Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Bode

Publications and source records attributed to F Bode.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The repolarization-excitability relationship in the human right atrium is unaffected by cycle length, recording site and prior arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between repolarization and excitability in the human atrium under various conditions. BACKGROUND: Action potential duration (APD) measurements from monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings provide a surrogate for measuring the effective refractory period (ERP) in human ventricle. The relationship between repolarization and refractoriness in human atrium and the effect of prior atrial fibrillation/flutter on the ERP/APD correlation are unknown. METHODS: Seven patients with sinus rhythm and 15 patients after conversion of atrial flutter or fibrillation were evaluated. Monophasic action potentials were recorded at multiple right atrial sites and during different basic cycle lengths from 300 to 700 ms, while ERPs were determined by extrastimulus technique using the MAP recording-pacing combination catheter. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between ERP and APD at 70% repolarization (APD70, r = 0.97; p < 0.001) and 90% repolarization (APD90, r = 0.98; p < 0.001), respectively. Refractoriness occurred at a repolarization level of 72 +/- 8%. The ERP/APD70 and ERP/APD90 ratios averaged 1.06 +/- 0.10 and 0.86 +/- 0.08, respectively. These ratios were nearly constant over the entire range of basic cycle lengths, between different sites in individual patients and between different patients. Patients cardioverted from atrial fibrillation or flutter exhibited no significant differences in the ERP/APD relationship compared with patients with sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Effective refractory period and APD are closely related in the human right atrium. Using the MAP recording technique, atrial ERPs can be assessed by measurement of APDs. Effective refractory period is most closely reflected by APD70. Thus, MAP recordings allow investigation of the local activation and repolarization time course beat by beat, visualizing the excitable gap.

Action Potentials↗

Course and prognostic implications of QT interval and QT interval variability after primary coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of early reperfusion on the course of QT interval and QT interval variability in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its prognostic implications on major arrhythmic events during one-year follow-up. BACKGROUND: Although early coronary artery recanalization by primary angioplasty is an established therapy in AMI, a substantial number of patients is still threatened by malignant arrhythmias even after early successful reperfusion, which may be caused by an inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization despite reperfusion. METHOD: Temporal fluctuations of ventricular repolarization were studied prospectively in 97 consecutive patients with a first AMI by measurements of QT interval and QT interval variability during and after successful PTCA (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grades 2 and 3). Continuous beat-to-beat QT interval measurement was performed from 24-h Holter monitoring, which was initiated at admission before PTCA. RESULTS: Reperfusion caused a significant continuous increase of mean RR interval (738 +/- 98 to 808.5 +/- 121 ms; p < 0.001) and a significant decrease of parameters of QT interval (QTc: 440 +/- 32 to 416.5 +/- 37ms; p < 0.001) and QT interval variability (QTcSD: 27.5 +/- 3 to 24.9 +/- 6 ms; p < 0.001) in the majority of patients. However, in patients with major arrhythmic events at the one-year follow-up (sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia, n = 15), parameters of QT interval remained unaltered after successful reperfusion (QTc: 447.3 +/- 41 to 432.9 +/- 45 ms, p = NS; QTcSD: 35.1 +/- 13.4 to 29.0 +/- 9.1 ms, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of QT interval and QT interval variability after timely reperfusion of the infarct-related artery may be a previously unreported beneficial mechanism of primary PTCA in AMI, indicating successful reperfusion.

Aged↗

Delayed restoration of atrioventricular synchrony with beat-to-beat mode switch.

This case report describes a patient with complete AV block and a VDD pacemaker who experienced repetitive episodes of symptomatic bradycardia. Episodes occurred due to activation of an automatic beat-to-beat mode switch algorithm. After mode switch to VDI operation, the pacemaker failed to immediately switch back to AV synchronous pacing when regular sinus rhythm (> or = 100 beats per minute) resumed despite adequate P wave sensing. Dizziness was felt for up to several minutes of asynchronous pacing at the lower rate limit until VDD mode was restored. Episodes were completely eliminated by programming the mode switch function from an automatic beat-to-beat algorithm to a fixed rate algorithm.

