Ibuprofen does not suppress active multiple sclerosis lesions on gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Barkhof.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We studied the appearance of retinoblastoma on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced images and the accuracy of tumour staging with MR imaging. The MR images were obtained in 18 children with retinoblastoma and compared with histopathological findings after enucleation. The MR imaging included T1-weighted and dual-echo T2-weighted images before, and T1-weighted images after, gadopentetate dimeglumine injection. The contrast between tumour and ipsilateral vitreous strongly increased (57 %) after gadolinium on T1-weighted images (p = 0.004). Tumour was strongly hypointense as compared with ipsilateral vitreous in all patients using heavily T2-weighted (TE = 120 ms) images (p = 0.001). The estimated T2 of tumour (mean 96 + 14 ms) did not correlate with histological grading or degree of calcification. Unenhanced T1-weighted MR images rightfully excluded extrascleral growth in 16 of 16 cases, but its presence was confirmed after enucleation in only one of 2 abnormal MR scans. Invasion of the optic nerve behind the cribriform plate was confirmed in 2 of 3 abnormal gadolinium-enhanced MR scans, but also in 1 of the 15 cases in which MR images were normal. The T2-weighted images were useful in assessing retinal detachment. We conclude that heavily T2-weighted images, unenhanced T1-weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images are complementary in characterizing and staging retinoblastoma.
Serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects substantial subclinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is presently included in most treatment trials as an objective outcome measure. Our current knowledge of the role of MRI in MS treatment trials is derived from very limited patient studies, and the aim of this paper is to identify strategies to optimize the use of MRI in monitoring disease activity in treatment trials. The number of active lesions revealed by MRI can be used as the primary outcome measure in exploratory treatment trials. With monthly scanning, the majority of active lesions will be seen by virtue of a limited number of new areas of gadolinium enhancement. The contrast between enhancing lesions and background could be increased by: (1) using higher doses of gadolinium, (2) suppressing the background signal with magnetization transfer, (3) delayed scanning, or (4) a combination of these. Following a systematic comparison of those approaches, the effect on the sensitivity in detecting active lesions should be analysed with reference to the power of treatment trials. We present preliminary results showing marked agreement between observers in reporting enhancing lesions; however, with new acquisition strategies, the observer variation should be re-established in a multicentre fashion. In definitive trials, the increase in total lesion load serves as a secondary outcome measure. Since the majority of lesions making up the total lesion load are inactive during the study, spatial resolution should be maximized in order to preclude any artificial changes in lesion load to be superimposed (noise) upon the relatively small actual change (information). Reduction in measurement error can be attempted by improved acquisition techniques with increased lesion to background contrast. More importantly, improvement in quantitation techniques is warranted. With a 6% coefficient of variation in measuring a baseline lesion load, we calculate the standard error of the mean yearly increase in T2 lesion load (typically 10% in untreated patients) in a treatment arm of 124 patients to be 7.5%. A comparison of several quantitation techniques should be performed in a multicentre longitudinal fashion in order to include variation caused by both scanner and segmentation technique, in addition to biological activity.
Using both quantitative computer-assisted analysis and visual estimation the MR imaging response of brain metastases to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was prospectively studied in 49 patients. Compared to the computer-assisted analysis, the precision of the visual estimation (by two readers in conference) of tumor response was determined. Also the radiological response was related to the clinical response. Six weeks after WBRT follow-up MR was performed in 27 of 49 patients. Of the remaining 22 patients without follow-up MR, 9 had died or deteriorated due to neurologic decline. In four patients (15%) tumor increase was demonstrated by computer-assisted analysis; in the other 23 patients tumor remained stable (15%) or decreased (70%). In 11 of the 27 patients, a second follow-up MR was obtained 26 wk after WBRT demonstrating tumor increase in seven patients (64%). Complete discordance between both assessment methods was noticed in only 4 of 38 MR scans (27 scans 6 wk after WBRT and 11 scans 26 wk after WBRT) with small quantitative changes in tumor volume. In 26 of 38 (68%) observations 6 and 26 wk after WBRT, there was a positive correlation between change in tumor volume and change in the Neurologic Status. Visual estimation analysis seems an appropriate method of routine therapy monitoring in individual patients with brain metastases. The computer-assisted analysis should be considered if precise response monitoring becomes critical.
