Methylphenidate effective in treating amphetamine abusers with no other psychiatric disorder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F J Baylé.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Impulsivity has been found to be an important trait of personality, whose consequences are not always negative although available questionnaires focused on its 'dysfunctional' aspect. METHOD: Dickman's Functional and Dysfunctional Impulsivity questionnaire has been translated into French, and filled out by students. The tetrachoric correlation matrices were factor analysed. RESULTS: The psychometric properties are very close to those of the English version, and we recovered both factors in males and females. The factor similarities between the genders (in our sample) and between the languages (English vs. French) are very good. The Dysfunctional scale is correlated with the Motor Impulsivity subscale of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and both scales are grossly independent from Spielberger's Trait-Anxiety Inventory. CONCLUSION: Our results support a two-factor solution similar to the English one. Nevertheless, the validity of the functional factor remains to be investigated in further studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Since reports have underscored that panic attacks (PA) may be an identifiable state occurring in schizophrenia, we studied the symptomatology of PA in a group of schizophrenic patients. Of 40 patients (21 males and 19 females) attending a clinic for maintenance therapy of schizophrenia, 19 (36.8%) had a lifetime history of PA. Seven among those 19 patients (36.8%) had or had had spontaneous panic attacks, not related to phobic fears or delusional fears, and for the 12 remaining patients, the PA were related to paranoid ideas. Moreover, the paranoid subtype of schizophrenia tends to be more often associated with a history of panic attack than other subtypes of schizophrenia (52.6% vs 23.8%; chi2 = 3.5, P =.06). It seems that there are at least two types of PA in schizophrenic patients. The first one could be independent from the psychotic feature, with no psychopathological link. The second kind of PA could be directly related to a schizophrenic disorder, and found in patients with the paranoid subtype.
OBJECTIVE: The authors compared impulsivity, sensation seeking, and anhedonia in a group of schizophrenic patients with and without lifetime substance abuse or dependence. METHOD: Patients (N=100) with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (per DSM-III-R criteria) were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview's section on psychoactive substance use disorder, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Barratt Impulsivity Scale, the Zuckerman Seeking Sensation Scale, and the Chapman Physical Anhedonia Scale. RESULTS: The mean scores for impulsivity and sensation seeking were higher in the group with substance abuse (N=41) than in the group without substance abuse (N=59). No significant difference between groups was found regarding physical anhedonia. CONCLUSIONS: As in the general population, high levels of impulsivity and sensation seeking are associated with substance abuse in patients with schizophrenia.
Though the concept of impulsiveness is controversial, there are many attempts being made to measure this dimension. In this context, only psychometric measures are widely considered valid and are routinely in use. Barratt developed the first scale that specifically measured impulsiveness. Subsequently, various refinements have improved the validity of results. We have translated, without any significant problems, the tenth validated version of this scale (BIS 10) into French, and we have completed a factorial analysis. The scale was coupled with a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess anxiety. A sample of 280 subjects between the ages of 18 and 79 years (average age, 36.9) were recruited from the general population. Subject age was found to have a weak but nevertheless significant correlation with the impulsiveness rating. A principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in the first 9 factors explaining 55.6% of the variance. Another PCA of these factors allowed the identification of a second tier of 3 second order factors; these were closely related to Barratt's ranking. Our study confirms results from the scale's initial analysis--results which could not be subsequently reproduced. To our knowledge, this is the first French translation of an instrument that specifically measures impulsiveness and the first in which a factorial structure has been tested in the general population.