Algorithms↗

Incidence and predictors of pacemaker dysfunction with unipolar ventricular lead configuration. Can we identify patients who benefit from bipolar electrodes?

Unipolar ventricular leads were implanted in a considerable percentage of pacemaker recipients. There is little information on incidence and risk factors for unipolar pacemaker dysfunction using modern lead designs. Included in a cross-sectional analysis were 682 patients who fulfilled the following criteria: chronically implanted bipolar ventricular leads (> 1 year), intraoperative stimulation threshold < 1.0 V/0.5 ms, and potential amplitude > 6 mV. Incidences of chest wall stimulation (CWS) at an output of twice the amplitude threshold and of myopotential oversensing (MPO) at a sensitivity of half the sensing threshold were assessed. Energy (0.60 [0.72] vs 0.63 [0.81] microJ) and sensing thresholds (8.31 [3.18] mV vs 8.47 [3.47] mV) did not differ between uni- and bipolar modes. While all pacemakers worked properly during bipolar configuration, malfunctions were observed in 5.9% of patients during unipolar configuration (CWS = 1.9%, MPO = 4.2%). Patient age > 76 years (hazard ratio HR 8.2; P < 0.001), heart failure > or = NYHA Class II (HR 3.8; P < 0.001), and an antiarrhythmic therapy with Class I or III drugs (HR 3.3; P = 0.002) were independently associated with the occurrence of unipolar pacemaker dysfunction. Use of steroid-eluting leads reduced the probability of pacemaker dysfunction (HR 0.45; P = 0.03). Risk factors for unipolar ventricular pacemaker malfunction were higher age, heart failure, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Particularly in these patients, use of bipolar ventricular leads is beneficial.

Adult↗

Cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemaker therapy: does single lead VDD pacing reduce treatment costs of atrioventricular block?

AIMS: Implantation of single-lead VDD pacemakers is an established alternative to DDD pacing in patients with atrioventricular block. This study compares the long-term costs of both systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty patients with atrioventricular block received VDD or DDD pacemakers in alternating order. Primary costs of implantation included: devices, leads and operation material, surgeons, nurses, medical technicians, and hospitalization. The mean cost of an uncomplicated DDD pacemaker implantation was defined as 1000 virtual cost-units (CU). Costs of pacemaker related complications or re-operations as well as upgrades from VDD to DDD devices were considered secondary costs and assessed during a mean follow-up period of 42+/-15 months. Pacing efficacy was assessed by event-free survival with maintained atrioventricular synchronized pacing mode. Costs of pacemaker devices were not different (639+/-26 CU in VDD vs 641+/-32 CU in DDD, ns). However, due to lower costs of lead hardware (102+/-10 CU in VDD vs 133+/-14 CU in DDD, P<0.001) and shorter implantation procedures (44.3+/-5.1 min vs 74.4+/-13.5 min, P<0.001), costs of an uncomplicated implantation were 8.9% lower in the VDD group (911+/-35 CU vs 1000+/-39 CU, P<0.001). A smaller complication rate in the VDD group led to a 16.1% reduction of secondary costs (26+/-17 CU year(-1)vs 31+/- 25 CU year(-1), P=0.024). Event-free survival did not differ between groups (83.4% in VDD vs 84.9% in DDD, ns). CONCLUSION: Use of single-lead VDD pacemakers achieves significant reduction of implantation and follow-up costs without loss of therapeutic efficacy compared to conventional DDD systems.

