Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Thoma

Publications and source records attributed to F Thoma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

TATA-binding protein promotes the selective formation of UV-induced (6-4)-photoproducts and modulates DNA repair in the TATA box.

DNA-damage formation and repair are coupled to the structure and accessibility of DNA in chromatin. DNA damage may compromise protein binding, thereby affecting function. We have studied the effect of TATA-binding protein (TBP) on damage formation by ultraviolet light and on DNA repair by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair in yeast and in vitro. In vivo, selective and enhanced formation of (6-4)-photoproducts (6-4PPs) was found within the TATA boxes of the active SNR6 and GAL10 genes, engaged in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II, respectively. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) were generated at the edge and outside of the TATA boxes, and in the inactive promoters. The same selective and enhanced 6-4PP formation was observed in a TBP-TATA complex in vitro at sites where crystal structures revealed bent DNA. We conclude that similar DNA distortions occur in vivo when TBP is part of the initiation complexes. Repair analysis by photolyase revealed inhibition of CPD repair at the edge of the TATA box in the active SNR6 promoter in vitro, but not in the GAL10 TATA box or in the inactive SNR6 promoter. Nucleotide excision repair was not inhibited, but preferentially repaired the 6-4PPs. We conclude that TBP can remain bound to damaged promoters and that nucleotide excision repair is the predominant pathway to remove UV damage in active TATA boxes.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Nucleotide excision repair and photolyase preferentially repair the nontranscribed strand of RNA polymerase III-transcribed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A high-resolution primer extension technique was used to study the relationships between repair, transcription, and mutagenesis in RNA polymerase III transcribed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The in vivo repair of UV-induced DNA damage by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and by photoreactivation is shown to be preferential for the nontranscribed strand (NTS) of the SNR6 gene. This is in contrast to RNA polymerase II genes in which the NER is preferential for the transcribed strand (TS). The repair-strand bias observed in SNR6 was abolished by inactivation of transcription in a snr6Delta2 mutant, showing a contribution of RNA polymerase III transcription in this phenomenon. The same strand bias for NER (slow in TS, fast in NTS) was discovered in the SUP4 gene, but only outside of the intragenic promoter element (box A). Unexpectedly, the repair in the transcribed box A was similar on both strands. The strand specificity as well as the repair heterogeneity determined in the transcribed strand of the SUP4 gene, correlate well with the previously reported site- and strand-specific mutagenesis in this gene. These findings present a novel view regarding the relationships between DNA repair, mutagenesis, and transcription.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed1998

Site-specific repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in a positioned nucleosome by photolyase and T4 endonuclease V in vitro.

Since genomic DNA is folded into nucleosomes, and DNA damage is generated all over the genome, a central question is how DNA repair enzymes access DNA lesions and how they cope with nucleosomes. To investigate this topic, we used a reconstituted nucleosome (HISAT nucleosome) as a substrate to generate DNA lesions by UV light (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, CPDs), and DNA photolyase and T4 endonuclease V (T4-endoV) as repair enzymes. The HISAT nucleosome is positioned precisely and contains a long polypyrimidine region which allows one to monitor formation and repair of CPDs over three helical turns. Repair by photolyase and T4-endoV was inefficient in nucleosomes compared with repair in naked DNA. However, both enzymes showed a pronounced site-specific modulation of repair on the nucleosome surface. Removal of the histone tails did not substantially enhance repair efficiency nor alter the site specificity of repair. Although photolyase and T4-endoV are different enzymes with different mechanisms, they exhibited a similar site specificity in nucleosomes. This implies that the nucleosome structure has a decisive role in DNA repair by exerting a strong constraint on damage accessibility. These findings may serve as a model for damage recognition and repair by more complex repair mechanisms in chromatin.

DNA↗
PubMed1997

RNA polymerase II transcription inhibits DNA repair by photolyase in the transcribed strand of active yeast genes.

