Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Esen Ozkaya-Bayazit

Publications and source records attributed to Esen Ozkaya-Bayazit.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Independent lesions of fixed drug eruption caused by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tenoxicam in the same patient: a rare case of polysensitivity.

Polysensitivity in fixed drug eruption is a rare finding that occurs because of chemically unrelated drugs. In cases of polysensitivity, the lesions may occur on identical or separate sites, the latter indicating the role of antigen-specific mechanisms in the site-specificity of fixed drug eruption. I herein report a patient with separate site involvement induced by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tenoxicam, a drug combination that has not been reported before. Reactivation of old trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-specific lesions after a long resting period was another striking feature.

Buttocks↗

Specific site involvement in fixed drug eruption.

A total of 105 patients with established fixed drug eruption (FDE) by oral provocation were evaluated with regard to a drug-related site involvement. Cotrimoxazole was the leading causative agent (63.8%), followed by naproxen sodium (23.8%), dipyrone (5.7%), oxicams (4.8%) and other rare causes (1.9%). Cotrimoxazole most frequently induced lesions on genital mucosa; naproxen and oxicams on lips; and dipyrone on trunk and extremities. Isolated FDE on male genitalia (n = 16) was exclusively because of cotrimoxazole. A highly significant association could be established between naproxen and FDE on lips (chi-square = 28.3; corrected P =.000002). As this study represents the largest series of patients with naproxen-induced FDE, we would suggest that naproxen should be considered as an important potential cause of FDE on lips.

Adolescent↗

Earlobe dermatitis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Antitubercular Agents↗

Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.

In this retrospective study, patch test results of 542 patients (303 female and 239 male), referred to our clinic between June 1996 and July 1999, were evaluated. All patients were patch tested with 32 allergens of an extended European standard series, 140 patients were tested with supplemental series, and 246 patients with their own substances. 280 (51.7%) patients had 1 or more positive results but allergic contact dermatitis, according to clinical relevance, was diagnosed in only 190 (67.9%) of these. Nickel sulfate was the most frequent sensitizer (19.1%), followed by potassium dichromate (11.8%), palladium chloride (9.4%), cobalt chloride (8.5%), and thiuram mix (7.7%). Frequencies of contact allergy to fragrance mix (5.5%), balsam of Peru (Myroxylon Pereirae resin) (2%), quaternium-15 (0.6%), and Kathon CG (methylchloroisothiazolinone+methylisothiazolinone) (0.2%) were relatively low, while no positive reactions were obtained to paraben mix in any case. Current clinical relevance to the present dermatitis was most frequently seen with carba mix (96.2%), thiuram mix (95.2%) and potassium dichromate (78.1%), whereas this rate was low for nickel (37.5%). In 85.8% of patients with allergic contact dermatitis, the responsible allergen was detected by testing with the extended standard series alone (18.4% identified by testing with the additional 10 allergens), in 11.6% by testing with the patients' own substances, and in 2.6% by testing with the supplemental series. Occupational contact dermatitis was diagnosed in 77 of the patients with positive reactions (27.5%), most of these being construction workers and house painters who showed relevant sensitizations to potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, thiuram mix and carba mix. There was no statistically significant difference in the total contact sensitization rate between atopics and non-atopics, but contact sensitivity to nickel sulfate and palladium chloride was significantly higher among atopics. MOAHL index in % was: 44.1/14.2/24.9/ 54.4/2.4. In conclusion, we believe that similar large series of patients would be helpful to delineate the exact profile of contact dermatitis in Turkey.

Adolescent↗