Aged↗

Gadolinium decreases stretch-induced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently associated with atrial dilatation caused by pressure or volume overload. Stretch-activated channels (SACs) have been found in myocardial cells and may promote AF in dilated atria. To prove this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of the SAC blocker gadolinium (Gd(3+)) on AF propensity in the isolated rabbit heart during atrial stretch. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 16 isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts, the interatrial septum was perforated to equalize biatrial pressures. Caval and pulmonary veins were occluded. Intra-atrial pressure (IAP) was increased in steps of 2 to 3 cm H(2)O by increasing the pulmonary outflow fluid column. Vulnerability to AF was evaluated by 15-second burst pacing at each IAP level. At baseline, IAP needed to be raised to 8.8+/-0.2 cm H(2)O (mean+/-SEM) to induce AF. A dose-dependent decrease in AF vulnerability was observed after Gd(3+) 12.5, 25, and 50 micromol/L was added. AF threshold increased to 19.0+/-0.5 cm H(2)O with Gd(3+) 50 micromol/L (P<0.001 versus baseline). Spontaneous runs of AF occurred in 5 hearts on a rise of IAP to 13.8+/-3.3 cm H(2)O at baseline but never during Gd(3+). Atrial effective refractory period shortened progressively from 78+/-3 ms at 0.5 cm H(2)O to 52+/-3 ms at 20 cm H(2)O (P<0.05). Gd(3+) 50 micromol/L had no significant effect on effective refractory period. CONCLUSIONS: Acute atrial stretch significantly enhances the vulnerability to AF. Gd(3+) reduces the stretch-induced vulnerability to AF in a dose-dependent manner. Block of SAC might represent a novel antiarrhythmic approach to AF under conditions of elevated atrial pressure or volume.

Animals↗

Efficacy and safety of bipolar sensing with high atrial sensitivity in dual chamber pacemakers.

In dual chamber pacemakers, atrial sensing performance is decisive for maintenance of AV synchrony. Particularly, the efficacy of mode switching algorithms during intermittent atrial tachyarrhythmias depends on the sensitive detection of low potential amplitudes. Therefore, a high atrial sensitivity of 0.18 mV, commonly used in single lead VDD pacemakers, was investigated for its efficacy and safety in DDD pacing. Thirty patients received dual chamber pacemakers and bipolar atrial screw-in leads for sinus node syndrome or AV block; 15 patients suffered from intermittent atrial fibrillation. Pace makers were programmed to an atrial sensitivity of 0.18 mV. Two weeks, 3, 9, and 15 months after implantation, P wave sensing threshold and T wave oversensing thresholds for the native and paced T wave were determined. The myopotential oversensing thresholds were evaluated by isometric contraction of the pectoral muscles. Automatic mode switch to DDIR pacing was activated when the mean atrial rate exceeded 180 beats/min. The patients were followed by 24-hour Holter monitoring. Two weeks after implantation, mean atrial sensing threshold was 1.81 +/- 0.85 mV (range 0.25-2.8 mV) without significant differences during further follow-up. Native T wave sensing threshold was < 0.18 mV in all patients. In 13% of patients, paced T waves were perceived in the atrial channel at the highest sensitivity. This T wave sensing could easily be avoided by programming a postventricular atrial refractory period exceeding 300 ms. Myopotential oversensing could not be provoked and Holter records showed no signs of sensing dysfunction. During a 15-month follow-up, 1,191 mode switch events were counted by autodiagnostic pacemaker function. Forty-two of these events occurred during Holter monitoring. Unjustified mode switch was not observed. In DDD pacemakers, bipolar atrial sensing with a very high sensitivity is efficient and safe. Using these sensitivity settings, activation of the mode switch algorithm almost completely avoids fast transmission of atrial rate to the ventricle during atrial fibrillation.

Adult↗

Age dependency of sensing performance and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacing.

Implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers is an established therapeutic option in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function. However, related to occurrence of sinus node disease and atrial undersensing, there is concern whether VDD devices are appropriate in physically active young patients. Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with isolated AV block and VDD pacemakers were investigated. This population was subdivided into quartiles of 58 patients according to age at time of inclusion: 26.2-59.4 years (group A), 59.5-70.1 years (group B), 70.2-81.0 years (group C), and 81.1-92.5 years (group D). Follow-up visits included pacemaker telemetry, Holter monitoring, and exercise testing. Patients were visited at 2 and 12 weeks after implantation thereafter followed by 6-month intervals. Mean follow-up period was 35 +/- 14 months. Three months after implantation, atrial sensing threshold was significantly higher in young patients: 1.18 +/- 0.58 mV (group A) versus 0.79 +/- 0.35 mV (group B), 0.68 +/- 0.33 mV (group C), and 0.60 +/- 0.25 mV (group D), P < 0.001 for comparison of group A to all other groups. Atrial undersensing was observed less frequently in young patients: 6.9% (group A) versus 17.2% (group B), 24.1% (group C), and 27.6% (group D), P = 0.025 for intergroup comparisons. Sinus node dysfunction did not occur in group A. Atrial arrhythmias and loss of AV synchronized pacing mode occurred rarely in young patients: 0.6% (0.4%) per year in group A versus 1.3% (1.3%) in group B, 3.9% (3.4%) in group C, and 5.7% (7.4%) per year in group D, P < 0.01 for intergroup comparisons. Our data show good atrial sensing performance, low incidence of sinus node dysfunction, and few atrial arrhythmias in young patients with VDD pacing for AV block. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended particularly for young patients with AV block.