Yeast uses nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photolyase (photoreactivation) to repair cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) generated by ultraviolet light. In active genes, NER preferentially repairs the transcribed strand (TS). In contrast, we recently showed that photolyase preferentially repairs the non-transcribed strands (NTS) of the URA3 and HIS3 genes in minichromosomes. To test whether photoreactivation depends on transcription, repair of CPDs was investigated in the transcriptionally regulated GAL10 gene in a yeast strain deficient in NER [AMY3 (rad1Delta)]. In the active gene (cells grown in galactose), photoreactivation was fast in the NTS and slow in the TS demonstrating preferential repair of the NTS. In the inactive gene (cells grown in glucose), both strands were repaired at similar rates. This suggests that RNA polymerases II blocked at CPDs inhibit accessibility of CPDs to photolyase. In a strain in which both pathways are operational [W303-1a (RAD1)], no strand bias was observed either in the active or inactive gene, demonstrating that photoreactivation of the NTS compensates preferential repair of the TS by NER. Moreover, repair of the NTS was more quickly in the active gene than in the repressed gene indicating that transcription dependent disruption of chromatin facilitates repair of an active gene.

Chromatin↗
PubMed1997

Nucleosome structure and positioning modulate nucleotide excision repair in the non-transcribed strand of an active gene.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major pathway to remove pyrimidine dimers (PDs), a class of DNA lesions generated by ultraviolet light. Since folding of DNA into nucleosomes restricts its accessibility and since transcription and DNA repair require access to DNA, nucleosome structure and positioning as well as the transcriptional state may affect DNA repair. We recently determined the chromatin structure of the yeast URA3 gene at high resolution and found multiple positions of nucleosomes as well as strand- and site-specific variation in DNA accessibility to DNase I (internal protected regions). Here, the same high-resolution primer extension technique was used to investigate NER of PDs in the URA3 gene of a mini-chromosome in vivo. In the non-transcribed strand (NTS), fast repair correlates with PD locations in linker DNA and towards the 5' end of a positioned nucleosome. Slow repair correlates with the internal protected region of the nucleosome. This repair heterogeneity reflects a modulation of NER by positioned nucleosomes in the NTS. NER in the transcribed strand (TS) is fast, less heterogeneous and shows no correlation with chromatin structure. Apparently, transcription-coupled repair overrides chromatin modulation of NER in the TS. Heterogeneity in NER generated by chromatin structure on the NTS may contribute to heterogeneity in mutagenesis.

Aldose-Ketose Isomerases↗
PubMed1997

Chromatin structure modulates DNA repair by photolyase in vivo.

Yeast and many other organisms use nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photolyase in the presence of light (photoreactivation) to repair cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), a major class of DNA lesions generated by UV light. To study the role of photoreactivation at the chromatin level in vivo, we used yeast strains which contained minichromosomes (YRpTRURAP, YRpCS1) with well-characterized chromatin structures. The strains were either proficient (RAD1) or deficient (rad1 delta) in NER. In contrast to NER, photolyase rapidly repairs CPDs in non-nucleosomal regions, including promoters of active genes (URA3, HIS3, DED1) and in linker DNA between nucleosomes. CPDs in nucleosomes are much more resistant to photoreactivation. These results demonstrate a direct role of chromatin in modulation of a DNA repair process and an important role of photolyase in repair of damaged promoters with presumptive effects on gene regulation. In addition, photoreactivation provides an in vivo test for chromatin structure and stability. In active genes (URA3, HIS3), photolyase repairs the non-transcribed strand faster than the transcribed strand and can match fast removal of lesions from the transcribed strand by NER (transcription-coupled repair). Thus, the combination of both repair pathways ensures efficient repair of active genes.

Chromatin↗
PubMed1996

Modulation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation in a positioned nucleosome containing poly(dA.dT) tracts.

