Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F A Greco

Publications and source records attributed to F A Greco.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

A brief-duration combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Curative combination chemotherapy is available for many patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); however, treatment of elderly patients with these regimens is difficult due to excessive toxicity. From 1983 to 1988 the authors treated 26 patients 65 years and older with aggressive NHL with a novel 8-week chemotherapy regimen containing bleomycin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate with leucovorin, and prednisone (BECALM), designed to preserve dose intensity and minimize toxicity. Median age was 75 years. Histologic types included the following: 20 intermediate grade (16 large noncleaved cell; two large cleaved cell; one intermediate grade, unspecified); six high grade (four small noncleaved cell; one immunoblastic sarcoma B-cell; one high grade, unspecified). Twenty-one patients were Stage III or IV. Twenty-two of 26 patients had one or more of the following: tumor greater than 10 cm; multiple extranodal sites; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 400 IU/l or greater; small noncleaved cell histologic type. Chemotherapy consisted of bleomycin 20 U intravenously (IV) weeks 1 and 7; etoposide 75 mg/m2 IV every day x 3 days on week 4; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV weeks 1, 4, 7; doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 IV weeks 1, 7; methotrexate 50 mg/m2 IV weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 with oral leucovorin rescue; prednisone 60 mg orally for 10 days on weeks 1, 4, 7. Eighteen patients completed the 8-week treatment course. There were 13 complete responses (CR); seven patients remain in continuous CR at a median follow-up of 37.5 months. There have been five relapses, including one late relapse; and one patient died of an intercurrent illness in CR. Overall and actual event-free survivals are 38% and 27%, respectively. The major toxicities were neutropenic fever and mucositis. There were four treatment-related deaths. The authors conclude that BECALM chemotherapy can be administered to elderly patients with aggressive NHL. Although neurotoxicity and cumulative toxicity from bleomycin and anthracycline are avoided, the regimen remains moderately toxic, particularly with respect to myelosuppression. Treatment results compare favorably with other reported regimens in this group of patients with multiple poor prognostic features.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Current status of etoposide in the management of small cell lung cancer.

Etoposide is a schedule-dependent drug with excellent activity against small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Single-agent etoposide achieves overall response rates ranging from 15% to 84%, depending on the schedule of drug administration and the characteristics of the treated population. The route of etoposide administration (intravenous versus oral) has little impact on response rate, provided appropriate dose adjustments are made for oral therapy. In combination with other active agents, etoposide has proven particularly effective in the management of SCLC. Etoposide can be substituted for doxorubicin or vincristine in the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) regimen without loss of efficacy. The etoposide and cisplatin (EP) combination is thought to be synergistic and has proven to be an effective salvage regimen for CAV failures. A regimen that alternates CAV and EP has been found by some investigators to be modestly more effective against SCLC than CAV alone; however, EP alone may be as useful as an alternating regimen. Most studies to date have demonstrated that EP induction is at least as effective as any other standard induction regimen. However, EP has the potential advantage of being more easily integrated with thoracic radiation therapy (RT). This is particularly important in limited-disease patients: two recent pilot studies employing EP induction with hyperfractionated thoracic RT yielded 2-year survival rates of greater than 50%. These promising results are being evaluated further in an ongoing Phase III trial in the United States. The available data indicate that etoposide is one of the most active agents against SCLC and therefore should be included as a component of induction therapy in all patients. New schedules of etoposide administration warrant further study.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Chronic oral etoposide.

Etoposide is an important drug that has been recently incorporated with other agents in the curative treatment of patients with advanced neoplasms, including germ cell tumors, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Etoposide demonstrates remarkable schedule dependency. A randomized comparison has shown an impressive survival difference for patients with extensive SCLC receiving a 5-day course versus those receiving a 1-day course. Because of these and previous clinical and laboratory data, etoposide is now given intravenously or orally in a 3-day to 5-day schedule. It is generally accepted that approximately 50% of the orally administered drug is absorbed. The authors have initiated several etoposide studies using an extended administration schedule, believing that a prolonged schedule may be superior to the standard 3-day to 5-day schedule. This was initially tested in a Phase I study. Results showed that etoposide (50 mg/m2/d) given over 21 days was feasible and was associated with only moderate toxicity. Several Phase II studies have been completed or are nearing completion, including studies in patients with SCLC, NHL, germ cell tumors, soft tissue sarcoma, renal carcinoma, and ovarian carcinoma. Responses have been seen in all of these groups, particularly in patients with SCLC, lymphoma, and germ cell tumors. In these groups we saw responses in patients who were clearly resistant to etoposide plus cisplatin given in a standard schedule or in some patients who were resistant to high-dose etoposide with bone marrow transplantation. Investigators at Indiana University Medical Center who studied oral etoposide in a similar fashion in patients with advanced germ cell tumors and SCLC achieved results similar to those reported here. The authors have initiated a number of combination chemotherapy programs using the chronic oral form of etoposide. These include patients with SCLC, non-small cell lung cancer, and elderly patients with high-grade and intermediate forms of NHL. In addition, chronic intravenous oral etoposide is being used in salvage approaches for patients with acute myelocytic leukemia and recurrent resistant intermediate-grade and high-grade NHL. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data suggest that a 50-mg/m2 oral dose is highly bioavailable (91% to 96%). Therefore, during a prolonged oral course at 50 mg/m2, many patients maintain a minimum plasma concentration of 1 microgram/ml. Further studies of multiple dose or continuous infusion etoposide to maintain a potentially critical plasma level are in progress. Etoposide administered in this way could represent a "new" drug because many of its features are different, and its activity spectrum may be broader.

