Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Kronenberg

Publications and source records attributed to F Kronenberg.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Use of complementary and alternative medicine among African-American and Hispanic women in New York City: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among African-American and Hispanic women residing in New York City, including use of specific treatments and practitioners, perceived effectiveness of CAM, and culturally specific words or expressions for CAM. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with two groups of African-American and two groups of Hispanic women (age 18-40 and 41-80) as preparation for the development of a quantitative instrument to assess the prevalence and determinants of CAM use among women of various ethnic backgrounds. Participants were recruited using a standard random digit dial procedure. RESULTS: The most commonly used CAM remedies were teas and herbs, vitamins and nutritional supplements, prayer and spiritual healing, meditation and relaxation techniques. Practitioners most frequently seen were chiropractors, herbalists, and acupuncturists. Use of alternative remedies and practitioners, particularly the latter, was most common among older women in both groups. Younger Hispanic women reported the most skepticism toward CAM, especially when it was used by relatives as a substitute for conventional medical care. Overall, these African-American and Hispanic women used CAM for a wide range of health conditions and for prevention. Few racial and ethnic differences emerged in patterns of CAM use for either self-care or treatment by practitioners, but there was a distinct age variation, especially in attitudes toward CAM.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Concentrations of the atherogenic Lp(a) are elevated in FH.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a complex in human plasma assembled from low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). High plasma concentrations of Lp(a) are a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in particular in patients with concomitant elevation of LDL. We have analysed for elevated Lp(a) levels in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), a condition caused by mutations in the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene and characterised by high LDL, xanthomatosis and premature CHD. To avoid possible confusion by the apo(a) gene which is the major quantitative trait locus controlling Lp(a) in the population at large, we used a sib pair approach based on genotype information for both the LDLR and the apo(a) gene. We analysed 367 family members of 30 South African and 30 French Canadian index patients with FH for LDLR mutations and for apo(a) genotype. Three lines of evidence showed a significant effect of FH on Lp(a) levels: (1) Lp(a) values were significantly higher in FH individuals compared to non-FH relatives (p < 0.001), although the distribution of apo(a) alleles was not different in the two groups; (2) comparison of Lp(a) concentrations in 28 sib pairs, identical by descent (i.b.d.) at the apo(a) locus but non-identical for LDLR status, extracted from this large sample demonstrated significantly elevated Lp(a) concentrations in sibs with FH (p < 0.001); (3) single i.b.d. apo(a) alleles were associated with significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations (p < 0.0001) in FH than non-FH family members. Variability in associated Lp(a) levels also depended on FH status and was highest when i.b.d. alleles were present in FH subjects and lowest when present in non-FH individuals. The study demonstrates that sib pair analysis makes it possible to detect the effect of a minor gene in the presence of the effect of a major gene. Given the interactive effect of elevated LDL and high Lp(a) on CHD risk our data suggest that elevated Lp(a) may add to the CHD risk in FH subjects.

Alleles↗
PubMed1998

Influence of hematocrit on the measurement of lipoproteins demonstrated by the example of lipoprotein(a).

BACKGROUND: The measurement of many parameters of human blood is usually performed in plasma or serum. Since lipoproteins or apolipoproteins, for example, are found almost exclusively in the plasma fraction after low-speed centrifugation, these parameters can be expected to be distributed in a different plasma volume depending on the hematocrit value. Therefore, the measured plasma levels might be relatively too low or too high in comparison to the whole blood concentrations in the case of abnormal hematocrit levels. The aim of our experiments was to evaluate the extent of differences between whole blood and plasma concentrations, taking as an example lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in hemodialysis patients with documented decreased hematocrit values. METHODS: Lp(a) was measured in plasma as well as whole blood of 15 hemodialysis patients with low hematocrit values (0.29 +/- 0.02) in comparison to 11 control subjects (0.45 +/- 0.04). RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were 27% higher in patients than in controls (19.7 vs. 15.5 mg/dl). The relative difference was twice as high (59%) when measured in whole blood (13.5 vs. 8.5 mg/dl). Similar relative differences were observed when whole blood concentrations of 125 hemodialysis patients and 256 controls were calculated with the formula [Lp(a)plasma * (1-hematocrit)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clearly demonstrate that hematocrit is a strong confounding variable of lipoprotein measurement in epidemiological studies when concentrations are measured in plasma, especially in cases of abnormal hematocrit values. Furthermore, studies investigating the longitudinal changes of lipoproteins should consider potential hematocrit changes.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗
PubMed1998

Homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen: metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular complications of chronic renal disease.

