Home total parenteral nutrition in cancer patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Bozzetti.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to test the activity and feasibility of an all-oral regimen of levo-leucovorin and doxifluridine (dFUR) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and to establish whether the pharmacokinetics of dFUR and fluorouracil (FU) are affected by demographic and/or biologic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer received orally administered levo-leucovorin 25 mg followed 2 hours later by dFUR 1,200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, with the cycle being repeated every 10 days. RESULTS: Among 62 previously untreated patients, two complete responses (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed (overall response rate, 32%; 95% confidence interval, 21% to 45%). The median response duration was 4 months (range, 2 to 13) and the median survival time, 14 months. Among 46 pretreated patients, there were three CRs and three PRs (response rate, 13%; 95% confidence interval, 5% to 26%). In this group of patients, the median response duration was 4 months (range, 1 to 12) and the median survival time, 12 months. No toxic deaths were observed. The only World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 to 4 side effect was diarrhea (32 patients). CONCLUSION: This regimen is active in previously untreated colorectal cancer patients and combines good compliance with safety. Limited but definite efficacy was also detected in the patients previously treated with FU, which suggests incomplete cross-resistance between the two drugs. The pharmacokinetic results suggest that the conversion rate of dFUR to FU increases between days 1 and 5, but that FU levels remain low in comparison to those measured after classical FU therapy. Under the experimental conditions used in this study, the interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters remains largely unexplained by the tested variables.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a supportive therapy commonly used in clinical oncology, in spite of its possible interference on tumor growth. In fact, studies performed on animals have demonstrated that TPN increases tumor growth and that load and quality of amino acids are probably the main factors involved. In contrast, some authors obtained a decrease in tumor growth using a special amino acids mixture or a TPN formula rich in lipids. However, data collected on animals are not transferable to humans owing to the large difference between tumor-host weight ratio and tumor doubling time. Analysis of the studies on effect of TPN on tumor growth in humans has not demonstrated a bad effect, but the results reported in the literature are limited by the small number of patients, the lack of a sure and reproducible method to analyze tumor growth, and some methodologic defects. In conclusion, it is not evident that TPN is dangerous for cancer patients. However, it may be possible in the future to employ different formulas to improve the host nutritional status and inhibit tumor growth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Various reports have documented the efficacy of the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, although other studies have not confirmed such results. This multicentre phase II study was designed to try to define the efficacy and tolerability of the original EAP regimen. From January 1990 to May 1992, 96 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated every 3 weeks with etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 4, 5 and 6, doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) on days 1 and 7, and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 2 and 8. All of the patients had measurable lesions, and were to receive a maximum of six cycles. A total of 416 courses was given (median four/patient), 27% with a delay of > or = 2 weeks. Objective responses were achieved in 34 of the 91 evaluable patients (37%: confidence interval 27-47%), with complete response (CR) in 11 (12%) and partial response (PR) in 23 (25%). The median duration of response was 6 months (range 1-19), and the median survival of the 96 eligible patients was 9 months. Side-effects (WHO grade 3-4) were leucopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (9%) and mucositis (10%). We conclude that the EAP regimen is active in inducing major objective responses (12% of CR), and that treatment is feasible in patients with good performance status.
We report a 1-year patient and graft survival after combined liver-pancreatic islet transplantation. The patient was affected by a pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma with extensive liver metastasis. Native pancreas and total liver removal was undertaken after a good response to chemotherapy, and the patient was still cancer-free 1 year later. Normal liver function and insulin independence was achieved, although islet response to glucose challenge remained delayed. Immunosuppression was maintained with cyclosporin monotherapy.
At present, there is limited evidence for the role of enteral nutrition as a primary therapy in cancer patients. Cachexia commonly occurs in patients with advanced cancer. A consensus view from a large number of studies suggests that cachexia cannot be fully reversed by vigorous enteral nutritional support. A review is included of the available data on the effects of enteral nutritional support on the common indices of nutritional state and on the final outcome of patients receiving enteral nutrition in conjunction with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or both. The 'nutritional' effects are probably limited because the duration of the nutritional support in most studies consists of a few weeks while malnutrition in the cancer patients often occurs over many months.
At the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 118 patients underwent surgical resection and 35 had liver transplants for HCC (hepatocarcinoma). Postoperative mortality was 14% and 17% after resection and transplantation respectively. The five-year survival was 35% for resected patients and 83% at 30 months for transplanted patients. Analysis of the literature shows that patients receiving a liver transplant for HCC stage I-II survive longer than those resected at the same stage.
The literature after 1980 dealing with the treatment of primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (stages I and II) is reviewed. Gastrectomy is recommended for patients with acute symptoms at presentation or with complications of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In elective cases, patients with stage I disease may be candidates for gastrectomy as a single therapy, provided that tumour-free resection margins are achieved. There is no evidence of substantial benefit from adding postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy after an apparently radical resection. In stage II disease, the best results are achieved with ablative surgery plus adjuvant therapy. The resection volume should be limited to macroscopically involved structures, in principle avoiding total gastrectomy and extensive lymph node dissection, since residual disease may be optimally controlled with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, represents an experimental approach; the advantages of sparing the stomach must be balanced against the toxicity of an aggressive chemotherapy regimen and the risk of emergency operation for iatrogenic complications.
