Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F F Foldes

Publications and source records attributed to F F Foldes.

120 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Comparison of methotrimeprazine and meperidine as components of balanced anesthesia.

Methotrimeprazine (MTM) (0.5 mg/kg) and meperidine (1.5 mg/kg) was administered to four groups of 10 patients each. Two of these groups (I and II) received MTM or meperidine 12 minutes before, two other groups (III and IV), 3 minutes after, induction of thiopental anesthesia. N2O-O2 was administered after thiopental induction, and fractional doses of meperidine and muscle relaxants were used as required for maintenance of anesthesia. The preliminary administration of MTM or meperidine decreased the induction dose of thiopental by about 60 percent. When administered before thiopental, both had similar effects on heart rate, but whereas MTM moderately decreased, meperidine moderately increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure MTM had little or no effect on respiratory rate, which was significantly depressed by meperidine. When given after an induction dose of thiopental, the circulatory effects of MTM and meperidine were similar. Respiratory measurements were little affected by MTM but were markedly depressed by meperidine. The mug/kg/min maintenance doses of meperidine were about the same in the four groups. Postanesthetic recovery of consciousness was delayed in the two MTM groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was less in the MTM than in the meperidine groups. MTM appears to have several advantages over meperidine as a component of balanced anesthesia, but is not desirable if rapid postanesthetic recovery or early ambulation is important. Its use is indicated in patients in whom even transient respiratory depression is undesirable and in those in whom prolonged postoperative sedation is desired.

Adolescent↗

Interaction of muscle relaxants and local anesthetics at the neuromuscular junction.

The effects on neuromuscular (NM) function of combinations of relaxants (d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, and succinylcholine) and local anesthetics (cocaine, procaine, lidocaine, etidocaine, and a quaternized derivative of procaine, procaine methobromide) were investigated using the rat's phrenic nerve--hemidiaphragm preparation. Combinations of ineffective concentrations of NM blocking agents with ineffective concentrations of local anesthetics caused a greater than 90% NM block. Preliminary administration of ineffective concentrations of local anesthetics significantly ( p less than 0.001) decreased the ED50 of NM blocking agents. The administration of ineffective concentrations of NM blocking agents caused a similar decrease of the ED50 of local anesthetics. Concentrations of d-tubocurarine and pancuronium which alone produced partial NM block had additive effects. These findings suggest that the interaction of NM blocking agents and local anesthetics consists of true potentiation caused by the different sites of action of the two types of compounds at the NM junction. The degree of potentiation may be enough to cause clinically significant NM block in patients who at the same time receive high enough doses of both agents. In vitro the NM block caused by the combinations of local anesthetics and NM blocking agents can be reversed by 4-aminopyridine.

Anesthetics, Local↗

In vitro comparison of the neuromuscular antinicotinic and intestinal antimuscarinic effects of different nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.

The postsynaptic antimuscarinic properties of different nondepolarizing muscle relaxants were compared with their postsynaptic antinicotinic effect. d-Tubocurarine, pipecuronium and vecuronium were the most selective antagonists on postsynaptic nicotinic receptors. Gallamine, diadonium and Duador (RGH-4201) had relatively greater effect on postsynaptic muscarinic receptors. Therefore, much less side effect is expected to occur when pipecuronium, d-tubocurarine or vecuronium are used.

Animals↗

Mutual potentiation of the neuromuscular effects of antibiotics and relaxants.

The interaction of d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, or succinylcholine with neomycin, streptomycin, or polymyxin B was investigated using a rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparation. All neuromuscular blocking agents (relaxants) mutually potentiated the neuromuscular blocking action of one another; combinations of ineffective concentrations of relaxants and antibiotics caused an 82 to 98% neuromuscular block. This extensive potentiation of the neuromuscular effects of relaxants by antibiotics can be attributed to the fact that antibiotics not only have a curare-like stabilizing effect on the postjunctional membrane, but also decrease presynaptic acetylcholine release. Neostigmine (0.25 microgram/ml) only partially antagonized the neuromuscular block caused by the various drug combinations. In contrast, 4 microgram/ml of 4-aminopyridine returned the twitch tension, depressed by combined administration of relaxants and antibiotics, to or above control values except in the case of neuromuscular block caused by the combinations of succinylcholine and polymyxin B.

Aminopyridines↗