Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F D Loop

Publications and source records attributed to F D Loop.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

On medical management.

To be successful, academic medical centers must exhibit leadership, a strong foundation in science and education, wide-ranging clinical experience, continuous innovation, exemplary service, and an earned reputation for consistently good results.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Relation of serum triglyceride levels to survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.

We performed a prospective observational study on 6,602 subjects (94% for 5 years and 34% for 10 to 15 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) between 1982 and 1992. We examined whether triglyceride concentrations adjusted for other factors (total cholesterol, history of diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, left ventricular function, number of coronary arteries significantly narrowed, and use of the internal thoracic arteries) explained total and event-free survival. These analyses were duplicated within gender (1,354 women and 5,248 men). This approach allowed a determination of any gender-related disparities in lipid predictors. Triglycerides in the highest quartile were associated with an increased risk of mortality of 20% (confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 1.4). Similar risk was seen for event-free survival. Although there was no evidence of gender differences in adjusted survival (p = 0.33), a gender by triglyceride interaction (p = 0.004) indicated that the response to high triglycerides as related to survival did differ by gender. Specifically, women had a dramatically higher risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, CI 1.1 to 2.1) than men (HR 1.1, CI 0.9 to 1. 3). Both men and women did have triglyceride-associated risk with regard to event-free survival (HR in men 1.2, CI 1.1 to 1.4; HR in women 1.4, CI 1.1 to 1.8). Examination of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a subcohort did not eliminate the observed triglyceride effects. Thus, triglyceride baseline values are primary determinants (similar to baseline left ventricular function or extent of coronary disease) for long-term total and event-free mortality after CABG in women but not in men.

Aged↗

Risk factors and outcomes after coronary reoperation in 739 elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: As second coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations are becoming more common in elderly patients, we conducted a retrospective analysis of risk factors for in-hospital and late outcome in patients aged 70 and over. METHODS: We reviewed records of 739 patients who underwent second CABG at age 70 or older at our institution between 1983 and 1993. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were analyzed to identify predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality. RESULTS: The mean age (+/- standard deviation) at reoperation was 74 +/- 3 years and the mean interval after primary operation was 130 +/- 55 months. In-hospital mortality was 7.6% (n = 56). Preoperative factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality were preoperative creatinine greater than 1.6 mg/dL (p < 0.001), emergency operation (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.012), moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction (p = 0.049), and left main coronary disease (p = 0.045). In-hospital, actuarial survival was 75% at 5 years and 49% at 10 years. Cardiac event-free survival was 60% at 5 years and 27% at 10 years. The factors independently associated with increased late death were hematocrit (p = 0.046), diabetes (p = 0.011), peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001), left ventricular function (p < 0.001), history of cancer (p = 0.016), preoperative nonsinus rhythm (p = 0.003), anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (p = 0.018), postoperative encephalopathy (p = 0.001), and postoperative stroke (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: CABG reoperation can have excellent results for many elderly patients, but mortality is markedly higher when elderly patients have certain risk factors and comorbidities, alone or in combination. This information should be helpful in educating patients before they decide whether to choose reoperation.

Aged↗

Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term effectiveness of a strategy for managing the aortic root and distal aorta according to the pathology in ascending aortic dissection. METHODS: From 1978 to 1995, 208 patients underwent operations for acute (n = 135) and chronic (n = 73) ascending aortic dissection. Surgical strategies included valve resuspension with supracoronary aortic root repair and ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and valve (n = 135), composite valve and ascending aortic graft for abnormal sinuses and valve (n = 47), and valve replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and abnormal valve (n = 26). Resection extended into the arch only if the intimal tear originated in or extended to the aortic arch (n = 31). RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 14%. Cardiogenic shock (P =.002) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.001) were associated with increased risk; use of circulatory arrest (P =.0003) decreased risk. Survival was 87%, 68%, and 52% at 30 days, 5 years, and 10 years, respectively. Advanced age, earlier date of operation, composite graft, and arch resection were associated with decreased survival; residual distal dissected aorta was not. Reoperation was required for 5 proximal and 8 distal problems. CONCLUSIONS: In both acute and chronic ascending aortic dissections, (1) circulatory arrest is associated with low early mortality; (2) with normal sinuses and valve, supracoronary repair of the dissected aortic root and valve resuspension is effective long term; and (3) residual distal dissected aorta does not decrease late survival and has a low risk of aneurysmal change and reoperation for at least 10 years.

