Testing pituitary function in aging individuals.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
Ezio Ghigo
Publications and source records attributed to Ezio Ghigo.
IGFs and IGFBPs in adult growth hormone deficiency.
In the current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) it is stated that, within the appropriate clinical context, it has to be shown by provocative tests only. But the diagnostic value of measuring IGF-I levels has been recently revisited. It has been confirmed that normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD in adults. However, it has also been emphasized that very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (and without malnutrition, liver disease or hypothyroidism) could be considered definite evidence for severe GHD. This assumption particularly applies to patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood. The value of measuring IGF-I levels for monitoring the efficacy and the adequacy of rhGH replacement remains definitely accepted.
Adult↗
Diagnosis of GH deficiency in the transition period: accuracy of insulin tolerance test and insulin-like growth factor-I measurement.
OBJECTIVE: A consensus exists that severe growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults is defined by a peak GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia (insulin tolerance test, ITT) of less than 3 microg/l based on a cohort of subjects with a mean age of 45 years. DESIGN AND METHODS: By considering one of the following two criteria for the diagnosis of probable permanent GHD, i.e. the severity of GHD (suggested by the presence of multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD)) or the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging identification of structural hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities, 26 patients (17 males, 9 females, mean age 20.8 +/- 2.3 years, range 17-25 years) were selected for re-evaluation of the GH response to ITT and their IGF-I concentration. Eight subjects had isolated GHD (IGHD) and 18 had MPHD. Normative data for peak GH were obtained after ITT in 39 healthy subjects (mean age 21.2 +/- 4.4 years, range 15.1-30.0 years) and the reference range for IGF-I was calculated using normative data from 117 healthy individuals. RESULTS: Mean peak GH response to ITT was significantly lower in the 26 patients (1.8+/-2.0 microg/l, range 0.1-6.1 microg/l) compared with the 39 controls (18.5 +/- 15.5 microg/l, range 6.1-84.0 microg/l; P < 0.0001). One subject with septo-optic dysplasia had a peak GH response of 6.1 microg/l that overlapped the lowest peak GH response obtained in normal subjects. There was an overlap for IGF-I SDS between subjects with IGHD and MPHD, as well as with normal controls. The diagnostic accuracy of a peak GH response of 6.1 microg/l showed a 96% sensitivity with 100% specificity. The maximum diagnostic accuracy with IGF-I SDS was obtained with a cut-off of -1.7 SDS (sensitivity 77%, specificity 100%) while an IGF-I < or = - 2.0 SDS showed a sensitivity of 62%. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the cut-off value of the peak GH response to ITT of less than 3 microg/l or 5 microg/l and of IGF-I of less than -2.0 SDS are too restrictive for the diagnosis of permanent GH deficiency in the transition period. We suggest that permanent GHD could be investigated more accurately by means of an integrated analysis of clinical history, the presence of MPHD, IGF-I concentration and the MR imaging findings of structural hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities.
Adolescent↗
The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on a reduced peak GH response to provocative tests, such as the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the GH-releasing hormone-arginine (GHRH-ARG) test. However, the cut-off limits of peak GH response in lean subjects are not reliable in obese patients; this is noteworthy since adult GHD is often associated with obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic cut-off limits of peak GH response to the GHRH-ARG test in overweight and obese as well as in lean population. DESIGN AND METHODS: The GH responses to the GHRH-ARG test were studied in 322 patients with organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease and in 318 control subjects. Patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the number of pituitary hormone deficits, except for GH deficiency: (a) patients with total pituitary hormone deficit (TPHD) and (b) patients without or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (PHD). Both patients and control subjects were divided into three subgroups according to body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI > or = 25 and <30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). TPHD patients were assumed to be GH deficient, whereas PHD patients may include subjects with either normal or impaired GH secretion. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis (Medcalc 7.2). The diagnostic cut-off points were calculated for lean, overweight and obese subjects to provide optimal separation of GH-deficient patients and control subjects according to two criteria: (1) a balance between high sensitivity and high specificity; (2) to provide the highest pair of sensitivity/specificity values for GH deficiency. RESULTS: In the lean population the best pair of values, with highest sensitivity as 98.7% and highest specificity as 83.7%, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 11.5 mug/l. In the overweight population the best pair of values, 96.7 and 75.5%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 8.0 mug/l. In the obese population the best pair of values, 93.5 and 78.3%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 4.2 mug/l. Applying the above mentioned cut-off points, among PHD patients we found that 80 subjects (72%) were GHD whereas 31 (28%) had normal GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the GHRH-ARG test is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in lean, overweight and obese patients, provided that specific BMI-related cut-off limits are assumed.