Drug Administration Schedule↗
PubMed1991

The role of etoposide in the treatment of poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site.

Patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) of unknown primary site comprise 25% to 35% of the patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Some of these patients have neoplasms that are highly responsive to combination chemotherapy, and a minority have potentially curable tumors. Between 1978 and 1982, 68 patients were treated with combination chemotherapy (most received cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin [PVB] with or without doxorubicin). Thirty-eight patients (56%) responded to treatment, with 15 (22%) complete responder (CR) and 9 (13%) long-term, disease-free survivors. Since that time, we have incorporated etoposide into the treatment of these patients because of its synergism with cisplatin and its great activity against several other neoplasms, including germ cell tumors. Seventeen patients with PDC of unknown primary site received salvage therapy with etoposide and cisplatin after failing PVB. Ten of these patients had partial responses (PR), with a median response duration of 5 months (range, 2 to 12 months). Thirty-two previously untreated patients with PDC received etoposide and cisplatin combinations as initial treatment. Eighteen of 30 evaluable patients (60%) responded to therapy, and 11 patients (37%) had CR. Seven patients remain disease-free 39 to 63 months after the completion of therapy. Etoposide is an active drug in the treatment of PDC of unknown primary site. Preliminary results indicate that initial treatment with etoposide and cisplatin combinations produces results equivalent to or superior to those achieved with PVB.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Future directions for etoposide therapy.

Etoposide is an important chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of selected patients with germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Its optimal use is continuing to evolve. It is clear that schedule dependency is of critical importance. Recently, preliminary studies have suggested that a prolonged schedule of etoposide administration (21 days) may be more effective than the standard 3- to 5-day schedule. Results of several Phase II studies show chronic oral etoposide administration induces occasional responses in resistant tumors and higher-than-expected response rates in patients with germ cell tumors and SCLC. Preliminary data show nearly 90% etoposide absorption when given in a low-dose schedule (50 mg/m2/d) for 21 days. These observations indicate that etoposide may be a "new drug" when given in the chronic schedule. Further exploration of the schedule dependency of etoposide is indicated. Etoposide has recently been proven useful in selected patients with gastric, ovarian, and poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site. Several other drugs are either synergistic or additive and will be explored in combination chemotherapy. The possibility of adding topoisomerase I inhibitors and modulating etoposide's activity by inhibiting drug resistance is now within the realm of human testing.

Drug Administration Schedule↗
PubMed1991

A comparison of hexamethylmelamine (altretamine), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (H-CAP) vs. cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) in advanced ovarian cancer.

We retrospectively compared the results of treatment with hexamethylmelamine (HMM), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (H-CAP) to treatment results using cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The treatments were identical in dosage and schedule with the exception of the addition of HMM to one regimen. Fifty-five patients treated with H-CAP between August 1977 and March 1980 were compared with a subsequent group of 22 patients who received CAP between October 1984 and October 1987. Following 6 months of therapy, patients were restaged either with second-look laparotomy or with clinical restaging. Fifty-three of 55 patients (96%) and 14/21 (67%) patients had objective responses to H-CAP and CAP respectively (p = 0.001). The pathologic complete response rate as determined by second-look laparotomy was higher in the patients who received H-CAP (35% vs. 19%). The median survival of patients receiving H-CAP is 47 months compared to 21 months for the CAP patients. In limited residual disease patients (maximum tumor diameter less than or equal to 3 cm), the median survival also favored the H-CAP treatment (101 months vs. 21 months, p = 0.002). The median time to progression was greater in patients receiving H-CAP vs. those receiving CAP (67 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.045). Treatment-related toxicity was similar for the two regimens. These findings suggest that the addition of HMM to CAP chemotherapy prolongs the median survival for patients with limited residual disease advanced ovarian cancer.

