Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Antonaci

Publications and source records attributed to F Antonaci.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The management of headaches in the emergency department: critical issues.

Typical cases of the most common kinds of headache can be diagnosed and treated by general practitioners (GPs). Non-traumatic patients with de novo acute sudden-onset disabling headaches as well as significant worsening of pre-existing headaches seek care at emergency departments (EDs) and represent a diagnostic challenge for the consultant neurologist, who is the specialist of reference for the entire diagnostic process. Explicit diagnostic criteria for the classification of headache disorders (ICHD-II) are fundamental for verifying the final diagnosis, but in the emergency setting diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines and recommendations, coupled with lists of diagnostic alarms and warnings, may further contribute to the preliminary identification of secondary headaches.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗
PubMed2005

Single high-dose steroid treatment in episodic cluster headache.

Corticosteroids appear to be the most rapid-acting of the prophylactic drugs used in the treatment of cluster headache (CH). These agents are frequently employed as a short-term regimen to induce clinical remission. In this study, we assessed in an open fashion the effect of high dose methylprednisolone (MPD) in a group of 13 patients with episodic CH (3 females and 10 males). On the 8th day of the active period, MPD was administered intravenously at the dose of 30 mg/kg body weight, as a 3-h infusion in saline. The attack frequency was followed for 7 days. The mean daily attack frequency before MPD administration was statistically different from that reported after treatment (respectively: 1.38 +/- 0.42 and 0.83 +/- 0.78; P = 0.05 Student's t-test). The mean interval between MPD administration and the occurrence of the first subsequent attack was 3.8 +/- 2.2 days (range: 2-7 days). Only 3 (23%) of 13 patients experienced a complete headache remission. No significant side-effects were noted after MPD administration. These data further demonstrate that in most patients with episodic CH, high-dose systemic steroid administration may invariably interrupt attack recurrence for a few days, but is ineffective in maintaining complete clinical remission. This study also suggests that MPD administered as a solitary dose does not provide any advantage above prednisone in CH treatment.

Cluster Headache↗
PubMed2003

Parenteral indomethacin (the INDOTEST) in cluster headache.

The interval between indomethacin administration and clinical response may be extremely relevant in the assessment of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH) and other unilateral headache disorders like cluster headache (CH), with which CPH can be confounded. Indomethacin is inactive in CH; however, in some anecdotal reports in recent years, doubt has been cast on the ineffectiveness of indomethacin in CH. In this study, we have re-assessed the effect of indomethacin treatment in a group of 18 patients with episodic CH (three females and 15 males). From the day 8 of the active period, indomethacin 100 mg i.m. was administered every 12 h, for 2 consecutive days, in an open fashion. The mean daily attack frequency before the test (1.6 +/- 0.6) was not statistically different from that on day 1 (2.1 +/- 0.9) and day 2 (1.9 +/- 0.8) after indomethacin administration. The mean interval between indomethacin injection and the following attack (day 1 and day 2) was 4.6 + 1.1 h. We did not observe any refractory period in any patient after indomethacin. Since the 'expected' attack occurred when there theoretically could have been a protective effect after indomethacin administration, it can be reasonably assumed that there is no such protective effect. The use of a test dose of 100 mg i.m. indomethacin (INDOTEST) appears to provide a clear-cut answer in this situation. It may be a useful tool for a proper clinical assessment of unilateral headache with relatively short-lasting attacks when problems of classification arise. A correct diagnosis of CPH or CH is important, since a CPH diagnosis may imply a lifelong treatment with a potentially noxious drug.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Nitric oxide pathway and response to nitroglycerin in cluster headache patients: plasma nitrite and citrulline levels.

Nitric oxide (NO) may participate in the mechanisms underlying vascular headaches, such as migraine and cluster headache (CH), by triggering neurogenic inflammation and activation of fibres conveying nociceptive inputs to the trigeminal ganglion. Similarly to migraine, the administration of the NO donor glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) to CH patients is a known model of inducing spontaneous-like attacks. We carried out a GTN test (0.9 mg, sublingually) in 18 patients with episodic CH in active phase and 12 controls. The plasma levels of NO metabolite nitrites (NO2-), after conversion of nitrates to NO2-, were measured spectrophotometrically at baseline, at the maximum intensity of the induced response (or 45 min after GTN in controls), and 120 min after GTN administration. The basal plasma levels of L-citrulline were also assayed in patients and controls using high-performance liquid chromatography. Basal NO2- levels, similar in GTN-responsive patients and controls (48.3 +/- 10.6 and 44.6 +/- 9.5 micromol/l, respectively) were found to be increased significantly at pain peak in patients (76.1 +/- 10.2 micromol/l) and after 45 min in controls (78.2 +/- 9.6 micromol/l) (P < 0.01 vs. respective baseline values), but not after 120 min, without differences between groups. L-citrulline levels in basal conditions showed no differences between groups (patients 64.8 +/- 11.7, controls 67.3 +/- 10.8 micromol/l). These data do not support the presence of a basal hyperactivity of the L-arginine-NO pathway in CH patients. Increased NO production may be of importance in the mechanisms leading to CH attacks, but other factors are likely to render CH patients hyperresponsive to NO, and ultimately to cause the occurrence of pain and associated features.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

3D kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation of neck movements in patients with whiplash injury.

