[Asthma: definition and clinical aspects].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F B Michel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: ALLERGIC AND PSEUDOALLERGIC REACTIONS: Adverse drug reactions occur in 1 to 3% of hospitalized patients and 10% are due to allergic and pseudoallergic reactions. Allergic reactions are unpredictable reactions related to immunologic mechanism. Pseudoallergic reactions mimic allergic reactions but no drug-specific antibody or T cell proliferation can be demonstrated. PREVENTION: We are lacking clinical and biological tools and the available ones still need to be validated. However, a precise diagnosis is required in order to set up prevention measures. We focus here on some basic and new data concerning these reactions, in particular epidemiological studies, mechanisms and diagnostic methods.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Nebulization therapy is an approach for the treatment of respiratory diseases such as asthma which was not anticipated in the international recommendations for the treatment of asthma and which merits study. Even if the place of nebulizers in the treatment of asthma exacerbations has been validated, this is not the case for adult asthmatic subjects with chronic asthma. While asthma control for most patients can be achieved using metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler therapy, some patients may require regular home nebulized therapy. Before determining the objectives and therapeutic characteristics of nebulization in the treatment of chronic asthma in the adult patient, we shall first describe the pathophysiological elements involved in the treatment of asthma and of the couple 'nebulized substance-nebulizer' leading to an optimal nebulization.
New-generation H1-blockers may possess antiallergic properties, and their effect may differ, depending on the target organ. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was carried out during the pollen season to compare the clinical effect on nasal and conjunctival symptoms of astemizole (10 mg o.d.) and loratadine (10 mg o.d.) with their effect on skin-test reactivity to allergen and histamine. Thirty-eight patients (12-56 years of age) were studied. Nasal and ocular symptoms were recorded daily from days 4 to 7. Skin prick tests with serial concentrations of allergens and one concentration of histamine were carried out before and at the end of the 7-day treatment period. Parallel-line bioassay, analysis of variance, and covariance were used to analyze skin test data. Loratadine and astemizole significantly decreased symptoms from baseline (P < 0.004 and P < 0.006). Skin-test reactivity to allergen and histamine was more profoundly decreased by astemizole than loratadine. The histamine covariant was more important in the allergen effect of astemizole than in that of loratadine. Two H1-blockers having the same clinical effect on nasal and ocular symptoms during the pollen season have totally different effects on skin-test reactivity. Skin-test reactivity to allergen or histamine is not predictive of the clinical efficacy of H1-blockers during seasonal allergic rhinitis.
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid resistant or insensitive asthmatic subjects are usually defined as patients whose baseline pre-bronchodilation forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of less than 70-80% predicted improves significantly in response to beta 2 agonists but by less than 15% following 1-2 weeks of 40 mg prednisolone daily. Since there is little long term clinical information on these patients, a one year prospective study was performed to assess whether glucocorticoid sensitivity may vary over time. METHODS: Nineteen severe asthmatic subjects were studied and received 40 mg prednisolone daily for seven days. Prednisolone was given for a further seven days in glucocorticoid insensitive asthmatics and then stopped. Patients were followed up for one year and the glucocorticoid test was repeated on five patients in each group six months later. RESULTS: Eleven patients were classified as glucocorticoid insensitive and eight as glucocorticoid sensitive on day 7. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. Four glucocorticoid insensitive patients became responsive after one further week of prednisolone treatment. Six months later, four of five glucocorticoid sensitive patients and three of five previously glucocorticoid insensitive patients were glucocorticoid sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid sensitivity varies over time.
The relationship between rhinitis and chronic sinusitis is close and complex and may perhaps show many points of view, anatomical and physiological, epidemiological (by comparing the prevalence of an ailment in carriers of another ailment), experimental (by making nasal allergen provocation tests and studying the sinus anomalies induced) and physiopathological (by phenotyping and comparison of the inflammation present with one another and other ailments). If the results of these studies are convincing, there is still lack of formal proof that confirms the fundamental role of nasal inflammation in general and in particular allergic inflammation in the genesis of sinusitis.