The purpose of this study was, first, to evaluate correlations between four potential magnetic resonance (MR) parameters for severe tissue destruction in multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Second, to evaluate the effect of incidental magnetization transfer (MT) effect on hypointense lesions in multislice T1 spin echo (SE) imaging. In 49 lesions, from 10 MS patients, MT ratio (MTR), T1 relaxation time, signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted SE images normalized to normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and SI normalized to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured. Differences in contrast of hypointense lesions were measured between single slice and multislice imaging. MTR correlated significantly (p < .001) with longitudinal relaxation rates (1/T1) (r = 0.84), SI normalized to NAWM (r = 0.78), and SI normalized to CSF (r = 0.75). The degree of reduction in contrast, caused by multislice imaging, correlated significantly with MTR of lesions (r = 0.60, p < .001), leading to reduction of hypointense lesion load (p < .01). We conclude that all four MR markers for severe tissue destruction are highly correlated when applied to selected hypointense lesions on T1-weighted SE images. Due to "incidental" off-resonance excitation, contrast and hypointense lesion load will be reduced in multislice T1-weighted SE images.
A 12-year-old girl was diagnosed as suffering from multiple sclerosis. At age 14, just after recovery from an exacerbation of MS with left-sided optic neuritis, she underwent a Mantoux tuberculin skin test. Within 30 minutes she developed complete irreversible optic neuropathy of the left eye. This case illustrates the urge for caution to perform vaccinations and tuberculin skin tests not only during progressive disease activity of MS, but also in the reconvalescent phase after an acute exacerbation.
We compared MRI criteria used to predict conversion of suspected multiple sclerosis to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Seventy-four patients with clinically isolated neurological symptoms suggestive of multiple sclerosis were studied with MRI. Logistic regression analysis was used to remove redundant information, and a diagnostic model was built after each MRI parameter was dichotomized according to maximum accuracy using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Clinically definite multiple sclerosis developed in 33 patients (prevalence 45%). The optimum cut-off point (number of lesions) was one for most MRI criteria (including gadolinium-enhancement and juxta-cortical lesions), but three for periventricular lesions, and nine for the total number of T2-lesions. Only gadolinium-enhancement and juxta-cortical lesions provided independent information. A final model which, in addition, included infratentorial and periventricular lesions, had an accuracy of 80%, and having more abnormal criteria, predicted conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis strongly. The model performed better than the criteria of Paty et al. (Neurology 1988; 38: 180-5) and of Fazekas et al. (Neurology 1988; 38: 1822-5). We concluded that a four-parameter dichotomized MRI model including gadolinium-enhancement, juxtacortical, infratentorial and periventricular lesions best predicts conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.
The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value for Alzheimer disease (AD) of single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), separately and in combination. The study was part of a two-stage population-based study of mental functioning among noninstitutionalized 65-to 85-year-olds living in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Participants (n = 51) were randomly selected within strata of cognitive function to obtain a sample of AD patients (n = 10) and clinically normal subjects (n = 41), of whom 22 displayed some cognitive impairment and fulfilled criteria for "minimal dementia" according to the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly. Coronal T1-weighted MRI was used to visualize the medial temporal lobe. Medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) was assessed qualitatively on a 0-4 scale. Regional cerebral blood flow on SPECT was assessed with the use of technetium 99m-HMPAO in three manually drawn regions of interest (frontal, parietal, and temporoparietal). Ratios were calculated by using the cerebellum as the reference area. MTA differed significantly between AD patients and clinically normal subjects (p = 0.0009), with sensitivity for AD of 70% and a specificity of 76%. None of the three SPECT ratios differed between normal and AD subjects. The temporoparietal/cerebellar ratio had a sensitivity of 30% and a specificity of 71% as a cutoff of 0.76. When both tests were positive the combined sensitivity was low (20%), but the false-positive rate was also very low (5%). A negative result on MRI or any SPECT ratio yielded a high specificity (93%-98%) but also a high false-negative rate (60-80%). Adding SPECT to MRI seems useful only if a diagnosis of AD is suspected clinically and confirmation is needed. When the clinical probability that AD is absent is high, normal results on either MRI or SPECT may confirm this notion. Given the fact that structural imaging should be performed in a clinical workup for dementia, using MRI only would be the most cost-effective approach.
To assess the reproducibility of a qualitative rating scale of cerebral atrophy on MRI in an aged population of demented and non-demented individuals, 4 raters independently judged cerebral atrophy (CA) in 13 regions on a 0-3 scale on 75 MRI scans, on two occasions. The level of agreement was expressed by kappa statistics as well as by analysis of variance for interexaminer reproducibility studies. The mean CA scores ranged from 13.3 to 21.2, indicating moderately high prevalence of cerebral atrophy in this sample. Complete agreement among observers was reached in 49.7% of the ratings during the first assessment and in 44.1% in the second assessment. The inter-observer agreement was poor in both sessions (mean overall kappas 0.34 and 0.24). The intra-observer agreement was moderate to good for all raters (mean overall kappa: 0.58). The average standard deviation of the differences between CA scores of the 4 raters was 5.12 in the first and 5.13 in the second session. The average standard deviation for the differences within raters was 2.4. We conclude that the assessment of cerebral atrophy using this rating scale on MRI in an aged population has a poor reproducibility among raters. However, it provides regional atrophy measurements and is quite reliable when performed by a single rater.
