Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Van den Heuvel

Publications and source records attributed to F Van den Heuvel.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Development and clinical implementation of an enhanced display algorithm for use in networked electronic portal imaging.

PURPOSE: To introduce and clinically validate a preprocessing algorithm that allows clinical images from an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to be displayed on any computer monitor, without loss of clinical usability. The introduction of such a system frees EPI systems from the constraints of fixed viewing workstations and increases mobility of the images in a department. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The preprocessing algorithm, together with its variable parameters is introduced. Clinically, the algorithm is tested using an observer study of 316 EPID images of the pelvic region in the framework of treatment of carcinoma of the cervix and endometrium. Both anterior-posterior (AP/PA) and latero-lateral (LAT) images were used. The images scored were taken from six different patients, five of whom were obese, female, and postmenopausal. The result is tentatively compared with results from other groups. The scoring system, based on the number of visible landmarks in the port, is proposed and validated. Validation was performed by having the observer panel score images with artificially induced noise levels. A comparative study was undertaken with a standard automatic window and leveling display technique. Finally, some case studies using different image sites and EPI detectors are presented. RESULTS: The image quality for all images in this study was deemed to be clinically useful (mean score >1). Most of the images received a score which was second highest (AP/PA landmarks > or =6 and LAT landmarks > or =5). Obesity, which has been an important factor determining the image quality, was not seen to be a factor here. Compared to standard techniques a highly significant improvement was determined with regard to clinical usefulness. The algorithm performs fast (less than 9 seconds) and needs no additional user interaction in most of the cases. The algorithm works well on both direct detection portal imagers and camera-based imagers whether analog or digital cameras. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that it is possible to preprocess EPIs in such a way that the clinically relevant landmarks are easily detected on a generic computer screen. The algorithm is system-independent and fast. This allows for the encoding of EPIs in more generalized commercial formats so that distribution of images is facilitated.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1999

Clinical brachytherapy with neutron emitting 252Cf sources and adherence to AAPM TG-43 dosimetry protocol.

Using Monte Carlo methods, neutron dosimetry for 252Cf Applicator Tube (AT) type medical sources available from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has for the first time been determined in terms of TG-43 formalism. This approach, as compared to previous "along-away" formalisms, demonstrates the relative angular independence of dose rate data, when the geometry factor has been removed. As the ORNL-made 252Cf AT type sources are considerably physically larger than most clinical sources used today, the radial dose function increases for radii less than 3.0 mm due to breakdown of the line source model. A comparison of the 252Cf neutron radial dose function with those for other medical sources revealed similarities with that from 137Cs. Differences with respect to previous 252Cf AT source neutron dosimetry data generally increased at increasing distances. This was attributed to differences in the various 252Cf AT source models and phantom compositions. The current status of 252Cf medical source fabrication and calibration procedures at ORNL is presented.

Anisotropy↗
PubMed1998

Electronic portal imaging with on-line correction of setup error in thoracic irradiation: clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: To analyze setup errors and the feasibility of their on-line correction using electronic portal imaging in the irradiation of lung tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen patients with lung cancer were irradiated through opposed anteroposterior fields. Localization images of anteroposterior fields were recorded with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Using an in-house developed algorithm for on-line comparison of portal images setup errors were measured and a correction of table position was performed with a remote couch control prior to treatment. In addition, residual errors were measured on the EPID verification image. Global and individual mean and standard deviation of setup errors were calculated and compared. The feasibility of the procedure was assessed measuring intra- and interobserver variability, influence of organ movement, reproducibility of error measurement, the extra time fraction needed for measuring and adjusting and the fraction of dose needed for imaging. RESULTS: In two setups the procedure could not be finished normally due to problems inherent to the procedure. The reproducibility, intraobserver variability, and influence of organ movements were each described by a distribution with a mean value less than or equal to 1 mm and a standard deviation (SD) of less than 1.5 mm. The interobserver variability showed to be a little bit larger (mean: 0.3 mm, SD: 1.7 mm). The mean time to perform the irradiation of the anteroposterior field was 4 +/- 1 min. The mean time for the measurement and correction procedure approximated 2.5 min. The mean extra time fraction was 65 +/- 24% (1 SD) with more than half of this coming from the error measurement. The dose needed for generation of EPID images was 5.9 +/- 1.4% of total treatment dose. The mean and SD of setup errors were, respectively, 0.1 and 4.5 mm for longitudinal and -2.0 and 5.7 mm for transversal errors. Of 196 measured translational errors 120 (61%) exceeded the adjustment criteria. For individual patients systematic and random setup errors can be as high as, respectively, 15.8 and 7.5 mm. Mean residual error and SD were for longitudinal direction 0.08 and 1.2 mm and for transversal direction -0.9 and 1.0 mm (pooled data). For individuals, the mean residual errors were smaller than 1 mm, with a typical SD per patient of less than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Setup errors in thoracic radiation therapy are clinically important. On-line correction can be performed accurately with an objective measurement tool, although this prolongs the irradiation procedure for one field with 65%.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1996

Dynamic radiotherapy: interactive movement of patient couch for treatment of craniospinal axis.

