Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F G Zeng

Publications and source records attributed to F G Zeng.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination.

The growth of loudness of a tone burst following an intense forward masker was measured as a function of the tone level. The level of the forward-masked tone was adjusted to balance the loudness of a standard tone presented without a forward masker, using a 2AFC, double-staircase, tracking procedure. The forward masker was a 90-dB SPL, 100-ms, 1000-Hz pure tone. The standard tone and the masked tone were both 25-ms, 1000-Hz pure tones. The forward masker and the masked tone were always presented in the first interval. With a 100-ms delay between them, there was little or no threshold elevation for the masked tone. However, the masker caused the masked tone to sound louder than it would if it had not been masked, a phenomenon termed "loudness enhancement" [Irwin and Zwislocki, Percept. Psychophys. 10, 189-192 (1971); Galambos et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1127-1130 (1972)]. In addition, the present results show a nonmonotonic enhancement function that the forward masker introduced a 10-16-dB enhancement effect for tones of 40-65 dB SPL and no significant effect for the 30 and 90 dB SPL tones. The loudness variability in forward masking was estimated from the upper and lower sequences tracking the 21% and the 79% louder response levels on the psychometric function, respectively. The variability demonstrated a similar nonmonotonic function. In forward masking loudness grows more steeply at low-medium sensation levels, and merges with normal growth at high levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation.

Binaural loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation is obtained in auditory brainstem implant listeners who had substantial acoustic hearing in one ear. The data are well described by a linear relationship between acoustic decibels and electric microamps. Based upon this linear relationship, we propose an exponential model of loudness growth in electric stimulation. The exponential model predicts that the loudness growth function can be determined solely by the threshold and the uncomfortable loudness level in electric stimulation. This prediction is consistent with previous psychophysical data on loudness functions. Implications of this finding for speech processor designs are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Intensity discrimination in forward masking.

A nonmonotonic intensity discrimination function was recently reported in which a midlevel hump occurred for 25-ms sinusoidal standards ranging from 20 to 100 dB SPL and presented 100 ms after an intense narrow-band noise forward masker [F.-G. Zeng et al., Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. This paper provides additional data on how the midlevel hump is affected by three factors of forward masking: signal delay, masker level, and frequency. Specifically, just-noticeable differences (jnd's) in intensity were obtained at signal delays of 50, 200, and 400 ms. Results show that at the midlevels the forward-masked intensity jnd's did not recover to their unmasked values, even at the 400-ms signal delay. The longer the signal delay, the smaller this midlevel hump. This slow recovery of the midlevel jnd's is consistent with the finding that low-spontaneous rate (SR) neurons have a slow recovery from forward masking [E. M. Relkin and J. R. Doucet, Hear. Res. 55, 215-222 (1991)]. The large midlevel effect decreased sharply as masker level was reduced from 90 to 60 dB SPL, and disappeared for masker levels less than 40 dB SPL. A frequency selectivity effect for the large midlevel jnd effect was also observed, as maskers with frequency components 2 to 3 oct away from the signal frequency did not affect the jnd's. Overall, the present data are consistent with the hypothesis of Zeng et al. (1991) that low-SR neurons are involved in the midlevel hump of intensity discrimination in forward masking.

Adult↗

Frequency discrimination in forward and backward masking.

Frequency difference limens for pure tones preceded by a forward masker or followed by a backward masker were obtained across a wide range of signal levels. Relkin and Doucet [Hear. Res. 55, 215-222 (1991)] have shown that at a masker-signal delay of 100 ms, the thresholds of high-SR (spontaneous rate) auditory-nerve fibers are recovered, while the low-SR fiber thresholds are not. Therefore, forward-masked frequency discrimination potentially offers a method to investigate the role of low-SR fibers in the coding of frequency. It has been shown that when an intense forward masker is presented 100 ms before a pure-tone signal, intensity difference limens are elevated for mid-level signals [Zeng et al., Hear. Res. 55, 223-230 (1991)]. However, Plack and Viemeister [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3097-3101 (1992)] have shown that a similar elevation in the intensity difference limen is obtained under conditions of backward masking, where selective adaptation of the auditory neurons would not be expected to occur. A condition of backward-masked frequency discrimination was therefore included to investigate the role of interference resulting from adding additional stimuli to a discrimination task. For signals at 1000 and 6000 Hz, there was no effect of a forward masker upon frequency difference limens. For the backward-masked conditions, an elevation of the frequency difference limen was observed at all signal levels, demonstrating that the effects of forward and backward maskers upon frequency discrimination are dissimilar and suggesting that cognitive effects are present in backward-masked discrimination tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Auditory Perception↗

Recovery from prior stimulation. II: Effects upon intensity discrimination.