Particular features are involved in the atypical antipsychotic concept: efficacity on refractory patients and negative symptoms, less or no extrapyramidal side effects, less tardive dyskinesia and less increase in prolactinemia. The imprecision of the atypical neuroleptic class must be underlined. In fact, the pharmacological agents who are included in this class potentially induce few neurological side effects. These effects appearing in doses very much higher than in the therapeutical range. In this case, atypical should refer to a particularity in the links between doses, efficacy and side effects more than to a definition in a specific category. Dopaminergic hypothesis is explained more and more by a dopaminergic system dysregulation than by a simple dopaminergic hyperactivity. This dysregulation might be autonomous or linked to other monoaminergic systems. These new antipsychotics show affinity for different monoaminergic receptors. After clozapine, several agents are now available (risperidone) or just about to be (olanzapine, seroquel, sertindole, ziprasidone, zotépine). Therapeutical effects are probably linked with a dual antagonist effects on 5HT2 and D2 receptors. The atypical antipsychotic efficacy on negative symptoms remains controversial. While very few patients are found to be "purely" negative, most of the schizophrenic patients will show sooner or later some negative symptoms mixed with positive ones. The obvious difficulties in methodological and clinical evaluation of negative symptoms are at least dual: depressive symptoms; extrapyramidal side effects. Secondary negative symptoms usually don't last, while primary negative symptoms are more permanent. Kraepelin describes them as the avolutionnal syndrome of dementia praecox. Usually negative symptoms improve during therapeutic trials, including those using classical neuroleptics. This should not lead us to the conclusion that we have today at our disposal pharmacological agents effective on avolutionnal syndrome or primary negative symptoms. More studies are still necessary. Similarities and differences between the new antipsychotic are not yet evaluated, except partly for clozapine and risperidone. Some new neuroleptics might simplify greatly the therapeutic range. Studies concerning risperidone clearly prove its efficacity on a daily dose of 6 +/- 2 mg. A daily dose of 10 mg doesn't bring any additional improvement. This aspect must be underlined while the efficacy-dose ratio of the classical neuroleptics are still questioned. Consequently too many patients might be given insufficient doses and others excessive doses resulting in side effects and no additional benefits. These new antipsychotics must add a positive modification in schizophrenic care. They might lead to a limited use of additional therapeutics and a better observance thus allowing less relapses and less rehospitalisations.
Depressive syndromes are very frequent in drug-addicted patients. Their study is particularly difficult on account of the toxic intake which disturbs the clinical analysis. Methadone has improved our understanding of these pathologies. In fact, methadone permits treatment of some depressive disorders typically linked to addiction, such as a motivational symptoms and depressive mood following intoxication. It brings to the fore the other mood disorders which are often associated with drug intake.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
For schizophrenic disorders, the clinical conception of "acute state" is widely used in clinical settings to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic programs as well as epidemiological studies. Schizophrenic-specific symptomatology modification, need for hospitalization, significant change in care, disturbances in social behavior or suicide attempts were all used to define acute schizophrenic state. The decision to hospitalize is frequently used to define acute state but refers to multiple factors such as mood disorder, suicide attempts, drug abuse or social and environmental problems. Indeed, several and distinct definitions in a criteria basis form are available but no one has reached consensus. Because recognition of acute schizophrenic state remains based on the subjective clinician's advice, epidemiological and therapeutic studies fail in validity and reliability. The aim of the study was to evaluate how a population of French psychiatrists define criteria and therapeutic targets of acute schizophrenic state in their clinical practice. Psychiatrists filled out a self administered interview. At the time the interview was given, clinicians were notified that they were participating in a clinical consensus survey about schizophrenia. Six major indicators for acute state definition based on the literature data were proposed: general schizophrenic symptomatology modification (depression, anxiety, agitation, impulsivity/aggressiveness), specific schizophrenic symptomatology modification (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganization), need for hospitalization, significant change in care, disturbance in social behavior and lastly, suicidal behavior. Minimal duration (1.2 or 4 weeks) of general and specific schizophrenic symptomatology modification required to define acute state were evaluated. The booklet included the 30 PANSS symptoms listed with their definitions. Among this symptom list, clinicians were instructed to select the ten criteria which they estimated