The development of fibreoptic bronchoscopy has enabled significant progress in the understanding of the pathogenesis of asthma. It has brought to the fore the importance of bronchial inflammation even in asymptomatic patients and/or in patients who have only mild disease. The practice of bronchial biopsy in vivo is an excellent method of studying bronchial inflammation. The purpose of this general review is to recall the value of bronchial biopsies in the understanding of the effects of steroids on asthma: effects on the epithelium, the basement membrane and the blood vessels. Their cellular contents consist equally of cytokines, enzymes and adhesion molecules. At the level of the bronchial epithelium steroid therapy engenders a diminution in eosinophils, mast cells an lymphocytes. It restores the ratio of ciliated to other cells back to normal and increases the number of nerve synapses. Regarding the interstitium the corticoids diminish the number of eosinophils, mast cells and T lymphocytes. The effect on different lymphocyte subtypes is controversial, as is the effect of the basal membrane. Steroid therapy diminishes the proteins, GM-CSF.RANTES and IL-8 as well as the messengers IL-4, IL-13 and IL-5. It seems to increase the messengers for IFN-gamma and IL-12 and favourably modulates the vascular composition to inflammation in asthma. Nevertheless it is to be regretted that too few studies have looked at the correlations between histological changes and clinical and respiratory function improvement engendered by steroid therapy.
This review presents a synthesis of published studies on the activity of the newer cytotoxic drugs in the treatment of bronchial cancer. It also touches on the early indications of recent results which until now have only been the subject of oral presentations. The taxanes form a new class of anti-cancer drug. Myelosuppression is their limiting factor. These are very active cytotoxic drugs but their toxological profile makes them difficult to use in polychemotherapy. The anti-tumour activity of docetaxel (Taxotere) has been shown. For non-small cell cancer (CNPC) the objective response (OR) is of the order of 26% in new patients and 21% in those who have been pre-treated with a combination of drugs based on Cisplatine. For paclitaxel (Taxol) the OR is around 25% in new patients. In association with a course of cisplatine the efficacy would be dose dependent. For small cell cancer (CPC) it enables a level of OR around 38% as monochemotherapy. Inhibitors of topoisomerase I (topotecan, irinotecan) form another new class of therapy. Myelosuppression again limits their toxicity. Diarrhoea is an additional toxicity of irinotecan (Campto). The inhibitors of topoisomerase I seem particularly active as monochemotherapy in the treatment of smal cell cancer. Haematological toxicity makes them difficult in association. The activity of topotecan (Hycantin) in the treatment of non-small cell carcinoma remains to be studied. For this indication irinotecan would enable an OR of 33% in new patients. The new anti-metabolite, gemcitabine (Gemzar) is characterised by a different mode of action from other cytotoxics used in the treatment of bronchial cancer. For non-small cell carcinoma it is active as monotherapy and in association with cisplatine. Its activity is more modest in the treatment of CPC but few studies are available for this indication. Its toxic profile makes it promising to be used in association. The new spindle drug vinorelbine (Navelbine) is active as monotherapy or associated with cisplatine in the treatment of non-small cell carcinoma. The limiting toxicity is haematological. Its neurotoxicity is moderate compared to agents in the same therapeutic class. These different cytotoxic drugs arouse a ligitimate interest but the optimal therapeutic schemas for their use remain poorly understood (with the exception of vinorelbine). Their place in the therapeutic arsenal remains to be defined whilst waiting for the results of Phase III studies, their routine use cannot be recommended.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with lung cancer and brain metastasis were prospectively included in this feasibility study (four small-cell and 16 non-small-cell lung cancers). There were two previously untreated patients and 18 pretreated patients for whom brain metastases constituted the first relapse after a treatment-free interval following chemotherapy for the primary lung cancer. Most of the patients had neurological symptoms and an ECOG performance index over 2. Treatment consisted of three courses of whole brain radiotherapy (18 Gy in 10 fractions) and ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 daily from day 1 through day 4, i.e., during the first four days of radiotherapy with uromitexan uroprotection and haematopoietic support (r-HuG-CSF). RESULTS: Seventeen patients completed the three-cycle programme. Sixteen patients had grade 4 neutropenia and six of them experienced a febrile episode. Other toxicities were mild to moderate and manageable. The received dose-intensity of ifosfamide was 90%. Response evaluation demonstrated stable disease for two patients, partial response for eight, complete response for six and progression for four. All responders benefited by a remission of symptoms and improvement of performance index. Median survival from start of protocol was 13 months. CONCLUSION: Brain radiotherapy plus high-dose ifosfamide is feasible in patients suffering from brain recurrences of lung cancer.
