Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F M Muggia

Publications and source records attributed to F M Muggia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: analysis of toxicities and predictors of outcome.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is a new formulation with activity against epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). The authors sought to determine patient characteristics that may predict for response to this treatment and favorable time to failure as well as survival. METHODS: Eight patients in a Phase I study and 44 patients in two consecutive Phase II studies who were treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40-60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for the first two cycles and 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks thereafter) after failing initial platinum-based chemotherapies for ovarian carcinoma were analyzed. Associations were sought for response, time to failure (TTF), and survival after the treatment and various pretreatment characteristics. RESULTS: Treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin yielded 23% objective responses in measurable disease and 31% overall responses, including serum CA 125-defined responses. The median TTF was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.9 months) in all patients, and the median response duration in all responders was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval, 11.9-18.5 months). The overall median survival was 15 months (95% confidence interval, 11-40 months). The main predictive factors were tumor size and baseline hemoglobin level for TTF, and these plus Karnofsky performance status were the main predictive factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is an effective drug when it is given as secondary therapy to patients with EOC. Lack of bulky disease is the major predictor for a favorable response, TTF, and survival. The role of this treatment in combination with other effective drugs should be explored in both previously treated and untreated patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Liposomal encapsulated anthracyclines: new therapeutic horizons.

After two decades of work in liposomal formulations for clinical use, two preparations containing doxorubicin (Doxil, ALZA, Pablo Alto, CA; and Evacet, The Liposome Company, Princeton, NJ), and one containing daunorubicin (DaunoXome; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA) have been undergoing widespread clinical study. Results have lived up to the promise that liposomal encapsulation may lead to toxicity attenuation, while retaining or even enhancing the efficacy of the parent anthracyclines. The eventual role of these agents in clinical practice is being defined in a number of studies that are reviewed herein. Already, approved indications have been achieved for doxorubicin against Kaposi's sarcoma and ovarian cancers, and for daunorubicin against Kaposi's sarcoma. The three compounds vary widely in their pharmacology, and these differences may contribute to their preferential localization into certain tumors. Additional indications for these liposomal encapsulated anthracyclines are likely to be established in the ensuing years.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2001

Phase I and pharmacologic study of i.v. hydroxyurea infusion given with i.p. 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and leucovorin.