Adult↗

Mentoring.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗

Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple strategies to achieve some degree of myocardial revascularization are available. In some, less complete revascularization is accepted to limit invasiveness. To examine the issues of incomplete revascularization, we assessed the long-term impact of additional non-left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses in patients undergoing only grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery. METHODS: A total of 2067 patients underwent primary isolated grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery from 1971 to 1997. Of these, 26% and 13% had 2- and 3-system disease, respectively. Multivariable analyses of survival and reintervention were performed in the hazard function domain for 27,683 patient-years of follow-up (mean 14 +/- 6.7). RESULTS: Survival was 99%, 88%, and 62% at 1, 10, and 20 years. Right coronary artery or left circumflex system disease of 50% or more (P =.02) and particularly high-grade (>/=70%) left circumflex (P =.01) and proximal right coronary artery disease (P =.01), as well as any degree of left main trunk stenosis (P <.0001), were associated with reduced long-term survival. Compared with 75% 20-year survival in patients with no non-left anterior descending disease, those with either left circumflex or left main trunk disease experienced a 44% survival, and those with proximal right coronary artery disease, 42%. The most common stated reason for incomplete revascularization was small vessel size. Freedom from reintervention was 89% and 65% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. High-grade left main trunk disease, but, in contrast, mid or distal disease of the right coronary artery, and not left circumflex disease, were risk factors for reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: These findings call into question the long-term appropriateness of interventions whose strategy includes leaving unrevascularized segments in territories not in the distribution of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Adult↗

Injury to a patent left internal thoracic artery graft at coronary reoperation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, outcome, and operative strategies for patients having injury to a patent left internal thoracic artery (LITA) graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) at coronary reoperation. METHODS: Of 655 patients with a patent LITA graft to the LAD undergoing coronary reoperation from 1986 to 1997, 35 (5.3%) sustained intraoperative injury to the LITA graft. RESULTS: Strategies to restore flow to the LAD included new saphenous vein graft to the LAD in 15 patients, saphenous vein graft to the LITA stump in 7, saphenous vein graft to the LAD and repair of the LITA graft in 6, and other strategies in 7. All or part of the LITA graft to the LAD was salvaged in 20 patients (57%). Fourteen patients (40%) sustained perioperative myocardial infarction, and 3 patients died (8.6%). The 3 patients who died all had stenosis or thrombosis of the graft to the LAD documented at autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) the prevalence of injury to a patent LITA graft is 5.3%; (2) a variety of techniques can be used to restore blood flow to the LAD; and (3) ineffective revascularization of the LAD in this situation is associated with operative mortality. At primary coronary artery bypass grafting, the LITA pedicle should be positioned in the left chest away from the posterior sternal table; this strategy may minimize the risk of LITA graft injury at coronary reoperation.

Adult↗

Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.

OBJECTIVE: Does the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single ITA graft? METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized, long-term (mean follow-up interval of 10 postoperative years) study of patients undergoing elective primary isolated coronary bypass surgery who received either single (8123 patients) or bilateral ITA grafts (2001 patients), with or without additional vein grafts. Multiple statistical methods including propensity score matching, and multivariable parsimonious and nonparsimonious risk factor analyses were used to address the issues of patient selection and heterogeneity. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.7% for both the bilateral and single ITA groups. Survival for the bilateral ITA group was 94%, 84%, and 67%, and for the single ITA group 92%, 79%, and 64% at 5, 10, and 15 postoperative years, respectively (P <.001). Death, reoperation, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were more frequent for patients undergoing single rather than bilateral ITA grafting, and this observation remained true despite multiple adjustments for patient selection, sampling, and length of follow-up. The differences between the bilateral and single ITA groups were greatest in regard to reoperation. The extent of benefit of bilateral ITA grafting varied according to patient-related variables, but no patient subsets were identified for whom single ITA grafting could be predicted to provide an advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received 2 ITA grafts had decreased risks of death, reoperation, and angioplasty.

