Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ellen Yorke

Publications and source records attributed to Ellen Yorke.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Reduction of organ motion in lung tumors with respiratory gating.

We evaluated the ability of a commercial respiratory gating system to assure the reproducibility of internal anatomy in respiration synchronized CT (RS-CT) scans. This passive system uses an infrared sensitive camera to track the motion of reflective markers mounted on the abdomen. Eighteen patients, nine with lung tumors and nine with liver tumors, were selected for evaluation of the Varian Real-Time Position Monitor respiratory gating system. Liver tumors were chosen as surrogate for lower lobe tumors. Each patient underwent at least two identical RS-CT scans, at end-inspiration (EI) or end-expiration (EE), to assess intra-fraction reproducibility. Twelve patients also underwent a free breathing scan and an opposed-respiration phase synchronized scan (EI if the two first were an EE and vice versa). On each CT, a physician contoured the liver, the kidneys, the spleen, and the diaphragms for the liver patients; and similarly, the lungs, the gross tumor volume (GTV), the trachea, the heart and the diaphragms for the lung patients. After registering the different CT images using bony anatomy, the changes of each structure between the respective data sets were quantified in terms of its volume, the displacement of its center of mass (COM), and an "index" coefficient of reproducibility. An analysis of the CT scans obtained at EI and EE phases yielded an average superior-inferior (SI) difference of the diaphragm position of 14.4 mm (range: 45.9-0.9). A similar analysis of CT scans acquired at the same breathing phase yielded 0.7 mm (range: 3.1-0, p=0.0001). Similar conclusions were derived in analysis of COM positions of the following structures: lungs, heart, lung's GTV, liver, spleen and kidneys. Evaluation of volume changes for lungs, liver, and spleen confirmed reproducibility of RS-CT while the "index" coefficient confirmed reproducibility of RS-CT of all organs. A commercial gating system using external markers for RS-CT significantly improves the positional reproducibility of thoracic and upper abdominal structures. This reproducible decrease in organ motion will allow a reduction of the margin of expansion facilitating increase in target dose beyond that allowed by conventional radiation treatments.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Interfractional anatomic variation in patients treated with respiration-gated radiotherapy.

As quality assurance for respiration-gated treatments using the Varian RPM system, we monitor interfractional diaphragm variation throughout treatment using extra anterior-posterior (AP) portal images. We measure the superior-inferior (SI distance between one or more bony landmarks and the ipsilateral diaphragm dome in each such radiograph and calculate its difference, D, from the corresponding distance in a planning CT scan digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR). For each patient, the mean of D represents the systematic diaphragm displacement, and the standard deviation of D represents random diaphragm variations and is a measure of interfractional gating reproducibility. We present results for 31 sequential patients (21 lung, 10 liver tumors), each with at least 8 such portal images. For all patients, the gate included end-exhale. The patient-specific duty cycle ranged from 30% to 60%. All patients received customized audio prompting for simulation and treatment, and 14 patients also received visual prompting. Respiration-synchronized fluoroscopic movies taken at a conventional simulator revealed patient-specific diaphragm excursions from 1.0 cm to 5.0 cm and diaphragm excursion within the gate from 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm, demonstrating a significant reduction of intra-fractional diaphragm (and by inference tumor) motion by respiratory gating. One standard deviation of the systematic displacement (the mean of D) was 0.63 cm and 0.48 cm for the lung and liver patient groups, respectively. The average +/-1 SD of the random displacements (i.e., the average of the standard deviations of D) was 0.42 +/- 0.11 cm and 0.50 +/- 0.19 for the two groups, respectively. The similar magnitude of the systematic and random displacements suggests that both derive from a common distribution of interfractional variations. Combining visual with audio prompting did not significantly improve performance, as judged by D. Guided by these portal images, field changes were made during the course of treatment for 6 patients (1 lung, 5 liver).

