Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Daschner

Publications and source records attributed to F Daschner.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Prevalence of nosocomial infections in representative German hospitals.

The nosocomial infection (NI) rate in German hospitals was studied in order to create reference data for comparison in hospitals where ongoing surveillance is impossible. The study was designed as a one-day prevalence study. Patients in 72 selected hospitals (inclusion criteria: acute care hospitals with departments for general medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynaecology) were examined by four external investigators (physicians trained and validated in the diagnosis of NI). A total of 14,996 patients were studied. The overall prevalence rate was 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) with a variation of 0-8.9% between hospitals. The commonest NI were: urinary tract infection (42.1%), lower respiratory tract infection (20.6%), surgical site infections (15.8%) and primary sepsis (8.3%). The highest prevalence rate (15.3%) was found in intensive care ward patients, followed by surgery (3.8%), general medicine (3.0%) and gynaecology/obstetrics (1.4%). The infection rate varied significantly with hospital size. A microbiology laboratory report was only available for 56.5% of patients thought to have an NI, and there were remarkable differences between hospitals with and without an on-site microbiology laboratory. Because of this and other methodological reasons the NI prevalence rates reported here may represent the absolute minimum of nosocomially infected patients in Germany.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1998

Prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections in German hospitals.

The prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in Germany were determined as part of a national survey on nosocomial infections. The study included 14,966 patients in 72 representatively selected hospitals with departments of general medicine, surgery, obstetrics, gynecology, and intensive care units (ICU). Surveillance was carried out by four previously validated medical doctors who strictly applied the CDC-criteria for diagnosis of nosocomial infections. The overall prevalence of hospital-acquired LRTI was 0.72% with the highest rate in hospitals with more than 600 beds (1.08%) and among the patients on intensive care units (9.00%). Ventilator-associated pneumonia rates were highest in patients on ICUs (13.27). Polytrauma, impaired consciousness, chronic airway disease, prior surgery, and cardiovascular disease were significantly related to the occurrence of nosocomial LRTI. P. aeruginosa was the predominant organism causing nosocomial LRTI. Nosocomial LRTI remain a problem mainly on ICUs. Patients at risk should be monitored with extra care.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1998

Prevalence of primary bloodstream infections in representative German hospitals and their association with central and peripheral vascular catheters.

The prevalence of noncentral and central lines and the prevalence of nosocomial primary bloodstream infections was investigated in 72 representative German hospitals (NIDEP Study). Data from a total of 14,966 patients were documented. On the prevalence day, it amounted to 23.9% for noncentral and 5.1% for central lines. The total prevalence of nosocomial primary bloodstream infections was 0.3%, 8.3% of all nosocomial infections recorded were primary bloodstream infections. The device utilization rate of vascular catheters was retrospectively observed for both the prevalence day and another 6 days. The device utilization rate was 27.3% for peripheral and 6.1% for central catheters with higher rates in west Germany. The associated incidence density of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter-days was 0.3 for noncentral and 0.8 for central lines. In 61.4%, the primary bloodstream infections were microbiologically confirmed. In 52.6% of cases, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated (Staphylococcus aureus: 15.8%, other coagulase negative Staphylococcus species: 34.2%) and in 47.4%, Gram-negative ones (mostly: Escherichia coli: 13.2% and Klebsiella species: 10.5%). Prevention to reduce nosocomial bloodstream infections is possible by antimicrobial establishing specially trained infusion therapy teams, using antimicrobial or antiseptic impregnated bloodstream catheters and a strict review of the indication for a vascular catheter together with a minimization of catheter days.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed1998

Importance of the surveillance method: national prevalence studies on nosocomial infections and the limits of comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the limits of comparison of national prevalence rates of nosocomial infections. DESIGN AND SETTING: Critical analysis of prevalence rates and methods of the Nosocomial Infections in Germany (NIDEP) study and other prevalence surveys with particular attention to the selection of patients, the qualification and training of the investigators, and the methods of identifying nosocomial infections. RESULTS: The lowest prevalence rate was found in Germany (3.5%), the highest in Belgium (9.3%). These differences may not be accurate, because variations in methods allow for differing explanations. CONCLUSIONS: Because of numerous methodological factors, comparison of infection rates between countries should be avoided. In contrast to other prevalence studies, the methodology of the German-NIDEP study permits registration of only certain infections, which is the main reason for the low rate.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1998