Altretamine↗
PubMed1991

Mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin: an effective, well-tolerated regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

Between September 1988 and August 1990, we treated 35 women with metastatic breast cancer with a novel regimen containing mitoxantrone, fluorouracil (5-FU), and high-dose leucovorin. This regimen was designed to take full advantage of the favorable toxicity profiles of these agents while maintaining a high level of activity. All patients had received previous chemotherapy (adjuvant only, 15 patients; at least one metastatic regimen, 20 patients). Seven patients had received previous doxorubicin, but none within 6 months of study entry. Of 31 assessable patients, 20 (65%) had objective responses (two complete, 18 partial), with a median response duration of 6 months (range, 3 to 16+ months). Four patients with bone metastases (abnormal bone scan only) and pain were not considered assessable by strict response criteria; two of these patients had sustained symptomatic relief for 6 and 8 months, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity but was mild in most patients; only four hospitalizations for fever and neutropenia were required (2% of courses). No severe thrombocytopenia occurred and no RBC transfusions were required. Alopecia, mucositis, and nausea/vomiting were uncommon and were not severe in any patient. The combination of mitoxantrone, 5-FU, and high-dose leucovorin is well tolerated and active as a first- or second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Comparison with other standard regimens for breast cancer is indicated.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site: clinical usefulness of immunoperoxidase staining.

To assess the clinical utility of immunoperoxidase tumor-cell staining in patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site, we performed a battery of stains on tumors from 87 patients treated between August 1978 and April 1983. Poorly differentiated carcinoma or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed on the basis of light microscopic examination, and all patients were treated before the technology of immunoperoxidase staining was routinely used. Therefore, results of immunoperoxidase staining can be correlated with clinical outcome in this group of similarly treated patients with a long median follow-up. Immunoperoxidase staining confirmed the diagnosis of poorly differentiated carcinoma in 49 patients (56%) and yielded other diagnoses in 14 patients (16%): melanoma, eight; lymphoma, four; prostatic carcinoma, one; and yolk sac carcinoma, one. In 24 patients (28%) the immunoperoxidase staining pattern was inconclusive; electron microscopy was usually helpful in clarifying the diagnosis in these patients. Seventy-five patients (86%) received combination chemotherapy with a cisplatin-based regimen, and 24 patients (28%) had a complete response. Nine of these patients were later given specific diagnoses by immunoperoxidase staining (lymphoma, four; melanoma, four; yolk sac tumor, one). All patients with an immunoperoxidase diagnosis of lymphoma also had clinical features compatible with lymphoma and are long-term survivors. Patients with immunoperoxidase features suggesting melanoma were surprisingly responsive to chemotherapy, with three of seven complete responses and two long-term survivors. Patients with melanoma diagnosed by immunoperoxidase staining should not be excluded from a trial of cisplatin-based therapy. Immunoperoxidase staining is useful in the routine evaluation of metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site, as it can occasionally suggest the lineage of the tumor and have specific therapeutic implications.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Effective treatment of small-noncleaved-cell lymphoma with high-intensity, brief-duration chemotherapy.

Small-noncleaved-cell (SNC) lymphoma is a high-grade, biologically aggressive neoplasm notable for poor response to therapy, high relapse rate, and less than a 20% long-term survival. We treated 20 patients with SNC lymphoma with a novel chemotherapeutic regimen using intensive doses of chemotherapy at frequent intervals in the inpatient setting. All patients were previously untreated. Sixteen patients (80%) had stage IV disease. Most patients (95%) had at least one other characteristic associated with poor prognosis (bulky [greater than 10 cm] disease, multiple extranodal sites, poor performance status), and 85% had two or more characteristics associated with poor prognosis. Seventeen patients (85%) achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy, including all three patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated disease. There have been three relapses, all occurring less than 18 months after treatment, and two of three relapses occurred in patients who were unable to complete therapy. At a median follow-up of 29 months, 13 patients (65%) remain disease-free; the calculated 5-year actuarial disease-free survival is 60%. Toxicity, chiefly myelosuppression, was severe but manageable. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in elderly patients with poor performance status and advanced-stage disease. These data suggest that such a dose-intensive approach improves the response and survival of patients with SNC lymphoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Randomized study of cisplatin dose intensity in poor-risk germ cell tumors: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group and Southwest Oncology Group protocol.