In recent decades whiplash injuries, being a major reason for compensation claims, have become increasingly important in forensic medicine. In view of this, a reliable diagnostic method of assessing cervical range of motion (ROM) is needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate neck function with a 3D kinematic method compared with clinical evaluation in whiplash injury. Seventy consecutive patients (M/F = 18/52) with a history of whiplash injury (WH) and 46 healthy volunteers (M/F = 24/22), mean age, respectively 33 +/- 9 and 28 +/- 6 years (mean+/-SD) entered the study. Patients suffered from neck pain and/or unilateral headache. A computerized kinematic analysis of the ROM (Elite system) using passive markers and two infrared TV cameras was used. Clinical evaluation of active ROM was also performed both in patients and in 61 controls (M/F = 23/38; mean age 47 +/- 18 years). Thirty out of 70 patients were tested at the time of their first consultation (T0) and 6 months later (T6), and 12 were also followed up after a year (T12). All neck movements, except extension, were significantly reduced in WH subjects compared with controls, in particular lateral bending. Comparing ROM at T0, T6 and T12, no significant differences were found. A global index of motion (GIM), obtained by calculating the sum of ROM in absolute value for all the movements acquired, was significantly reduced in WH compared with control subjects. The interobserver reliability of the clinical evaluation was globally acceptable. On the basis of the clinical evaluation, a significantly reduced ROM was found in all movements in WH subjects compared with an age-matched population. Computing the number of impaired cervical movements (ICMs), a significantly higher number was observed in WH patients than in controls, showing a decreasing trend at T6 and T12, with a significant improvement at T6 vs. T0. The computerized study of neck ROM may constitute a useful tool in the evaluation of WH at baseline and follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Cervicogenic headache: clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis.

Since the first attempt at setting down diagnostic criteria was made in 1990, there has been considerable progress in the field of cervicogenic headache (CEH). CEH makes up a "final common pathway" for several neck disorders that may originate at different levels of the cervical spine. CEH has been defined as being mainly a unilateral headache without sideshift; it may accordingly also be bilateral. Anesthetic blockades are mandatory for scientific work. If the pain is bilateral, it is particularly important that blockades are carried out. Pain stemming from the neck usually spreads to the oculofrontotemporal area. The most characteristic features are symptoms and signs of neck involvement (such as mechanical precipitation of attack, and so forth). Migraine without aura and tension-type headache are the most difficult differential diagnosis problems.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2001

Cervicogenic headache: evaluation of the original diagnostic criteria.

A variety of headaches are frequently associated with the occurrence of neck pain. The purpose of this paper was to describe the adherence to diagnostic criteria of a series of patients enrolled on the basis of two clinical criteria: (1) unilateral headache without side-shift, and (2) pain starting in the neck and spreading to the fronto-ocular area. One hundred and thirty-two patients (36 male and 96 female) entered the study. Sixty-two patients were assigned to Group A (patients fulfilling criteria 1 and 2), 40 to Group B (criterion 2 only) and 12 to Group C (criterion 1, only). Eighteen subjects were excluded because X-rays of the neck were not available. Patients were evaluated regardless of whether or not they fell into one or more of the following diagnostic categories: cervicogenic headache (CEH), migraine without aura (M) and headache associated with disorders of the neck (HN) (IHS definitions). Fulfillment of the diagnostic criteria for CEH was found to be particularly frequent in Group A. A higher frequency of CEH diagnosis was found when two criteria were used (Group A) than in Group B (P = 0.001); in the former group a higher mean number of diagnostic criteria for CEH were also present (P = 0.001). Group A patients more frequently presented pain episodes of varying duration or fluctuating, continuous pain and moderate, non-excruciating, non-throbbing pain than Group B patients (P = 0.04 and P = 0.08, respectively). In Group C patients, the frequency of these two criteria was relatively low (17%) especially of the first mentioned variable. The presence of at least five of the seven 'pooled' CEH criteria (present in > or = 50% of the patients) might be deemed a reliable cut-off point, allowing the headache to be diagnosed as 'probable' CEH. If patients fulfilling M or HN criteria in addition to the CEH criteria are added to the 'pure' CEH group a total of 74% of Group A patients may have a CEH picture. The temporal pattern of pain and the quality of pain in Group A showed good sensitivity and specificity (> or = 75) when compared with Group B; therefore, the chances of diagnosing a definite CEH are significantly more frequent in patients presenting with unilateral pain that also begins as a neck pain. Head/neck trauma and radiological abnormalities in the cervical spine were not significantly associated with CEH, M or HN diagnoses. An improvement of the current diagnostic IHS criteria might make it possible to avoid the existing, partial overlap of CEH with HN and M. Extensive use should be made of the GON, and other, blockades in the routine work-up of CEH, both in the differential diagnosis and in the mixed forms (CEH + M, and CEH + HN), in order to improve the efficiency of the current diagnostic system.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Hemicrania continua: diagnostic criteria and nosologic status.