Preclinical data suggests that the action of fluoropyrimidines may be enhanced by the addition of hydroxyurea. We developed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of i.v. hydroxyurea (HU) in combination with i.p. 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) and leucovorin (LV). Eligible patients had metastatic carcinoma confined mostly to the peritoneal cavity, and adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Patients were treated with a fixed dose of FUdR (3 g) and LV (640 mg) administered on days 1--3. HU was administered as a 72-h infusion starting simultaneously with i.p. therapy on day 1. The following dose levels were studied: 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.6 g/m(2)/day. Pharmacokinetics were studied in blood and peritoneal fluid. Twenty-eight patients were accrued. Steady-state plasma and peritoneal fluid HU levels increased with increasing dose, and steady state was achieved within 12 h of continuous dosing. The steady-state HU plasma:peritoneal fluid concentration ratio ranged from 1.06 x 10(3) to 1.25 x 10(3) and the plasma HU clearance ranged from 4.63 to 5.81 l/h/m(2). Peritoneal fluid AUC = 137,639 +/- 43,914 microg/ml x min, t(1/2) = 100.9 +/- 56.4 min and Cl = 25.29 +/- 10.88 ml/min. Neutropenia represented the dose-limiting toxicity. We conclude that i.p. FUdR and LV in combination with i.v. HU is well tolerated. The addition of systemic HU increased the incidence of myelosuppression.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in advanced gynecologic cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) may have enhanced therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with the parent compound. This phase II study further evaluates the activity of Doxil in patients with ovarian cancer and explores activity in other gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were treated with Doxil 50 mg/m(2) infused over 1 h; 44 were evaluable. Forty-eight had epithelial ovarian cancer and all received prior treatment with cisplatin and paclitaxel: 27 received two to six prior regimens, 44 were platinum resistant, 21 patients had measurable disease, and 27 had evaluable disease only. RESULTS: The overall survival of these patients was 10 months (range, 0.25-33); progression-free survival was 3 months (range, 0.25-18). The response rate among those with measurable disease was 19%, with a median duration of 4.5 months (range, 3-12). The response rate of 22 patients with elevated CA-125 was 59%; median duration was 3.5 months (range, 1-12). Also, 27% achieved prolonged stabilization of disease for a median of 7 months (range, 5-18). Overall, treatment was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population. Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects were: 5 grade 3 stomatitis, 3 grade 3 skin, 1 each grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, 5 admits for infection, and no neutropenic fever; nausea and vomiting were uncommon in 204 cycles to ovarian cancer patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the activity of Doxil in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer and poor prognostic features and confirms the prolonged responses and favorable toxicity profile. Encouraging findings were also observed in the patients with nonovarian gynecologic cancers.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase II study of combination taxol and estramustine phosphate in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Taxol has activity in the treatment of high grade gliomas but estramustine phosphate (EMP) has not been used in this setting. In vitro data demonstrates that EMP is cytotoxic to glioma cell lines and estramustine binding proteins are expressed by glioma cells. The combination of Taxol and EMP is reported to be active in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and in taxane-resistant breast and ovarian cancer. We therefore performed a phase II study to assess the activity and toxicity of this combination in high grade gliomas. Taxol was given at a dose of 225 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours on day 1 and EMP was given at a dose of 900 mg/m2 orally on days 1 through 3. Cycles were repeated every three weeks. Twenty patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were enrolled: 11 male, median age 45 years. All patients received anti-epileptic medications and 17 (80%) had received prior chemotherapy. Of 18 evaluable patients, two had partial responses (11) and six had stable disease (33%) for a minimum of eight weeks. Treatment was well tolerated with grade 3 neutropenia occurring in only three patients. There were no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The median time to progression for the cohort was only six weeks (range 3-60+ weeks). The median overall survival was 12 weeks (range 3-60+ weeks). In conclusion, the combination of Taxol and EMP is well tolerated and has modest activity in the treatment of recurrent GBM.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I trial of paclitaxel and etoposide for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated doses of intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel for women with previously treated persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 during 24 hours and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days. The study was designed to escalate first the dose of etoposide, and then the dose of paclitaxel, in successive cohorts of patients. In an attempt to determine whether toxicity was affected by sequence of the drugs, the order of administration of the two drugs was reversed on alternate cycles. The starting doses of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2/24 hours) and etoposide (50 mg/m2/day x 3) caused severe neutropenia even with the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and the trial was amended to administer the paclitaxel during 3 hours. However, this also proved too myelosuppressive without growth factor support. Twenty-one women were treated. A complete response was observed in one of nine patients with measurable disease, and a major decrease in CA-125 was noted in two patients who did not have measurable disease. Because of the severe myelosuppression observed in most patients, dose reduction was often required after the first cycle. The power to detect sequence-dependent variation in toxicity was minimal; however, no large differences were observed. A combination of the usual doses of these drugs will be difficult to administer in patients who have received previous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase III randomized study of cisplatin versus paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal stage III or IV ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer receiving cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) or 24-hour infusion paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) or the combination of paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After stratification for disease measurability, patients were randomized to receive six cycles of one of the treatments every 3 weeks. If measurable, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was determined. RESULTS: Six hundred fourteen of 648 patients who entered onto the trial were eligible. Monotherapies were discontinued more frequently (cisplatin because of toxicity or patient refusal [17%], and paclitaxel because of progression [20%]) compared with the combination therapy (7% and 6%, respectively). Neutropenia, fever, and alopecia were more severe with paclitaxel-containing regimens; whereas anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity were more severe with cisplatin-containing regimens. The CR/PR rates on paclitaxel monotherapy were significantly lower compared with the cisplatin regimens (42% v 67%, respectively; P <.001). The relative hazard (RH) of first progression or death was significantly greater among those randomized to paclitaxel (RH = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 1.73; P <.001) when compared with cisplatin; however, RH did not differ significantly between the two cisplatin regimens (RH = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.895 to 1.30). Relative to cisplatin, the death rate on paclitaxel was 15% greater (RH = 1.15; 95% CI, 0. 929 to 1.42), and the death rate on the combination treatment was 1% less (RH = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.795 to 1.23). These differences among treatment groups were not statistically significant (P =.31). CONCLUSION: Cisplatin alone or in combination yielded superior response rates and PFS relative to paclitaxel. However, OS was similar in all three arms, and the combination therapy had a better toxicity profile. Therefore, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel remains the preferred initial treatment option.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase I study of AG 331, a novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This was a phase I study of AG 331 to determine systemic tolerance and pharmacokinetics following single and multiple escalating intravenous doses. METHODS: The study was an open-label phase I trial that was divided into two components. In phase IA (single dose), six dose levels from 12.5 to 225 mg/m2 were administered to 18 patients (3 at each dose level) and serial blood samples were collected for 72 h. Upon achieving satisfactory pharmacologic parameters, the multiple dosing component (phase IB) was initiated. Six dose levels from 50 to 800 mg/m2 per day were administered for 5 consecutive days to 18 patients. Pre- and postdose blood samples were obtained on days 1-4 and serial blood samples were collected over 24 h following dose 5. Nonhematologic and hepatic toxicities were assessed, serum AG 331 concentrations were measured and pharmacokinetic parameters determined. RESULTS: Other than fatigue, no severe toxicities were encountered in phase IA. Liver toxicity was manifested by elevations in transaminase first noted at multiple doses of 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. Fever and malaise but no myelosuppression were noted. The mean terminal t1/2 following single doses was significantly shorter than the t1/2 following multiple dosing (6.8 vs 9.9 h) and clearance was significantly faster following single doses than following multiple dosing (81.7 vs 30.4 l/h), but no significant difference in Vd was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-related toxicity profile precludes further clinical development at this time. The pharmacokinetics of AG 331 following single and multiple doses showed significant differences.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Complement activation by Cremophor EL as a possible contributor to hypersensitivity to paclitaxel: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients treated with the anticancer drug, paclitaxel (Taxol) often experience mild to severe hypersensitivity reactions. It is not known how these reactions are induced and whether the inducer is paclitaxel or its vehicle (i.e., Cremophor EL in 50% ethanol). Molecules present in Cremophor EL are similar in structure to certain nonionic block copolymers that activate complement proteins (i.e., proteins involved in various immune processes). To explore the role of complement in the observed hypersensitivity reactions, we studied the effects of paclitaxel and Cremophor EL plus ethanol on human complement in vitro. METHODS: Serum specimens from healthy individuals and cancer patients were incubated with paclitaxel or with relevant control compounds (Cremophor EL with ethanol, ethanol only, docetaxel, and cyclosporine), and markers of complement activation (SC5b-9 and Bb) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Similar incubations were performed in the presence of inhibitors of complement activation (i.e., EGTA/Mg2+ and soluble complement receptor type 1 [sCR1]). RESULTS: Paclitaxel in Cremophor EL plus ethanol caused increased formation of SC5b-9 in serum specimens from 10 of 10 healthy control subjects and from five of 10 cancer patients. Experiments with one or more individual sera indicated the above effect was due to Cremophor EL plus ethanol, that increased formation of Bb also occurred, that the drug-induced rise in SC5b-9 was inhibited by sCR1, and that EGTA/Mg2+ partially inhibited SC5b-9 formation and stimulated Bb formation. IMPLICATION: The role of complement activation in hypersensitivity reactions associated with administration of paclitaxel in Cremophor EL plus ethanol should be studied in vivo.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