Several retrospective analyses have recently shown the advantage of liver transplantation (OLT) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at early tumor stages. Preliminary results of a prospective series of OLT for unresectable small HCC arising in cirrhosis are reported. Eighteen out of 22 patients (82%) are alive without evidence of HCC recurrence after a median follow-up of 11 months.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper describes the construction, validation and use of a simple prognostic score suitable for predicting survival of patients undergoing a curative gastric resection. Using death from all causes as outcome, the prognostic significance of age, sex, tumour site, stage of disease (nodal status and wall invasion), surgical treatment and histological type was investigated in a set of 213 patients recruited in a multi-centre clinical trial. A Weibull multiple regression model was adopted to evaluate the joint effect of these variables on survival. From a full model, containing all the variables, a final parsimonious model was obtained by means of a backward selection procedure. The prognostic score is based on the final model, including four variables which are easily detected in every institution: age, wall invasion, site of tumour, and nodal status. Three groups of patients with different probabilities of surviving 5 years from surgery were identified: group I (survival probability > or = 70%), group II (30%-69%) and group III (< 30%). The prognostic score, obtained from the multicentre trial patients, was tested on a set of 135 consecutive patients in an independent institution, confirming its reliability in predicting survival. The score system presented can supply a simple tool for classifying patients radically operated for gastric cancer into three well discriminated groups from the prognostic point of view.
BACKGROUND: The study analyzes clinical-pathologic features, treatment and outcome of all patients with primary lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NHL) seen during the past two decades at the Milan Cancer Institute. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical and histopathological data from 135 patients presenting with GI-NHL and disease localized within the abdomen were reviewed. Of these, 114 (84%) presented with limited disease (stage I and II), while 21 patients were found to have disease involvement of other abdominal organs (i.e., liver, pancreas, peritoneum) or more than one gastrointestinal site and were therefore classified as stage IV. Seventy-three percent presented with lymphoma in the stomach, 15% in the small intestine and 9% in the large bowel, while in 5 cases multiple localizations of the gastrointestinal tract were documented. Median age was 50 years, with one-fourth of patients older than 60 years. According to the revised Kiel classification for GI-NHL, 61% of patients presented with pure high-grade lymphoma, 9% high-grade NHL associated with residual low-grade lymphoma, and 30% had low-grade NHL. Nine percent presented with bulky disease, 5% with elevated LDH and 21% with a Karnofsky performance status (PS) < or = 80. RESULTS: Laparotomy with radical (108 patients) or palliative (15 patients) intent was performed in all patients who were not deemed at high risk of complication from major surgery. Complete removal of all measurable tumor was feasible in 101 patients, with no difference relative to primary site. Surgical morbidity and mortality were 11% and 2%, respectively. Overall, 83% of patients were treated with chemotherapy. Patients who did not receive systemic chemotherapy included 12 managed with surgery alone and 10 who received only postoperative irradiation mainly because of low-grade lymphoma with superficial disease. Of patients with limited disease, 99% achieved complete tumor remission. After a median follow-up of 73 months, 13 of 113 patients have relapsed, mostly (70%) outside the gastrointestinal tract. The actuarial 10-yr. freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were 84% and 86%, respectively. Aside from age, no other factor revealed a statistically significant impact on outcome. There was only a trend in favor of low-grade histology (FFP 97% vs. 79%), that failed to reach statistical significance. Of patients with advanced abdominal disease, 48% achieved complete remission with chemotherapy with or without prior surgical debulking. Actuarial 10-yr. FFP and OS were 44% and 42%, respectively. In this subset, tumor burden and LDH levels represented the most important prognostic factors affecting outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study underscores the good results obtained in a wide and unselected population of patients with limited-stage primary GI-NHL following a combined-modality approach that included surgical debulking and systemic chemotherapy for most patients. Surgery alone can be considered adequate treatment for patients with low-grade NHL disease that does not infiltrate beyond the submucosa. Patients with advanced GI-NHL show a long-term outcome similar to that of patients with advanced NHL arising outside the gastrointestinal tract.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate factors affecting the outcome of cholangitis after PTBD in jaundiced cancer patients. Twenty nine patients with neoplastic jaundice (male/female ratio 13/16, median age 55 years) with full clinical data, were treated by PTBD and developed cholangitis at a median of 9 days later. Four patients (14%) died of biliary sepsis a median of one month after PTBD while the other 25 survived a median of 6 months, with one week median duration of cholangitis. The probability of the cholangitis resolving was analyzed by time to resolution and it was found that 50% and 100% of the recoveries occurred 5 and 9 months respectively from the onset of the complication. The series was analyzed to determine the role of several variables (disease/patient/treatment related) in the resolution of cholangitis. Only a low stricture site, a large initial drainage catheter (10F) and a temperature increase exceeding 39 degrees C were correlated with a positive outcome. We conclude that PTBD-related cholangitis has, in our experience, a good chance of cure, low mortality rate and satisfactory 6 months median survival.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.