Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ernst J Müller

Publications and source records attributed to Ernst J Müller.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Traumatic manubriosternal dislocation.

Manubriosternal dislocation is an extremely rare occurrence, especially as the result of an indirect compression injury. Manubriosternal dislocations are divided into two types: In a Type I dislocation, the body of the sternum is displaced in a dorsal direction; in Type II dislocation, the body is displaced to the ventral side of the manubrium. A manubriosternal dislocation may be caused by direct or indirect trauma. Direct injury is generally a collision injury occurring in the context of a road accident. Resulting may be in either a Type I or Type II dislocation. Indirect trauma always leads to a Type II dislocation due to a flexion-compression mechanism in the region of the spine. Rheumatic arthritis and obvious kyphosis are predisposing factors in manubriosternal dislocation due to the indirect compression injury. Non-operative treatments after reduction, e.g. correction tape or plaster bandage, symptomatic pain treatment, application of ice, and several weeks without sports, are associated with a not inconsiderable rate of subluxations or reluxations, especially due to insufficient patient compliance. These disorders can lead to chronic pain, periarticular calcification with ankylosis, and progressive deformity. It has not been possible to establish an optimal, standardized operative procedure so far because of the small number of cases. We have achieved very good, postoperative long-term outcomes after plate osteosynthesis of manubriosternal dislocations in two patients.

Accidental Falls↗

Non-rigid immobilisation of odontoid fractures.

Despite various reports on the management of odontoid fractures, there is no consensus on the subject, and the appropriate treatment still remains controversial. While untreated fractures or fractures treated only with a cervical orthosis seem to have the highest rate of non-union, the need for rigid external stabilisation has never been substantiated. In a retrospective analysis we reviewed 26 patients with acute type II and III fractures of the odontoid, treated with a cervical orthosis only. Study inclusion was limited to fractures that had a fracture gap of less than 2 mm, an initial antero-posterior displacement of less than 5 mm and angulation of less than 11 degrees, less than 2 mm displacement on lateral flexion/extension views, and were without neurological deficits. These fractures were defined as stable. There were 19 (73.1%) type II and 7 (26.9%) type III fractures; in 10 (38.5%) of these fractures the odontoid was displaced and/or angulated. The overall complication rate was 11.4% ( n=3). One patient suffered from pulmonary embolism, in two patients (7.7%) with initially minimally displaced fractures, secondary internal stabilisation had to be performed because of persistent instability. In 20 (77%) of the remaining fractures healing was uneventful. In 4 nondisplaced fractures (15%) fibrous union was documented. Three of these patients were over 65 years old. The overall fusion rate was 73.7% for type II and 85.7% for type III fractures. At follow-up 39% of the patients were free of symptoms; however, the clinical outcome did not correlate with the radiological findings. According to our findings, stable type II and type III fractures of the odontoid can be successfully treated with non-rigid immobilisation, even if they are displaced. A thorough assessment of the stability of the odontoid with lateral flexion/extension views or dynamic fluoroscopy is recommended to evaluate the appropriate treatment. Non-rigid immobilisation may be an option in selected cases with stable injuries.

Adolescent↗