Aged↗

Increased risk and decreased morbidity of coronary artery bypass grafting between 1986 and 1994.

BACKGROUND: The collective impact of advances in medical, surgical, and anesthetic care on the characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting was assessed. METHODS: We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics, preoperative risk factors, morbidity, and mortality of two groups of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in isolation or in combination with other procedures between July 1, 1986, and June 30,1988 (group 1, n = 5,051), and between January 1, 1993, and March 31, 1994 (group 2, n = 2,793). The patients were stratified according to their preoperative risk level. Outcome measures consisted of changes in preoperative risk categories; hospital mortality rates; overall and risk-adjusted major cardiac, neurologic, pulmonary, renal, and septic morbidity rates; and intensive care unit length of stay. RESULTS: Changes in the distribution of risk categories, from a median of 2 to 4 on a 9-point scale (p < 0.001), indicated that patients in group 2 were at significantly higher risk than those in group 1. The risk-adjusted mortality rate did not change (2.8% to 2.9%; p = 0.15), but the risk-adjusted morbidity rate decreased significantly (14.5% to 8.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting are now at greater preoperative risk at the time of hospital admission. However, their morbidity rate is significantly lower and their mortality rate is unchanged, results that we attribute to the collective impact of changes in our medical and surgical procedures.

Aged↗

Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad?

BACKGROUND: As the population ages, more octogenarians become candidates for aortic valve replacement. Many octogenarians, particularly women, have a small aortic annulus and there is uncertainty as to the optimal management of this situation in that age group. METHOD: To examine this issue, we reviewed 248 octogenarians (mean age, 82.6 +/- 2.3 years; 58% men) who underwent primary isolated aortic valve replacement (n = 99), or aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization (n = 149), between 1980 and 1995. Nineteen-millimeter valves were used in 26% of the patients. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 8.9%, 5% for aortic valve replacement alone and 11.4% for aortic valve replacement and coronary revascularization. It was 12.5% for the 19-mm size valves compared with 7.7% for the bigger size valves (p = 0.24). Follow-up (mean interval, 4.4 years) demonstrated survival for all patients of 85%, 60%, and 30% and survival free from cardiovascular events of 80%, 45%, and 21% at 1, 5, and 10 postoperative years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified triple-vessel disease and preoperative congestive heart failure as associated with increased risk for both in-hospital and late mortality (p < 0.05). Valve size did not influence late survival or event-free survival regardless of body surface area. CONCLUSIONS: The use of small aortic valve prostheses in octogenarians does not adversely affect the incidence of early or late mortality or cardiac events.

Aged↗

Durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative mitral valve disease is the most common cause of mitral regurgitation in the United States. Mitral valve repair is applicable in the majority of these patients and has become the procedure of choice. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to identify factors influencing the durability of mitral valve repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1997, 1072 patients underwent primary isolated mitral valve repair for valvular regurgitation caused by degenerative disease. Repair durability was assessed by multivariable risk factor analysis of reoperation. It was supplemented by a search for valve-related risk factors for death before reoperation. Three hospital deaths occurred (0.3%); complete follow-up (4152 patient-years) was available in 1062 of 1069 hospital survivors (99.3%). RESULTS: At 10 years, freedom from reoperation was 93%. Among 30 patients who required reoperation for late mitral valve dysfunction, the repair failed in 16 (53%) as a result of progressive degenerative disease. Durability of repair was adversely affected by pathologic conditions other than posterior leaflet prolapse, use of chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and posterior leaflet resection without annuloplasty. Durability was greatest after quadrangular resection and annuloplasty for posterior leaflet prolapse and was enhanced by the use of intraoperative echocardiography. Death before reoperation was increased in patients having isolated anterior leaflet prolapse or valvular calcification and by use of chordal shortening or annuloplasty alone. CONCLUSIONS: Repair durability is greatest in patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse who have posterior leaflet resection and annuloplasty. Chordal shortening, annuloplasty alone, and leaflet resection without annuloplasty jeopardize late results.