Adult↗
The negative association between total ghrelin levels, body mass and insulin secretion is lost in hypercortisolemic patients with Cushing's disease.
OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin exerts a wide spectrum of endocrine and non-endocrine actions. The stomach is the major source of circulating ghrelin levels that are negatively associated with body mass, insulin and glucose levels. The role of glucocorticoids in ghrelin secretion and action is still unclear. DESIGN: In 8 patients with Cushing's disease (CD, BMI 29.8 +/- 1.6 kg/m(2)), 7 normal (NS) and 6 obese subjects (OB, BMI 32.9 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2)) we studied: a) total ghrelin levels (every 15 min over 3 h) and their correlation with BMI, insulin, glucose, homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index, ACTH and cortisol levels; b) GH, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acylated ghrelin administration (1.0 mug/kg i.v. at 0 min). RESULTS: CD patients had BMI, insulin and glucose levels as well as HOMA index higher than those in NS (P < 0.05) but similar to those in OB. Despite this, total ghrelin levels in CD were similar to those in NS and both were higher (P < 0.05) than those in OB. No correlation was found among total ghrelin and BMI, insulin, glucose, ACTH and cortisol levels in CD patients. The GH responses to ghrelin in CD and OB were similar and both were lower (P < 0.002) than those in NS. In CD ghrelin induced exaggerated ACTH and cortisol responses clearly higher (P < 0.005) than in OB and NS. Ghrelin administration increased glucose in all groups; insulin levels showed slight decrease that was significant (P < 0.05) in OB only. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercortisolism in humans is associated with impaired ghrelin secretion and action. In fact, total ghrelin secretion in CD is not reduced despite increased BMI, insulin and glucose levels, while the GH and ACTH responses to acylated ghrelin are clearly reduced and enhanced, respectively.
Acylation↗
Ghrelin stimulates, whereas des-octanoyl ghrelin inhibits, glucose output by primary hepatocytes.
Ghrelin exerts various metabolic activities, including regulation of glucose levels in humans. To verify whether the glucose response to ghrelin reflects a modulation of an insulin-independent hepatic phenomenon, we studied glucose output by primary porcine hepatocytes in suspension culture, after incubation with acylated ghrelin (AG), unacylated ghrelin (UAG), and hexarelin (HEX). AG induced glucose output dose dependently after 20 min of incubation (P < 0.001), whereas HEX, a GH secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a) agonist, had no effect. UAG inhibited glucose release also dose dependently and after 20 min (P < 0.001). Moreover, UAG completely reversed AG-induced glucose output (P < 0.01). Using real-time PCR, GHS-R1a gene expression was undetectable in all the hepatocyte preparations studied. The lack of efficacy of HEX, the efficacy of UAG, and the absence of GHS-R1a expression indicate the involvement of a yet uncharacterized ghrelin receptor type. In conclusion, glucose output by primary hepatocytes is time- and dose-dependently stimulated by AG and inhibited by UAG. Moreover, UAG counteracts the stimulatory effect of AG on glucose release. These actions might be mediated by a different receptor than GHS-R1a, and apparently, we must consider AG and UAG as separate hormones that can modify each other's actions on glucose handling, at least in the liver.
Animals↗
Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin both inhibit isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in rat adipocytes via a non-type 1a growth hormone secretagogue receptor.
Besides possessing a strong growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity, the gastrointestinal octanoylated peptide ghrelin has been reported to antagonize lipolysis in rat adipocytes. It is not yet clear whether this inhibitory activity on lipolysis is also shared by the major circulating isoform, des-acyl ghrelin, that does not activate the ghrelin receptor, namely the type 1a GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-R1a) and lacks the endocrine effects of the acylated form. Here we show that des-acyl ghrelin, like ghrelin and some synthetic GHS (hexarelin and MK0677) and carboxy-terminally ghrelin fragments such as ghrelin-(1-5) and ghrelin-(1-10), all significantly reduced, over concentrations ranging from 1 to 1000 nM, the stimulation of glycerol release caused in rat epididymal adipocytes by the nonselective beta-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol in vitro. The order of potency on stimulated-lipolysis was: des-acyl ghrelin=ghrelin>MK0677=hexarelin>ghrelin-(1-5)=ghrelin-(1-10). This ranking was consistent with the binding experiments performed on membranes of epididymal adipose tissue or isolated adipocytes that did not express mRNA for GHS-R1a. A common high-affinity binding site was recognized in these cells by both acylated and des-acylated ghrelin and also by hexarelin, MK0677, ghrelin-(1-5) and ghrelin-(1-10). In conclusion, these findings provide the first evidence that des-acyl ghrelin, as well as ghrelin, short ghrelin fragments and synthetic GHS, may act directly as antilipolytic factors on the adipose tissue through binding to a specific receptor which is distinct from GHS-R1a.