Adult↗

Long-term superiority of steroid elution in atrial active fixation platinum leads.

Steroid elution reduces the acute increase in stimulation threshold particularly in active fixation leads. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy of steroid elution in atrial screw-in leads compared to conventional lead design. Two different bipolar active fixation platinum lead designs were implanted. Leads were similar except for the presence (group S, n = 66) or absence (group N, n = 68) of steroid elution. Patients received dual chamber pacemakers with the following atrial leads in consecutive order: Medtronic 4058 M (group N, n = 30), Medtronic 4068 (group S, n = 40), Vitatron IMS 13 (identical to 4058 M, group N, n = 38), and Vitatron IMX 13 (identical to 4068, group S, n = 26). The mean follow-up period was 40.7 +/- 16.1 months (range 10 to 84 months). Stimulation thresholds, pacing impedances, P wave potentials, and sensing threshold were assessed for both groups immediately, 10 days, 6 weeks, and 3 months after implantation followed by 6-months intervals. Energy thresholds, chronaxie-rheobase products, and energy consumption of atrial pacing were calculated. Chronic values were deduced from the most recent measurement performed in an individual patient. Within the first 10 days after implantation, atrial voltage threshold at pulse duration of 0.4 ms increased from 0.91 +/- 0.42 to 2.06 +/- 0.45 V in group N (P < 0.001). Less increase was observed in group S (0.83 +/- 0.39 to 1.08 +/- 0.53 V, P = 0.003). Atrial voltage thresholds remained markedly lower in steroid-eluting leads during whole follow-up (1.12 +/- 0.49 V in group S vs 1.58 +/- 0.71 V in group N, P < 0.001). Chronic energy consumption was markedly reduced in group S (4.0 +/- 2.7 microJ) compared to group N (9.8 +/- 7.5 microJ, P < 0.001). An atrial voltage threshold below 1.25 V at 0.4 ms was achieved in 92.3% of patients of group S allowing programming of an output of 2.5 V. Such low outputs were feasible in only 49.3% of patients in group N (P < 0.001). Chronic P wave amplitudes did not differ significantly between groups (3.27 +/- 1.81 mV in group N vs 3.24 +/- 1.18 mV in group S, P = 0.91). Steroid elution diminishes the increase of stimulation thresholds of nonsteroid atrial active fixation platinum leads resulting in a long-term reduction of energy consumption. Thus, use of steroids can be recommended for general use in atrial active fixation lead designs.

Aged↗

Atrial lead placement during atrial fibrillation. Is restitution of sinus rhythm required for proper lead function? Feasibility and 12-month functional analysis.

Unexpected atrial fibrillation (AF) during implantation of an atrial pacemaker lead is sometimes encountered. Intraoperative cardioversion may lengthen and complicate the implantation process. This study prospectively investigates the performance of atrial leads implanted during AF (group A) and compares atrial sensing and pacing properties to an age- and sex-matched control group in which sinus rhythm had been restored before atrial lead placement (group B). Patient groups consisted of 32 patients each. All patients received DDDR pacemakers and bipolar, steroid-eluting, active fixation atrial leads. In patients with AF at the time of implantation (group A), a minimal intracardiac fibrillatory amplitude of at least 1.0 mV was required for acceptable atrial lead placement. In patients with restored sinus rhythm (group B), a voltage threshold < 1.5 V at 0.5 ms and a minimal atrial potential amplitude > 1.5 mV was required. Patients of group A in whom spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm did not occur within 4 weeks after implantation underwent electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Pacemaker interrogations were performed 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. In group A, implantation time was significantly shorter as compared to group B (58.7 +/- 8.6 minutes vs 73.0 +/- 17.3 minutes, P < 0.001). Mean atrial potential amplitude during AF was correlated with the telemetered atrial potential during sinus rhythm (r = 0.49, P < 0.001), but not with the atrial stimulation threshold. Twelve months after implantation, sensing thresholds (1.74 +/- 0.52 mV vs 1.78 +/- 0.69 mV, P = 0.98) and stimulation thresholds (1.09 +/- 0.42 V vs 1.01 +/- 0.31 V, P = 0.66) did not differ between groups A and B. However, in three patients of group A, chronic atrial sensing threshold was < or = 1 mV requiring atrial sensitivities of at least 0.35 mV to achieve reliable atrial sensing. Atrial lead placement during AF is feasible and reduces implantation time. However, bipolar atrial leads and the option to program high atrial sensitivities are required.