Calcinosis↗

Cost of cardiac care in the three years after coronary catheterization in a contained care system: critical determinants and implications.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the clinical, angiographic, treatment and outcome correlates of the intermediate-term cost of caring for patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: To adequately predict medical costs and to compare different treatment and cost reduction strategies, the determinants of cost must be understood. However, little is known about the correlates of costs of treatment of CAD in heterogeneous patient populations that typify clinical practice. METHODS: From a consecutive series of 781 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in 1992 to 1994, we analyzed 44 variables as potential correlates of total (direct and indirect) in-hospital, 12- and 36-month cardiac costs. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) patient age was 65+/-10 years; 71% were men, and 45% had multiple vessel disease. The initial treatment strategy was medical therapy alone in 47% of patients, percutaneous intervention (PI) in 30% and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in 24%. The 36-month survival and event-free (death, infarction, CABG, PI) survival rates were 89.6+/-0.2% and 68.4+/-0.4%, respectively. Median hospital and 36-month costs were $8,301 and $28,054, respectively, but the interquartile ranges for both were wide and skewed. Models for log(e) costs were superior to those for actual costs. The variances accounted for by the all-inclusive models of in-hospital, 12- and 36-month costs were 57%, 60% and 71%, respectively. Baseline cardiac variables accounted for 38% of the explained in-hospital costs, whereas in-hospital treatment and complication variables accounted for 53% of the actual costs. Noncardiac variables accounted for only 9% of the explained costs. Over time, complications (e.g., late hospital admission, PI, CABG) and drug use to prevent complications of heart transplantation became more important, but many baseline cardiac variables retained their importance. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Variables readily available from a comprehensive cardiovascular database explained 57% to 71% of cardiac costs from a hospital perspective over 3 years of care; 2) the initial revascularization strategy was a key determinant of in-hospital costs, but over 3 years, the initial treatment become somewhat less important, and late complications became more important determinants of costs.

Aged↗

Coronary artery surgery: the end of the beginning.

In each of the first three decades of myocardial revascularization, conventional treatment has been revised completely. This lecture comments on three areas of discovery that have shaped the evolution of myocardial revascularization: science, technology development, and revascularization. The discoveries in all three areas are inexorably interrelated. The single greatest lesson learned so far is that conduit performance carries more prognostic weight than any other factor. We have observed that vein graft atherosclerosis is predictable, and that the first-generation lipid lowering drugs have a favorable effect in patients who achieve marked LDL reduction. Biologically better revascularization begins with use of the internal thoracic artery for grafting to the anterior descending coronary artery. As the results of internal thoracic artery grafting are widely reported, arterial bypass revascularization has expanded, notably by radial and gastroepiploic arteries. The results of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting are discussed, including large-scale registry results of internal thoracic artery usage in the United States. The internal thoracic artery is significantly underutilized. Diabetes affects both endoluminal and surgical revascularization. The new pharmacology in cardiology interventions shows promise in diminishing restenosis and thrombosis even in diabetic patients. Conversely, extended internal thoracic artery grafting may also benefit diabetic patients. Now we are entering a new age of minimally invasive coronary surgery. We have passed through the early stages of mini-thoracotomy, and we are moving on to access through 1-cm ports, intrathoracic cannulation, antegrade and retrograde myocardial protection, and computer guided three-dimensional vision and instrumentation. The potential for robotic control adds greater precision, ease of use, and safety. This new technology will be integrated with diagnostic information, intraoperative monitoring, anesthesia and perfusion data, cost accounting, and surgical note transcription. The operating room of the future will package intraoperative information and is adaptable to all surgical specialties. The future of coronary artery surgery will depend on minimally invasive techniques, all-arterial grafting, and selective lipid modification to reduce progressive atherosclerosis. The conclusion of this decade marks the end of the beginning. The new generation of cardiothoracic surgeons will share in an array of technology and research unmatched in previous decades.