best defined the acute state, followed by the ten most important target symptoms to be treated. Out of 2,369 questionnaires, 1,584 were collected on time (66.9%). Among the six majors indicators proposed to define acute state 75% of psychiatrists considered 1 to 3 criteria. Three were more frequently rated, including core schizophrenic symptomatology disturbance (68.4%), general schizophrenic symptomatology disturbance (68.0%) and suicidal behavior (64.9%). The other criteria were rated as follows: need for hospitalization (26.8%), significant change in care (18.3%), and disturbance in social behavior (29.1%). For 53.2% of psychiatrists the definition of acute state requires the presence of specific schizophrenic symptomatology for a minimal duration of one week. Two weeks with general symptomatology was required for 45.5% of psychiatrists to define acute state. Symptoms more often rated within the four first choices for acute state definition included delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior and excitement. Except for grandiosity, all the PANSS positive subscale items were chosen to be included in the definition (delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, suspiciousness/persecution and hostility). Four items, including anxiety, depression, uncontrolled hostility, inner tension from the general psychopathology subscale were chosen as part of the ten most important criteria to define acute state. On the PANSS negative subscale (blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor relationships, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity/flow of conversation and stereotyped thinking), no item was rated to be included in the acute state definition. The highest rated symptoms among the four first choices for treatment included delusions, hallucinatory behavior, excitement and anxiety. The ten most important criteria for treatment were the same as for acute state definition with differences in frequency. Excited state, depression and suspiciousness/persecution were more rated for treatment than definition whereas delusion, hostility and conceptual disorganization were less rated as treatment target than definition criteria. In clinical practice, recognition of acute schizophrenic state is underscored by the association of specific schizophrenic symptomatology (positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganization) and general symptomatology (impulsivity/aggressiveness, anxiety, depression, agitation) of schizophrenia. For most clinicians, acute state definition requires specific symptom for a minimum of one week and other non-specific indicators such as suicidal behaviour have to be taken into account. With regard to PANSS criteria, most positive schizophrenic symptoms and some general schizophrenic symptoms are necessary for definition and designated as treatment priorities. Negative symptoms were not taken into account. Hallucinatory behavior is the first symptom rated in definition and is considered by psychiatrists as the absolute therapeutic priority. This survey could be a first step in the construction of an operational and consensual definition. This definition is strongly needed as a valid measurement in therapeutic and epidemiological outcome studies, which remain at least partly based on clinician subjective judgment.
In 1974, rapid cycling bipolar disorder has been defined by Dunner and Fieve as four or more episodes of depression or mania per year. Twenty year later, this definition appeared for the first line in an international classification of mental disorders in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The rapid cycling phenomenon has been since studied with new adapted modified criteria taking into account different duration of affective episodes which characterise rapid cycling. Rapid cycling is associated with a low prophylactic efficacy of lithium and often represents a difficult approach for the clinician. Clinical aspects, influence of antidepressants associated with acceleration of cycles and possible therapeutic trials including non pharmaceutical treatment are discussed.
Medical information for the general public, patients and their families is a current Public Health priority. What information can be given to a patient suffering from schizophrenia, whose understanding and judgement capacities are supposedly affected by this mental disease? In the United States, 70% of psychiatrists inform patients of schizophrenia and diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder, while in Japan less than 30% do this. The lack of information given to the general public on the disease may contribute to reinforcing the difficulty in announcing the diagnosis. Indeed, the beliefs and attitudes of the patient, his/her family, the general population and health carers concerning the disease do not match up. However, the first two years seem to be a main issue for the subsequent evolution of the disease. No specific data on the attitude of French clinicians with respect to the announcement of the diagnosis is available. In the current legal context and in view of the advances in treatment, we have carried out a survey among French psychiatrists. It is an auto-questionnaire, transversal epidemiological, descriptive and analytical. The questionnaire was sent to a population of 12,958 psychiatrists. It comprised 48 questions: 7 referred to the socio-demographic and professional characteristics of the subjects, 22 to the attitude with respect to the announcement of the diagnosis to the patients, and the last 18 concerned the attitude with respect to the announcement of the diagnosis to the families. 