Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Candan

Publications and source records attributed to F Candan.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Comparison of body composition analysis methods in clinical routine.

BACKGROUND: Skinfold thickness (SFT) and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) are readily available and commonly used techniques in patient monitoring for body composition analysis (BCA) in clinical practise. Another one, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method became popular in body composition analysis (BCA) in recent years. Its results have been reported to be quite accurate and precise, in comparison with in vivo or in vitro multiple component reference methods. The aim of the present study was to assess the degree of agreement between SFT and DEXA, and BIA and DEXA methods, in obese and nonobese patients. METHODS: Body fat mass (FM) was measured in 16 nonobese (mean body mass index; BMI = 22.2 +/- 2.2 kg/m(2)) and in 21 obese (BMI = 34.5 +/- 6.1 kg/m(2)) women with DEXA, SFT, and BIA in the same morning. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) FM (kg) was 16.3 +/- 5.5, 15.0 +/- 5.1, 14.7 +/- 4.9 in nonobese subjects and 38.8 +/- 10.1, 36.3 +/- 10.0, 37.1 +/- 12.0 in obese patients, by DEXA, SFT and BIA, respectively. Comparison of the DEXA-BIA and DEXA-STF methods showed high correlation in regression line analysis in nonobese subjects as, r(2) = 0.93 and 0.89, respectively. Regression coefficients were 0.84 and 0.75 in obese patients. However, reanalysis of the data by the Bland and Altman method revealed an obvious lack of agreement between the DEXA-BIA and DEXA-SFT methods in obese patients. In addition, FM was underestimated by BIA and SFT as compared to DEXA in both of the study groups. Besides, better precision was obtained by DEXA method among the others. CONCLUSION: The SFT or BIA method would be preferred to monitor BCA in non-obese subjects in clinical routine. However, DEXA should be considered as the method of choice in obese patient monitoring, since reproducibility gains special importance, other than the accuracy in the context.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2000

Lipid and lipoprotein patterns in type 2 non-obese diabetic patients. Do Lp(a) levels decrease with improved glycemic control in these patients?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study, we investigated the levels of apolipopotein-AI (apo-AI), apolipoprotein (apo-B), triglyceride (TG), high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) in a group of non-obese, type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with different types of treatment and a control group of non-obese, non-diabetic subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups according to their treatment types: insulin, sulphonylurea and untreated groups. All groups were similar in sex, weights, known duration of diabetes and habits. Each group consisted of 30 subjects. There were no differences in apo-AI, apo-B and TG levels (p > 0.05), whereas HDL-C levels in the untreated group were significantly lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). Lp(a) levels in the untreated group were higher than in the other (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gaining metabolic control in diabetes mellitus is crucial in pulling back lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels to a desired level and in attenuating CAD (coronary artery disease) risk factors, and also in preventing CAD. Lp(a) levels in particular are decreased by insulin or sulfonylurea in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Apolipoprotein A-I↗
PubMed1996

The effects of hemodialysis on duodenal and gastric mucosal changes in uremic patients.

From March 1992 to July 1992, 30 uremic patients (15 dialysed, 15 non-dialysed) and 15 non-uremic patients who had dyspeptic complaints were compared in terms of gastric and duodenal diseases. Gastritis and duodenitis graded as I, II and III were not found different in three groups (p > 0.05). Although the incidence of peptic ulcer disease is very high in both groups of uremic patients in comparison with the controls, there was no significant difference between two uremic groups (p > 0.05). Also the prevalence of gastritis determined histologically was not different in dialysed and non-dialysed uremic patients (p > 0.05). The incidence of the histologically proven gastritis was found higher in uremic patients than in non-uremic patients (p < 0.05). But, there were no significant differences among the three groups with regard to the rate of histologically proved duodenitis (p > 0.05). Gastrin levels, urea positivity, the incidence of gastritis and duodenitis and peptic ulcers did not differ in both uremic groups. However, these values were found significantly high in the uremic patients when compared to non-uremics. These findings showed serum gastrin levels, H.-pylori-infection, gastritis and duodenal disease in the uremic patients to be higher than those of the control group. Moreover, no effect of hemodialysis treatment on these results was observed.

Adult↗