Proposals for the diagnostic criteria for hemicrania continua (HC) and also for the nosological status of HC are set forth. The clinical constellation of symptoms and signs making up HC consists of: unilaterality without side shift; absolute indomethacin effect; and long-lasting repetitive attacks of varying duration, eventually with a chronic pattern, the pain being mild to severe. For the typical clinical picture of HC, including a positive 'indotest', we propose the term hemicrania continua vera. More or less analogous, but 'indotest-negative' clinical pictures have provisionally been termed hemicrania generis incerti (of undetermined nature). At the present level of knowledge, the diagnosis of hemicrania generis incerti should be made mostly by exclusion. HC may possibly best be classified along with chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (CPH) as this is the only other headache absolutely responsive to indomethacin. The bond between these two headaches on the one hand and cluster headache on the other should, at most, be a loose one. Interrelationships of these four classifiable headaches are briefly discussed.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

The hemicrania continua diagnosis.

More than 16 years after the first description of hemicrania continua (HC), its aetiology and pathogenesis remain obscure. Clinically, HC is considered a syndrome with two pivotal characteristics: (i) strictly unilateral (moderate, fluctuating, relatively long-lasting) headache; and (ii) absolute response to indomethacin. HC is further characterized by some ancillary, but mostly "negative", features such as: (iii) relative paucity of accompaniments; and (iv) lack of precipitating factors. The female preponderance is also remarkable, although not diagnostic in the solitary case. Finally, a non-specific, but remarkable feature is the temporal pattern. HC may present as a remitting or chronic (continuous) headache. In HC, unilaterality and absolute response to indomethacin are considered crucial diagnostically. Existing controversy, such as regarding atypical features, particularly the so-called "HC resistant to indomethacin", is discussed. The nature of hemicrania with negative indomethacin response remains most unclear; it may not belong to the HC cycle at all. Accordingly, we propose that the typical clinical picture of HC, including an absolute response to indomethacin, be termed Hemicrania continua vera. More or less analogous, but indomethacin-resistant, clinical pictures can provisionally be termed Hemicrania generis incerti (of undetermined nature), provided other diagnostic possibilities have been ruled out. The differential diagnosis of HC vs. other unilateral headaches is commented on. Previous attempts at classification of HC into the group chronic daily headache (CDH) are discussed. The only acceptable "link" of HC with the other headaches classified as CDH is the temporal pattern (which is a non-specific feature). HC is probably pathophysiologically different from the others disorders classified under CDH. Conversely, HC and chronic paroxysmal hemicrania share many common features, including the absolute response to indomethacin. HC should probably be included in the IHS group 3.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2000

The effect of intranasal cocaine and lidocaine on nitroglycerin-induced attacks in cluster headache.

