in 6.5% of patients and was associated with a higher subsequent adjusted risk of the primary outcome (rate ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 2.57-5.18]; P < .001). The subdistribution hazard ratio for new-onset AF or AFL among those receiving finerenone vs placebo was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-1.04; P = .09). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The efficacy of finerenone was consistent regardless of AF status. New-onset AF was associated with a substantially higher risk of subsequent outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The mode of death in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood and may vary by EF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mode of death according to EF and the treatment effect of finerenone on cause-specific mortality in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial, which evaluated clinical outcomes in 6001 patients with HF and EF greater than or equal to 40% randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. The mode of death in relation to baseline EF categories (<50%, ≥50-<60%, and ≥60%) was examined, and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models was assessed. Data analysis was conducted between September 2024 and January 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mode of death as centrally adjudicated by a clinical end points committee. RESULTS: Of 1013 patients (16.9%; median [IQR] age, 76 [69-82] years; 594 male [58.6%]) who died during median (IQR) follow-up of 32 (23-36) months, mode of death was ascribed to cardiovascular causes in 502 (49.6%), noncardiovascular causes in 368 (36.3%), and undetermined cause in 143 (14.1%). Of cardiovascular deaths, 215 (42.8%) were due to sudden death, 163 (32.4%) to HF, 48 (9.6%) to stroke, 25 (5.0%) to myocardial infarction, and 51 (10.2%) to other cardiovascular causes. The proportion of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death was higher in those with EF less than 50%. The proportion of deaths related to HF was similar across EF categories, and the proportion of deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular causes was low regardless of EF. Randomization to finerenone did not significantly reduce death or cause-specific death compared with placebo in any EF category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF in the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, higher proportions of cardiovascular and overall mortality in those with EF less than 50% were related principally to higher proportions of sudden death. A clear treatment effect of finerenone on cardiovascular or cause-specific mortality was not identified, although the trial was likely underpowered for these outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024. INTERVENTION: Participants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events. RESULTS: Of the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles. RESULTS: A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome = .24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Estimated Long-Term Benefits of Finerenone in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: People living with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction have substantially curtailed life expectancy free from clinical events compared with their peers of comparable age. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, was recently shown to reduce risks of cardiovascular events in this population over a median follow-up of 2.6 years; as patients with HF typically continue treatment beyond this time frame, estimating the potential long-term benefits of finerenone could inform shared clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the projected long-term treatment effects of finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction if treated over a patient's lifetime. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted of the FINEARTS-HF trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater were randomized from September 2020 to January 2023. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.6 (1.9-3.0) years. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone (titrated to either 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was time to cardiovascular death or worsening HF event. The long-term gains in survival free from a primary end point with finerenone were iteratively estimated with age-based Kaplan-Meier curves using age at randomization rather than time from randomization. Differences in areas under the survival curves between the finerenone and placebo arms represented event-free survival gains. RESULTS: Among 6001 participants (median [IQR] age, 73 [66-79] years; 3269 male [54.5%]), mean survival free from the primary end point for a 55-year-old participant was 13.6 years (95% CI, 11.9-15.2 years) with finerenone and 10.5 years (95% CI, 6.8-11.3 years) with placebo, representing a gain in event-free survival of 3.1 years (95% CI, 0.8-5.4 years; P = .007). Mean event-free survival for a 65-year-old participant was 11.0 years (95% CI, 10.1-11.9 years) with finerenone and 8.9 years (95% CI, 8.1-9.8 years) with placebo, representing a gain of 2.0 years (95% CI, 0.8-3.3 years; P = .001). Projected mean event-free survival was numerically greater with finerenone than with placebo for every starting age between 50 to 80 years. Lifetime gains in event-free survival were observed even among individuals already treated with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (65-year-old participant: 3.1 years; 95% CI, 0.1-6.0 years; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, long-term treatment with finerenone was estimated to extend event-free survival by up to 3 years among people with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Left bundle branch block as a risk factor for progression to heart failure.

The prevalence of conduction disturbances, particularly left bundle branch block (LBBB), is strongly correlated with age and with the presence of cardiovascular disease. LBBB has been reported to affect approximately 25% of the heart failure (HF) population and it is likely that the deleterious role of such conduction disorders in the progression to HF has been underestimated. The purpose of this article is to review the data from the literature indicating that LBBB may have a causative role, mediated through the resulting intra-ventricular asynchrony, in the deterioration of cardiac function and the development of cardiac remodelling and HF. It also aims to address the potential for future clinical therapies for this conduction disorder.

Bundle-Branch Block↗

PubMed2006

FDA and CPMP rulings on subgroup analyses.

The extent to which subgroup analyses should affect the interpretation and conclusions in a trial report is a contentious matter, and guidelines regarding this issue have been established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EU Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Subgroup analyses should be set out in the protocol of clinical trials. The treatment effect itself may vary within a subgroup or covariate. In some cases, interactions are anticipated or are of particular a priori interest; hence a subgroup analysis or a statistical model including interactions is part of the planned analysis. However, subgroup or interaction analyses are often merely exploratory and should be clearly identified as such in the protocol. When exploratory, these analyses should be interpreted cautiously. Market approval of a compound is based on the overall trial results, and, importantly, no drug has so far been approved or not-approved either in the US or in the EU on the basis of subgroup analysis. However, subgroup analysis can influence the approval or can even be required, and therefore it can influence the labelling of the Summary Characteristics of a Product. Two examples in heart failure are given by the Val-HeFT trial comparing valsartan to placebo and the MERIT-HF trial comparing metoprolol to placebo, from which some remarkable regulatory issues arose that were debated by the FDA and CPMP.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2006

Role of aldosterone blockade for treatment of heart failure and post-acute myocardial infarction.

Heart failure continues to significantly impact morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), especially when associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Therefore, routine use of optimal therapy for patients with heart failure after AMI is needed in the future. Data from the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) has demonstrated that addition of eplerenone to standard therapy in patients with LVSD and clinical heart failure post-AMI significantly improves outcomes in these patients, providing the basis for acceptance of aldosterone blockade as an integral component of therapy. However, further studies are needed to more broadly explore the usefulness of aldosterone blockade in heart failure therapy. As research clarifies the many complex pathophysiologic processes involved in post-AMI remodeling, treatment should continue to move beyond symptom-targeted therapies to disease- and mechanism-targeted therapies that will further improve outcomes in the setting of heart failure post-AMI and beyond.

Heart Failure↗

PubMed2006

Benefits, challenges, and registerability of the polypill.

Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) stress the importance of treating global risk, rather than individual risk, factors. Patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, for example, benefit from a combination of aspirin, antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering drugs, and possibly folic acid. As the number of medications that a patient requires increases, adherence and compliance to therapy are likely to decrease. The use of affordable, multiple-target, fixed-combination 'polypills', which concomitantly reduce multiple risk factors without increasing the pill burden or the risk of adverse effects, has the potential to improve CV risk factor management, thereby reducing the incidence of CVD. This review discusses the benefits of the polypill and the challenges and requirements for its success and registerability. Discussions with regulatory bodies are required in order to obtain some 'balance' between an overcautious registration approach and the potentially large public health benefits that are likely to arise from the use of polypills.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