PURPOSE: The various techniques that have been described for treatment of the craniospinal axis show the common challenge of edge matching between adjacent orthogonal and parallel photon beams. Such edge matching is needed because the maximum field length provided by modern treatment machines is generally insufficient to treat adults with less than three matching fields. Using the common techniques, field edge matching becomes difficult, if for medical reasons, the patient cannot be treated in the prone position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A scanning couch technique is proposed, with the patient lying in supine position. After treating the cerebral and upper neck regions by two lateral opposed half beam fields defined by asymmetric collimators (split beam), the patient is being moved along the spinal axis through an 8.0 cm wide by 15.0 cm long posterior split beam (allowing edge matching with the lateral fields at the neck region) by means of remote controlled couch movement. Stopping and starting of the scanning field resulted in a linear decrease of dose on both sides of the scan. Two ways of resolving this problem were investigated. RESULTS: The administered dose varied less than 8.5% through the craniospinal axis. Flatness of the rectangular scanned field was 0.76%. Apart from dose homogeneity, patient comfort and decreased simulation time are major advantages. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique represents a suitable alternative using a common linear accelerator, requiring a remote couch controller as an additional component.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Clinical implementation of an objective computer-aided protocol for intervention in intra-treatment correction using electronic portal imaging.

In order to test the feasibility of a protocol for intra-fractional adjustment of the patient position, during radiation therapy treatment in the pelvic region, a two-fold study is carried out. The protocol involves an objective quantitative measurement of the error in positioning starting from the comparison of a portal image with a reference image. The first part of the study applies the protocol to determine the efficacy of adjustment using subjective determination of the positioning errors by a clinician by measuring the residual errors after adjustment. A group of 13 patients was followed extensively throughout their treatment, analyzing 240 fields. In the second part the measurement itself determines the extent of readjustment of the position. Throughout the procedure elapsed time is measured to determine the extra time involved in using this procedure. For this part a group of 21 patients was followed yielding statistics on 218 fields. Using this computer aided protocol it is shown that systematic as well as random errors can be reduced to standard deviations of the order of 1 mm. The price to pay however is additional treatment time up to 58% of the treatment time without the protocol. Time analysis shows that the largest part of the added time is spent on the readjustment of the patients' position adding a mean of 37% of time to the treatment of one field. This is despite the fact that the readjustment was performed using a remote couch controller. Finally a statistical analysis shows that it is possible to select patients benefiting from the use of such a protocol after a limited number of fractions.

Feasibility Studies↗
PubMed1994

On the determination of the effective transmission factor for stainless steel ovoid shielding segments and estimation of their shielding efficacy for the clinical situation.

Commercially available ovoid tubes for gynecological applications used in conjunction with the microSelectron-HDR (Nucletron International B.V., Waardegelder 1, 3905 TH Veenendaal, The Netherlands) for 192Ir sources, allow for shielding. Publications concerning the transmission properties of these 4.5-mm thick stainless steel (AISI number 303/304) shielding segments are scarce and not compatible for implementation in treatment planning. Therefore the effect of shielding on dose distribution is unknown. The effective transmission factor has been measured and implemented in the planning computations. Screening efficacy was evaluated on 20 actual treatment plans, analyzing dose reduction to critical tissue and comparing dose distribution in planes relevant for this particular application. Due to high transmission (effective transmission factor = 0.85), stainless steel screening segments only provide low, local dose reductions of maximum 15%. A new approach with regard to optimization and source configuration is needed to reduce dose to vulnerable tissue, exploiting the screening segments to a maximum extent. Better shielding, especially at the midline (plane bisecting the ovoids) could be expected by using shielding segments with other geometrical characteristics.