Inhomogeneous patient samples have been used in previous studies to determine the power of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for trial monitoring in multiple sclerosis (MS). These power-calculations might not be applicable to the active relapsing-remitting patient who is preferably included in trials. In order to reevaluate the power-calculations for MRI in the monitoring of treatment in strictly relapsing-remitting MS and to compare the power of different trial designs we studied 12 relapsing-remitting MS patients prospectively for a median period of 12 months using monthly clinical assessments and gadolinium-enhanced MRI. A median number of two clinical relapses/patient occurred of which a median of one was treated with steroids. A median of 1.59 new lesions/scan/patient was detected (range 0-8). The total number of new active lesions correlated significantly with study period relapses (SRCC = 0.72, P = 0.023). Computer simulations using the bootstrap technique yielded mostly lower power values for a parallel groups design than in previous studies except for short follow-periods in larger samples. In this-sample the open cross-over design was found to be between 20 and 40% more powerful. Results of power-calculations are clearly sample dependent implying that for treatment trial monitoring using MRI in relapsing-remitting MS conservative sample size estimates are to be used. In an active patient group open cross-over trial designs could be a very powerful alternative to parallel groups design.
Now that the concept of remyelination is gaining acceptance in MS, there is a need for a paraclinical marker to monitor remyelination in MS, for example to study the effect of therapeutical interventions. At present there is no known imaging marker for remyelination. While positron emission tomography (PET) has ample sensitivity and specificity, an appropriate tracer is locking and spatial resolution is poor. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has superior sensitivity and spatial resolution, but the standard techniques lack specificity. Conventional T2-weighted images will most probably still appear abnormal in an area of remyelination. Among several newer MR techniques that are more specific, magnetization transfer contrast is the best candidate with regards to imaging remyelination. There is a strong need for an appropriate animal model and for histopathological confirmation to be able to further develop both PET and MR.
In this study we evaluated and compared the inter-rater variabilities in detecting enhancing lesions in patients with MS after injection of a standard dose (s.d.) and a triple dose (TD) of gadolinium (Gd). Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were obtained in 15 patients, consisting of T1-weighted images 5 to 7 min after the injection of the s.d. (0.1 mmol/kg) of Gd and, after an interval of 6 to 24 h, 5 to 7 min after the injection of the TD (0.3 mmol/kg). An additional scan 1 h after the TD injection (delayed scanning-DS) was obtained in 11 patients. The scans were independently evaluated in a random order by four observers. Lesions were counted and scored according to size and location. The level of inter-observer observer concordance was very high for reporting the total numbers of enhancing lesions, their sizes and sites for the three experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in inter-observer variability in reporting the total number of enhancing lesions and their location in different brain sites in the three conditions. Our data indicate that the gain in sensitivity in detecting enhancing lesions in MS with the TD is not counteracted by a loss in reproducibility. This is important in planning clinical trials in which the number of enhancing lesions is used as a measure of outcome.
We report the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory trial of the chimeric monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody cM-T412 in 71 patients suffering from active relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Infusion of the antibody produced frequent but usually minor side effects and resulted in a long-lasting reduction of circulating CD4-positive T cells. There was no significant effect on the primary measure of efficacy, the number of active lesions on monthly gadolinium-enhanced MRI over 9 months. Further statistical evaluation provided evidence that the degree of depletion of CD4-positive cells was important with regard to treatment efficacy; using CD4 counts as a covariate there was a statistically significant effect on the number of active lesions over 18 months (p = 0.04). There was a statistically significant reduction of 41% in the number of clinical relapses (a secondary efficacy parameter) after 9 months (p = 0.02), which was still present after 18 months, but this finding may be partly due to physician unblinding. Other secondary efficacy parameters (Expanded Disability Status Scale progression, number of courses of methylprednisolone) were not influenced by anti-CD4 treatment. We conclude that intravenous treatment with the monoclonal antibody cM-T412 in the dosage we used results in a substantial and sustained reduction of the number of circulating CD4-positive cells, but is not able to reduce MS activity as measured by monthly gadolinium-enhanced MRI, and is therefore unlikely to have a beneficial effect on the clinical disease course. We found preliminary evidence suggesting that more aggressive depletion of CD4-positive cells might lead to a more substantial reduction in MRI activity.
