Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Evan Wood

Publications and source records attributed to Evan Wood.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Harm reduction, HIV/AIDS, and the human rights challenge to global drug control policy.

The global HIV/AIDS pandemic, and the role of unsafe drug injection as one of its principal drivers, have added to the list of harms associated with unsafe drug use. HIV/AIDS has highlighted ways in which prohibitionist drug policy causes or contributes to such harms and focused attention on the international regime of illicit drug control. At the same time, HIV/AIDS has catalyzed the "health and human rights movement" to articulate legal and policy responses that both represent sound public health policy and fulfill human rights obligations recognized in international law; this necessarily includes scrutinizing the interpretation and implementation of the UN drug control conventions. This article brings together public health evidence and legal analysis as a contribution toward changing the global drug control regime to a more health-friendly, human rights-based system.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Getting global funds to those most in need: the Thai Drug Users' Network.

The Thai Drug Users' Network (TDN) formed in 2002 in response to the deplorable health and human rights conditions facing illicit drug users in Thailand. In 2003, TDN submitted a proposal for funding to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (GFATM). The proposal appeared destined to fail as it did not have the support of the Thai government and because the interventions proposed were highly incongruent with national policies. In the midst of an ongoing drug war, TDN took action to increase awareness of the harms of the drug war, the shortcomings in GFATM policies, and the need for peer-driven interventions. This article describes the circumstances surrounding this instance of successful drug-user organizing in order to identify the lessons that can be learned.

Financing, Organized↗

Unstable housing, associated risk behaviour, and increased risk for HIV infection among injection drug users.

We sought to examine the relationship between housing status and risk of HIV-infection among injection drug users in Vancouver, Canada. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, we found an elevated HIV incidence rate among those who reported residing in unstable housing (log-rank p=0.006). In Cox's regression survival analysis, unstable housing remained marginally associated with elevated risks of HIV infection (relative hazard=1.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.09-2.00); p=0.084) after adjustment for potential confounders including syringe sharing. Adjusted generalized estimating equations analysis that examined factors associated with unstable housing demonstrated that residing in unstable housing was independently associated with several HIV risk behaviours including borrowing used needles (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.14) and sex-trade involvement (adjusted OR=1.19). Our findings suggest that unstable housing environments are associated with elevated risk of HIV- infection due to risk behaviours that take place in these environments. Implications for policy including more comprehensive housing interventions (e.g. 'floating support') are discussed.

British Columbia↗

Gender differences in HIV-1 RNA rebound attributed to incomplete antiretroviral adherence among HIV-Infected patients in a population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: There have been growing concerns about possible gender-related differences in rates of responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We therefore examined the association between gender and time to HIV-1 RNA rebound in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients initiating HAART in a population-based setting. METHODS: We evaluated all antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected men and women who achieved HIV-1 RNA suppression at least once (HIV RNA <500 copies/mL) after initiating HAART between August 1, 1996 and July 31, 2000 and who were followed until March 31, 2002 in a province-wide HIV treatment program. We evaluated time to HIV-1 RNA rebound (> or =500 copies/mL) using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: In total, 844 (87.0%) men and 126 (13.0%) women initiated HAART during the study period and achieved HIV-1 RNA suppression at least once. Overall rates of rebound were 47.4% and 34.0% for women and men, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.021). Women were less likely to be > or =95% adherent (P = 0.001) and more likely to have a history of injection drug use (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, incomplete adherence was found to be highly predictive of HIV-1 RNA rebound (adjusted relative hazard [ARH] = 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33-5.00). Although female patients had higher rates of HIV-1 RNA rebound in univariate analysis (relative hazard [RH] = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05-1.82), this was no longer statistically significant once other known confounders such as adherence and injection drug use were adjusted for (RH = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.71-1.28). When the analyses were stratified based on history of injection drug use, we found that rates of rebound were higher among injection drug-using women than among injection drug-using men (P = 0.048), whereas there was no gender difference among non-injection drug users with respect to rebound (P = 0.345). CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher rates of HIV-1 RNA rebound among women were primarily explained by incomplete adherence, which was more prevalent among women in this cohort. Our findings suggest that psychosocial factors such as drug use and incomplete adherence predict HIV-1 RNA rebound and that gender differences in time to rebound can be largely attributed to a disproportionate prevalence of these factors among women in this population.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

Baseline self-perceived risk of HIV infection independently predicts the rate of HIV seroconversion in a prospective cohort of injection drug users.