Biophysical Phenomena↗
PubMed1993

On-line portal imaging: image quality defining parameters for pelvic fields--a clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: A test of several image enhancement techniques, performed on on-line portal images in real clinical circumstances, is presented. In addition a score system enabling us to evaluate image quality on pelvic fields is proposed and validated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Localization images (n = 546) generated by an on-line portal imaging system during the treatment of 13 patients on pelvic fields were obtained by delivering a radiation dose of 6-8 cGy by an 18 MV photon beam, and recorded with a silicon intensified target video camera with adjustable gain, kV- and black level. Set-up errors were corrected before continuing irradiation. A scoring system based on the number of visible bone-soft tissue edges and transformed to a scale 0 to 5 was developed to judge image quality. A validation of this classification of images was performed with the use of transsectional bone-densities (bone-density*radiological path length) specified at the score defining landmarks. A high pass filter was used on all images, additional on-line open field subtraction was performed on 242 fields. Off-line study was performed in which a panel consisting of two groups (one composed of three radiation oncologists, the other of three radiotherapy technologists), scored 470 pelvic fields without further enhancement, and the same images with Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) (Pizer et al.). Two different clipping levels (3.0 and 5.0) were studied. RESULTS: Gender and transsectional bone-densities were the most defining patient-related factors influencing image quality. Camera settings, gantry angle, and image post-processing were important non-patient-related factors. All investigators judged CLAHE to ameliorate low contrast images and to deteriorate good quality images (p < 0.001).

Humans↗
PubMed1993

Interactive use of on-line portal imaging in pelvic radiation.

We have evaluated a fluoroscopic on-line portal imaging system in routine clinical radiotherapy, involving the treatment of 566 pelvic fields on 13 patients. The image was typically generated by delivering a radiation dose of 6-8 cGy. Comparison between portal image and simulator film was done by eye and all visible errors were corrected before continuing irradiation. If possible, these corrections were performed from outside the treatment room by moving the patient couch by remote control or by changing collimator parameters. Adjustments were performed on 289/530 (54.5%) evaluable fields or 229/278 (82.4%) evaluable patient set-ups. The lateral couch position was most frequently adjusted (n = 254). The absolute values of the adjustments were 6.8 mm mean (SD 6.6 mm) with a maximum of 40 mm. All absolute values of adjustments exceeding 25 mm were recorded in one patient and those exceeding 15 mm were observed in two patients. Both patients were obese females. Adjustments exceeding 5 mm were observed in all 13 patients. Related to the use of on-line portal imaging, treatment time was increased by a median of 36.5% (mean 45.8%; SD 42.1%). The range was 7.7 to 442%. The fraction of the total treatment time to perform corrections was 22.7% median (mean: 26.0; SD: 11.8%). Statistically significant systematic in-plane errors were found in 7/13 patients. A systematic error was detected on the lateral position of the field in five patients. In one patient a systematic error of the longitudinal field position and in one patient a rotational error was detected. For adjustments in the lateral direction the present method does not allow to detect lateral shifts of less than 2 mm. For adjustments in the longitudinal direction the sensitivity could not be estimated but the available data suggest that 80% of errors < or = 5 mm were not adjusted. In obese patients, random errors may be surprisingly large.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed1992

Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch.

We have evaluated the fluoroscopic on-line portal imaging (OPI) system developed by Siemens (Beamview-1, Concord, CA, U.S.A.) in routine clinical radiotherapy, involving the treatment of 883 fields (559 patient set-ups for treatment) on 21 patients. The image was typically generated by delivering 10 monitor units when used in single exposure or 1-2 monitor units on a large open field followed by 8-10 monitor units on the actual field when double exposure was used. Comparison between the portal image and the simulator film was done by eye. A region of tolerance was drawn on the simulator film and the field edges on the portal image had to project within this region. If this criterion was not met, adjustments followed by verification portal images were done before the remaining field dose was delivered. If possible, these adjustments were performed by moving the patient couch by remote control. The image quality was insufficient for evaluation in 75/883 (8.5%) fields. The abovementioned criterion was not met in 95/808 (11.8%) of the evaluable fields (26/559 patient set-ups were not evaluable). Of the 533 evaluable patient set-ups, 92 had to be adjusted (17.2%) including three (pelvic irradiations) set-ups that were adjusted on both field irradiated during the same radiotherapy session. In one case an incorrect tray (with wrong blocks) was detected and replaced. In one case (a 5.5 x 6.0 cm rectangular larynx field) the x and y axis of the field were interswitched. In one case incorrect focusing of a block was shown by the portal image. To make adjustments, the couch longitudinal position was changed 20 times (range -10 to +15 mm). The lateral position was changed 73 times (range -15 to +16 mm). The height position was changes 6 times (range -7 to +6 mm). Diaphragma rotation changes were performed 5 times (1 degree). The fraction of treatment time that was related to the use of OPI was 30.7% median (mean 32.4%, S.D. 14.1%). The range was 4.1 to 78.6%. On the basis of calculations assuming no OPI would have been used, field treatment time was increased by a median of 44.2% (mean 55.8%; S.D. 41.2%) by using OPI. The fraction of monitor units (fraction of the dose) to generate a satisfactory image was 10% median.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