Adipocytes↗
Dual effects of IGFBP-3 on endothelial cell apoptosis and survival: involvement of the sphingolipid signaling pathways.
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 has both growth-inhibiting and growth-promoting effects at the cellular level. The cytotoxic action of several anticancer drugs is linked to increased ceramide generation through sphingomyelin hydrolysis or de novo biosynthesis. Herein, we investigated the role of IGFBP-3 on apoptosis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and its relationship with ceramide levels. We report that IGFBP-3 exerts dual effects on HUVEC, potentiating doxorubicin-induced apoptosis but enhancing survival in serum-starved conditions. Ceramide was increased by IGFBP-3 in the presence of doxorubicin and decreased when IGFBP-3 was added alone to cells cultured in serum-free medium. The protection exerted by the ceramide synthase inhibitor fumonisin B1 over doxorubicin-induced apoptosis was enhanced by IGFBP-3 with concomitant reduction of ceramide levels. IGFBP-3 alone activated sphingosine kinase (SK) and increased SK1 mRNA; the SK inhibitor N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS) blocked IGFBP-3 antiapoptotic effect. Moreover, IGFBP-3 increased IGF-I mRNA and dramatically enhanced IGF-I release. IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and its downstream signaling pathways Akt and ERK were phosphorylated by IGFBP-3, whereas inhibition of IGF-IR phosphorylation with tyrphostin AG1024 suppressed the antiapopoptic effect of IGFBP-3. Finally, IGFBP-3 increased endothelial cell motility in all experimental conditions. These findings provide evidence that IGFBP-3 differentially regulates endothelial cell apoptosis by involvement of the sphingolipid signaling pathways. Moreover, the survival effect of IGFBP-3 seems to be mediated by the IGF-IR.
Apoptosis↗
Ghrelin, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and Cushing's syndrome.
Ghrelin, a peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, has been discovered as a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a), known as specific for synthetic GHS. Ghrelin has recently attracted considerable interest as a new orexigenic factor. However, ghrelin exerts pleiotropic actions that are explained by the widespread distribution of ghrelin and GHS-R expression. Besides strong stimulation of GH secretion, the neuroendocrine ghrelin actions also include significant stimulation of both lactotroph and corticotroph secretion; all these actions depend on acylation of ghrelin in serine-3 that allows binding and activation of the GHS-R1a. However, GHS-R subtypes are likely to exist; they also bind unacylated ghrelin that is, in fact, the most abundant circulating form and exerts some biological actions. Ghrelin secretion is mainly regulated by metabolic signals, namely inhibited by feeding, glucose and insulin while stimulated by energy restriction. The role of glucocorticoids on ghrelin synthesis and secretion is still unclear although morning ghrelin levels have been found reduced in some patients with Cushing's syndrome; this, however, would simply reflect its negative association to body mass. Ghrelin, like synthetic GHS, stimulates ACTH and cortisol secretion in normal subjects and this effect is generally sensitive to the negative glucocorticoid feedback. It is remarkable that, despite hypercortisolism, ghrelin as well as synthetic GHS display marked increase in their stimulatory effect on ACTH and cortisol secretion in patients with Cushing's disease. This is even more intriguing considering that the GH response to ghrelin and GHS is markedly reduced by glucocorticoid excess. It has been demonstrated that the ACTH-releasing effect of ghrelin and GHS is purely mediated at the central level in physiological conditions; its enhancement in the presence of ACTH-secreting tumours is, instead, likely to reflect direct action on GHS receptors present on the neoplastic tissues. In fact, peculiar ACTH hyperresponsiveness to ghrelin and GHS has been observed also in ectopic ACTH-secreting tumours.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Ghrelin and synthetic growth hormone secretagogues are cardioactive molecules with identities and differences.
Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide mainly produced by the stomach, is a natural ligand of the type 1a growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) that also binds synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GHSs. GHS-R1a and various GHS-R1a-related receptor subtypes are widely distributed in central and peripheral tissues, particularly in the cardiovascular system. In agreement with this distribution of GHS-R, ghrelin and synthetic GHSs exert a wide spectrum of actions, including cardiac and vascular activities. Ghrelin, as well as peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GHSs, is able to increase cardiac performances both in animals and in humans and to exert protective effects on ischemia/reperfusion injury of isolated rat heart. Moreover, both ghrelin and synthetic GHSs have been shown as able to act as survival factors, protecting cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells from doxorubicin-induced apoptosis. Despite the fact that the neuroendocrine actions of ghrelin are dependent on its acylation in serine 3, these cardiovascular effects are exerted by unacylated as well as by acylated ghrelin. This evidence indicates that these actions are not likely to be mediated by a type 1a GHS-R, which, by definition, binds acylated ghrelin only. However, synthetic peptidyl GHSs, but not nonpeptidyl, and even ghrelin itself are able to reduce atherosclerotic lesion development in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice. This action seems to be mediated by a specific receptor for synthetic peptidyl GHSs only, identified as CD36, a multifunctional B-type scavenger receptor involved in atherogenesis and mainly expressed in cardiomyocytes and microvascular endothelial cells. Thus, there are similarities, but also differences, between ghrelin and synthetic GHSs, in terms of cardiac actions that are likely to be related to the existence of multiple GHS-R subtypes that mediate the cardiovascular actions of the above substances. These actions indicate their potential pharmacotherapeutic implications in cardiovascular diseases.
Animals↗
Ghrelin does not mediate the somatotroph and corticotroph responses to the stimulatory effect of glucagon or insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in humans.
OBJECTIVE: Acylated ghrelin, a gastric peptide, possesses a potent GH- but also significant ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity mediated by the activation of GH secretagogue receptors (GHS-R) at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. The physiological role of ghrelin in the control of somatotroph and corticotroph function is, however, largely unclear. Glucagon is known to induce a clear increase of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels in humans, at least after intramuscular administration. In fact, glucagon is considered to be a classical alternative to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT) for the combined evaluation of the function of GH and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We aimed to clarify whether ghrelin mediate the GH and corticotroph responses to intramuscular glucagon or ITT, which has recently been reported able to induce a surprising ghrelin decrease. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young male subjects [age (mean +/- SD): 29.0 +/- 8.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 21.9 +/- 2.5 kg/m(2)]. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied ghrelin, GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose levels after glucagon (GLU; 0.017 mg/kg intramuscularly), ITT (0.1 IU/kg insulin intravenously) or saline administration. RESULTS: Saline infusion was not followed by any significant variation in ghrelin, GH and glucose levels while ACTH and cortisol showed the expected spontaneous morning trend toward a decrease. GLU administration increased (P < 0.01) circulating GH, ACTH and cortisol as well as insulin and glucose levels. ITT induced an obvious increase (P < 0.01) of GH, ACTH and cortisol levels. The ITT-induced increases in GH and ACTH, but not cortisol, levels were higher (P < 0.01) than those after GLU. Circulating ghrelin levels were not modified by GLU. On the other hand, ghrelin levels underwent a transient reduction (P < 0.01) after insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin does not mediate the GH and ACTH responses to glucagon or to the ITT. In fact, ghrelin levels are not modified at all by glucagon and transiently decrease during the ITT. These findings support the assumption that ghrelin does not play a major role in the physiological control of somatotroph and corticotroph function.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Marked GH secretion after ghrelin alone or combined with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in obese patients.
OBJECTIVES: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid peptide, predominantly produced by the stomach. It displays a strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamus-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R). There are different studies that suggest the importance of ghrelin in feeding and weight homeostasis. In obesity there is a markedly decreased GH secretion. For both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli, including the response to GHRH. However, the response to the natural GH secretaogogue ghrelin is unclear at the present time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in a group of obese patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in obesity and to clarify the mechanism of action of ghrelin. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Six obese female patients (31 +/- 3.4 years) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m(2) were studied. As a control group, six normal nonobese female subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Four tests were performed: placebo, GHRH [1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, intravenous (i.v.)], ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) and GHRH (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) plus ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.). Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After GHRH, the median peak GH secretion in obese patients was 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion showed in obese patients a median peak of 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin in obese patients the median peak GH secretion was 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05) or ghrelin (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal control subjects showed a median peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion in normal showed a median peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin, in normal subjects the median peak GH secretion was 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH or ghrelin alone (P < 0.05). When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after GHRH alone, it was markedly decreased in obese people when compared with normal patients (P < 0.05) with a median GH peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l) and 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively. When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after ghrelin alone or GHRH plus ghrelin, it was only blunted in obese subjects when compared with normal subjects with a median GH peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l) and 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85 micro g/l) for normal and obese subjects, respectively, after ghrelin alone (P < 0.05) and a median GH peak of 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l) and 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively, after GHRH plus ghrelin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a massive GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in obese patients, suggesting that altered ghrelin secretion could play a major role in the blunted GH secretion present in obese patients.