Tomudex (ZD1694, NSC 639186) in platinum-pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Tomudex is a second-generation folate analogue that when polyglutamated is a potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase (TS). METHODS: Based on indications of antitumor activity in phase I trials, the Gynecologic Oncology Group initiated a phase II study of Tomudex 3 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, who had been pretreated with platinum drugs, and had subsequently recurred more than 6 months following such treatment. RESULTS: Of 30 patients entered into the trial, 2 were pathologically ineligible, leaving 28 fully evaluable. In this patient population, Tomudex was generally well tolerated, but only three objective (partial) responses were documented. CONCLUSIONS: With the level of activity seen, the drug was not considered for further clinical development in ovarian cancer by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. However, it may be worthwhile to explore whether quantitation of TS could lead to selection of patients more likely to respond to this TS inhibitor.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Camptothecins: a review of their development and schedules of administration.

Used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine, camptothecin was rediscovered in the 1950s during a search for compounds that could be used as a source for steroid synthesis. Due to its limited water solubility, a sodium salt was used in the early clinical trials. The severe toxicity and erratic absorption relegated this compound to the research laboratory until the 1980s when the topoisomerase enzyme was identified as the cellular target of camptothecin, the topoisomerase enzyme was found to be overexpressed in cancer cells and a structure-activity relationship was determined for camptothecin. These new developments brought the camptothecins back to the clinical setting for further testing. The various analogues that have been most studied to date include: irinotecan (CPT-11), and its derivative SN-38, topotecan, and 9-aminocamptothecin. Numerous trials have been conducted in an attempt to establish the efficacy in various tumour types, to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and to define the optimal schedule of administration. It seems that large doses of these drugs given on intermittent schedules are not effective. Our hypothesis is that the camptothecins require a prolonged schedule of administration given continuously at low doses or frequent intermittent dosing schedules to be most effective. With these schedules, normal haematopoietic cells and mucosal progenitor cells with low topoisomerase I levels may be spared, while efficacy is preserved.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

A phase II study of Doxil (liposomal doxorubicin): lack of activity in poor prognosis soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx, Doxil) delivers doxorubicin to a tumor, but has a vastly altered pharmacology and attenuated acute and chronic toxicities. Therefore, its efficacy in soft tissue sarcomas is worth exploring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas who had not failed prior doxorubicin were accrued into this phase II study. Patients were treated with Doxil at a dose of 50 mg/m2 every four weeks. RESULTS: No responses were seen but three patients were removed from study after only one cycle of treatment. Moreover, leiomyosarcoma was the most common histology and most patients had low grade, and bulky, disseminated tumors. Treatment was well tolerated with no episodes of grade 4 toxicity and only five episodes of grade 3 toxicities: two episodes of neutropenia and one each of stomatitis, dermatologic toxicity and nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Doxil's lack of activity in this study of patients with adult soft tissue sarcoma may be related to the poor prognostic features of our population. We confirm its favorable toxicity profile and suggest that additional studies be done in patients with other characteristics.

Adult↗