High plasma concentrations of homocysteine, lipoprotein(a) and fibrinogen are accompanied by an increased risk for cardiovascular complications in the general population. All three parameters are markedly elevated in patients with renal disease, a group with a high prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular complications. This review discusses these parameters in such patients in relation to the occurrence of atherosclerotic complications.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1998

Rapid activation of the complement system by cuprophane depends on complement component C4.

Hemodialysis with cuprophane dialyzer membranes promotes rapid activation of the complement system, which is thought to be mediated by the alternative pathway. Complete hereditary deficiency of complement C4, a classical pathway component, in two hemodialysis patients provided the opportunity to investigate a possible role of the classical pathway. In two hemodialysis patients with both C4 isotypes, C4A and C4B, and in one patient with C4B deficiency complement activation occurred immediately after the onset of hemodialysis, with peak levels of C3a and terminal complement complex (TCC) after ten to fifteen minutes. In patients with complete C4 deficiency, C3a and TCC remained unchanged for fifteen minutes and increased thereafter, reaching the highest level after thirty minutes. The leukocyte nadir was also delayed from fifteen to thirty minutes. In vitro incubation of normal, C4A- or C4B-deficient serum with cuprophane caused complement activation after fifteen minutes. In contrast, no activation was observed in sera of four C4-deficient patients. The addition of normal serum or purified human C4 restored the capacity for rapid complement activation. In one patient with severe immunoglobulin deficiency, C3a and TCC levels increased only moderately after 25 minutes of cuprophane dialysis. This patient's serum also exhibited delayed complement activation in vitro, which was normalized after pretreatment of cuprophane with immunoglobulins. Preincubation of normal serum with MgEGTA, a blocker of the classical pathway, inhibited rapid complement activation through cuprophane. As basal levels of C4a are markedly increased in hemodialysis patients (3450 +/- 850 ng/ml) compared to healthy controls (224 +/- 81 ng/ml), no further elevation of C4a was detectable during cuprophane hemodialysis. Incubation of normal serum with cuprophane, however, caused a slight increase in C4a after five minutes. These results indicate that the initial deposition of complement C3b on the cuprophane membrane, necessary for activation of the amplification loop of the alternative pathway, is mediated by the classical pathway C3-convertase C4b2a. We propose an extended concept of complement activation through cuprophane, which is based on four steps: (a) binding of anti-polysaccharide antibodies, (b) classical pathway activation, (c) alternative pathway activation and (d) terminal pathway activation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Association of serum lipoprotein(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism with target-organ damage in arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and other plasma lipids and apolipoproteins and target-organ damage (TOD) in patients with arterial hypertension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a case series. SETTING: University medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Lipoprotein(a) and apolipoproteins were analyzed in 277 untreated patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and in 102 healthy controls. Apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes were additionally analyzed in an independent sample set of 106 hypertensive and 105 control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Staging of TOD obtained according to World Health Organization guidelines by clinical evaluation, and laboratory tests including measurments of creatinine clearance, proteinuria, ophthalmoscopy, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and ultrasound examination of major arteries; levels of lipids, apolipoproteins, Lp(a), fibrinogen, and apo(a) phenotypes. RESULTS: Blood pressure, duration of hypertension, and levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, Lp(a), and fibrinogen were significantly related to the presence and severity of TOD in univariate analysis. Stepwise multivariate analysis showed Lp(a) levels (P<.001) to be the best discriminator of the presence of TOD, followed by systolic blood pressure (P<.001), duration of hypertension (P=.01), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=.04). The Lp(a) levels were related to TOD independent of the level of blood pressure. We confirmed this association between Lp(a) concentrations and severity of TOD in a second independent sample set and observed a significantly higher frequency of low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms with increasing severity of TOD (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Lipoprotein(a) and apo(a) phenotype are sensitive indicators of the severity of TOD in patients with essential hypertension, and their evaluation might permit identification of hypertensive subjects liable to the development of organ damage. The higher frequency of low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms in patients with TOD demonstrates a genetically determined risk for the development of TOD in hypertensive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Increased plasma concentrations of LDL-unbound apo(a) in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and its characteristic glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] are risk factors for atherosclerosis in the general population. Patients with renal disease show an elevation of Lp(a). Recent studies have described an arteriovenous difference of Lp(a) in the renovascular bed as well as the plasma-derived fragmented LDL-unbound apo(a) in urine, suggesting that the kidney is involved in the metabolism of Lp(a). We therefore investigated whether patients with chronic renal failure have higher levels of LDL-unbound apo(a) and whether this could account for the increased Lp(a) concentrations in these patients. In addition, we studied the possible generation of apo(a) fragments in vitro by mimicking uremic plasma conditions and by investigating the assembly of Lp(a) in cell culture experiments. Patients treated by hemodialysis (N = 185) and by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD; N = 20) had markedly elevated absolute (1.22 +/- 1.55 mg/dl and 2.14 +/- 2.86 mg/dl) as well as relative (7.5% and 7.3%) amounts of LDL-unbound apo(a) in comparison to controls (0.46 +/- 0.48 mg/dl or 4.5%). Following renal transplantation the absolute amount decreased significantly. Lp(a) plasma concentration was the most important determining variable for the absolute amount of LDL-unbound apo(a) and showed a positive correlation in both hemodialysis patients (r = 0.85) and controls (r = 0.92). In vitro experiments demonstrated that "uremization" of plasma samples did not generate a higher amount of LDL-unbound apo(a). Although LDL of renal patients has different chemical and structural properties as compared to control LDL, the extracellular assembly of Lp(a) did not differ between patients and controls. Therefore, the higher amounts of LDL-unbound apo(a) found in renal disease are not caused by an impaired assembly of Lp(a), but rather indicate a catabolic role of the kidney for LDL-unbound apo(a) as was already shown for Lp(a). Despite a small contribution, these elevated levels cannot explain the higher Lp(a) values found in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