The administration of nitroderivatives in cluster headache (CH) sufferers is the most reproducible experimental paradigm to induce spontaneous-like pain attacks. Previous uncontrolled studies have reported that the local use of anaesthetic agents in the area of the sphenopalatine fossa is able to extinguish nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced pain in CH. The present study, carried out according to a double-blind placebo-controlled design, included 15 CH patients, six with episodic CH (mean +/- SD age of 36.8+/-5.6 years), and nine with chronic CH (37.8+/-10.4 years). Patients had undergone a standard NTG test (0.9 mg sublingually), during which the intensity of pain was scored using a visuoanalogic scale (VAS, range 0-10). Nine patients (two with the episodic form, seven with the chronic form) experienced a typical, spontaneous-like attack on the usual side, occurring in all cases within 45 min. In these patients, the test was repeated with an interval of 2 days, and once pain intensity reached 5 on the VAS, a 10% solution of cocaine hydrochloride (1 ml, mean amount per application 40-50 mg), or 10% lidocaine (1 ml), or saline was applied using a cotton swab in the area corresponding to the sphenopalatine fossa, under anterior rhinoscopy. This was done in both the symptomatic and the non-symptomatic side, for 5 min. Treatments were always performed randomly, in separate sessions. All patients responded promptly to both anaesthetic agents, with complete cessation of induced pain occurring after 31.3+/-13.1 min for cocaine and 37.0+/-7.8 min for lidocaine (M+/-SD). In the case of saline application, pain severity increased thereafter, and extinction of the provoked attacks occurred with a latency of 59.3+/-12.3 min (P<0.01 and P<0.01 vs. cocaine and lidocaine, respectively, Mann-Whitney U-test). While further suggesting that the sphenopalatine ganglion participates in the mechanisms of pain, these findings indicate that the local administration of the anaesthetic agents cocaine and lidocaine is effective on NTG-induced CH attacks, and may be used in the symptomatic treatment of this disorder.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2000

Asymmetrical reduction of the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold in cluster headache.

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) of the lower limbs (RIII reflex) was examined bilaterally in 54 cluster headache (CH) patients suffering from episodic CH (ECH) and chronic CH (CCH). Fifteen ECH patients were examined in both remission and active phases. The RIII reflex threshold (Tr) and the threshold of pain sensation (Tp) were significantly reduced on the symptomatic side in patients with episodic CH during the bout. During the active phase of episodic CH an inverse correlation was found between the severity of CH (ratio: number of cluster periods/years of illness duration) and the Tp, which may suggest a role for secondary central sensitization in pain pathways. The lower Tr and Tp on the symptomatic side is in keeping with previous observations exploring pain mechanisms using different methods (i.e. corneal reflex, pain pressure threshold). On the whole, these data tie in with the view of an impairment of the pain control system, which parallels the periodicity of the disorder in the episodic form.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Headache in the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) era: management and appropriateness of admission.

Headache is an extremely common disorder which has a marked impact on the utilisation of healthcare resources and constitutes a considerable socio-economic burden. The related costs, both direct and indirect, are especially high in developed countries, since headache predominantly affects an economically-active section of the population. The Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) system, a method for reimbursing healthcare structures for patient admissions, was introduced in Italy in 1995. The aim of the system was to control public health expenditure and to promote better distribution of financial resources. Here, we report the results of the application of the DRG system to headache patients admitted to the Department of Neurology of the University of Pavia in 1996 and 1998. The financial analysis revealed high fixed costs (hospital running costs per days of hospitalisation); by contrast, the impact of the variable costs (those relating to the direct management of the individual patient, i.e. examinations, therapeutic interventions etc.) was low. It was found that reducing the number of days of hospitalisation increases the hospital's income and reduces the mean loss incurred in each DRG. It is therefore suggested that a complete approach to the management of headache must include educational programmes for patients and general practitioners, and that access to headache centres and to hospital care should be restricted to cases of acute, severe headache, or recurrent, chronic headache with/without drug abuse or dependence.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed1998

Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. Parenteral indomethacin: the 'indotest'.

The interval between indomethacin administration and clinical response may be clinically relevant in the assessment of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua and other unilateral headache disorders with which they can be confounded. Eight patients with chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (6 women and 2 men) and 12 patients with hemicrania continua (8 women and 4 men) were entered into the study. The patients were given 50 mg of indomethacin intramuscularly (i.m.) on day 1 and some of them 100 mg IM on day 2 in an open fashion. The usual attack pattern was reestablished prior to the second test. The mean interval between attacks before the two injections (51 +/- 18 minutes) in chronic paroxysmal hemicrania was significantly shorter than the mean after each of the two indomethacin injections (50 mg = 493 +/- 251 minutes; 100 mg = 668 +/- 211 minutes; P < 0.001; Mann-Whitney test). In every patient, there was a clear refractory period after indomethacin. Since the first "expected" attack after indomethacin administration did not occur, it can, with reasonable certainty, be assumed that the protective phase was initiated already prior to the time of the next "anticipated" attack. The mean attack duration was 22 minutes (last three attacks prior to test). The mean interval between the onset of two consecutive pretest attacks was 73 minutes. Since the interval between attacks was rather stable, one is, therefore, probably allowed to assume that the absolute protective effect of indomethacin on average had begun somewhere between 22 (mean attack duration) and 73 minutes after indomethacin injection. Similarly, in hemicrania continua, the time between 50-mg indomethacin injection and complete pain relief was 73 +/- 66 minutes. The pain-free period after indomethacin injection was around 13 hours (i.e., 13 +/- 8 hours after 50 mg and 13 +/- 10 hours after 100 mg). The use of a test dosage of 50 mg of indomethacin IM ('indotest') gives a clear-cut answer and may be a useful tool in the diagnostic arsenal in every unilateral headache for a proper clinical assessment. A diagnosis of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania or hemicrania continua is a serious matter because it may imply life-long treatment with a potentially noxious drug. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that an 'indotest' is carried out in a standard fashion. In the future, the rules set forth in the present context should be followed, at least in scientific studies. Pain pressure thresholds at cranial and extracranial levels were not significantly modified after indomethacin injection in any of the headaches.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua: lack of efficacy of sumatriptan.