Artifacts↗
PubMed2005

Results of a phase I dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to report the results of a Phase I dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Between 1991 and 2003, 104 patients were enrolled for 3D-CRT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The median patient age was 69 years. Twenty-eight percent of patients had Stage I-II NSCLC, 33% of patients had Stage IIIA NSCLC, 32% of patients had Stage IIIB NSCLC, and 6% of patients had recurrent NSCLC. Induction chemotherapy was received by 16% of patients. Radiation was delivered in daily fractions of 1.8 grays (Gy) for doses < or = 81.0 Gy and in daily fractions of 2.0 Gy for higher doses. Accrual at a dose level was complete when 10 patients received the intended dose without unacceptable acute morbidity. RESULTS: After an incident of fatal acute radiation pneumonitis at the starting dose of 70.2 Gy, the protocol was modified to limit normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) to < 25%. The dose was then escalated from 70.2 Gy, to 75.6 Gy, 81.0 Gy, and 84.0 Gy, with at least 10 patients treated at each dose level. Unacceptable pulmonary toxicity occurred at 90.0 Gy. Subsequently, another 10 patients were accrued at the 84.0 Gy level with acceptable toxicity. Thus, 84.0 Gy was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The crude late pulmonary toxicity rate was 7%, the 2-year local control rate was 52%, the disease-free survival rate was 33%, and the overall survival rate was 40%. The median survival was 21.1 months. Overall survival was improved significantly in patients who received > or = 80.0 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of 3D-CRT for NSCLC with an NTCP constraint of 25% was 84.0 Gy in the current study. There was a suggestion of improved survival in patients who received 80.0 Gy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE: To compare tumor volume delineation using registered positron emission tomography (PET)/CT vs. side-by-side image sets. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 19 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer had 18-fluorine-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET scans registered with planning CT scans. The disease was Stage I-II in 26%, IIIA in 42%, and IIIB in 32%. Two radiation oncologists contoured 9 tumor volumes using registered images (registered) and 10 using separate FDG-PET images as a guide (nonregistered). A third physician, who had done the treatment planning for these patients a median of 40 months before using registered images, repeated all contours: 10 on registered images (registered/registered) and 9 without registration (registered/nonregistered). Each pair of volumes (A and B) was compared. Quantitative comparison used the concordance index, (A intersection B)/(A union or logical sum B). For qualitative analysis, pairs of volumes were projected onto digitally reconstructed radiographs. The differences were graded as insignificant, minor, moderate, or major. RESULTS: The median interobserver percentage of concordance among nonregistered pairs was 61% vs. 70% in the registered group (p <0.05). On qualitative analysis, in the nonregistered group, the differences were insignificant in 5, minor in 3, and moderate in 2 of 10. The differences in the registered group were insignificant in 7 and minor in 2 of 9. The median intraobserver percentage of concordance in the registered/nonregistered group was 58% vs. 71% in the registered/registered group (p = 0.10). On qualitative analysis, the intraobserver differences in the registered/nonregistered group were insignificant in 2, minor in 2, moderate in 0, and major in 5 of 9. In the registered/registered group, the differences were insignificant in 2, minor in 6, moderate in 2, and major in 0 of 10. CONCLUSION: Registration of FDG-PET and planning CT images results in greater consistency in tumor volume delineation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of end normal inspiration and expiration for gated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gated delivery of radiation during part of the respiration cycle may improve the treatment of lung cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In terms of the respiration phase for gated treatment, normal end-expiration (EE) is more stable but normal end-inspiration (EI) increases lung volume. We compare the relative merit of using EI and EE in gated IMRT for sparing normal lung tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients received EI and EE respiration-triggered CT scans in the treatment position. An IMRT plan for a prescription dose of 70 Gy was generated for each patient and at each respiration phase. The optimization constraints included target dose uniformity, less than 35% of the total lung receiving 20 Gy or more and maximum cord dose <or=45 Gy. We compared planning target volume (PTV) coverage, mean lung dose, percentage of total lung receiving 20 Gy or more (V(20)) and lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). RESULTS: For 9 of the 10 patients, cord and lung doses were acceptable and PTV coverage was similar for EE and EI, with lung sparing was equal to or slightly better at EI than at EE. For the 10th patient, lung sparing at EI was significantly better. Patient averaged mean lung dose was 15.4 Gy (range: 7.1-20.4) at EI and 16.3 Gy (range: 6.9-21.9) at EE. The average V(20) was 23.8% (range: 13-36.4) at EI and 25.3% (range: 13-37.3) at EE. The average NTCP at EI was 8 versus 12% at EE. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric indices of lung protection for IMRT plans at EI are better than at EE. For 9 out of the 10 patients in our study, this difference is small. Thus other factors such as reproducibility, reliability and duty cycle at normal end expiration may be more critical for selecting treatment breathing phase.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.

