Management of early inflammatory arthritis. Intervention with immunomodulatory agents: monoclonal antibody therapy.
Over the last three years there has been a dramatic rise in the number of trials using monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. So far, the numbers of patients treated in the individual studies have been small, and the study designs not comparable. All these trials have been conducted in a non-blinded, uncontrolled fashion. The patient populations tended to represent the severe end of the disease spectrum, being usually individuals for whom all other conventional and sometimes even unconventional experimental therapeutic approaches have failed. Clearly, therefore, larger controlled double blind studies in patients with less advanced stages of rheumatoid arthritis are needed. In the trials thus far, long-standing diseases afflicting the joints, usually with severe destruction, have frequently made clinical evaluation very difficult. Moreover, apparently with the exception of one or two reagents (16H5 and possibly B-F5) routine laboratory parameters which are helpful in determining disease activity such as CRP or the rheumatoid factor usually remain unaltered with anti-T cell therapy. In addition, in some individuals there was no clinical improvement despite sometimes severe CD4 cell depletion. The notion that the mere depletion of CD4+ cells is not sufficient to permanently suppress disease activity in autoimmune disease is further supported by studies carried out by Conolly and Wofsy in 1990. In a mouse lupus model, these investigators demonstrated that a small subpopulation of CD4+ T cells may be refractory to depletion by anti-CD4 and may be able to promote the full expression of the disease. Similar mechanisms could apply to certain individuals with human autoimmune disorders. Many additional questions remain open. The most important of these is which markers identify clinical responders to therapy. Attempts to correlate clinical response to the level of T cell depletion, modulation of the target antigens or in vitro functional assays so far have not yielded significant results. Other questions relate to the frequency of antibody administration and the amounts needed to permanently suppress disease activity. The initial hope based on animal experiments of inducing a permanent tolerance to certain antigens by anti-CD4 treatment has been clearly shown not to apply to rheumatoid arthritis. Even though there are individual variations, the efficacy of anti-T cell treatment tends to wear off after 3 or even 1 month, necessitating retreatment. Protocols will have to be designed for either longer treatment periods, repeated courses or more frequent single administrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)