Attacks of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania are prevented by the continuous administration of indomethacin. Sumatriptan, an agonist of 5-HT1-like receptors, has proven effective in the treatment of cluster headache attacks. There are clear clinical similarities between chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and cluster headache. A natural consequence of these considerations would be to establish whether chronic paroxysmal hemicrania also responds similarly to sumatriptan. Since hemicrania continua is another unilateral headache responsive to indomethacin, it would be meaningful to also include hemicrania continua in such a study. Sumatriptan, 6 mg subcutaneous, was tried in an open fashion in 7 patients (6 women and 1 man) with chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and 7 patients (5 women and 2 men) with hemicrania continua. In chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, the mean interval between the last three attacks prior to sumatriptan treatment (40 +/- 23 minutes) was not statistically different from the mean interval between the three attacks subsequent to sumatriptan treatment of an attack (32 +/- 20 minutes). In none of the patients did the mean duration of the "test attack" decrease as compared to the attacks antedating the test attack (25 +/- 11 minutes and 19 +/- 9 minutes, respectively) (P = 0.027, Wilcoxon). In 2 patients with chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, placebo (saline) administration did not lead to any change in the interval between attacks. There was a mild, but statistically significant reduction in visual analog scale values for headache intensity in hemicrania continua (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon). There was no clear, i.e., clinically meaningful, reduction in visual analog scale values in any particular patient with hemicrania continua. Taken together, these results seem to show that sumatriptan is of no benefit in chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, but may have a partial efficacy in hemicrania continua. However, the latter effect is clinically unimportant. This minor difference in regard to the clinical effect may, nevertheless, be of some interest pathogenetically, indicating minor differences between the two headaches. The lack of sumatriptan effect in chronic paroxysmal hemicrania clearly and markedly strengthens the nonalignment concept in regard to chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and cluster headache.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability.

The purpose of this study was to estimate inter-examiner reliability of head and neck algometry. Pain perception thresholds were assessed with a mechanical pressure algometer in 21 healthy individuals. Thresholds were assessed at 13 symmetrical points on each side of the head and neck, at the deltoid muscle and at the median finger. The pressure range of the instrument proved insufficient to study the pain perception threshold on the finger, however. Two different examiners carried out one or two examinations in each subject during one day. The sequence of investigations was varied randomly. The inter-examiner reliability was found to be good, with a mean intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75. Intra-examiner reproducibility was excellent (mean ICC = 0.84). The mean inter-examiner coefficient of variation was 18.7%, while the mean coefficient of repeatability (CR) was 1.60 kg/cm2. In comparison, the mean intra-examiner coefficient of variation was 15% while the mean CR was 1.29 kg/cm2. Statistically significant differences between examiners were found for the frontal point (p < 0.01), while a trend towards lower thresholds in one of the two observers was seen in 10 of the 13 non-significant points. Inter-examiner reliability of side differences was excellent, with CR = 1.23 kg/cm2. In conclusion, manual algometry with a rather inexpensive mechanical device has a good to excellent inter-rater reliability. When studying patients, however, the possible bias introduced by different examiners should be taken into account, both regarding study design and data analysis.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Headache coding and diagnostic-related groups: a survey of one year's admissions to a neurological department.

In 1995, the introduction of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) within the Italian National Health Service (NHS) significantly changed the mode of payment for hospital admissions. The ICD-IX system is the fundamental instrument by which to identify various clinical entities; however, its codes still refer to an old international classification of diseases. Headache disorders are now diagnosed according to the new classification of the International Headache Society, and their recognition using ICD-IX codes appears to be increasingly inadequate. We evaluated 1-year admissions for "headache" in our Department of Neurology according to the new DRG system, and paid particular attention to the problems related to compilation of the patient discharge schedule. The most common mistakes affecting the definition of DRGs and the admission costs for the NHS were also examined.

Data Collection↗