Uncertainties in tumor position during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan optimization are usually accounted for by adding margins to a clinical target volume (CTV), or additionally, to organs at risk (OAR). The former approach usually favors target coverage over OAR protection, whereas the latter does not account for correlation in target and OAR movement. We investigate a new approach to incorporate systematic errors in tumor and organ position. The method models a distribution of systematic errors due to setup error and organ motion with displaced replicas of volumes of interest, each representing the patient geometry for a possible systematic error, and maximizes a score function that counts the number of replicas meeting dose or biological constraints for both CTV and OAR. Dose constraints are implemented by logistic functions of Niemierko's generalized model of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). The method is applied to prostate and nasopharynx IMRT plans, in which CTV and OAR each consists of five replicas, one representing no error (the position in the planning CT) and the other four discrete systematic setup displacements in one dimension with equal probability. The resulting IMRT plans are compared with those from two other EUD-based optimizations: a standard planning target volume (PTV) approach consisting of a single replica of each OAR in the planned position and a single PTV encompassing all CTV replicas, and a PTV-PRV approach consisting of a single PTV and a single planning risk volume (PRV) for each OAR encompassing all replicas. When systematic error is present, multiple-replica optimization provides better critical organ protection while maintaining similar target coverage compared with the PTV approach, and provides better CTV-to-OAR therapeutic ratio compared with the PTV-PRV instances where there is substantial PTV-PRV overlap. The method can be used for other systematic errors due to organ motion and deformation.

Body Burden↗
PubMed2005

Tumor motion control in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer.

Tumor motion due to respiration during radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer is a significant problem. This article reports on two techniques used to control tumor motion: respiratory gating and the deep inspiration breath hold technique. This technique was implemented in 40 patients without significant difficulties and there are encouraging clinical outcomes.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2004