Adult↗
Traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage are conditions at high risk for hypopituitarism: screening study at 3 months after the brain injury.
OBJECTIVE: Acquired hypopituitarism in adults is obviously suspected in patients with primary hypothalamic-pituitary diseases, particularly after neurosurgery and/or radiotherapy. That brain injuries (BI) can cause hypopituitarism is commonly stated and has been recently emphasized but the management of BI patients does not routinely include neuroendocrine evaluations. AIM: To clarify the occurrence of hypopituitarism in patients after traumatic brain injury (TBI) or subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) 3 months after the BI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The occurrence of hypopituitarism in conscious patients after traumatic brain injury [TBI, n = 100, 31 women, 69 men; age 37.1 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 23.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m(2); Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3-15] or subarachnoid haemorrhage [SAH, n = 40, 14 men, 26 wpmen, 51.0 +/- 2.0 years; 25.0 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2); Fisher's scale 1-4] was studied in a multicentre study 3 months after the BI. All patients underwent wide basal hormonal evaluation; the GH/IGF-I axis was evaluated by GHRH + arginine test and IGF-I measurement. RESULTS: In TBI patients, some degree of hypopituitarism was shown in 35%. Total, multiple and isolated deficits were present in 4, 6 and 25%, respectively. Diabetes insipidus was present in 4%. Secondary adrenal, thyroid and gonadal deficit was present in 8, 5 and 17%, respectively. Severe GH deficiency (GHD) was the most frequent pituitary defect (25%). In SAH patients, some degree of hypopituitarism was shown in 37.5%. Despite no total hypopituitarism, multiple and isolated deficits were present in 10 and 27.5%, respectively. Diabetes insipidus was present in 7.5%. Secondary adrenal, thyroid and gonadal deficit was present in 2.5, 7.5 and 12.5%, respectively. Severe GHD was the most frequent defect (25%). CONCLUSIONS: TBI and SAH are conditions associated with high risk of acquired hypopituitarism. The pituitary defect is often multiple and severe GHD is the most frequent defect. Thus neuroendocrine evaluations are always mandatory in patients after brain injuries.
Adult↗
Ghrelin secretion is inhibited by glucose load and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia but unaffected by glucagon and arginine in humans.
OBJECTIVE: Circulating ghrelin levels are increased by fasting and decreased by feeding, glucose load, insulin and somatostatin. Whether hyperglycaemia and insulin directly inhibit ghrelin secretion still remains matter of debate. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate further the regulatory effects of glucose and insulin on ghrelin secretion. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: We studied the effects of glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 100 g orally], insulin-induced hypoglycaemia [ITT, 0.1 IU/kg insulin intravenously (i.v.)], glucagon (1 mg i.v.), arginine (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) and saline on ghrelin, GH, insulin, glucose and glucagon levels in six normal subjects. MEASUREMENTS: In all the sessions, blood samples were collected every 15 min from 0 up to + 120 min. Ghrelin, GH, insulin, glucagon and glucose levels were assayed at each time point. RESULTS: OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin while decreasing (P < 0.01) GH and ghrelin levels. ITT increased (P < 0.01) GH but decreased (P < 0.01) ghrelin levels. Glucagon increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin without modifying GH and ghrelin. Arginine increased (P < 0.01) GH, insulin, glucagon and glucose (P < 0.05) but did not affect ghrelin secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin secretion in humans is inhibited by OGTT-induced hyperglycaemia and ITT but not by glucagon and arginine, two substances able to increase insulin and glucose levels. These findings question the assumption that glucose and insulin directly regulate ghrelin secretion. On the other hand, ghrelin secretion is not associated with the GH response to ITT or arginine, indicating that the somatotroph response to these stimuli is unlikely to be mediated by ghrelin.
Adult↗
Insulin-like growth factor I levels and the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency.