LDL-unbound apolipoprotein(a) and carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients.

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations, which are genetically determined by apo(a) size polymorphism, are directly associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who show an enormous prevalence of cardiovascular disease, have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a). In recent studies we were able to show that apo(a) size polymorphism is a better predictor for carotid atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients than concentrations of Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Less than 5% of apo(a) in plasma exists in a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-unbound form. This "free" apo(a) consists mainly of disintegrated apo(a) molecules of different molecular weight, ranging from about 125 to 360 kDa. LDL-unbound apo(a) molecules are elevated in patients with ESRD. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether the LDL-unbound form of apo(a) contributes to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in a group of 153 hemodialysis patients. The absolute amount of LDL-unbound apo(a) showed a trend to increasing values with the degree of carotid atherosclerosis, but the correlation of Lp(a) plasma concentrations with atherosclerosis was more pronounced. In multivariate analysis the two variables were related to neither the presence nor the degree of atherosclerosis. Instead, the apo(a) phenotype took the place of Lp(a) and LDL-unbound apo(a). After adjustment for other variables, the odds ratio for carotid atherosclerosis in patients with a low molecular weight apo(a) phenotype was about 5 (p<0.01). This indicates a strong association between the apo(a) phenotype and the prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis. Finally, multivariate regression analysis revealed age, angina pectoris and the apo(a) phenotype as the only significant predictors of the degree of atherosclerosis in these patients. In summary, it seems that LDL-unbound apo(a) levels do not contribute to the prediction of carotid atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. However, this does not mean that "free", mainly disintegrated, apo(a) has no atherogenic potential.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Apolipoprotein B, fibrinogen, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes predict coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients.