1,691 questionnaires were returned by free post and analysed. The socio-demographic characteristics of the sample are close to those of French psychiatrists as a whole. The number of patients suffering from schizophrenia in the active files of the psychiatrists is 24% (+/- 21.4) on the entire sample. Approximately a third (37.8%) of psychiatrists deem it necessary to announce the schizophrenia diagnosis and approximately two thirds (69.5%) declare that they sometimes announce it. Among the patients suffering from schizophrenia in the active files of the psychiatrists who responded, approximately a third (34%) were informed of their diagnosis. The main reasons for not announcing the diagnosis are firstly the "reticence to give a diagnosis label" and secondly "the functional incapacity of the patient to understand the concept". The alternative diagnosis term most commonly used is "psychosis" (46.5%). However, 48.1% of practitioners state that the announcement of a specific diagnosis allows a better therapeutic combination. Depending on the proportion of patients suffering from schizophrenia in their active file presented in two categories (< 10% and > 10%), psychiatrists significantly most frequently announce the specific diagnosis (17.3% vs 25.3%, p < 10(-3). A statistically significant proportion of younger psychiatrists (44.4 vs 46.3, p < 10(-3) with fewer years of practice (14.1 vs 15.8), more often believe that it is necessary to announce the diagnosis. The rate of response (13.5%) for this type of survey seems high, which could indicate a high interest among psychiatrists with respect to this question. Our data showed the existence of a correlation between age, number of years in practice, type of practice and the proportion of patients suffering from schizophrenia in the active file on the one hand and the attitude of the psychiatrists with respect to the announcement of the diagnosis on the other hand. It is possible that the multi-disciplinary team work of public practice psychiatrists and the fact that they are more often confronted with schizophrenic disease facilitate the announcement of this diagnosis. In the survey population, the inability to give a diagnosis may be related to the questions of the practitioners about the capacity of the subjects to understand, the lack of precision of this diagnosis, the fear of disheartening the patients and the absence of curative treatment. The risk of suicide does not seem to be one
The concept of addiction is now of interest in psychiatry, but is a great subject of controversies. It is now recognized that as different disorders as alcoholism, drug addiction, bulimia, kleptomania, trichotillomania, pathological gambling are to be considered as addictive states. Other pathological behaviours could be included in the addictive spectrum (i.e. suicidal behaviours, compulsive spending). The comorbidity rates of these disorder are elevated in these populations. For example, high comorbidity rates are found between kleptomania and bulimia or drug addiction and pathological gambling. Polyaddictive states are well established. For some subjects, more than one addiction is present in life-time, but not occurring in the same period. We present three patients in whom different addictive states occurred alternately. All the patients had a history of compulsive spending and kleptomania, two of them had a history of bulimia and sexual compulsion. Some clinical characteristics were common: recurrent mood disorder, depression preceeding the addictive state, no psychoactive substance disorder. In all patients, severity of depressive state decreased when addiction appeared. Depressive symptoms varied inversely to addiction severity. The hypothesis about psychopathological links between kleptomania and bulimia on one hand and mood disorders on the other hand has been known for a long time. Kleptomania as other impulsive disorders is, for some authors, understood in the meaning of a "spectrum affective disorder". For these three patients, an antidepressant effect of the behavioural addictions is suggested. In fact, the addictions appeared alternately. The possibility of common psychopathological and/or biological mechanisms for behavioural addiction is supported by these clinical observations, that could contribute to the addiction concept validity.
Difficulties in anxiety treatment is emphasized by benzodiazepine use and misuse. Pathological anxiety threshold can be understood in a dimensional perspective or by large in philosophical considerations. Therapeutic guidelines can be defined on the length of disease or by a categorical and nosological approach. Actually, this one appears more efficient. Numerous studies lead to better selection of psychotropics for each disorders (panic disorder; general anxiety disorder; social phobia; obsessive-compulsive disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder). Therapeutic choice is under others conditions such as length of prescription, severity of the disorders; comorbidity; individual feature to patient. Improvement in therapeutic efficacy needs further studies. Some directions could be: better definition of disorders and their link with personality, appreciation of intensity and chronicity, biological parameters.