Between 1984 and 1989, 159 patients presenting with advanced germ cell cancer were entered on a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and bleomycin and either standard-dose cisplatin (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) or high-dose cisplatin (40 mg/m2 daily for 5 days). Of the 159 patients, 153 were assessable for toxicity and response. As expected, patients receiving the high-dose cisplatin regimen experienced significantly more neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, nausea and vomiting, and myelo-suppression. Four patients (3%) died related to therapy. Despite the toxicity encountered, dose intensity was maintained. Overall, 84% of patients in the high-dose arm received 80% or more of the projected dose of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin; and 90% of patients on the standard-dose arm received 80% or more of the projected dose. Of the 76 eligible patients randomized to receive the high-dose cisplatin regimen, 52 (68%) became disease-free with chemotherapy alone or with subsequent resection of residual teratoma or cancer. Of the 77 patients randomized to the standard-dose arm, 56 (73%) became disease-free with chemotherapy alone or with surgery. Median follow-up is now 24 months. Eleven patients (three high-dose and eight standard-dose) relapsed from disease-free status. Overall, 74% of patients receiving the high-dose cisplatin regimen are alive, and 63% are continuously free of disease. Of the patients receiving the standard-dose cisplatin regimen, 74% are alive, and 61% are continuously free of disease. This randomized prospective trial in advanced germ cell cancer achieved dose intensity of the most active single agent in this disease. This dose intensity did not translate into an improved survival or cure. We conclude that dose escalation of cisplatin beyond standard doses results in excess toxicity with no accompanying therapeutic benefit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Poorly differentiated carcinoma and germ cell tumors.

Although many questions remain unanswered, recent clinical and pathologic studies have shed considerable light on the subject of carcinoma of unknown primary site. It is now clear that some patients in this group have extragonadal germ cell tumors. This is suggested by the superior treatment results in patients with clinical features of extragonadal germ cell tumor and is confirmed by the finding of the diagnostic chromosome abnormality in tumor cells of some patients. These patients have tumors that are unrecognizable using all available pathologic techniques other than molecular genetic analysis; most patients also do not have elevated serum tumor marker levels. Young men with poorly differentiated carcinoma located predominantly in the mediastinum or retroperitoneum should be strongly suspected of having germ cell tumors; chromosomal analysis should be obtained if possible, and these patients should be treated as for germ cell tumor. It is clear that some responsive patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma do not have extragonadal germ cell tumors. A few patients initially thought to have poorly differentiated carcinoma actually have non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. With the widespread availability of immunoperoxidase staining for LCA, this diagnostic error should be minimized. Other responsive patients have poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. The nature and spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors is still being defined; however, our initial documentation of cisplatin responsiveness has been confirmed, even in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors with a known primary site. It is likely that additional responsive subgroups also exist but have not yet been identified. With the availability of a diagnostic chromosomal marker, the answers to other questions regarding the relationship of poorly differentiated carcinoma and germ cell tumors will soon be forthcoming.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Treatment of patients with cancer of unknown primary site.

Advances in the management and treatment of the large, heterogeneous population of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site have been achieved by recognizing treatable subsets within this group. Each of these subsets has been thoroughly discussed; Table 10-9 summarizes the treatable subsets and the evaluations necessary for their identification. Even within treatable subsets, treatment data remain limited, and optimal therapy is still evolving. Despite these advances, a large group of patients with relatively insensitive tumors remains. Improved therapy for these patients will probably await therapy breakthroughs in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and the various other GI malignancies, since these tumors represent the majority of occult primary sites.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1990

Thoracic radiotherapy does not prolong survival in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent vindesine, thoracic radiotherapy, or both treatment modalities. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, phase III trial. SETTING: Multi-institutional, university-based national cooperative oncology group. PATIENTS: The study included 319 patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer who had no evidence of extrathoracic metastases. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable disease. Some patients could not have surgery because of coexisting medical conditions. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive vindesine, 3 mg/m2 body surface area weekly; standard thoracic radiotherapy, 60 Gy over 6 weeks; or both vindesine and thoracic radiotherapy. Vindesine was administered for 6 weeks and then every other week to patients who had no disease progression. Patients who developed progressive disease while receiving vindesine or radiotherapy alone were crossed over to radiotherapy or vindesine, respectively. Response assessment took place at week 6. RESULTS: The overall response rate was superior in the radiotherapy arms (radiotherapy alone, 30%; radiotherapy plus vindesine, 34%; vindesine alone, 10%; P = 0.001). However, with a minimum follow-up of 42 months, no improvement in survival has been seen with radiotherapy. The median survival was 8.6 months for patients receiving radiotherapy alone, 9.4 months for those receiving radiotherapy plus vindesine, and 10.1 months for those receiving vindesine (P = 0.58). Radiotherapy also failed to improve long-term survival. The 5-year survivals were 3%, 3%, and 1%, respectively (P = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have inoperable, nonmetastatic disease gain no clinically meaningful survival advantage with immediate thoracic irradiation, even when modern megavoltage radiation therapy techniques and equipment are used.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1990