We have used a defined-sequence nucleosome to concomitantly investigate the generation and location of DNA lesions in nucleosomes and their influence on nucleosome positioning (translational and rotational setting). A 134 bp HISAT sequence from the yeast DED1 promoter, containing a polypyrimidine region (40 bp) with a T6-tract, two T5-tracts, and a T9-tract, was reconstituted in nucleosomes with a defined rotational setting. T-tracts adopt unusually rigid DNA structures in solution ("T-tract structure") and are hot spots of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) formation by UV light (254 nm). DNA was irradiated with UV light before or after reconstitution. The CPD yields and distribution were analyzed by cleavage with T4 endonuclease V. The rotational setting of nucleosomal DNA was characterized by DNase I digestion. With the exception of one T5-tract (1T5), the T6-, the 2T5-, and the T9-tracts formed T-tract structure in solution. T-tract structure was lost upon folding in nucleosomes, demonstrating a dominant constraint of DNA folding in nucleosomes over that of T-tract structure. CPD formation was strongly modulated by the nucleosome structure, but the CPD distribution differed from that reported for mixed-sequence DNA. CPD formation in the nucleosome had no effect on the rotational setting of nucleosomal DNA, but the rotational setting was affected when nucleosomes were assembled on damaged DNA. The toleration of DNA distortions imposed by CPDs in nucleosomes may have important implications for the recognition and repair of these damages in chromatin.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Chromatin structure of the yeast URA3 gene at high resolution provides insight into structure and positioning of nucleosomes in the chromosomal context.

To characterize nucleosome structure and positioning in the chromosomal context, the chromatin structure of the whole URA3 gene was studied in the genome and in a minichromosome by testing the accessibility of DNA to micrococcal nuclease and DNase I. The cutting patterns and hence the chromatin structures were almost indistinguishable in the genome and in the minichromosomes. The only notable exception was enhanced cutting between nucleosomes U3/U4 and U4/U5 in the minichromosomes. The results demonstrate that there is no severe constraint acting from outside the URA3 gene in chromosomes and minichromosomes. While low-resolution mapping showed six regions with a positioned nucleosome (U1 to U6), each region resolved in a complex pattern consistent with multiple overlapping positions. Some regions (U1, U4, U5 and U6) showed multiple positions with a dominant rotational setting (DNase I pattern), while U2 showed positioning within 10 bp but with no defined rotational setting, demonstrating that nucleosome positions were not in phase and not coordinately regulated. Reduced DNase I cutting from about 50 bp form the 5' end towards 3' end was common to all nucleosome regions. This polarity has been observed on isolated core particles. The results demonstrate that the DNase I pattern observed in vitro indeed reflects a structural property of nucleosomes in the chromosomal context. It is emphasized that despite the local heterogeneity revealed by high-resolution mapping, the low-resolution map is a reasonably accurate representation of the chromatin structure.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Inactivation of topoisomerases affects transcription-dependent chromatin transitions in rDNA but not in a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase II.

Previous studies on a chromatin reporter gene (GAL-URARIB) in yeast showed that nucleosomes were maintained but rearranged during transcription in galactose, which was consistent with local dissociation of histones at the site of the RNA polymerase. Furthermore, repositioning of nucleosomes occurred rapidly after glucose repression. Because nucleosomal disruption and transcription produce topological changes in the chromatin substrate, the effect of topoisomerase activity was tested by the insertion of GAL-URABIB in topoisomerase mutant strains. The chromatin structure was analysed by nuclease digestion and psoralen crosslinking, and compared with that of the rDNA locus. In GAL-URARIB, neither the inactivation of topoisomerases I, II or I and II generated nucleosomal loss during transcription, nor was topoisomerase activity required for repositioning of the nucleosomes after repression. In contrast, the inactivation of topoisomerase I promoted an enhanced psoralen accessibility of the transcribed rDNA, possibly because of altered supercoiling, and the inactivation of topoisomerases I and II disrupted the chromatin structure of the whole rDNA locus by redistribution of the nucleosomes. The inactivation of topoisomerase II alone had no effect. These observations substantiate a differential participation of topoisomerases in the modulation of the chromatin structures of rDNA genes and of a single copy polymerase II gene. It is suggested that topological stress in genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II might diffuse away into flanking regions.

Chromatin↗
PubMed1995

Reciprocal interferences between nucleosomal organization and transcriptional activity of the yeast SNR6 gene.