Experience with two validation methods in a prevalence survey on nosocomial infections.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an investigator effect remained on the first German study on the prevalence of nosocomial infections Nosokomiale Infektionen in Deutschland Erfassung und Prävention (NIDEP), despite extensive validation efforts. DESIGN: Two validation methods were applied: bedside validation and validation by case studies. In both cases, the results of the four investigators were compared with the diagnosis of gold standard observers. SETTING: Validation measures were applied before, intermittently, during, and at the end of the surveillance period in 72 acute-care hospitals with 14,966 patients. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity in the bedside-validation periods was 89.0%; the overall specificity was 99.5%. For validation by case studies, overall sensitivity was 95.6%, and overall specificity was 92.8%. At the end of the surveillance, a remarkable investigator effect was found. CONCLUSION: Despite validation results that were assessed as satisfactory, based on available literature, an investigator effect was observed. This underlines the need for data validation and the formulation of recommendations for data validation. Clarification of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for pneumonia and primary bloodstream infection and the inclusion of some diagnostic test results may reduce or prevent an investigator effect in future studies.

Bias↗
PubMed1998

[Diagnostic training for the surveillance of nosocomial infections: what is possible and significant?].

The data of surveillance of nosocomial infections are used as clinical indicators of quality. Their diagnosis must therefore be accurate. One hundred medical records from surgical and intensive care patients were used to assess the accuracy of diagnosing nosocomial infections according to CDC definitions. All case histories included signs and symptoms of infection. There were 45 patients with a total of 60 nosocomial infections (18 urinary tract infections, 18 surgical site infections, 11 lower respiratory tract infections and 13 other infection types). After evaluating the medical records, 18 physicians independently decided whether or not there was a nosocomial infection and, if so, the type of underlying infection. Their results were compared to the diagnosis of two experienced physicians (gold standard). Twenty-five cases were assessed on each of four consecutive days and the results were discussed with the experienced physicians on the following morning. The discussions of the first day may thus have been influenced by the results of the following days. Overall sensitivity was 85.4% (Cl95 82.8-87.8%) and overall specificity was 97.1% (Cl95 95.8-98.0%). Among the most common types of nosocomial infections, urinary tract infections had the highest sensitivity (90.1%), followed by surgical site infections (87.3%) and lower respiratory tract infections (85.8%). The specificity for these types of infections was 98.2%, 98.9% and 99.5%, respectively. Although the method of investigation used does not fulfill the formal requirements of a validation study for diagnosing nosocomial infections, it seems useful for training in the diagnostics of nosocomial infections or for intermittent evaluation of criteria before starting surveillance activities. This method is useful for training the application of CDC definitions, particularly when the medical records are reduced to case studies that include only the basic information on determining the presence of a nosocomial infection in order to evaluate a large number of suspected cases in a short period of time.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗
PubMed1997

Analysis of benzalkonium chloride in the effluent from European hospitals by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with post-column ion-pairing and fluorescence detection.

A highly reproducible and specific method for the analysis of the quaternary ammonium compound, benzalkonium chloride, in effluents from European hospitals is presented. Benzalkonium chloride was extracted with end-capped RP-18 solid-phase cartridges and was selectively eluted. The resulting solution was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). After elution from the analytical column of the HPLC system, 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene-2-sulfonate was added continuously as a fluorescence marker, forming a hydrophobic ion-pair with benzalkonium chloride. The ion-pair was analyzed by fluorescence detection. The method was applied to highly complex effluent samples from different sized European hospitals. The measured concentrations were between 0.05 and 6.03 mg/l. The amounts emitted per bed and year were 4.5-362 g and did not correlate with the size of the hospital. The total amounts were 2.6-909 kg/year.

Anthracenes↗
PubMed1997

[Hygiene in the surgical department--recommendations by the National Reference Center for Hospital Hygiene].

Many hygienic procedures performed in operation units are not supported by scientific investigations. The following recommendations by the National Reference Center for Hospital Epidemiology, founded by the German Ministry of Health in 1996, are based on the scientific literature and separate necessary from less necessary and unnecessary procedures.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗
PubMed1997

An analysis of two prevalence surveys of nosocomial infection in German intensive care units.

