Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Zijlstra

Publications and source records attributed to F Zijlstra.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

[Multidetector computed tomography of the coronary arteries].

In the past decade, improvements in CT techniques have enabled non-invasive visualization of the coronary arteries. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is currently the generally accepted technique for the follow-up of coronary stents and by-pass grafts, and for the evaluation of anomalous coronary arteries and coronary artery disease. Both the degree of stenosis, as well as plaque composition can be determined by MDCT. Plaque composition has proven to be a more important predictor for acute coronary syndromes than the degree of stenosis. In addition, MDCT has less risks of complication and lower costs. Limitations of MDCT are: sensitivity to rhythm- and breathing artefacts, a lower spatial and time resolution than coronary angiography (CAG), and difficulties in coronary evaluation close to high density structures such as calcifications and stents. Coronary angiography is still indicated when functional information has to be obtained about coronary flow. MDCT should be considered in all cases in which diagnostic CAG is performed.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2004

Role of collateral circulation in the acute phase of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention.

AIMS: The role of collateral flow in the first hours of infarction remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether the presence of coronary collateral flow, as evidenced by angiography, has a beneficial effect on infarct size and left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated by means of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between 1994 and 2001, 1059 patients with acute MI treated with primary PCI, TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) 0 or 1 flow at first contrast injection and technically adequate angiograms for collateral flow detection were analysed. RESULTS: Comparison of collateral flow grades 0, 1, and 2/3 showed that increased collateral flow was associated with a lower incidence of Killip class >/= 2 at presentation (12% vs. 10% vs. 3%, p for trend 0.02), less need for intra-aortic balloon pumping after PCI (17% vs. 13% vs. 5%, p for trend 0.005), better myocardial blush grade (MBG) in infarcts related with the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (MBG3: 14% vs. 18% vs. 34%, p for trend 0.01), and smaller enzymatic infarct size (cumulative lactate dehydrogenase release 36 h after symptom onset [LDHQ(36)]) (1932+/-1531 U/l vs. 1870+/-1458 U/l vs. 1217+/-762 U/l, p for trend 0.041). These beneficial effects were particularly evident in LAD-related infarcts. CONCLUSION: The presence of angiographically detectable collaterals has a protective effect on enzymatic infarct size and pre- and postintervention haemodynamic conditions in patients with acute MI treated by primary PCI, in particular when Rentrop grade 2/3 is present and the LAD is involved in the infarct.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2003

[The troponin assay in a cardiac emergency unit: especially to exclude severe cardiac risk].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value in daily practice of a troponin assay for triage of patients with chest pain. DESIGN: Retrospective and descriptive. METHOD: All patients in whom troponin T was measured after at least six hours after complaints began during the first three months of 2001 in the cardiac emergency unit of the Isala Clinics, location Weezenlanden, Zwolle, the Netherlands, were included. Cardiac events occurring within 30 days after the troponin assay were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS: All 350 included patients were followed for 30 days. An elevated troponin level was found in 51 patients (15%). At 30 days, 27 of these 51 patients had had a myocardial infarction or had died. Apart from these 27 patients, a revascularisation procedure was performed in nine patients. In the remaining 15 patients with an elevated troponin level, another reason for myocardial damage was found. In 40 patients in whom the troponin assay was negative, coronary artery disease was diagnosed later. The negative predictive value for myocardial infarction or death within 30 days was 98%. CONCLUSION: A troponin assay, performed six hours or more after the onset of cardiac symptoms, appears to be a safe method to exclude patients with severe coronary artery disease resulting in myocardial necrosis and an elevated risk of death. An elevated troponin level was always associated with myocardial damage, but not always with coronary artery disease. Therefore, there must be a clear indication for requesting a troponin assay, and one should always keep in mind that a normal troponin level does not exclude coronary artery disease.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2003

Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Overviews of trials suggest that percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be more effective than thrombolysis. However, whether these effects are sustained beyond hospital discharge, and the extent to which the results are applicable to a broad cross section of patients and the wider community are unknown. We compared the effectiveness of primary PTCA and thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction during a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: Detailed individual patient data were collected from randomized trials commenced from 1989 to 1996 that compared primary PTCA with thrombolysis. Data were combined to produce estimates of relative reduction in events at 30 days and 6 months for the group and for predefined clinical subgroups. Treatment effects were also assessed in relation to several study-related factors. RESULTS: Eleven trials were identified. The mortality rate at 30 days was 4.3% for 1348 patients randomized to undergo PTCA, and 6.9% for 1377 patients assigned to thrombolytic therapy (relative risk [RR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.86, P =.004). At 6 months, the mortality rate was 6.2% for PTCA and 8.2% for thrombolysis (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, P =.04). Combined death and reinfarction rates at 30 days were 7.0% for PTCA and 12.9% for thrombolysis, with a sustained effect at 6 months (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.75, P <.0001). The risk of hemorrhagic stroke at 30 days was lower in the PTCA group (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.0-0.50, P =.009). The relative treatment effect did not vary across clinically important subgroups, but the absolute benefit varied according to baseline risk. The relative treatment effect varied across the trials and according to the thrombolytic comparator used, the delay in performing PTCA, and the recruitment rate. CONCLUSION: In the context of these trials, primary PTCA was more effective than thrombolytic therapy in reducing death, reinfarction, and stroke, with the greatest absolute benefit in patients who were at the highest risk. These benefits appear to be sustained for 6 months. The effect of treatment varied significantly across the trials, and this raises issues about how widely the results can be applied.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2 h), intermediate (2-4 h) and late (>4 h) presentation treated by primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: We examined the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with early (<2 h), intermediate (2-4 h) and late (>4 h) presentation treated by primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2635 patients enrolled in 10 randomized trials of primary angioplasty (n=1302) vs thrombolytic therapy (n=1333) in acute myocardial infarction, and baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Increase in presentation delay is associated with older age, female gender, diabetes and an increased heart rate. We classified the patients according to the time delay from symptom onset to presentation into three categories: early presentation (<2 h), intermediate presentation (2-4 h), and late presentation (>or=4 h). At 30 days the combined rate of death, non-fatal reinfarction and stroke in patients presenting early was 5.8% in the angioplasty group vs 12.5% in the thrombolysis group, in patients with intermediate presentation, 8.6% vs 14.2%, respectively, and in patients presenting late 7.7% vs 19.4%, respectively. With increasing time from symptom onset to presentation, all major adverse cardiac event rates show a trend to a larger increase in the thrombolysis group compared to the angioplasty group, both at 30 days and at 6 months after the acute event. CONCLUSIONS: Major adverse cardiac event rates are lower after angioplasty compared to thrombolysis, irrespective of time to presentation. With increasing time to presentation major adverse cardiac event rates increase after thrombolysis but appear to remain relatively stable after angioplasty.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Although recognized as an important feature of atherosclerotic coronary disease, little is known about the frequency and prognostic importance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of a randomized trial of thrombolysis vs primary angioplasty, 178 patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with primary angioplasty. In these patients the occurrence of distal embolization after angioplasty was assessed. Embolization was defined as a distal filling defect with an abrupt 'cutoff' in one of the peripheral coronary artery branches of the infarct-related vessel, distal to the site of angioplasty. We analysed myocardial blush grade, ST-T segment elevation resolution, enzymatic infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with and without distal embolization. Clinical information was collected for a mean of 5 years. Distal embolization was present in 27 patients (15.2%). Mean age and gender were not different from patients without distal embolization. Angiographic success (thrombolyis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 and residual stenosis <50%) after primary angioplasty was less frequently observed in patients with distal embolization (70% vs 90%, P<0.01). Myocardial blush and ST-T segment elevation resolution after angioplasty were reduced when distal embolization was present. Patients with distal embolization had a larger enzymatic infarct size (mean cumulative lactate dehydrogenase measured over 72 h, 1612 vs 847, P<0.05) and a lower left ventricle ejection fraction at discharge (42% vs 51%, P<0.01). Long-term mortality was higher in patients with distal embolization (44% vs 9%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Distal embolization in patients treated with primary angioplasty is visible on the coronary angiogram in 15.2% of patients. It is related to reduced myocardial reperfusion, more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Additional pharmacological interventions and/ or mechanical devices should be studied to prevent and/or treat distal embolization.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The timing of PCI.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Preinfarction angina protects against out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute occlusion of the left coronary artery.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of preconditioning on out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: More than half of the deaths associated with AMI occur out of the hospital and within 1 h of symptom onset. In humans, preinfarction angina (PA), which can serve as a surrogate marker for preconditioning, reduces infarct size, but the protective effect against out-of-hospital VF has not been investigated. METHODS: Preinfarction angina status and acute coronary angiographic findings of 72 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by out-of-hospital VF were compared with 144 matched controls without this complication. RESULTS: Preinfarction angina is associated with a lower risk for VF (odds ratio [OR]: 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18 to 0.88). In patients with acute occlusion of the left coronary artery (LCA) (n = 136), the risk reduction is pronounced (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.66), whereas, in patients with acute occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) (n = 67), the protective effect of PA on VF was not observed (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 0.45 to 11.22). Subgroup and multivariate analyses show that the protective effect is independent of cardiovascular risk factors, preinfarction treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents or aspirin, the presence of collaterals or residual antegrade flow or the extent of coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: Preinfarction angina protects against out-of-hospital VF in patients with acute occlusion of the LCA. This protection is independent of risk factors or coronary anatomy. A larger study is needed to examine the apparently different effect in patients with acute occlusion of the RCA.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Initial experience with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention during mechanical reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction.