We obtained just-noticeable differences (jnds) for the intensity of pure tones following a forward masker. The masker was a 100-ms burst of narrow-band noise centered at 1000 Hz presented at 90 dB SPL; the pure-tone signal was at 1000 Hz and was 25 ms in duration. The masker-signal delay was 100 ms. Under these conditions, there is no threshold shift for the detection of the pure-tone signal following the forward masker. In contrast with the absence of a forward-masker effect upon detection thresholds, unusually large midlevel (40-60 dB SPL) jnds were observed. These large midlevel jnds were measured as a function of signal delay, revealing that they are not completely recovered to the normal (unmasked) values by 400 ms. We interpret these data as a consequence of the slower recovery of low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons following prior stimulation (Relkin and Doucet, 1990). These experiments may therefore provide psychophysical evidence that the low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons are a necessary physiological component in the coding of the large dynamic range for intensity. In addition, the present data provide evidence that the assumption that the effect of forward masking is limited to 100-200 ms is inappropriate, as this recovery time does not necessarily apply to suprathreshold tasks.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Binaural loudness matches in unilaterally impaired listeners.

Binaural loudness matching data using a 21FC adaptive procedure were obtained in high-frequency, unilateral cochlear-impaired listeners. The matches were obtained at frequencies where both ears had similarly normal thresholds, and also at other frequencies where the impaired ear had various degrees of hearing loss. In these listeners, one presumed difference between the ears is the limited or altered spread of excitation in the impaired ear. In agreement with previous studies using other approaches (Hellman, 1974, 1978; Hellman & Meiselman, 1986; Moore, Glasberg, Hess & Birchall, 1985; Schneider & Parker, 1987), the results of the present study suggest that both the range and the slope of loudness growth function are not dependent on the spread of excitation, but instead are related primarily to the degree of threshold elevation at the test frequency. Following this suggestion, a spread-of-excitation-independent model, based upon a group of neurons with the same characteristic frequency (CF) but different thresholds, is proposed to account for loudness growth in both normal and recruitment cases. In particular, it is shown quantitatively that a compressed distribution of thresholds due to threshold elevation may be responsible for loudness recruitment in sensorineural hearing loss.

Adult↗

Recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sufficient perceptual cues used in the recognition of four voiceless fricative consonants [s, f, theta, integral of] followed by the same vowel [i:] in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adult listeners. Subjects identified the four CV speech tokens in a closed-set response task across a range of presentation levels. Fricative syllables were either produced by a human speaker in the natural stimulus set, or generated by a computer program in the synthetic stimulus set. By comparing conditions in which the subjects were presented with equivalent degrees of audibility for individual fricatives, it was possible to isolate the factor of lack of audibility from that of loss of suprathreshold discriminability. Results indicate that (a) the friction burst portion may serve as a sufficient cue for correct recognition of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing subjects, whereas the more intense CV transition portion, though it may not be necessary, can also assist these subjects to distinguish place information, particularly at low presentation levels; (b) hearing-impaired subjects achieved close-to-normal recognition performance when given equivalent degrees of audibility of the frication cue, but they obtained poorer-than-normal performance if only given equivalent degrees of audibility of the transition cue; (c) the difficulty that hearing-impaired subjects have in perceiving fricatives under normal circumstances may be due to two factors: the lack of audibility of the frication cue and the loss of discriminability of the transition cue.

Adult↗

Cochlear implants in China.

China has approximately 6 million totally deaf people according to an official survey conducted in 1990, although the actual number is probably higher. A primary cause of deafness is the use of ototoxic drugs. There does not appear to be any emergent deaf culture in China at present. As the only available medical device that can restore partial hearing to a totally deaf person, the cochlear implant has been in development in China since 1979. This paper provides an overview of cochlear implants in China and is based on a review of published materials, visits to research institutes and hospitals, and personal communication with Chinese colleagues. As of 1993, about 1,000 deaf people, including 50 children below age 12 years, have received four types of single-electrode cochlear implants that were developed and fabricated by institutions in China. These single-electrode devices have provided an aid to lip reading, but are no longer in use due to their inability to produce open-set speech recognition. Present implant research in China focuses on development of multi-electrode devices. Basic research in electrical stimulation is relatively lacking and standardized audiological evaluation for cochlear implant effectiveness needs to be developed. The present economic growth and legal system reform in China, combined with advances in implant technology, may make it possible to produce an affordable yet effective cochlear implant system. This paper discusses cochlear implants only in China, but the social and economic factors are similar in many developing countries in Asia, South America, Eastern Europe, and Africa, where a low-cost, high-performance cochlear implant system is also needed.

Child↗