Aged↗

Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction.

Episodes of repetitive P wave undersensing have been described in dual chamber pacemakers due to automatic extension of the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). Pacemaker stimulation was completely inhibited despite the presence of adequate P waves. This study sought to determine whether cycles of repetitive P wave undersensing occur even in the absence of PVARP extension. Two-hundred fifty-five patients were investigated after DDD or VDD pacemaker implantation for intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. Forty-six episodes of repetitive atrial undersensing were found during 24-hour Holter ECG in nine patients. Pacemaker syndrome-like symptoms occurred. Episodes were elicited by atrial or ventricular premature contractions when (1) native AV conduction was present but considerably prolonged, (2) intrinsic sinus rate exceeded pacemaker intervention rate, and (3) native AV interval plus PVARP exceeded sinus cycle length. Programming of a particularly short AV interval and PVARP helped to reduce the incidence of repetitive P wave undersensing. Patients with dual chamber devices and prolonged native AV conduction are prone to develop episodes of output inhibition. Standard timing cycles may be inappropriate in these patients.

Atrioventricular Node↗

Diagnosis of atrial undersensing in dual chamber pacemakers: impact of autodiagnostic features.

Atrial undersensing occurs in a considerable number of patients, both with single lead VDD pacemakers and with DDD devices. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of electrocardiographic methods and autodiagnostic pacemaker features to detect atrial sensing dysfunction. Two hundred and thirty-one patients with AV block received single lead VDD pacemakers or DDD devices. Atrial sensitivity was programmed to 0.1 or 0.18 in VDD devices and to 0.5 mV in DDD devices; the rate limits were set to 40 and 160 beats/min. Twelve-lead ECG recording for 1 minute during deep respiration and change of body position, 24-hour Holter ECG recording, and treadmill exercise were performed 2 weeks and 15 months after pacemaker implantation. AV synchrony and, if available, P wave amplitude histogram were sampled by autodiagnostic pacemaker features and compared to electrocardiographic findings. Atrial undersensing was assumed, if AV synchrony was below 100% or if minimal P wave amplitude (PWA) was equal to the programmed atrial sensitivity. Intermittent atrial undersensing occurred in 20.7% of patients. The diagnostic sensitivities of the various methods used to detect atrial sensing failures were: 24-hour Holter monitoring 97.5%, P wave amplitude histogram 90.0%, stored AV synchrony 68.0% without significant difference between the various devices, treadmill exercise testing 58.8%, and 12-lead ECG recording 21.3%. In one patient, atrial undersensing was exclusively detected by exercise testing. In conclusion, autodiagnostic pacemaker features facilitate the evaluation of atrial sensing performance. However, to exclude intermittent atrial malesensing, routine Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise are still needed.

Aged↗

Electrophysiological performance of a bipolar membrane-coated titanium nitride electrode: a randomized comparison of steroid and nonsteroid lead designs.