BACKGROUND: The identification of individuals at the highest risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is critical for targeting prevention strategies. We evaluated self-perceived risk of HIV infection and rates of subsequent HIV seroconversion among a prospective cohort study of injection drug users (IDUs). METHODS: We performed an analysis of the time to HIV infection among 994 baseline HIV negative IDUs enrolled in the Vancouver injection drug users study (VIDUS). IDUs were stratified based on their baseline self-perceived risk of HIV seroconversion (higher than others vs same or lower). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate cumulative HIV incidence rates and Cox regression was used to determine adjusted relative hazards for HIV seroconversion. RESULTS: At the end of 24 months after enrolment into the cohort, the cumulative HIV incidence rate was significantly elevated among the 5.9% of the sample who perceived their risk for HIV infection to be higher at baseline (26.6% vs 7.8% log-rank P < 0.001). In a Cox model that adjusted for all variables that were associated with the time to HIV infection in univariate analyses, a higher baseline self-perceived risk of acquiring HIV infection (relative hazard RH: 2.48 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.51, 4.10]; P = 0.004) remained independently associated with time to HIV seroconversion. CONCLUSIONS: IDUs' perception of their risk for HIV seroconversion upon enrolment into a prospective cohort study was strongly and independently associated with the subsequent rate of HIV seroconversion. Since this risk marker remained independently associated with HIV seroconversion, even after adjustment for time-updated risk behaviours, our findings have major implications that may aid outreach workers in their efforts to identify IDUs who should be targeted with prevention efforts.

Adult↗

Methodology for evaluating Insite: Canada's first medically supervised safer injection facility for injection drug users.

Many Canadian cities are experiencing ongoing infectious disease and overdose epidemics among injection drug users (IDUs). In particular, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have become endemic in many settings and bacterial and viral infections, such as endocarditis and cellulitis, have become extremely common among this population. In an effort to reduce these public health concerns and the public order problems associated with public injection drug use, in September 2003, Vancouver, Canada opened a pilot medically supervised safer injecting facility (SIF), where IDUs can inject pre-obtained illicit drugs under the supervision of medical staff. The SIF was granted a legal exemption to operate on the condition that its impacts be rigorously evaluated. In order to ensure that the evaluation is appropriately open to scrutiny among the public health community, the present article was prepared to outline the methodology for evaluating the SIF and report on some preliminary observations. The evaluation is primarily structured around a prospective cohort of SIF users, that will examine risk behavior, blood-borne infection transmission, overdose, and health service use. These analyses will be augmented with process data from within the SIF, as well as survey's of local residents and qualitative interviews with users, staff, and key stakeholders, and standardised evaluations of public order changes. Preliminary observations suggest that the site has been successful in attracting IDUs into its programs and in turn helped to reduce public drug use. However, each of the indicators described above is the subject of a rigorous scientific evaluation that is attempting to quantify the overall impacts of the site and identify both benefits and potentially harmful consequences and it will take several years before the SIF's impacts can be appropriately examined.

Journal Article↗

Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users.

BACKGROUND: North America's first medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users was opened in Vancouver on Sept. 22, 2003. Although similar facilities exist in a number of European cities and in Sydney, Australia, no standardized evaluations of their impact have been presented in the scientific literature. METHODS: Using a standardized prospective data collection protocol, we measured injection-related public order problems during the 6 weeks before and the 12 weeks after the opening of the safer injecting facility in Vancouver. We measured changes in the number of drug users injecting in public, publicly discarded syringes and injection-related litter. We used Poisson log-linear regression models to evaluate changes in these public order indicators while considering potential confounding variables such as police presence and rainfall. RESULTS: In stratified linear regression models, the 12-week period after the facility's opening was independently associated with reductions in the number of drug users injecting in public (p < 0.001), publicly discarded syringes (p < 0.001) and injection-related litter (p < 0.001). The predicted mean daily number of drug users injecting in public was 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5.4) during the period before the facility's opening and 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.0) after the opening; the corresponding predicted mean daily numbers of publicly discarded syringes were 11.5 (95% CI 10.0-13.2) and 5.4 (95% CI 4.7-6.2). Externally compiled statistics from the city of Vancouver on the number of syringes discarded in outdoor safe disposal boxes were consistent with our findings. INTERPRETATION: The opening of the safer injecting facility was independently associated with improvements in several measures of public order, including reduced public injection drug use and public syringe disposal.

