Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Ducrocq

Publications and source records attributed to F Ducrocq.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Directed forgetting in PTSD: a comparative study versus normal controls.

The most characteristic feature of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is the reexperiencing syndrome. The patient's memory seems to be fixed on the traumatic event, which may be due to disturbance of the autobiographic memory. To retrieve memories, others have to be inhibited. These inhibition mechanisms have been studied using the Directed Forgetting Paradigm, which measures the capacity to forget recently processed information and to retain the relevant information. Our hypothesis is that during PTSD, the memory is saturated with traumatic memories, so that the patients are no longer able to use the inhibitory processes. Therefore, during a Directed Forgetting Task (DFT) in which words "to remember" and words "to forget" are given, PTSD patients cannot inhibit the words "to forget", and so recall more words than the controls. We studied 30 patients with PTSD and compared them with 30 healthy controls, using DFT. The results show that the patients remembered significantly fewer words overall, and fewer of the words "to remember" than the controls, both for immediate and final recall. Our results are in favor of a reduction in directed forgetting in patients suffering from PTSD, resulting in difficulty in inhibiting irrelevant information from the overall information. There seems to be a deficit in the inhibitory processes in the memory in PTSD.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Cyclic oro-alimentary disorders].

Eating behaviours have been changing in our society for at least twenty years. Thus, they represent a good indicator of the functioning of a society or a person. Beyond these recent sociocultural variations, recent clinical and research data, particularly in chronobiology, showed clearly the influence of hormonal or seasonal changes in our eating behaviours. Actually, we observed that an important proportion of these cyclic turmoils can fit into other phenomena and cyclic pathologies: premenstrual syndrome, seasonal affective disorders, bipolar disorders, binge eating.

Bipolar Disorder↗
PubMed1981

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

History, Modern 1601-↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[From the biology of trauma to secondary preventive pharmalogical measures for post-traumatic stress disorders].

Of all the psychological complications that an individual is likely to present with when confronted with an exceptional event, the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is characterized by being progressive, frequent, invalidating, strongly associated with comorbidity, and having the tendency to become chronic if it is not detected clinically. By definition, it is threatening and produces an intense fear reaction. The traumatic event is a situation of extreme stress, not only capable of altering the physical and psychological homeostasis of the individual, but is also recognized as determinant in the aetiopathology of complications. The intensity of this distress can be identified clinically and physiologically, and is currently considered as an important risk factor for the development of PTSD later on, together with other pre-, peri- and post-traumatic factors. In fact, the most studied field is the therapeutic approach, in particular drug treatment, of the fully-constituted disorder, although this actually represents tertiary prevention. Even though primary prevention seems to concern Medicine very little, any prospect of performing secondary prevention should begin by rapid identification of the risk or vulnerability factors and should allow a population at risk from developing complications to be defined. Its potential therapeutic impact brings together psychotherapeutic and drug treatment, since it is only this combination that seems able to allow the most favourable clinical outcome to be achieved for an individual, who is confronted by an out-of-the-ordinary event. The aims of secondary prevention strategies are, for example, to reduce the incidence of acute PTSD in patients seen following the event. The benefits for the individual and for the society can easily be measured in terms of the consequences on his/her social, professional and family life, or in terms of cost. The usefulness of this prevention can also be measured by the possible ways that other conditions, comorbid to PTSD, are controlled, such as anxiety disorders, depression and substance abuse, for example. Secondary prevention strategies may also be aimed at determining the therapeutic impact, by preventing or moderating the appearance of an acute stress, or even by contributing in avoiding the onset of chronic PTSD. Psychopharmacology of the immediate and post-immediate disorders, however, remains a field which has been studied very little. Reduction or control of the high, prolonged level of hyperarousal phenomena or hypersensitization of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis, would contribute to the comfort of the individual, and would participate in the prevention of PTSD. Based on current knowledge of the neurobiology of trauma, we look into the existing and potential pharmacological possibilities. Even though benzodiazepines tend to have an important role, knowledge of other drugs and therapeutic groups is rapidly increasing. In this review, we will see that the efficacy of anti-adrenergic drugs and certain other anxiolytics is now well-documented, this opening the door to their use in the future. Other drug groups offer interesting, well-proven approaches, such as serotoninergic drugs, CRF or NPY antagonists, NMDA antagonists, anticonvulsants or other GABAergic agents. In view of this disorder, which represents a true public health problem, we consider that it is now possible to widen the horizons of our drug therapy, in combination with any necessary psychotherapeutic treatment, to reach the heart of the traumatic event, that often upsets the victims, both by the psychological suffering it induces, and the loss of his/her social, family and professional references and support structures.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Depression and sexual disorders].