Very low doses of warfarin can prevent thrombosis in central venous catheters. A randomized prospective trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether very low doses of warfarin are useful in thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with central venous catheters. DESIGN: Patients at risk for thrombosis associated with chronic indwelling central venous catheters were prospectively and randomly assigned to receive or not to receive 1 mg of warfarin, beginning 3 days before catheter insertion and continuing for 90 days. Subclavian, innominate, and superior vena cava venograms were done at onset of thrombosis symptoms or after 90 days in the study. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients entered the study, and 82 patients completed the study. Of 42 patients completing the study while receiving warfarin, 4 had venogram-proven thrombosis. All 4 had symptoms from thrombosis. Of 40 patients completing the study while not receiving warfarin, 15 had venogram-proven thrombosis, and 10 had symptoms from thrombosis (P less than 0.001). There were no measurable changes in the coagulation values assayed due to this warfarin dose, except in occasional patients who had become anorectic because of their disease or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Very low doses of warfarin can protect against thrombosis without inducing a hemorrhagic state. This approach may be applicable to other groups of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

An evaluation of combination 5-fluorouracil and spirogermanium in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Seventeen patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil and spirogermanium, a recently developed azaspiran-germanium compound remarkable for its lack of hematologic, gastrointestinal, renal or hepatic toxicity. Response to treatment and the incidence and severity of toxicity were evaluated. No patient achieved a complete response; there were three partial responses. Toxicity was unexpectedly frequent and severe; one patient was removed from study early due to intractable diarrhea, and there were two toxic deaths, both attributable to neutropenia and sepsis. Significant toxicity occurred in all seventeen patients, including three instances of Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. Given the low response rate and high incidence of life-threatening toxicity, we do not recommend further evaluation of this schedule of 5-fluorouracil and spirogermanium in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Chronic daily administration of oral etoposide in refractory lymphoma.

In a phase II study, 25 patients with previously treated lymphoma received oral etoposide for 21 consecutive days. All patients were considered incurable with standard therapy. Etoposide was administered at 50 mg/m2 per day: courses were repeated every 28-35 days, depending on myelosuppression. 15 patients (60%) had partial responses (95% CI 41-77%), while 10 patients had no response. Median time to disease progression was 5 months (range 2-13 months). Oral etoposide was active against indolent and aggressive (intermediate and high grade) lymphomas; however, median time to progression was only 3 months in aggressive lymphoma compared with 8 months in indolent lymphoma. Myelosuppression was the major side-effect; 7 patients (28%) had a leucocyte nadir below 1000/microliters during the first course, and 11 patients required dose reduction during subsequent courses due to unacceptable leukopenia. All patients had total alopecia, but other side-effects were uncommon. These results highlight the importance of schedule in the administration of etoposide.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

The role of hexamethylmelamine in the combination chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer: a comparison of hexamethylmelamine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (H-CAP) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP).

To evaluate the contribution of hexamethylmelamine (HMM) to the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with combination chemotherapy, we compared the results of treatment with HMM, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (H-CAP regimen) to treatment results using cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP regimen). The treatment regimens were identical in dosage and schedule with the exception of the addition of HMM to one regimen. Fifty-five patients treated with H-CAP at Vanderbilt University Hospital between August 1977 and March 1980 were compared with a subsequent group of 22 patients who received CAP between October 1984 and October 1987. Following six months of therapy, patients were restaged either with second-look laparotomy or with clinical restaging. Fifty-three of 55 patients (96%) had objective responses to H-CAP compared with 14 of 21 patients (67%) treated with CAP (p = 0.001). The pathologic complete response rate was also higher in the patients who received H-CAP (35% versus 19%). The median survival of patients receiving H-CAP is 47 months compared to 21 months for the CAP patients. When patients with limited residual disease (maximum tumor diameter less than or equal to 3 cm) were compared, the median survival also favored the H-CAP treatment (101 months versus 21 months, p = 0.002). The median time to progression was also greater in patients receiving H-CAP versus those receiving CAP (67 months versus 16 months, p = 0.045). Treatment-related toxicity did not differ substantially between the two regimens. Our findings suggest that the addition of HMM to CAP chemotherapy prolongs the median survival in patients with ovarian cancer and limited residual disease following cytoreductive surgery.

Adult↗