Asthma is a disease which is increasing in frequency and severity despite the incontestable advances in the understanding of its physiology and treatment. New therapeutic strategies are therefore required and at the time when a new treatment, that of gene therapy, is giving hope for the treatment of so far incurable illnesses, it would seem to us to be useful to discuss the possible use of this treatment in severe asthma and in particular in the case of the most severe asthmatic patients requiring continuous oral steroid treatment (referred to as steroid-dependent). These patients are those who require particular medical attention, they often need to be admitted to hospital and they represent over 50% of the total costs associated with asthma. No satisfactory alternative therapy is currently available. In this regard, a variety of gene-based strategies have recently been proposed for inflammatory and immunologic disorders. It is thus the purpose of this review to consider its application to asthma therapy, although there are very few published works that directly bear on gene therapy linked to asthma. After a brief outline of the epidemiology of asthma, its genetics and the available animal models, we will focus on its immunopathology slanting the discussion towards the possibility of a gene-based treatment.
Pharmacologic intervention in the management of allergic conjunctivitis was evaluated with different topical ocular agents in man. Their effect can be precisely assessed with the conjunctival provocation test (CPT). A potent specific H1-receptor antagonist, 0.05% mequitazine eye-drops, was tested in a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study using CPT with grass pollen allergens. Twenty healthy subjects allergic to grass pollen were included outside the pollen season after a positive CPT screening. They received one drop of 0.05% mequitazine in one eye and the vehicle in the contralateral eye in a random order, four times daily for 5 days. CPT was performed 15 min after the last instillation, and the threshold dose inducing a positive reaction was determined. Results were given by Abelson's composite score including redness, chemosis, tearing, and itching. Topical 0.05% mequitazine significantly reduced the composite score compared to placebo. The allergen threshold concentration which induced the positive conjunctival reaction was higher in mequitazine pretreated eyes. No side-effect was reported. These data clearly suggest that mequitazine has potential to treat allergic conjunctivitis.
H1-blockers are often added to the standard treatment of acute sinusitis, but this is not supported by a controlled study. A multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was done in 139 allergic patients (15-65 years) to assess the adjunct efficacy of loratadine in acute exacerbation of rhinosinusitis. Sinusitis was diagnosed by symptoms and confirmed by rhinoscopy and sinus radiograph. Allergy was characterized by skin tests, RAST, and history. Patients were treated with antibiotics (14 days), oral corticosteroids (10 days), and loratadine (10 mg OD) or placebo (28 days). Treatment efficacy was assessed over 28 days by symptom scores quoted daily by patients. Physicians also rated total symptom scores at entry and at day 28. At entry, both groups had similar symptoms. Placebo-treated patients improved significantly, but patients who received loratadine had a significantly greater improvement in sneezing (P = 0.003) after 14 days, and in nasal obstruction (P = 0.002) after 28 days. Physicians found that patients receiving loratadine were significantly improved compared to placebo patients (P = 0.0125). Loratadine in addition to standard therapy was found to improve the control of some symptoms of sinusitis.
ICAM-1, a transmembrane glycoprotein promoting adhesion in immunologic and inflammatory reactions, was found to be increased on nasal epithelial cells of patients with allergic rhinitis. Loratadine, an H1-blocker, was found to reduce in vitro the expression of ICAM-1 on nasal epithelial cells. A double-blind, parallel-group study was carried out during the pollen season to compare the effect of two H1-blockers, cetirizine (10 mg OD) and loratadine (10 mg OD), on the release of soluble ICAM-1 in nasal secretions. A group of untreated patients was used as a control group. sICAM-1 was measured by enzyme immunoassay before and after 2 weeks of treatment. Symptoms were significantly decreased in the actively treated groups. sICAM-1 levels were unchanged in the control group but were significantly reduced in the two treated groups (P < 0.015, Wilcoxon's W test). This study shows that two H1-blockers, loratadine and cetirizine, have a similar effect on sICAM-1 released in nasal secretions during the pollen season.