Coronary Artery Disease↗

Is there an advantage to repairing infected mitral valves?

BACKGROUND: The therapy for native mitral valve endocarditis is in evolution. Antibiotics have significantly improved survival rates, but patients with complications of endocarditis may require surgical treatment. METHODS: Between January 1985 and December 1995, 146 patients underwent surgical therapy (repair or replacement) for native mitral valve endocarditis. All patients had documented bacterial endocarditis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of hospital death, long-term event-free survival, and probability of repair. Patients were evaluated in three groups: all patients, patients with acute endocarditis, and patients with chronic endocarditis. RESULTS: There were ten hospital deaths (6.8%). Patients undergoing repair had a lower hospital mortality rate (p = 0.008) then those having replacement. Event-free survival was improved after mitral valve repair in the overall group (p = 0.02) and in the group with healed (chronic) endocarditis (p = 0.05). Although the acute endocarditis group demonstrated an improved event-free survival rate after mitral valve repair versus replacement (74% versus 20% at 6 years), this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that mitral valve repair is preferable to mitral valve replacement when possible, in patients with complications of endocarditis, as repair results in a lower hospital mortality and an improved long-term survival.

Adolescent↗

ICU admission score for predicting morbidity and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to develop an intensive care unit (ICU) admission risk score based on preoperative condition and intraoperative events. This score provides a tool with which to judge the effects of ICU quality of care on outcome. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 4,918 patients (study group n = 2,793 and a validation data set n = 2,125) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting alone or combined with a valve or carotid procedure between January 1, 1993, and March 31, 1995. Data were analyzed by univariate and multiple logistic regression with the end points of hospital mortality and serious ICU morbidity (stroke, low cardiac output, myocardial infarction, prolonged ventilation, serious infection, renal failure, or death). RESULTS: Eight risk factors predicted hospital mortality at ICU admission, and these factors and five others predicted morbidity. A clinical score, weighted equally for morbidity and mortality, was developed. All models fit according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. This score applies equally well to patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: This model is complementary to our previously reported preoperative model, allowing the process of ICU care to be measured independent of the operative care. Sequential scoring also allows updated prognoses at different points in the continuum of care.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Intraoperative echocardiography is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative echocardiography is a valuable monitoring and diagnostic technology used in cardiac surgery. This reports our clinical study of the usefulness of intraoperative echocardiography to both surgeons and anesthesiologists for high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From March to November 1995, 82 consecutive high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were studied in a four-stage protocol to determine the efficacy of intraoperative echocardiography in management planning. Alterations in surgical and anesthetic/hemodynamic management initiated by intraoperative echocardiography findings were documented in addition to perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Intraoperative echocardiography initiated at least one major surgical management alteration in 27 patients (33%) and at least one major anesthetic/hemodynamic change in 42 (51%). Mortality and the rate of myocardial infarction in this consecutive high-risk study population using intraoperative echocardiography and in a similar group of patients without the use of intraoperative echocardiography was 1.2% versus 3.8% (not significant) and 1.2% versus 3.5% (not significant), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that when all of the isolated diagnostic and monitoring applications of perioperative echocardiography are routinely and systematically performed together, it is a safe and viable tool that significantly affects the decision-making process in the intraoperative care of high-risk patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and may contribute to the optimal care of these patients.

Aged↗