The feasibility and safety of simultaneous multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention during mechanical reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction was analyzed in a retrospective, case-controlled study. Patients who underwent multivessel coronary intervention had a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes through 6 months compared with matched controls in whom coronary intervention was limited to the infarct-related artery.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2001

Long-term recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To investigate changes in left ventricular function in the first 6 months after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. To assess clinical variables, associated with recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Changes in left ventricular function were studied in 600 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, all treated with primary angioplasty. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by radionuclide ventriculography in survivors at day 4 and after 6 months. Patients with a recurrent myocardial infarction within the 6 months were excluded. RESULTS: Successful reperfusion (TIMI 3 flow) by primary angioplasty was achieved in 89% of patients. The mean ejection fraction at discharge was 43.7%+/-11.4, whereas the mean ejection fraction after 6 months was 46.3%+/-11.5 (P<0.01). During the 6 months, the mean relative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was 6%. An improvement in left ventricular function was observed in 48% of the patients; 25% of the patients had a decrease, whereas in the remaining patients there was no change. After univariate and multivariate analysis, an anterior infarction location, an ejection fraction at discharge < or =40% and single-vessel disease were significant predictors of left ventricular improvement during the 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: After acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty there was a significant recovery of left ventricular function during the first 6 months after the infarction. An anterior myocardial infarction, single-vessel coronary artery disease, and an initially depressed left ventricular function were independently associated with recovery of left ventricular function. Multivessel disease was associated with absence of functional recovery. Additional studies, investigating complete revascularization are needed, as this approach may potentially improve long-term left ventricular function.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed2001

Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long term clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly allocated to primary stenting (112) or balloon angioplasty (115). The primary end point was the cumulative first event rate of death, non-fatal reinfarction, or target vessel revascularisation. Secondary end points were restenosis at six months and the cost-effectiveness at follow up. RESULTS: After 24 months, the combined clinical end point of death/reinfarction was 4% after stenting and 11% after balloon angioplasty (p = 0.04). Subsequent target vessel revascularisation was necessary in 15 patients (13%) after stenting and in 39 (34%) after balloon angioplasty (p < 0.001). The cumulative cardiac event-free survival rate was also higher after stenting (84% v 62%, p < 0.001). The angiographic restenosis rate after stenting was less than after balloon angioplasty (12% v 34%, p < 0.001). Despite the higher initial costs of stenting (Dfl 21 484 v Dfl 18 625, p < 0.001), the cumulative costs at 24 months were comparable with those of balloon angioplasty (Dfl 31 423 v Dfl 32 933, p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with balloon angioplasty, primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in a better long term clinical outcome without increased cost.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