Recent work has demonstrated a repressive effect of chromatin on the transcription of the yeast SNR6 gene in vitro. Here, we show the relations between chromatin structure and transcriptional activity of this gene in vivo. Analysis of the SNR6 locus by micrococcal nuclease digestion showed a protection of the TATA box, nuclease-sensitive sites around the A and B blocks, and arrays of positioned nucleosomes in the flanking regions. Analysis of a transcriptionally silent SNR6 mutant containing a 2-bp deletion in the B block showed a loss of TATA-protection and rearrangement or destabilization of nucleosomes in the flanking regions. Hence, SNR6 organizes the chromatin structure in the whole region in a manner dependent on its transcriptional state. Transcriptional analysis was performed by use of maxi-gene SNR6 constructs introduced into histone-mutated strains. Chromatin disruption induced by histone H4 depletion stimulated the transcription of promoter-deficient, but not of wild-type SNR6 genes, revealing a competition between the formation of nucleosomes and the assembly of Pol III transcription complexes that was much in favor of transcription factors. On the other hand, amino-terminal mutations in histone H3 or H4 had no effect (H4) or only a moderate stimulatory effect (H3) on the transcription of promoter-deficient SNR6 genes.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Transcription through the yeast origin of replication ARS1 ends at the ABFI binding site and affects extrachromosomal maintenance of minichromosomes.

When the function of origins of replication in yeast was compromised by placing ARS sequences downstream of strong promoters, ARS activity might have been affected either by transcription or by an altered chromatin configuration induced by the construct. To distinguish between these possibilities, derivatives of the yeast TRP1ARS1 minichromosome were constructed that contained either the DED1 or the PET56 promoter firing against ARS1 (DEDARS and PETARS constructs). PETARS constructs transformed yeast at high frequencies and were maintained as minichromosomes consistent with efficient ARS1 function, but DEDARS constructs transformed at low frequencies and had to be rescued as minichromosomes by insertion of a second ARS (H4-ARS). Chromatin analysis revealed that the ARS1 regions in PETARS and H4-DEDARS constructs were indistinguishable from the ARS1 region of the host TRP1ARS1 circle showing a nuclease sensitive region flanked by a nucleosome. However, RNA-analysis in the ARS region showed high and low levels of transcripts in H4-DEDARS and PETARS, respectively. Transcription elongated through the A, B1, and B2 elements and ended in B3, the binding site for ABFI. We conclude that transcription through ARS1 and not an altered chromatin structure affected ARS activity in these constructs.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1994

Histone H1 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae binds to chromatin and affects survival, growth, transcription, and plasmid stability but does not change nucleosomal spacing.

Histone H1 is proposed to serve a structural role in nucleosomes and chromatin fibers, to affect the spacing of nucleosomes, and to act as a general repressor of transcription. To test these hypotheses, a gene coding for a sea urchin histone H1 was expressed from the inducible GAL1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of a YEp vector for high expression levels (strain YCL7) and a centromere vector for low expression levels (strain YCL1). The H1 protein was identified by its inducibility in galactose, its apparent molecular weight, and its solubility in 5% perchloric acid. When YCL7 was shifted from glucose to galactose for more than 40 h to achieve maximal levels of H1, H1 could be copurified in approximately stoichiometric amounts with core histones of Nonidet P-40-washed nuclei and with soluble chromatin fractionated on sucrose gradients. While S. cerevisiae tolerated the expression of low levels of H1 in YCL1 without an obvious phenotype, the expression of high levels of H1 correlated with greatly reduced survival, inhibition of growth, and increased plasmid loss but no obvious change in the nucleosomal repeat length. After an initial induction, RNA levels for GAL1 and H1 were drastically reduced, suggesting that H1 acts by the repression of galactose-induced genes. Similar effects, but to a lower extent, were observed when the C-terminal tail of H1 was expressed.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Chromatin transitions during activation and repression of galactose-regulated genes in yeast.