British Columbia↗

The future face of coinfection: prevalence and incidence of HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection among young injection drug users.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection among young (aged 29 years or younger) injection drug users (IDUs) and to compare sociodemographic and risk characteristics between (HIV/HCV) coinfected, monoinfected, or HIV- and HCV-negative youth. Data were collected through the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS). To date, more than 1400 IDUs have been enrolled and followed, of whom 479 were aged 29 years or younger. Semiannually, participants have completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and have undergone serologic testing for HIV and HCV. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to investigate predictors of baseline coinfection. Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates were used to identify predictors of time to secondary infection seroconversion. A Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to determine risk associations across 3 categories: no infection, monoinfection, and coinfection. Of the 479 young injectors, 78 (16%) were coinfected with HIV and HCV at baseline and a further 45 (15%) with follow-up data became coinfected during the study period. Baseline coinfection was independently associated with being female, being aboriginal, older age, greater number of years injecting, and living in the IDU epicenter. Factors independently associated with time to secondary infection seroconversion were borrowing needles and greater than once-daily cocaine injection, and accessing methadone maintenance therapy in the previous 6 months was protective. There were clear trends across the 3 categories for increasing proportions of female subjects, aboriginal subjects, older age, greater number of years injecting, living in the IDU epicenter, and daily cocaine use. There were a shocking number of youth living with coinfection, particularly female and aboriginal youth. The median number of years injecting for youth seroconverting to a secondary infection was 3 years, suggesting that appropriate public health interventions should be implemented immediately.

Adolescent↗

Inability to access addiction treatment and risk of HIV infection among injection drug users.

It was recently found that 94% of the nearly $500 million allocated annually to Canada's illicit drug strategy has been spent on enforcement-based interventions. As a result, lack of funds for addiction treatment has meant demand for substance abuse treatment among illicit drug users has exceeded availability. This study evaluated whether injection drug users (IDUs) who reported being unable to access addiction treatment were at elevated risk of HIV infection. A prospective analysis was done of factors associated with syringe borrowing by baseline HIV-negative IDUs among participants enrolled in the Vancouver Injecting Drug Users Study (VIDUS). Since serial measures for each individual were available, variables potentially associated with syringe borrowing were evaluated using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with logit link for binary outcomes. Overall, 1157 HIV-negative IDUs were enrolled into the VIDUS cohort between May 1996 and May 2002. Unsuccessful attempts to access addiction treatment were associated with reporting syringe borrowing during follow-up in both univariate (odds ratio 1.72; 95% CI 1.47-2.00; P<0.001) and in multivariate GEE analyses (adjusted odds ratio 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.53; P=0.003). Inability to access addiction treatment was independently associated with syringe borrowing among HIV-negative IDUs at risk for HIV infection. These findings suggest that the limited provision of addiction treatment may result in a major missed opportunity to reduce HIV transmission behavior among IDUs and that the expansion of addiction treatment services has major potential to reduce the substantial human and fiscal costs of HIV infection.

British Columbia↗

Displacement of Canada's largest public illicit drug market in response to a police crackdown.

BACKGROUND: Law enforcement is often used in an effort to reduce the social, community and health-related harms of illicit drug use by injection drug users (IDUs). There are, however, few data on the benefits of such enforcement or on the potential harms. A large-scale police "crackdown" to control illicit drug use in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside provided us with an opportunity to evaluate the effect. METHODS: As part of our ongoing prospective cohort study of IDUs in Vancouver, we examined data collected from 244 IDUs in the 3 months before the police crackdown and from 142 IDUs in the 3 months after the start of the crackdown, on Apr. 7, 2003. All study subjects were active drug users. We also examined external data on needle exchanges and syringe disposal. RESULTS: The 2 groups of IDUs were statistically similar: they were mainly young (mean age 39 years) and male (63%), and they had injected illicit drugs for 13 years on average. Ethnic background and the proportion homeless were also similar. There were no statistically significant reported differences (all p > 0.1) in the street price of heroin, cocaine or "crack" in the 2 periods. In the 3-month periods before and after the crackdown, respectively, the rates of daily heroin injection were 27.9% and 26.8%, daily cocaine injection 28.7% and 27.5%, and daily crack use 59.4% and 60.6% (all p > 0.1). The proportions of study subjects receiving methadone treatment, 41.0% and 44.4% (p = 0.516), did not differ. However, the proportions reporting a change in where drugs were used, 22.5% and 33.8% (p < 0.05), and the proportions reporting a change in the neighbourhood of use because of police presence, 18.1% and 26.8% (p < 0.05), increased significantly. Needle-exchange data confirmed that the community levels of drug use were unchanged. Disposal statistics demonstrated that the monthly average number of used syringes found on the streets outside the traditional area of drug use increased from 784 in the 3 months before Apr. 1 to 1253 in the subsequent 3 months (p = 0.002) and the monthly average number of used syringes found in public boxes for the safe disposal of syringes decreased from 865 to 502 (p = 0.018). INTERPRETATION: The effort to control illicit drug use did not alter the price of drugs or the frequency of use, nor did it encourage enrollment in methadone treatment programs. Several measures indicated displacement of injection drug use from the area of the crackdown into adjacent areas of the city, which has implications for both recruitment of new initiates into injection drug use and HIV prevention efforts.

