Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F H Jurden

Publications and source records attributed to F H Jurden.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Factorial equivalence of the Wechsler Memory Scale: revised across standardization and clinical samples.

A two-phased analysis of the WMS-R is reported In the first phase, confirmatory factor analyses of the WMS-R standardization sample were conducted in order to identify a baseline model against which to compare two large samples of substance abusers These analyses revealed that most of the exploratory factor models reported in the literature were plausible representations of the WMS-R, however, a three-factor oblique model representing Attention/Concentration, Verbal Memory, and Visual Memory emerged as the best fitting model In the second phase, we conducted multi-sample factor analyses to test the generality of this model in two large samples of inpatients at an addiction recovery unit The results revealed that the factor loadings, subtest error variances (reliabilities), factor variances, and factor covariances were identical across groups Thus the factor structure of the WMS-R appears to be unaltered in these clinical groups Researchers may thus make meaningful comparisons of the dimensions indexed by the WMS-R between normal samples and neuropsychological groups with diffuse pathology.

Journal Article↗

Age differences in memory-span errors: speed or inhibitory mechanisms?

This study investigated age differences in errors on the digit-span task. Protocols of 119 men and women, aged 18-99 years, were scored for the occurrence of three types of errors derived from the speed-of-processing and inhibition-deficit frameworks: omission errors, intrusion errors, and transposition errors. The types of errors made on the digit-span task varied with span size. At larger span sizes, participants were more likely to omit digits or introduce nonstimulus digits than to transpose those in storage. No age differences in intrusion errors were found, however, old-old women (75+ years) were significantly more likely than young (18-25 years) and old (60-70 years) adults of either sex to exhibit transposition errors. Consequently, old-old women were significantly less likely to exhibit omission errors. The results indicate that the digit-span task may involve two parallel processes: digit storage/recall and serial/position storage-recall. Age differences in the serial-processing component, rather than in the digit storage/recall component, may be age sensitive. These results are discussed within an inhibition-deficit framework of cognitive aging.

Adolescent↗