Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Arnone

Publications and source records attributed to F Arnone.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

[Intravenous omeprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of hemorrhagic duodenal ulcer: a prospective randomized study].

This prospective randomized trial compares the results of i.v. omeprazole and i.v. ranitidine in 45 patients admitted as an emergency with an endoscopic diagnosis of bleeding duodenal ulcer. The patients were randomized to receive i.v. omeprazole, 40 mg bolus followed by 80 mg/day by continuous infusion for 3 days (group A), or ranitidine 50 mg i.v. bolus followed by 400 mg/day i.v., continuous infusion for 3 days (group B). Follow-up endoscopy on day 4 demonstrated successful therapy, except when more than 4 units of blood/day had to be transfused to maintain hemoglobin level above 10 g/l. Bleeding stopped in 20/21 patients in group A (95.2%), and in 17/24 patients in group B (70.80%) (p < 0.05). From the results of the study, it can be concluded that intravenous omeprazole seems to be effective in the control of bleeding duodenal ulcer.

Aged↗

[Biliary scintigraphy vs. ultrasonography in the etiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis].

Etiology of acute pancreatitis has important implications in the treatment of the disease as gallstones pancreatitis requires the correction of the underlying biliary disease. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the detection of stones in emergency has been questioned, and HIDA biliscintigraphy has been reported to be a possible indicator of biliary pancreatitis. This study compares the value of HIDA colesscintigraphy and ultrasonography in the etiologic diagnosis of 35 patients admitted and treated for acute pancreatitis in our Institution. All patients underwent ERCP for the confirmation of the findings. Cholescintigraphy showed no visualisation of the gallbladder, suggesting biliary tract stones, in 25 patients. In all of them ERCP confirmed the presence of gallbladder and/or common bile duct stones, and endoscopic sphincterotomy and later elective cholescystectomy was performed. Ultrasonography failed to demonstrate biliary stones in 11 of those patients. HIDA cholescintigraphy showed a sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 1 vs 0.56 and 0.45 for ultrasonography. From the results of our study it can be concluded that HIDA biliscintigraphy is more reliable than ultrasonography in the discrimination of biliary vs non-biliary acute pancreatitis in emergency.

Acute Disease↗