Improved local control with higher doses of radiation in large-volume stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that larger tumor volume is associated with poor survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated whether high-dose radiation improved local control in patients with large-volume Stage III NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-two patients with Stage III NSCLC and gross tumor volumes (GTV) of greater than 100 cc were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Patients were divided into two groups: those treated to less than 64 Gy (37 patients) and those treated to 64 Gy or higher (35 patients). RESULTS: The 1-year and 2-year local failure rates were 27% and 47%, respectively, for Stage III patients treated to 64 Gy or higher, and 61% and 76%, respectively, for those treated to less than 64 Gy (p = 0.024). The median survival time for patients treated to 64 Gy or higher was 20 months vs. 15 months for those treated to less than 64 Gy (p = 0.068). Multivariate analysis revealed that dose and GTV are predictors of local failure-free survival. A 10 Gy increase in dose resulted in a 36.4% decreased risk of local failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that administration of higher doses using 3D-CRT improves local control in Stage III NSCLC patients with large GTVs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Dosimetric effect of respiratory motion in external beam radiotherapy of the lung.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To study the effect of breathing motion on gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage for lung tumors using dose-volume histograms and relevant dosimetric indices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment plans were chosen for 12 patients treated at our institution for lung carcinoma. GTV volumes of these patients ranged from 1.2 to 97.3 cm(3). A margin of 1-2 cm was used to generate the planning target volume (PTV). Additional margins of 0.6-1.0 cm were added to the PTV when designing treatment portals. For the purposes of TCP calculation, the prescription dose was assumed to be 70 Gy to remove the effects of prescription differences. Setup error was incorporated into the evaluation of treatment plans with a systematic component of sigma(RL) = 0.2 cm, sigma(AP) = 0.2 cm, and sigma(SI) = 0.3 cm and a random component of sigma(RL) = 0.3 cm, sigma(AP) = 0.3 cm, and sigma(SI) = 0.3 cm. Breathing motion was incorporated into these plans based on an independent analysis of fluoroscopic movies of the diaphragm for 7 patients. The systematic component of breathing motion (sigma(RL) = 0.3 cm, sigma(AP) = 0.2 cm, and sigma(SI) = 0.6 cm) was incorporated into the treatment plans on a slice by slice basis. The intrafractional component of breathing motion (sigma(RL) = 0.3 cm, sigma(AP) = 0.2 cm, and sigma(SI) = 0.6 cm) was incorporated by averaging the dose calculation over all displacements of the breathing cycle. Each patient was simulated 500 times to discern the range of possible outcomes. The simulations were repeated for a worst case scenario which used only breathing data with a large diaphragmatic excursion, both with and without intrafractional breathing motion. RESULTS: Dose to 95% of the GTV (D95), volume of the GTV receiving 95% of the prescription dose (V95) and TCP changed an average of -1.4+/-4.2, -1.0+/-3.3, and -1.4+/-3.8%, respectively, with the incorporation of normal breathing effects. In the worst case scenario (heavy breathers), D95 and V95 changed an average of -9.8+/-10.1 and -8.3+/-11.3%, respectively, and TCP changed by -8.1+/-9.1%. GTVs with volumes greater than 60 cm(3) showed stronger sensitivity to breathing especially if the shape was non-ellipsoidal. In the normal breathing case, the probability of a decrease in D95, V95, or TCP of a magnitude greater than 10% is less than 4%, and in the worse case scenario this probability is approximately 30-40% with intrafractional breathing motion included, and less than 10% with intrafractional breathing motion not included. CONCLUSIONS: With the PTV margins routinely used at our center, the effects of normal breathing on coverage are small on the average, with a less than 4% chance of a 10% or greater decrease in D95, V95, or TCP. However, in patients with large respiration-induced motion, the effect can be significant and efforts to identify such patients are important.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2004

Deep inspiration breath hold and respiratory gating strategies for reducing organ motion in radiation treatment.

We examine 2 strategies for reducing respiration-induced organ motion in radiation treatment: deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and respiratory gating. DIBH is a controlled breathing technique in which the patient performs a supervised breath hold during treatment. The technique offers 2 benefits: reduced respiratory motion from the breath hold and increased normal tissue sparing from the increased lung volume. In respiratory-gated treatment, a device external to the patient monitors breathing and allows delivery of radiation only during certain time intervals, synchronous with the patient's respiratory cycle. Gated treatment offers reduced respiratory motion with less patient effort than DIBH. We briefly survey the development of these 2 strategies, describe their clinical implementation for treatment of thoracic and liver tumors at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and discuss their advantages and limitations.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2003