Patients with end-stage renal disease have a markedly elevated risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Lipids and most lipoproteins, however, seem to be not predictive for CAD in these patients. Although there is clear evidence that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is significantly elevated in these patients, no study with a sufficiently large group of hemodialysis patients has investigated the relationship between CAD and Lp(a), as well as the genetically determined apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype. This cross-sectional study determines the prevalence of CAD in relation to the cardiovascular risk profile in an unselected population of 607 hemodialysis patients, of which 33% were diabetic patients. Twenty-six percent (n = 158) of all patients suffered from CAD as diagnosed by a definitive myocardial infarction (n = 102) and/or at least one stenosis >50% of a coronary artery (n = 143). In univariate analysis, several classic risk factors, including the concentration of lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and fibrinogen, correlated with CAD. Lp(a) in patients with CAD showed only a tendency to higher levels, without reaching significance, compared with patients without CAD (26.6 +/- 30.8 mg/dl versus 22.1 +/- 30.4 mg/dl, P = 0.10). The frequency of low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms, however, was significantly greater in the group with CAD (34.8% versus 23.6%, P < 0.01). Stepwise logistic regression analysis found seven variables associated with CAD: apolipoprotein B, the low molecular weight apo(a) phenotype, male sex, age, fibrinogen, diabetes mellitus, and HDL cholesterol. The association of these variables with CAD differed depending on age. These results indicate that, besides classic risk factors such as age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, additional factors of the lipoprotein and fibrinolytic system contribute to the high prevalence of CAD in hemodialysis patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in serum and urine: correlation with renal expression of ICAM-1 in patients with kidney disease.

A soluble form of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) has been described in serum and other body fluids. In order to determine whether sICAM-1 in serum and urine is a useful marker of inflammatory activity in kidney diseases we measured sICAM-1 in serum and urine of fifty patients who underwent renal biopsy, and of twenty healthy individuals. Expression of ICAM-1 on proximal tubular epithelial cells was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Soluble ICAM-1 in serum did not differ between patients and controls (354 +/- 129 ng/ml vs. 305 +/- 52 ng/ml). By multiple regression analysis sICAM-1 correlated with tubular expression of ICAM-1 (p < 0.01), but not with serum creatinine, infiltrating leukocytes, urinary ICAM-1 or proteinuria. In healthy controls mean urinary ICAM-1/cr was 2.5 +/- 3.0 ng/mg creatinine and differed significantly from that of patients (14.5 +/- 14.9 ng/mg) (p < 0.005). Patients with minimal-change disease had the highest uICAM-1 levels. The ratio of urinary ICAM-1 and proteinuria was remarkably constant in all patients with 6.0 +/- 0.9 ng/mg. By multiple regression analysis uICAM-1/cr correlated with proteinuria/cr (p < 0.001) and sICAM-1 (p < 0.005). These data show that sICAM-1 does to some degree reflect ICAM-1 expression in the kidney, whereas uICAM-1 is derived from glomerular filtration and closely parallels proteinuria. Both sICAM-1 and uICAM-1 are not useful to estimate ICAM-1 expression and inflammatory activity in the kidney.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed1997

Renovascular arteriovenous differences in Lp[a] plasma concentrations suggest removal of Lp[a] from the renal circulation.

High plasma concentrations of lipoprotein[a] (Lp[a]) are considered a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerosis. Lp[a] is produced by the liver. The site(s) and mechanism(s) of catabolism are presently unclear. Lp[a] is elevated secondary to end-stage renal disease which suggests a direct or indirect role of the kidney in the metabolism of Lp[a]. We therefore investigated, by a simple in vivo approach, whether Lp[a] is removed by the human kidney. Lp[a] plasma concentrations were measured simultaneously by various methods in the ascending aorta and renal vein of 100 patients undergoing coronary angiography or coronary angioplasty. Lp[a] levels differed significantly between the two vessels even after correcting for hemoconcentration (20.1 +/- 21.6 mg/dL versus 18.7 +/- 20.3 mg/dL, P < 0.001). This corresponds to a mean arteriovenous difference of -1.4 mg/ dL or -9% of the arterial concentration. No Lp[a] or intact apo[a] could be detected in urine from healthy probands. Although we cannot assign the kidney a regulatory role for Lp[a] plasma levels in humans with normal renal function, we conclude from our data that substantial amounts of this atherogenic lipoprotein are taken up by the kidney. The underlying mechanisms are unknown at the moment. This study therefore demonstrates for the first time that the human kidney plays an active role in the catabolism of Lp[a]. This may explain the elevated Lp[a] concentrations found in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Cellular uptake of lipoprotein[a] by mouse embryonic fibroblasts via the LDL receptor and the LDL receptor-related protein.