In 1995, the results of two extensive prevalence studies on hospital-acquired infections were published. Both studies included a prevalence component for German intensive care units (ICUs), but provided very different infection rates. A comparison of the methods used revealed that the data from the ICUs included in the German section of EPIC (European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care), reflected the situation in the ICUs of large hospitals. The situation in ICUs with fewer than 600 beds was quite different, and led to the lower overall rate of infection as seen in the NIDEP (Nosocomial Infections in Germany-Surveillance and Prevention) study. Additionally, the NIDEP data permitted the calculation of device-associated, device-day, infection rates for urinary tract infections, pneumonia and bacteraemia. The differences between the ICUs in the two hospital groups were mainly due to a lower use of patient devices with regard to urinary catheters, central venous lines and respiratory ventilators.

Bacteremia↗
PubMed1997

Analysis of risk factors for nosocomial infections--results from the first national prevalence survey in Germany (NIDEP Study, Part 1).

An analysis of risk factors for nosocomial infections (NI) was carried out using data from the first national prevalence survey on NI in Germany. Fourteen thousand, nine hundred and sixty-six patients, with a total of 543 NI, were included. Urinary tract infections (UTI), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), surgical site infections (SSI) and primary septicaemia (PS) were analysed. UTI were significantly associated with unconsciousness, age, prior operation, hospital size and female sex (P < 0.1). LRTI were significantly associated with chronic airway disease, intensive care units, unconsciousness, polytrauma, prior operation, cardiovascular disease, malignancy and absence of infection on admission. The department, age, diabetes mellitus, male sex and hospital size were risk factors for SSI. The department, prior operation and unconsciousness were significantly associated with PS. An investigator effect was observed for LRTI and PS. Although no final conclusions from a risk factor analysis based on prevalence data can be drawn the results support stratification of NI for routine surveillance.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Nosocomial infections in Germany. Microbiological diagnosis, preventive antibiotics and antibiotic therapy].

BACKGROUND: The NIDEP-study (Nosocomial Infections in Germany-Prevalence and Prevention) is the first large multicenter survey to examine the prevalence of nosocomial infections (NI) in Germany. This part of the NIDEP-study describes the frequency and quality of the microbiological diagnosis, antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis and therapy in representative German hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prevalence of nosocomial infections in 14 966 patients of 72 randomly selected representative German hospitals was determined. Frequency, nature and results of the microbiological diagnosis, antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis and therapy were recorded simultaneously. RESULTS: The total prevalence rate of nosocomial infections was 3.5%. The most common infections were urinary tract infections (42.1%), lower respiratory tract infections (20.6%), postoperative wound infections (15.8%), and septicemia (8.3%). Microbiological evaluation was done in 56.5% of the patients with infections. Only five of the 49 hospitals with less than 400 beds and only nine of the 23 hospitals with more than 400 beds had their own microbiological department. Antimicrobial chemotherapy was administered in 17.7% of the patients. In 35.1% of the patients who were treated with antibiotics, no clinical diagnosis of infection was made, criteria for nosocomial infections were not fulfilled or microbiological evaluation was not established. Antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis was done in one third of the patients. Prophylaxis was missed in 20.6% of patients with colorectal operations, 60.1% of appendectomies, 48% of vaginal hysterectomies, and 35.5% of total hip replacements. On the other hand antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis was frequently administered in clean procedures without increased risk of postoperative wound infections. CONCLUSION: Insufficient microbiological evaluation, inadequate perioperative antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis and administration of chemotherapy without documented infection were detected in representative German hospitals.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