Respiratory gating for liver tumors: use in dose escalation.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical impact of the Varian Real-Time Position Monitor (RPM) respiratory gating system for treatment of liver tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with liver tumors were selected for evaluation of this passive system, which tracks motion of reflective markers mounted on the abdomen with an infrared-sensitive camera. At simulation, a fluoroscopic movie, breathing trace, and CT scans synchronized at end-expiration (E-E) and end-inspiration were acquired in treatment position using the RPM system. Organs and gross tumor volume were contoured on each CT. Each organ's positional change between two scan sets was quantified by calculation of the center of volume shift and an "index coefficient," defined as the volume common to the two versions of the organ to the volume included in at least one (intersection/union). Treatment dose was determined by use of normal tissue complication probability calculations and dose-volume histograms. Gated portal images were obtained to monitor gating reproducibility with treatment. RESULTS: Eight patients received 177 treatments with RPM gating. Average superior-to-inferior (SI) diaphragm motion on initial fluoroscopy was reduced from 22.7 mm without gating to 5.1 mm with gating. Comparing end-inspiration to E-E CT scans, average SI movement of the right diaphragm was 11.5 mm vs. 2.2 mm for two E-E CT scans. For all organs, average E-I SI organ motion was 12.8 mm vs. 2.0 mm for E-E studies. Index coefficients were closer to 1.0 for E-E than end-inspiration scans, indicating gating reproducibility. The average SI displacement of diaphragm apex on gated portal images compared with DRR was 2.3 mm. Treatment was prolonged less than 10 minutes with gating. The reproducible decrease in organ motion with gating enabled reduction in gross tumor volume-to-planning target volume margin from 2 to 1 cm. This allowed for calculated dose increases of 7%-27% (median: 21.3%) in 6 patients and enabled treatment in 2. CONCLUSION: Gating of radiotherapy for liver tumors enables safe margin reduction on tumor volume, which, in turn, may allow for dose escalation.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Optimization of conformal thoracic radiotherapy using cone-beam CT imaging for treatment verification.

PURPOSE: Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MVCBCT) has been proposed for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy. However, the doses required for such imaging may compromise the quality of the delivered dose distribution. The present paper explores the effect of cone-beam imaging on dose homogeneity and critical organ dose and the use of our new tool, adapted intensity-modulated radiation therapy (AIMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three types of treatment plans were devised (3D-CRT [three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy], IMRT [intensity-modulated radiotherapy], and AIMRT) based on 4 patients with thoracic malignancies. MVCBCT fields were then integrated into the plans. The MVCBCT technique used 21 imaging portals at 10 degrees intervals. The MVCBCT apertures were shaped to conform to the planning target volume with a 6-mm margin. In a second set of plans, the field size was expanded by a further 2 cm. The unoptimized MVCBCT dose distribution was incorporated into the IMRT plan using AIMRT. RESULTS: Normal-tissue complication probability with MVCBCT is acceptable for all plans at the 66.6 Gy level, but exceeds tolerance for both 3D-CRT alone and 3D-CRT with MVCBCT at higher doses. In contrast, the use of AIMRT planning with MVCBCT allowed safe dose escalation to 85 Gy. Expanding the MVCBCT aperture provided better anatomic visibility with an acceptable lung dose. The results using IMRT with MVCBCT fell between the values measured for 3D-CRT and AIMRT with MVCBCT. CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to demonstrate that MVCBCT can be incorporated into 3D-CRT and IMRT planning with minimal effect on planning target volume homogeneity and dose to critical structures. This paves the way for highly conformal radiotherapy at greater doses delivered with increased confidence and safety.