The sites and precise mechanisms of the catabolism of the atherogenic lipoprotein[a] (Lp[a]) are unknown. It has been proposed that the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) and the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) are involved in the catabolism of Lp[a]. To address the question whether and to what extent the LDL-R and/or LRP are involved in the catabolism of Lp[a], we studied the cellular uptake of Lp[a] via those two receptors using mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cell lines lacking either the LDL-R, the LRP, or both receptors due to disruption of the respective mouse genes. 125I-labeled LDL and 125I-labeled Lp[a] uptake by wild-type fibroblasts (MEF1) was compared with that by fibroblasts homozygous for the disrupted LRP allele (MEF2), fibroblasts with two defective alleles for the LDL-R (MEF3), and fibroblasts homozygous for defects both in the LDL-R and LRP gene (MEF4). Compared with MEF1, 125I-labeled LDL uptake by MEF2 was 77%, by MEF3 30%, and by MEF4 24% of that by MEF1. However, no significant differences in the specific 125I-labeled Lp[a] uptake by the four mouse embryonic cell lines was observed. In comparison with MEF1, the 125I-labeled Lp[a] uptake by MEF2 was 98%, by MEF3 111%, and 73% by MEF4. Approximately 50% of the total cellular uptake of 125I-labeled Lp[a] was nonspecific. In conclusion, our results suggest that Lp[a] is a poor ligand for the LDL receptor and the LRP. The data of the displacement studies, however, indicated that the nonspecific uptake of Lp[a] constitutes a major route for the cellular Lp[a] catabolism in this study.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1996

Complement C4 phenotypes in patients with end-stage renal disease.

The phenotypes of complement C4 were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis in 130 patients with end-stage renal failure of various causes and compared with those of 140 healthy controls. C4 allotype frequencies did not differ between patients and controls. Null alleles of both isotypes C4A and C4B were increased, but also without reaching significance. In type 1 diabetics an increased frequency of C4AQ0 (25 vs. 11.8%, p < 0.05) was found. Patients with two null alleles were far more frequent in the group with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (25 vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). We confirmed the presence of a previously described uremic variant of C4B1. Additional uremic variants of C4 were detected in uremic patients homozygous for C4A3, B2 and B3. The relative electrophoretic migration values of the uremic variants of C4A3, B1, B2 and B3 were 132.1 +/- 2.9, 35.8 +/- 1.5, 70.4 and 73.9. These variants appear early in the course of chronic renal failure and disappear after successful renal transplantation. Uremic variants are the only acquired C4 phenotypes known so far. How uremia causes these variants remains unclear, but probably involves carbamylation of the C4 molecule.

Alleles↗
PubMed1996

Lp(a) levels and atherosclerotic vascular disease in a sample of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia sharing the same gene defect.