Adult↗

The impact of adherence on CD4 cell count responses among HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: There have been concerns that irreversible immune damage may result if highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is initiated after the CD4 cell count declines to below 350 cells/microL; however, the role of antiretroviral adherence on CD4 cell count responses has not been well evaluated. METHODS: We evaluated CD4 cell count responses of 1522 antiretroviral-naive patients initiating HAART who were stratified by baseline CD4 cell count (<50, 50-199, and >or=200 cells/microL) and adherence. RESULTS: Among patients starting HAART with <50 cells/microL, during the fifth 15-week period after the initiation of HAART, absolute CD4 cell counts were 200 cells/microL (interquartile range [IQR]: 130-290) for adherent patients versus 60 cells/microL (IQR: 10-130) for nonadherent patients. Similarly, among patients starting HAART with 50 to 199 cells/microL, during the fifth 15-week period after the initiation of HAART, absolute CD4 cell counts were 300 cells/microL (IQR: 180-390) versus 125 cells/microL (IQR: 40-210) for nonadherent patients. In Cox regression analyses, adherence was the strongest independent predictor of the time to a gain of >or=50 cells/microL from baseline (relative hazard [RH] = 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-3.37). Among patients with baseline CD4 cell counts <200 cells/microL, adherence was the strongest independent predictor of the time to a CD4 cell count >200 cells/microL (RH = 4.85, 95% CI: 3.15-7.47). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that substantial CD4 gains are possible among highly advanced adherent patients and should contribute to the ongoing debate over the optimal time to initiate HAART.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Rationale for evaluating North America's first medically supervised safer-injecting facility.

Many cities throughout the world are experiencing ongoing infectious disease and overdose epidemics among illicit injection drug users (IDUs). In particular, HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have become endemic in many settings and bacterial infections, such as endocarditis, have become extremely common among this population. In an effort to reduce these public health concerns, in September 2003, Vancouver, Canada, opened a pilot medically supervised safer- injecting facility (SIF), where IDUs can inject pre-obtained illicit drugs under the supervision of medical staff. Before and since the facility's opening, there has been a substantial misunderstanding about the rationale for evaluating SIF as a public-health strategy. This article outlines the evidence and rationale in support of the Canadian initiative. This rationale involves limitations in conventionally applied drug-control efforts, and gaps in current public-health policies in controlling the spread of infectious diseases, and the incidence of overdose among IDUs.

British Columbia↗

The cost of inaction on HIV transmission among injection drug users and the potential for effective interventions.

Estimated and potential medical costs of treating patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in urban areas of high HIV prevalence have not been well defined. We estimated the total medical cost of HIV disease among injection drug users in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, assuming stable and increasing HIV prevalence. Total medical costs were estimated by multiplying the average lifetime medical cost per person by the number of HIV-infected individuals. We assumed the cost of each HIV infection to be 150,000 Canadian dollars, based on empirical data, and HIV prevalence estimates were derived from the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS) and external data sources. By use of Monte Carlo simulation methodology, we performed sensitivity analyses to estimate total medical cost, assuming the HIV prevalence remained stable at 31% and under a scenario in which the prevalence rose to 50%. Expected medical expenditures based on current HIV prevalence levels were estimated as 215,852,613 Canadian dollars. If prevalence rises to 50% as reported in other urban centers, the median estimated medical cost would be approximately 348,935,865 Canadian dollars. This represents a difference in the total costs between the two scenarios of 133,083,253 Canadian dollars. Health planners should consider that predicted medical expenditures related to the HIV epidemic among injection drug users in our setting may cost an estimated 215,852,613 Canadian dollars. If funding cannot be found for appropriate prevention interventions and the prevalence rises to 50%, a further 133,083,253 Canadian dollars may be required.

British Columbia↗

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and CD4 T-cell count responses among HIV-infected injection drug users.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to CD4 cell count response (> or = 50 cells/mm3) among patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with and without a history of injection drug use, and to examine the potential role of non-adherence to HAART on differential CD4 responses. METHODS: Population-based analysis of treatment-naive patients initiating HAART during the period 1 August 1996 to 31 July 2000 and who were followed until 31 March 2002. Patients were stratified based on 95% adherence and history of injection drug use, and Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression were used to evaluate CD4 response rates and factors associated with CD4 responses. RESULTS: Overall, the CD4 cell count response rate was slower among injection drug users in Kaplan-Meier analyses (log-rank: P<0.05). However, no differences existed when the analyses were restricted to adherent patients (log-rank: P=0.349). Similarly, the differences in the time to CD4 cell count response observed in univariate Cox regression analyses for patients with a history of injection drug use [relative hazard: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97)] diminished after adjustment for adherence [adjusted relative hazard: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.16)]. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the importance of adherence on CD4 cell count responses and highlight the need for interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence among injection drug user.

