Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Barbieri

Publications and source records attributed to F Barbieri.

115 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Feasibility of thymidine labelling index on fine needle aspirates from breast cancer: comparison with surgical samples.

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) provides a suitable diagnostic tool in the management of patients with breast cancer lesions. The current study reports on tumor proliferative activity, by 3H-Thymidine Labelling Index (TLI), assessed on 59 FNA (TLI1) and 28 surgical specimens (TLI2) from the same breast cancer patients. Median TLI values from FNA and surgical material were 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively. In the 28 patients, evaluable for the comparison between TLI1 and TLI2, the association was found to be highly significant (p = 0.000). Moreover, no change in tumor proliferative activity was observed in the majority (79%) of cases when evaluated preoperatively and at surgery. This study confirms the feasibility of TLI analysis on FNA from breast cancer and provides results superimposable on those obtained in a tissue sample from the same patient.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study comparing a levosulpiride-based and a metoclopramide-based combination in the prevention of ProMECE-CytaBOM-induced emesis.

BACKGROUND: To test two different antiemetic regimens for preventing nausea and vomiting in patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing systemic chemotherapy (CT) with ProMECE-CytaBOM (P-C). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive untreated adult outpatients with histologically confirmed NHL and scheduled to receive P-C chemotherapy were registered in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study to compare the antiemetic efficacy of a levosulpiride (LS)-based and metoclopramide (MTC)-based regimen. RESULTS: Complete protection from vomiting was recorded in 93% (62/67) of courses with the LS-regimen and in 89% (62/70) with the MTC-regimen (p = 0.428). No nausea was observed in 84% (56/67) of courses with the LS-regimen and in 74% (52/70) with the MTC-regimen (p = 0.183). No differences in prevention of emesis were recorded when patients crossed to the other regimen. Both regimens were well tolerated; however, on day 8 of chemotherapy, when both antiemetic regimens were administered at a higher dose, the LS-based combination showed significantly lower toxicity (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: ProMECE-CytaBOM-induced emesis can be prevented in most cases with appropriate, specifically designed antiemetic therapy. Both the LS- and MTC-based combinations resulted in a high percentage of complete protection from emesis, but the higher incidence of side effects observed with MTC makes the LS-based regimen preferable for patients receiving P-C chemotherapy.

Adult↗