[Nosocomial infections in Germany. Their epidemiology in old and new Federal Länder].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in different parts of Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 14,966 patients (45.9% medical, 35.9% surgical, 14.7% obstetrical/gynaecological and 3.5% intensive care) in 72 randomly chosen German hospitals (59 in the old [i.e. previously West German] and 13 in the new [i.e. East German] Federal Lands). Using the CDC criteria for the diagnosis of nosocomial infections specially trained doctors determined whether the infection was in fact nosocomial. RESULTS: There was a 3.5% prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in the entire population (95% confidence interval 3.1-3.9%). In view of the chosen methods and the in part incorrect indication of microbiological diagnosis in the included hospital, this rate of nosocomial infection is likely to be a minimum number. The prevalence rate for the most important nosocomial infections was lower in the new Lands of Federal Germany than the older ones (total prevalence of 2.7 vs 3.6%). The difference is mainly due to the less frequent employment of various devices (e.g. peripheral vascular catheters), rather than different hygienic standards in their use. CONCLUSION: The lower prevalence rate of nosocomial infections in the new Lands, because fewer devices are employed, underlines the need constantly to test the indications for their use.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Scoring system for nosocomial pneumonia in ICUs.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a scoring system for stratifying patients in intensive care units (ICUs) by risk of developing nosocomial pneumonia (NP), based on variables generally available in an ICU, and to determine the probability of a patient developing NO in the ICU. DESIGN AND SETTING: a 2-year prospective cohort study conducted in a medical and surgical ICU. PATIENTS: 756 patients admitted to the ICU for 48 h or more were followed up until the development of NP or death or discharge from the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: 129 (17.1%) patients developed NP, 106 (14%) in the first 2 weeks. The following independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: no infection on admission [relative risk (RR) = 3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 2.0 to 4.81; thorax drainage (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.2 to 3.5); administration of antacids (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4 to 3.1); partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) > 110 mmHg (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.6); administration of coagulation factors (RR = 1.8 95% CI = 1.0 to 3.2); male gender (RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.2 to 6.3); urgent surgery (RR = 2.4, 95% CI = 0.9 to 6.4); and neurological diseases (RR = 4.2, 95% CI = 1.9 to 9.4). To obtain a predictive risk index for NP, a scoring system was developed using a multivariate model. The probability of developing NP varied between 11.0% in the lowest risk group and 42.3% in the highest risk group. The patients' risk of acquiring NP was seven times higher in the highest score category (i.v.) than in the lowest one (I). CONCLUSIONS: ICU patients can be stratified into high- and low-risk groups for NP. No infection on admission, thorax drainage, administration of antacids, and PO2 > 110 mmHg were associated with a higher risk of NP during the entire 2-week period.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Nosocomial infections intensive care units. A nation-wide prevalence study].

UNLABELLED: In a large, multicenter survey in 1994, the prevalence of nosocomial infections in German hospitals was examined, predominant pathogens were identified, and possible risk factors evaluated. In this paper the results from the intensive care units (ICUs) are presented. METHODS: Seventy-two representative hospitals in Germany were selected by randomisation and divided into four different groups according to their size (< 200 beds; 200-400 beds; 400-600 beds; > 600 beds). During 10 months four especially trained doctors documented the patients clinical and laboratory data and possible endogenous and exogenous risk factors for nosocomial infections. For better evaluation, they discussed the cases with the responsible senior officers and health care workers and visited the patients. Diagnosis of nosocomial infection was based on CDC criteria. RESULTS: In 515 patients in 89 ICUs, 78 hospital-acquired infections were documented (15.3%). The most common were pneumonia (5.9%), bronchitis (2.7%), urinary tract infections (2.4%), and septicaemia (2.2%). Possible exogenous risk factors included: peripheral venous catheters (65.6%); catheterisation of the urinary tract (64.5%); central venous catheters (60.4%); gastric tubes (38.0%); wound drainage (28.6%) and artificial ventilation (27.6%). The most frequent concomitant diseases were cardiovascular (61.9%), diabetes (20.2%), malignancies (18.8%), pre-existing infections (15.3%), and chronic respiratory disease (14.0%). The prevalence of nosocomial infections was higher in hospitals with more than 600 beds than in smaller ones (28.3% versus 12.9%, P < 0.001). Predominant pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp.. Fifty per cent of the ICUs changed ventilation tubes and 66.3% changed infusion sets daily; 34.8% of patients received drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers that neutralise or decrease production of gastric acid; only 7.6% received sucralfate. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done by 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs, respectively. DISCUSSION: Nosocomial infections are seen far more often in ICUs than on normal wards due to the immuno-suppressed state of many ICU patients and the continuous use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Most of these infections are of endogenous origin. Other prevalence surveys have shown results comparable to ours. Daily changing of ventilation tubes is no longer necessary, but is still routine in many hospitals. Infusion sets were also changed more often than required. The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract for the prevention of pneumonia is still controversial; in our study it was practised in only 1.5% of the cases. The most commonly used drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers were H2-receptor blocking agents, although it has been shown that sucralfate is the better choice, as it can help prevent nosocomial pneumonia. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done in 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs. No study so far has shown that routine cultures of tracheal secretions and urine have a preventive effect regarding infection.

Adult↗