The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate the performance of a new cardiac pacemaker lead with a titanium nitride cathode coated with a copolymer membrane. In particular, the electrophysiological effect of steroid dissolved in this ion-exchange membrane was evaluated by randomized comparison. Ninety-five patients were randomized either to the 1450 T (n = 51) or the 1451 T ventricular lead (n = 45) and received telemeteral VVI(R) pacemakers with identical diagnostic features. Both leads were bipolar, were passively affixed, and had a porous titanium nitride tip with a surface area of 3.5 mm2. The only difference between the two electrodes was 13 micrograms of dexamethasone added to the 1450 Ts membrane coating. Voltage thresholds (VTH) at pulse durations of 0.25, 0.37, and 0.5 ms, lead impedance, and sensing thresholds were measured at discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after implantation. Mean amplitude and the slew rate from three telemetered intracardiac electrograms, chronaxie-rheobase product, and minimum energy consumption were calculated. After a 6-month follow-up, mean voltage thresholds of 0.65 +/- 0.20 V and 0.63 +/- 0.34 were achieved for the 1450 T lead and 1451 T lead, respectively. As a result, a VTH < 1.0 V was obtained in all patients with 1450 T electrodes and in 97.7% of patients with 1451 T leads after 6 months follow-up. In both electrodes, stable VTH was reached 2 weeks after implantation, and no transient rise in threshold was observed. No differences were observed between the steroid and the nonsteroid group in respect to VTH, chronaxie-rheobase product, minimum energy consumption, and potential amplitude and slew rate. In conclusion, safe and efficient pacing at low pulse amplitudes were achieved with both leads. The tip design, independently of the steroid additive, prevented any energy-consuming increases in the voltage threshold.

Coated Materials, Biocompatible↗

Atrial sensing and AV synchrony in single lead VDD pacemakers: a prospective comparison to DDD devices with bipolar atrial leads.

INTRODUCTION: Single lead VDD pacing has offered an alternative to DDD systems in patients with isolated AV block. Up to now, however, the relative performance of these pacemaker systems was not systematically compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred sixty patients who received either a VDD pacemaker (n = 180) or a DDD device (n = 180) with a bipolar atrial lead were investigated prospectively for a mean period of 30 +/- 13 months. Pacemaker function was analyzed by telemetry, Holter monitoring, and exercise ECG. Time of implantation and fluoroscopy was significantly lower with VDD devices (44.3 +/- 5.1 min vs 74.4 +/- 13.5 min and 4.6 +/- 2.5 min vs 10.3 +/- 5.6 min in DDD pacemakers, respectively). Intermittent atrial undersensing occurred in 23.3% of patients with a VDD pacemaker and in 9.4% with DDD devices (NS). The incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias did not differ between the VDD (6.7%) and the DDD group (6.1%). Sinus node dysfunction developed in 1.9% of patients, but the vast majority (85.7%) of patients were asymptomatic. There was a tendency for a higher rate of operative revisions in the DDD group (6.1% vs 3.3% in VDD pacemakers, P = 0.15). Cumulative maintenance of AV-synchronized pacing mode was 94.9% in patients with VDD pacemakers and 92.1% with DDD devices (NS). CONCLUSION: With the benefit of a simpler implant procedure, long-term outcome of single lead VDD pacing is equivalent to DDD pacing in patients with AV block and preoperative normal sinus node function.

Aged↗

Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of sinus node disease after pacemaker implantation for exclusive atrioventricular (AV) block. DESIGN: 441 patients were followed after VDD (n = 219) or DDD pacemaker (n = 222) implantation for AV block over a mean period of 37 months. Sinus node disease and atrial arrhythmias had been excluded by Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise preoperatively in 286 patients (group A). In 155 patients with complete AV block, a sinus rate above 70 beats/min was required for inclusion in the study (group B). Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise were performed two weeks, three months, and every six months after implantation. Sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min, sinoatrial block, sinus arrest, or subnormal increase of heart rate during treadmill exercise were defined as sinus node dysfunction. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of sinus node disease was 0.65% per year without differences between groups. Clinical indicators of sinus node dysfunction were sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min in six patients (1.4%), intermittent sinoatrial block in two (0.5%), and chronotropic incompetence in five patients (1.1%). Only one of these patients (0.2%) was symptomatic. Cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 2.0% per year, independent of the method used for the assessment of sinus node function and of the implanted device. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for isolated AV block, sinus node syndrome rarely occurs during follow up. Thus single lead VDD pacing can safely be performed in these patients.

Aged↗