There is considerable variation in the severity of cardiovascular disease among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Some reports have suggested that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels may explain such variation and that FH subjects deficient in LDL receptors, especially those with coronary heart disease, tend to have elevated Lp(a) levels. We have investigated the possible role of the LDL receptor in determining plasma Lp(a) levels in genetically homogeneous FH population and the contribution of Lp(a) to cardiovascular risk. A total of 98 FH subjects and 66 healthy first- and second-degree relatives from 30 families with FH due to the French-Canadian > 10-kilobase deletion of the LDL receptor gene were studied. A reference group of 392 normolipidemic French-Canadian participants in a Heart Health Survey was used for comparison. FH subjects were subdivided into subsets of 63 individuals free from atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) and 35 individuals with AVD. A complete cardiovascular evaluation was performed, and plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and Lp(a) levels were measured in all subjects in the absence of medication. Apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] phenotype was determined in 112 of FH and non-FH subjects. The log-transformed values for plasma Lp(a) were not significantly different among the three groups: 0.98 +/- 0.54 (mean +/- SD) in FH subjects with AVD, 0.89 +/- 0.51 in FH subjects without AVD, and 0.82 +/- 0.64 in their relatives. The distribution of the apo(a) phenotypes did not differ between the FH and non-FH groups. Comparison of two age- and sex-matched subgroups of FH subjects, with and without AVD, failed to show any differences in Lp(a) level. However, mean Lp(a) log values in the reference group (n = 392) were significantly lower than values obtained for the total FH group (0.79 +/- 0.57 versus 0.92 +/- 0.52, respectively; P < .05) but were not different from those of the unaffected family members. Thus, in our sample, the LDL receptor appears not to influence plasma Lp(a) levels; rather, these levels reflect shared apo(a) genes. The cardiovascular risk in this group of subjects with FH was related to age, male sex, total and LDL cholesterol, and higher apoB but not Lp(a) levels.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Lipoprotein(a) in stored plasma samples and the ravages of time. Why epidemiological studies might fail.

Prospective case-control studies investigating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a risk factor for atherosclerosis have measured Lp(a) in samples stored frozen up to nearly 20 years. We therefore prospectively examined the influence of long-term plasma sample storage on measured values, depending on the molecular weight of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Apo(a) phenotyping was performed in 310 plasma samples, and Lp(a) was measured after 3 and 28 months of storage at -80 degrees C. The values of both measurements correlated significantly for both low- and high-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes (r = .97 and r = .98, respectively, P < .001). Nevertheless, we detected on average a small decrease of 4.83% from mean +/- SD (median) 21.24 +/- 23.54 (11.10) mg/dL to 20.02 +/- 21.72 (10.55) mg/dL, which was statistically significant (P < .001). The absolute and relative Lp(a) decrease over time became larger with a decreasing number of kringle IV repeats of apo(a) (P < .05), and Lp(a) decreased markedly more in subjects with low-molecular-weight compared with those with high-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms (-3.26 versus -0.46 mg/dL, P < .05). More than 70% of the absolute Lp(a) decrease in the total sample was caused by samples with low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms, which represented only 27% of the sample. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) isoforms are reportedly more frequent in patients with atherothrombotic disease compared with control subjects. Measurement of Lp(a) in several-year-old frozen samples is therefore likely to result in a preferential decrease and false lower Lp(a) concentrations in patient groups compared with control groups. The negative results of some prospective studies with retrospective measurement of Lp(a) may be caused by such an artifact.

Arteriosclerosis↗
PubMed1996

Apolipoprotein(a) kringle IV repeat number predicts risk for coronary heart disease.

A high plasma concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been suggested as a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), but some recent prospective studies have questioned the significance of Lp(a). Lp(a) concentrations are determined to a large extent by the hypervariable apo(a) gene locus on chromosome 6q2.7, which contains a variable number of identical tandemly arranged transcribed kringle IV type 2 repeats. The number of these repeats correlates inversely with plasma Lp(a) concentration. We analyzed whether apo(a) gene variation (kringle IV repeat number) is associated with CHD. Apo(a) genotypes were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis/genomic blotting in CHD patients who had undergone angiography (n = 69) and control subjects matched for age, sex, and ethnicity (n = 69) and were related to Lp(a) concentration, apo(a) isoform in plasma, and disease status. Apo(a) alleles with a low kringle IV copy number ( < 22) and high Lp(a) concentration were significantly more frequent in the CHD group (P < .001), whereas large nonexpressed alleles were more frequent in control subjects. The odds ratio for CHD increased continuously with a decreasing number of kringle IV repeats and ranged from 0.3 in individuals with > 25 kringle IV repeats on both alleles to 4.6 in those with < 20 repeats on at least one allele. This provides direct genetic evidence that variation at the apo(a) gene locus, which determines Lp(a) levels, is also a determinant of CHD risk.

Alleles↗