We evaluated the effect of interscanner variation on brain MRI-measured lesion volumes and measurement reproducibility in MS. Twenty clinically definite MS patients were each scanned on two or three scanners (a total of 14 scanners were used). In addition, a formalin-fixed MS brain was studied on eight scanners from different manufacturers and with different field strengths. For the formalin-fixed MS brain, on each machine we obtained two scans with slice thicknesses of 5 and 3 mm. Only 5-mm-thick slices were obtained from patients. The lesion volume present on each scan was evaluated three times by a single observer in random order, using a local thresholding technique. In two groups of eight patients scanned on machines with different field strengths, the mean lesion volumes present on scans obtained at 1.5 T were significantly higher than those measured on scans obtained with machines operating at 0.5 and 1.0 T (p < 0.01). When a single observer repeatedly evaluated the same scan, a median introbserver agreement of 98.7% (95% CI, 97.9 to 99.1) was achieved. However, when the observer evaluated the scans from different MRI scanners, the agreement (an interscanner agreement) fell to 91.1% (CI, 90.2 to 94.1). When only scanners operating at 1.5 T were considered, the median interscanner agreement was 96.7% (CI, 95 to 97.5). Also, for the formalin-fixed MS brain, the intraobserver agreements obtained with both slice thicknesses were significantly higher than the corresponding interscanner agreements. The interscanner agreement, but not the intraobserver agreement, obtained with a slice thickness of 3 mm was higher than that obtained with a slice thickness of 5 mm. Our results indicate that lesion volume measurements in MS are influenced significantly by the use of different MR scanners and that a patient included in a serial study should be always scanned with the same MR machine using 3-mm thick slices.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is a sensitive and objective means to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated the interobserver agreement and the value of observer training in reporting enhancing lesions from serial MRI. Scans of 16 MS patients were evaluated by five inexperienced and five experienced observers before and after consensus formation and training. The number of lesions at baseline, and the number of new and persistent lesions at follow-up were scored. For each condition, weighted kappa values (kappa) and the mean average difference to the median (MADM) scores were calculated. Without training, the experienced readers showed good agreement on number of lesions at baseline and new lesions at follow-up, and moderate agreement for persistent lesions. The inexperienced readers showed poor agreement for baseline and persistent lesions, and moderate agreement for new lesions. After training, both groups reported lower absolute numbers of lesions, especially the inexperienced readers. The experienced readers showed good agreement for all lesion types, the inexperienced readers showed agreement for baseline and new lesions, and agreement was moderate for persistent lesions. In both groups MADM scores were < 0.72 for baseline and new lesions, but > 1.2 for persistent lesions. Interobserver agreement is improved by training, especially in inexperienced readers. Interobserver agreement in reporting gadolinium-enhanced lesions is high, which validates the use of serial, enhanced MRI as an outcome parameter in treatment trials in MS.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of single-dose gadolinium with magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) with that of triple-dose gadolinium in detecting enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with multiple sclerosis were examined with MR imaging first with 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium (single dose) and then, after 24 to 72 hours, with 0.3 mmol/kg gadolinium (triple dose). T2-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo MR images with and without MTC were obtained before contrast administration followed by either T1-weighted spin-echo images with MTC (single dose) or conventional T1-weighted spin-echo images (triple dose), starting 5, 17, and 29 minutes after contrast administration. All images were evaluated in a blinded fashion and scored in random order by two readers. Outcome parameters included number of enhancing lesions, number of active MR examinations (those containing at least one enhancing lesion), contrast ratio (signal intensity of enhancing lesion divided by signal intensity of normal-appearing white matter), and size of enhancing lesions. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent more enhancing lesions and 49% more active MR examinations were detected when a triple dose of gadolinium was used as compared with a single dose. The level of agreement between readers as to the number of enhancing lesions was significantly higher for triple-dose than for single-dose gadolinium. With triple-dose gadolinium, contrast ratios and areas of enhancement increased by 10% and 33%, respectively. Delayed imaging increased the size of the lesion by 11% on single-dose MTC images and by 18% on triple-dose images. CONCLUSION: Triple-dose gadolinium is more effective (higher sensitivity and interobserver agreement) than single-dose gadolinium in combination with MTC in detecting enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions.
PURPOSE: To investigate the intersubject and intrasubject variability of the activated area in the visual cortex with functional MR imaging. METHODS: Double-section gradient-echo MR images were acquired at 1.5 T in 28 healthy volunteers using the fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique. Visual stimulation was obtained with light-emitting diode (LED) goggles. Eighteen volunteers were studied twice. The size of the activated areas in the visual cortex and the increase in signal were measured. A reproducibility ratio for size (R[size]) and for location (R[overlap]) was calculated on a scale of 0.0 to 1.0. RESULTS: Activation was seen in 89% of the subjects. The size of the activated area was widely variable among subjects: mean, 460 +/- 284 mm2; range, 0 to 1029 mm2 in the first study in all volunteers. Signal increases ranged from 3.2% to 10.9%, with a mean of 6.6 +/- 1.7%. The mean values of intrasubject variability testing were R(size) = 0.83 +/- 0.16 and R(overlap) = 0.31 +/- 0.11. CONCLUSION: Functional MR imaging with the FLASH technique is useful in identifying certain cortical areas that have quite variable locations among subjects. This study provides reference data for the intrasubject and intersubject variability of the activation pattern of the visual cortex.