The current guidelines state that, within the appropriate clinical context, the diagnosis of adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency must be made biochemically using provocative tests. Measurement of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels cannot always distinguish between healthy and GH-deficient individuals. In particular, IGFBP-3 as a marker of GH status is clearly less sensitive than IGF-I and there is general agreement that its measurement does not provide useful diagnostic information. However, the diagnostic value of measuring IGF-I levels has been revisited recently. It has been confirmed that normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GH deficiency (GHD) in adults, in whom the diagnosis has therefore to be based on the demonstration of severe impairment of the peak GH response to provocative tests. It has also been emphasized that very low IGF-I levels in patients with high suspicion of GHD could be considered to be definite evidence for severe GHD. This assumption particularly applies to patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitary deficiencies acquired in adulthood. In addition, the use of IGF-I levels to monitor the efficacy and adequacy of recombinant human GH replacement remains widely accepted.
Adult↗
Biological, physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin.
Ghrelin is a peptide predominantly produced by the stomach. Ghrelin displays strong GH-releasing activity. This activity is mediated by the activation of the so-called GH secretagogue receptor type 1a. This receptor had been shown to be specific for a family of synthetic, peptidyl and nonpeptidyl GH secretagogues. Apart from a potent GH-releasing action, ghrelin has other activities including stimulation of lactotroph and corticotroph function, influence on the pituitary gonadal axis, stimulation of appetite, control of energy balance, influence on sleep and behavior, control of gastric motility and acid secretion, and influence on pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function as well as on glucose metabolism. Cardiovascular actions and modulation of proliferation of neoplastic cells, as well as of the immune system, are other actions of ghrelin. Therefore, we consider ghrelin a gastrointestinal peptide contributing to the regulation of diverse functions of the gut-brain axis. So, there is indeed a possibility that ghrelin analogs, acting as either agonists or antagonists, might have clinical impact.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Ghrelin secretion in childhood is refractory to the inhibitory effect of feeding.
Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue, is predominantly produced by the stomach. Ghrelin has other actions including orexant activity, modulation of energy balance, and modulation of endocrine and nonendocrine functions. Ghrelin secretion is increased by fasting and energy restriction but decreased by food intake, glucose, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin secretion does not seem to be a function of age; in fact, morning ghrelin levels after overnight fasting in prepubertal and pubertal children are similar to those in young adults. To clarify whether children and adults have the same sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of food intake, we studied the ghrelin response to a standardized light breakfast (SLB) in 10 prepubertal lean children whose results were compared with those recorded in 19 normal-weight adults. Basal ghrelin levels in children (median, 224.5; 25th to 75th percentile, 122.0-447.7 pg/ml) and adults (338.0; 238.0-512.0 pg/ml) were similar. SLB inhibited ghrelin levels in adults (263.0; 190.0-399.0 pg/ml). However, no change in ghrelin levels after SLB (206.5; 105.0-274.0 pg/ml) was recorded in children. Thus, food intake inhibits ghrelin secretion in adults but not in children. Ghrelin refractoriness to inhibition by food intake in children would reflect a peculiar functional profile of the ghrelin system in childhood.
Adult↗
Acetylcholine regulates ghrelin secretion in humans.
Ghrelin secretion has been reportedly increased by fasting and energy restriction but decreased by food intake, glucose, insulin, and somatostatin. However, its regulation is still far from clarified. The cholinergic system mediates some ghrelin actions, e.g. stimulation of gastric contractility and acid secretion and its orexigenic activity. To clarify whether ghrelin secretion undergoes cholinergic control in humans, we studied the effects of pirenzepine [PZ, 100 mg per os (by mouth)], a muscarinic antagonist, or pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg per os), an indirect cholinergic agonist, on ghrelin, GH, insulin, and glucose levels in six normal subjects. PD increased (P < 0.05) GH (change in area under curves, mean +/- SEM, 790.9 +/- 229.3 microg(*)min/liter) but did not modify insulin and glucose levels. PZ did not significantly modify GH, insulin, and glucose levels. Circulating ghrelin levels were increased by PD (11290.5 +/- 6688.7 pg(*)min/ml; P < 0.05) and reduced by PZ (-23205.0 +/- 8959.5 pg(*)min/ml; P < 0.01). The PD-induced ghrelin peak did not precede that of GH. In conclusion, circulating ghrelin levels in humans are increased and reduced by cholinergic agonists and antagonists, respectively. Thus, ghrelin secretion is under cholinergic, namely muscarinic, control in humans. The variations in circulating ghrelin levels induced by PD and PZ are unlikely to mediate the cholinergic influence on GH secretion.
Acetylcholine↗