Adult↗

Psychosocial determinants of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among injection drug users in Vancouver.

BACKGROUND: Sub-optimal adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among injection drug users (IDUs) is a significant concern. As such, there is an urgent need to identify psychosocial determinants of adherence that can be incorporated into interventions designed to promote optimal adherence. OBJECTIVE: To identify psychosocial determinants of adherence to HAART, as well as self-reported reasons for missing doses of HAART among HIV-infected IDUs. METHODS: We developed an eight-item adherence self-efficacy scale comprised of two sub-scales: adherence efficacy and self-regulatory efficacy. We examined correlates between adherence self-efficacy, outcome expectations, socio-demographic characteristics, drug use and risk behaviours, social support and HAART adherence among 108 HIV-infected participants in the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS). Pharmacy-based adherence to HAART was obtained through a confidential record linkage to the province of British Columbia's HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program. Participants were defined as adherent if they picked-up 95% of their HAART prescriptions. Participants were also asked to indicate reasons for missing doses of HAART. Logistic regression was used to identify the factors independently associated with adherence to HAART. RESULTS: Seventy-one (66%) HIV-infected IDUs were less than 95% adherent. Forgetting was the most frequently cited reason (27%) for missing doses of HAART. Factors independently associated with adherence to HAART included adherence efficacy expectations [OR=1.8 (95% CI: 1.0-3.1); P=0.039] and negative outcome expectations [OR=0.8 (95% CI: 0.7-0.9); P=0.027]. CONCLUSIONS: We found low rates of adherence to HAART among IDUs. Psychological constructs derived from self-efficacy theory are highly germane to the understanding of adherence behaviour, and interventions that address these constructs should be developed and tested among HIV-infected drug users.

Adult↗

Initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy and continuity of HIV care: the impact of incarceration and prison release on adherence and HIV treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of incarceration within 12 months of initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on non-adherence and HIV-1 RNA suppression. METHODS: We compared the adherence and virological outcomes among participants in a population-based HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program in British Columbia, Canada, by history of incarceration in a provincial prison. Participants who were HIV-infected, naive to HAART and who were prescribed treatment between 1 July 1997 and 1 March 2002 were eligible for this study. Logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with non-adherence and Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine the factors associated with HIV-1 RNA suppression adjusting for age, gender, history of drug use, baseline HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4 cell count, type of antiretroviral regimen [two nucleosides + protease inhibitor (PI) vs two nucleosides + non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)], physician's HIV-related experience for each subject and adherence as measured by pharmacy refill compliance. RESULTS: There were 1746 subjects (101 incarcerated/1645 non-incarcerated) who started antiretroviral therapy between 1 July 1997 and 1 March 2002. Of those incarcerated, 50 initiated HAART while in prison and 27 subjects were released but returned to prison in the follow-up period. Subjects received antiretroviral therapy while incarcerated for a median number of 4 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2-10]. Multiple logistic regression results showed that a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART independently increased the odds of non-adherence [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.40; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.54-3.75]. A history of injected drug use was also associated with non-adherence (AOR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.17-1.90). The following factors were negatively associated with non-adherence: older age (AOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.91), male sex (AOR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38-0.65) and higher physician HIV-related experience (AOR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). In addition, a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART reduced the odds of achieving HIV-1 RNA suppression [adjusted hazards ratio (AHR): 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51-0.89]. Other factors negatively associated with viral suppression included a history of drug injection (AHR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91), two nucleosides + PI vs two nucleosides + NNRTI (AHR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.87), higher baseline HIV-1 RNA (AHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.62-0.70). Higher adherence was positively associated with viral suppression (AHR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.34-1.42). Among the 101 subjects who were incarcerated in the first year of starting HAART, the time spent in jail was positively associated with HIV-1 RNA suppression (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10). CONCLUSION: HIV-infected subjects with a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART have higher odds of non-adherence and, consequently, lower probability of achieving HIV-1 RNA suppression. The longer their sentence, however, the higher the probability of virological suppression. The British Columbian provincial prison system provided a structured setting for HAART but subjects are unable to continue this level of adherence upon release. Strategies to ensure continuation of HIV/AIDS care for HIV-infected individuals leaving the criminal justice system must be a public health priority.

Adult↗