Nowadays, we talk more and more often about sexual disorders, and depression in one of the possible etiologies of them. Depression could lead to sexual disorders or induce them indirectly. Paradoxically, depression treatments, such as tricyclic antidepressant or SSRI could induce this kind of disorder. Tianeptine, the only molecule representative of this pharmacological class, has proved its good acceptability on the libido, as shown by the results of a meta-analysis. The respect of the sexual function is essential to obtain a good observance of the antidepressant treatment.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Post-traumatic stress, post-traumatic depression and major depressive episode: literature].

Although they are likely to add their effects, physical and psychic traumata (or traumas) can provoke in different ways the appearance of depressive symptoms sometimes common. Post-traumatic depression, reactional depression, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder represent different clinical and nosographic disorders in despite of their occasionally common symptomatic core. Historically, it is interesting to note during the XXth century the true semantic change of the terms of trauma from the somatic field to the psychic sphere. Physical traumatism is often represented by a material shock for the subject and by its organic consequences. It is defined as an event that leaves its mark which itself inflicts and handicaps the vital trajectory of the subject. It primarily comprises brain and rachis injuries, whose evolution is frequently characterized by the occurrence/appearance of a depressive disorder, whose genesis rests on psychological but also neurobiologic and physical arguments. Thus major depressive disorders are often present in the course of various physical traumatisms mainly related to nervous system. In accordance with several studies, the prevalence of major depressive disorders ranges from 25% to 50%. These mood disorders occur in the year which follows the accidental event. Their average time of revelation is estimated at four months and their average duration lies between three and six months. Lastly, although these depressive illnesses present clinical symptoms comparable with those observed in other contexts, some nuances can be raised. Nonetheless, they confine sometimes with true clinical forms depending on the intensity, the form, the circumstances or the consequences of the trauma. Psychic traumatism doesn't have the same profile and rests for much dedicated with the reexperiencing. Thus for some authors, depression illness represents a disorder that occurs after a traumatic event whereas others see a differential diagnosis which exludes or which represents a comorbidity with post-traumatic stress disorder. The review of the literature allows us to emphasize the complexity of the links as well as the clinical and epidemiologic differences between stress disorder and major depressive disorder. From the clinical point of view, the major features of PTSD are articulated around a triad of symptoms. They include the reexperiencing symptoms of the traumatic event such as intrusive memories and recurrent nightmares, the protective reactions such as avoidance of the stimuli associated with the trauma and emotional numbing, and the arousal symptoms such as the startled response and hypervigilance. The complexity of this syndrom is due to the frequent combination of these symptoms with other nonspecific ones. As far as the mood is concerned (the mood symptoms are concerned), the regrouping of some of these symptoms allows the clinician to sometimes releave a depressive symptomatology without being able to assess the DSM diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Epidemiologic studies dealing with the risk of installation of a PTSD after a traumatic event reveal differences in the prevalence depending on the nature of the traumatic events: ranging from 1% in general population to 80% following some situations of extreme and durable psychic suffering. Between both poles, one finds a prevalence ranging between 20 and 50% following other events such as serious accidents, natural disasters or criminal assaults. The clinical features of depressive episodes comorbid or associated with PTSD have some characteristics making it possible to individualize various clinical forms as a function of traumatic event type: asthenic, characterial or with somatic symptoms. According to the majority of authors, the co-occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder is high although differential diagnosis is sometimes difficult. However, conceptual differences remain and two conceptions are distinguished. For some authors, like Bleich and Shalev, there would not be true chronological evolution from PTSD to MDD. Moreover the presence of symptoms considered as pertaining to the mood register within the criteria of PTSD would be clearly predictive of the occurrence and the severity of the diagnosis but not of the chronicity. For others, there would be a continuity between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder. It is the case in many studies of veterans but also for civilian traumatic events. It is also the case for the American national study of comorbidity in which Kessler concludes that for 78% of the subjects who present a comorbidity PTSD/MDD (comorbidity raised for 48% of the 5,877 subjects included), the mood disorder is secondary to PTSD. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Comorbidity↗