High dose heparin as pretreatment for primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the Heparin in Early Patency (HEAP) randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: In the Heparin in Early Patency (HEAP) pilot study a beneficial effect of high-dose heparin on early patency in acute myocardial infarction (MI) was observed in a matched-control study. BACKGROUND: High dose bolus intravenous injection of heparin may achieve lysis of coronary thrombi and could enhance early patency of the infarct related vessel in patients with MI scheduled for primary angioplasty. METHODS: Before primary angioplasty, 584 patients with MI entered an open randomized trial of high dose (300 IU/kg) or low dose (0 or 5,000 IU) heparin. Of the 584 patients, 299 were randomized to high dose and 285 patients to low dose heparin. RESULTS: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 was observed before primary angioplasty in 65 patients (22%) in the high dose group and 60 patients (21%) in the low dose heparin group (p > 0.1), whereas TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 38 (13%) and 24 patients (9%), respectively (p = 0.11). There were no differences in the clinical end points between the two groups. There were no hemorrhagic strokes, while 10% of the patients in the high dose group required blood transfusion versus 6% in the low dose/no heparin group (p = 0.07). No subsets of patients showed beneficial effects of high dose heparin, such as patients with longer delay between heparin administration and diagnostic angiogram or patients with short delay between symptom onset and admission. CONCLUSIONS: There is no benefit of high dose bolus heparin on early patency compared with no or low dose heparin.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: coronary angiographic determinants.

OBJECTIVES: The study intended to compare the acute coronary anatomy of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) versus patients with AMI without this complication. BACKGROUND: More than half of the deaths associated with AMI occur out of the hospital and within 1 h of symptom onset. The angiographic determinants of out-of-hospital VF in patients with AMI have not been investigated in detail. METHODS: Acute coronary angiographic findings of 72 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by out-of-hospital VF were compared with findings from 144 matched patients with AMI without this complication. RESULTS: Patients with an acute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) or left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) had a higher risk for out-of-hospital VF compared with patients with an acute occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, respectively, 4.82 [2.35 to 9.92] and 4.92 [2.34 to 10.39]). With regard to extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), the location of the culprit lesion in the coronary arteries (proximal vs. mid or distal), the flow in the infarct related artery (IRA), the presence or absence of collaterals to the IRA and chronic occlusions, there were no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Acute myocardial infarction due to occlusion in the left coronary artery (LCA) is associated with greater risk for out-of-hospital VF compared to the RCA. The location of occlusion within LCA (LAD, LCx, proximal or distal), amount of myocardium at risk for necrosis and extent of CAD are not related to out-of-hospital VF.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: As compared with thrombolytic therapy, primary coronary angioplasty results in a higher rate of patency of the infarct-related coronary artery, lower rates of stroke and reinfarction, and higher in-hospital or 30-day survival rates. However, the comparative long-term efficacy of these two approaches has not been carefully studied. METHODS: We randomly assigned a total of 395 patients with acute myocardial infarction to treatment with angioplasty or intravenous streptokinase. Clinical information was collected for a mean (+/-SD) of 5+/-2 years, and medical charges associated with the two treatments were compared. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were assigned to undergo primary angioplasty, and 201 to receive streptokinase. Mortality was 13 percent in the angioplasty group, as compared with 24 percent in the streptokinase group (relative risk, 0.54; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.87). Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 6 percent and 22 percent of the two groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.52). The combined incidence of death and nonfatal reinfarction was also lower among patients assigned to angioplasty than among those assigned to streptokinase, with a relative risk of 0.13 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.37) for early events (within the first 30 days) and a relative risk of 0.62 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.43 to 0.91) for late events (after 30 days). The rates of readmission for heart failure and ischemia were also lower among patients in the angioplasty group than among patients in the streptokinase group. Total medical charges per patient were lower in the angioplasty group (16,090 dollars) than in the streptokinase group (16,813 dollars, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During five years of follow-up, primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was associated with lower rates of early and late death and nonfatal reinfarction, fewer hospital readmissions for ischemia or heart failure, and lower total medical charges than treatment with intravenous streptokinase.

Analysis of Variance↗