F Schliehe — Page 2 | Search PubMed

PubMedDate not supplied

[Expanding outpatient rehabilitation].

Up to now, the majority of rehabilitative measures in Germany has been performed in inpatient programmes. In the past 10 years an extension of outpatient rehabilitation can be noted. Because of new social welfare legislation the legal disadvantages for participants in outpatient rehabilitation have been eliminated on the 1st July 2001. In the past year, the Federal Rehabilitation Council as well as various rehabilitation providers have developed further and specified their concepts in outpatient rehabilitation. Concept requirements include still the principles of holism, interdisciplinarity, goal-oriented rehabilitation and team-work of rehabilitation staff. The extension of outpatient rehabilitation in the sphere of German pension insurance scheme is documented by the increase in models respectively regular services and rehabilitative measures. The results of the evaluation suggest, that the outpatient realisation of a comprehensive rehabilitation concept yields comparable results as the inpatient realisation. In some regions there is a strong cooperation between pension insurance institutes and corresponding health insurance companies in order to extend outpatient rehabilitation. A quality assurance program for outpatient rehabilitation will be developed. It can be expected, that the extension of outpatient rehabilitation goes on and that thereby the possibilities of a more flexible medical rehabilitation grow.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Evaluation of outpatient rehabilitation: goals, conceptual framework and study design of a health and pension insurance joint research project].

In Germany the statutory health and pension insurance schemes are the main providers of medical rehabilitation, the majority of rehabilitation measures being given in an inpatient setting. Over the last few years, the health and pension insurance schemes have strengthened the extension of outpatient rehabilitation, and have funded a comprehensive evaluation study in this context. In this evaluation study outpatient rehabilitation in centres with different conceptual backgrounds is compared with inpatient rehabilitation in rehab clinics, indications considered being cardiology and orthopaedics. Overall, 14 rehab centres and more than 2000 patients were included in the project. The patients were interviewed and medically examined before and after the measure. A follow-up was done after six and twelve months. In addition to the rehabilitants themselves, the rehab centre physicians as well as the office-practice physicians were interviewed about the outcome of the rehab measure. One year after rehabilitation, data were collected from the relevant health and pension insurance funds concerning the benefits the patients had received. Due to the study's non-experimental design, validity of the results is confined to rehabilitants participating on an outpatient basis and who had been found medically suited for this type of rehabilitation, were capable of travelling to the rehab centre on their own within less than 45 minutes and had voluntarily opted for the outpatient setting. The findings of the study show that outpatient rehabilitants' motivation and expectations differ from those found in inpatient rehabilitation. The health economics analysis performed is restricted to the costs involved in the rehabilitation measure as such as well as the health-related benefits provided to the rehabilitants in the twelve-month study period. The issue of whether increasing outpatient rehab measures will lead to decreasing costs in the rehab system as a whole had not been considered in the framework of this project.

Ambulatory Care↗