To study the fate of nucleosomes during transcription, a yeast gene 'GAL-URARIB' was constructed which is tightly regulated by the GAL1 promoter and shows in its inactive state a series of positioned nucleosomes that are sensitive for monitoring structural changes by micrococcal nuclease. Upon transcriptional activation, nucleosome positions were lost, but a residual nucleosomal repeat with an altered repeat length and no changes in psoralen accessibility measured by a band shift assay indicated that nucleosomes were present but rearranged on the transcribed gene. When chromatin was prepared 10 or 50 min after glucose repression, nucleosomes were repositioned in a large fraction of the population by a rapid process which most likely did not depend on histone synthesis or DNA replication. However, complete regeneration of the inactive structure and repeat length was observed after one cell generation (2.5 h) suggesting that in this step some missing histones were replaced. The results are consistent with a local dissociation of nucleosomes at the site of the polymerase followed by a rapid reassembly into nucleosomes behind it. The data are further supported by analysis of the chromosomal GAL1, GAL7 and GAL10 genes.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed1992

Transcription, nucleosome stability, and DNA repair in a yeast minichromosome.

The template strand of the URA3 gene in the minichromosome YRpTRURAP is repaired of UV-induced cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimers (PD) much more efficiently than the nontemplate strand in growth-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (Smerdon, M. J., and Thoma, F. (1990) Cell 61, 675). However, other regions of the plasmid are also efficiently repaired. We have examined the transcription and chromatin structure of these regions in growth-arrested cells to allow a more detailed comparison of transcription, nucleosome stability, and excision repair efficiency. Northern analysis, using strand-specific probes, indicates that four different transcripts are made from YRpTRURAP in addition to the URA3 mRNA in both growing and growth-arrested cells. The templates for these transcripts encompass all of the efficiently repaired regions outside of the URA3 gene. Nucleosome mapping indicates that the structure of the minichromosome in growth-arrested cells is indistinguishable from that of growing cells except for two nucleosomes in the region 500-800 base pairs 5' of the URA3 gene which become much less stable in growth-arrested cells. Comparison of the distribution of YRpTRURAP topoisomers in the two states, however, indicates that these nucleosomes are not lost from the majority of plasmid molecules. One of the four transcripts initiates in this region and increases by more than 5-fold in growth-arrested cells. Another transcript extends into a "slowly repaired" region which contains a very stable nucleosome. By determining the stability and relative amounts (at equilibrium) of the RNAs made from YRpTRURAP, transcription rates were determined and compared with the average PD repair rate for the different template regions. The results indicate that: 1) the rate of excision repair increases once a low, basal rate of transcription is achieved; 2) beyond this rate of transcription there is no simple correlation between the rates of transcription and PD repair; 3) nucleosome stability may "override" the coupling between transcription and repair if the transcription rate is low; and 4) at higher transcription rates, repair may be insensitive to nucleosome stability.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Species specific protein--DNA interactions may determine the chromatin units of genes in S.cerevisiae and in S.pombe.

Yeast genes, such as URA3, are chromatin units characterized by positioned nucleosomes and flanking nuclease sensitive regions (NSRs). To investigate the structural determinants at the chromatin level in vivo, the URA3 gene was dissected into three parts (U5', Umid and U3'), and the chromatin structures of the individual parts were analysed after insertion into minichromosomes and after chromatin assembly in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. While nucleosome positions were altered on Umid, the 5'-end and the 3'-end of URA3 maintained their native structures (a positioned nucleosome and a NSR each) independent of the site or orientation of insertion. This suggests that the chromatin unit of the native URA3 gene is dominated by strong protein boundaries at the 5'- and 3'-ends. In an alternative approach, we investigated whether nucleosome positions or NSRs were maintained when the whole URA3 gene was placed on a shuttle vector and assembled into chromatin by Schizosaccharomyces pombe providing different proteins, but the same nucleosomal spacing. In a complementary exchange experiment, the ade6 gene of S.pombe was shuttled to S.cerevisiae. In spite of a general conservation of histone proteins and nucleosome core structures, neither nucleosome positions nor NSRs were maintained in the heterologous background. The results demonstrate that chromatin structures are species specific and that the structural boundaries of yeast genes may be dominated by strong species specific protein-DNA interactions.

Chromatin↗