Computer Graphics↗
PubMed2003

The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be conveniently delivered with a multileaf collimator. With this method, the entire field is not delivered at once, but rather it is composed of many subfields defined by the leaf positions as a function of beam on time. At any given instant, only these subfields are delivered. During treatment, if the organ moves, part of the volume may move in or out of these subfields. Due to this interplay between organ motion and leaf motion the delivered dose may be different from what was planned. In this work, we present a method that calculates the effects of organ motion on delivered dose. The direction of organ motion may be parallel or perpendicular to the leaf motion, and the effect can be calculated for a single fraction or for multiple fractions. Three breast patients and four lung patients were included in this study,with the amplitude of the organ motion varying from +/- 3.5 mm to +/- 10 mm, and the period varying from 4 to 8 seconds. Calculations were made for these patients with and without organ motion, and results were examined in terms of isodose distribution and dose volume histograms. Each calculation was repeated ten times in order to estimate the statistical uncertainties. For selected patients, calculations were also made with conventional treatment technique. The effects of organ motion on conventional techniques were compared relative to that on IMRT techniques. For breast treatment, the effect of organ motion primarily broadened the penumbra at the posterior field edge. The dose in the rest of the treatment volume was not significantly affected. For lung treatment, the effect also broadened the penumbra and degraded the coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). However, the coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV) was not much affected, provided the PTV margin was adequate. The same effects were observed for both IMRT and conventional treatment techniques. For the IMRT technique, the standard deviations of ten samples of a 30-fraction calculation were very small for all patients, implying that over a typical treatment course of 30 fractions, the delivered dose was very close to the expected value. Hence, under typical clinical conditions, the effect of organ motion on delivered dose can be calculated without considering the interplay between the organ motion and the leaf motion. It can be calculated as the weighted average of the dose distribution without organ motion with the distribution of organ motion. Since the effects of organ motion on dose were comparable for both IMRT and conventional techniques, the PTV margin should remain the same for both techniques.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams may have strong fluence variations and are advantageous at disease sites such as lung and head and neck (H&N), where neighboring tissues have very different electron densities. We use Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations to evaluate the dosimetric effects of these inhomogeneities for 10 clinical IMRT treatment plans for five lung patients and four H&N patients. All beams are 6 MV photons. "Standard plans" were first produced on a clinical treatment planning system which optimizes beam intensity distributions to meet dose and dose-volume constraints and calculates dose using a measurement-based pencil-beam algorithm with an equivalent pathlength inhomogeneity correction. Patient anatomy and electron densities were obtained from patient-specific CT images. The dose distribution of each beam was recalculated with the MC method, using the same CT images, beam geometry, beam weighting and optimized fluence intensity distributions as the corresponding standard plan. For the lung cases, the MC calculated dose distributions are characterized by reduced penetrations and increased penumbra due to larger secondary electron range in the low-density media, which is not accurately accounted for in the pencil beam algorithm. For the lung cases, the PTV was underdosed; except for one dose-volume index, underdose was less than 10%. Individual H&N fields are affected to different degrees by tissue inhomogeneities, depending on specific anatomy, especially the size and location of air cavities in relation to the beam orientation and field size. For four H&N plans, PTV coverage changed by less than 2%; for the fifth, there was less than 10% difference between the standard and the MC plans. Critical normal tissue DVHs (cord, lung, brainstem) are changed by <10% at the high dose end and mean lung doses are changed by <6%.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.

Many lung cancer patients who undergo radiation therapy are treated with higher energy photons (15-18 MV) to obtain deeper penetration and better dose uniformity. However, the longer range of the higher energy recoil electrons in the low-density medium may cause lateral electronic disequilibrium and degrade the target coverage. To compare the dose homogeneity achieved with lower versus higher energy photon beams, we performed a dosimetric study of 6 and 15 MV three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment plans for lung cancer using an accurate, patient-specific dose-calculation method based on a Monte Carlo technique. A 6 and 15 MV 3D conformal treatment plan was generated for each of two patients with target volumes exceeding 200 cm(3) on an in-house treatment planning system in routine clinical use. Each plan employed four conformally shaped photon beams. Each dose distribution was recalculated with the Monte Carlo method, utilizing the same beam geometry and patient-specific computed tomography (CT) images. Treatment plans using the two energies were compared in terms of their isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The 15 MV dose distributions and DVHs generated by the clinical treatment planning calculations were as good as, or slightly better than, those generated for 6 MV beams. However, the Monte Carlo dose calculation predicted increased penumbra width with increased photon energy resulting in decreased lateral dose homogeneity for the 15 MV plans. Monte Carlo calculations showed that all target coverage indicators were significantly worse for 15 MV than for 6 MV; particularly the portion of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose (V(95)) dropped dramatically for the 15 MV plan in comparison to the 6 MV. Spinal cord and lung doses were clinically equivalent for the two energies. In treatment planning of tumors that abut lung tissue, lower energy (6 MV) photon beams should be preferred over higher energies (15-18 MV) because of the significant loss of lateral dose equilibrium for high-energy beams in the low-density medium. Any gains in radial dose uniformity across steep density gradients for higher energy beams must be weighed carefully against the lateral beam degradation due to penumbra widening.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