Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Elisabetta Mezza

Publications and source records attributed to Elisabetta Mezza.

42 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Flexibility as an implementation strategy for a daily dialysis program.

BACKGROUND: Daily hemodialysis (DHD) is an interesting dialysis option, experienced worldwide by only a few hundred patients, because of clinical and logistic limitations. This study describes the main clinical and implementation results of a flexible policy applied in starting a DHD program. METHODS: The setting is the University Nephrology Center of Turin, Italy (approximately 150 hemodialysis and 50 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients) where in November 1998 a short daily DHD program was started. Outcome measures were logistical (enrollment rate, indications and drop-outs) and clinical (dialysis efficiency, metabolic control, hypertension and anemia control). RESULTS: 25 patients experienced DHD, 16 (11% of the hemodialysis pool) were on DHD in November 2001; overall the DHD follow-up was 409.1 months (median 18, range 0.7-36 months). Flexibility was applied to schedules (patients modulated dialysis time and could switch to 3-4 sessions/wk); treatment setting (home: 11 patients, limited care center: 13; alternate settings: one); clinical selection (23/25 patients with comorbidity). Main reasons for choice were poor tolerance of previous schedule and the search for "best" treatment. Five patients dropped out (work reasons), one died on DHD and three were grafted. As compared to baseline, dialysis efficiency increased (EKRc pre-DHD 14.5 +/- 2.1 mL/min; 17.4 +/- 2.8 mL/min and 17.7 +/- 3.5 mL/min at 1-6 months; p<0.000). Despite the potentially confusing effect of comorbidity, the main clinical data improved. CONCLUSIONS: A flexible approach allowed development of DHD in approximately 11% of hemodialysis patients, with promising clinical results, despite frequent comorbidity.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Home hemodialysis à la carte: a tailormade program (1998-2003).

BACKGROUND: There are good epidemiological (increased numbers of dialysis patients), economical (renal replacement therapy (RRT) costs) and clinical reasons (new highly efficient schedules) to reconsider the choice of home hemodialysis (HD). STUDY AIM: Analysis of the results and costs of a flexible, tailormade home dialysis program (1998-2003). SETTING: Home HD facility of the University of Turin-Italy. METHODS: Results were analyzed in terms of feasibility (enrolment rate, logistical problems--the two usual caregivers performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical records; production costs, assessed with a logic bottom-up technique). Since the main program feature was the tailoring of dialysis to the patient, kinetic data were analyzed to control the efficiency of the chosen schedules. RESULTS: In 1998-2003 (54 months), 31 patients joined the home HD program (six patients were already being treated), while another 12 patients were treated in the training area and trained for an ongoing self-care program; mean age was 47.1 +/- 12.8 yrs; 35/49 patients had clinical comorbidities. During the study, four patients died, 10 were grafted, and six patients dropped out or were transferred. In March 2003, 23 patients were at home/in training and six were being treated in the training area: 11 patients were on a conventional schedule, four on daily dialysis, 12 on other schedules (two patients non-resident in the Piedmont region were not considered). Dialysis efficiency reached the target (EKRc > 11 mL/min) in all but four patients (schedules with more frequent sessions were planned for these patients). Costs were comparable to limited care HD (daily: 96.5 euros/session at home, 98.76 euros/session in the center; conventional: 133.48 euros/session at home, 131.25 euros/session in the center). CONCLUSION: A tailored, flexible policy can help to revive a home HD program.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Referral of type 1 diabetic patients to a nephrology unit: will pre-emptive transplantation change our life?

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetic patients are a small but challenging subset of chronic kidney disease. The new frontiers of pancreas-kidney transplantation may enhance the need for early referral. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the referral pattern of type 1 diabetics to a specialized Nephrology Unit, and to quantify the indications for pancreas or pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation at referral in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Setting of study was a Nephrology Outpatient Unit, dedicated to diabetics, active since 1986; period of study 1991--2002. The main biochemical and clinical parameters were analyzed at referral. Indications for transplantation were put at: serum creatinine (sCr)> or =2 mg/dL or > or =3 mg/dL and/or nephrotic syndrome. Pancreas: lesser degrees of functional impairment without worsening after FK-506 challenge. RESULTS: 90 type 1 diabetics were referred: 48 males, 42 females; median age: 38 (18-65) years; median diabetological follow-up 20 (3-37) years; sCr 1.2 (0.6-7) mg/dL, proteinuria 0.9 (0-12.3) g/day; creatinine clearance: 58 (6-234) ml/min; Hbalc: 8.8% (5.9-14), diastolic blood pressure: 80 (55-100) mmHg, systolic blood pressure: 137.5 (70-180) mmHg. 85.6% had signs of end-organ damage due to diabetes. 67% of the patients had diabetic nephropathy, 20.7% hypertensive with or without diabetic nephropathy. According to the chosen criteria, 30.6% had indications for pancreas-kidney graft (sCr > or = 2 mg/dL), 25.9% considering sCr > or = 3 mg/dL; 28.2% further patients could be considered for isolated pancreas graft. CONCLUSIONS: At referral to the nephrologist, over 50% of type 1 diabetics may have indications for pancreas-kidney or pancreas graft; an earlier multidisciplinary work-up is needed to optimize an early pre-emptive transplant approach.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Teenagers' point of view on living donor kidney transplantation: Cinderella or princess?

UNLABELLED: Living kidney donation is an important clinical option, encountering different fortunes in the world. AIM: To analyse the opinions of a large subset of older teenagers attending high school (7999 students, median age 18) on different aspects of living kidney transplantation. METHODS: Analysis of semistructured questionnaires submitted within an educational campaign on dialysis and transplantation in the high schools of Torino and its county (about 2,000,000 inhabitants). RESULTS: Over 90% of the students had already heard of transplantation, mainly via television (88.4% county, 84.5% city). 80% would donate a kidney to a family member (3.5% wouldn't, 16.5% uncertain); answers were correlated with sex (females more than males p<0.0001), school type (istituti tecnici versus licei p=0.007), interest (yes versus other p<0.0001). A lower percent of individuals would receive a kidney (58.4% county, 59.4% city), only 10% would ask for donation. Over 40% of students consider legally buying a kidney a patient's right, only 26.6% would discourage this choice. The answers were correlated with the reverse pattern as for non-mercenary donation with type of school (licei more than istituti tecnici: p<0.0001), sex (males versus females p<0.0001), interest (not versus yes: p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Teenagers are favourable towards all forms of living kidney donation. The lower prevalence of positive answers on acceptance versus donation suggests that fears of endangering the donor's health may be one of the causes for a low living donation rate in our setting. The mixed answers on mercenary donation suggest discussing this complex issue in future educational programs.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Dialysis choice in the context of an early referral policy: there is room for self care.

BACKGROUND: Predialysis care is vital for the patient and is crucial for dialysis choice: empowered, early referred patients tend to prefer out-of-hospital and self-care treatment; despite these claims, early referral remains too often a program more than a reality. Aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern and reasons for RRT choice in patients treated in a long-standing outpatient network, presently following 850 chronic patients (about 80% diabetics), working with an early referral policy and offering a wide set of dialysis options (home hemo and PD; self care and limited care hemodialysis; hospital hemodialysis). METHODS: Prospective historical study. All patients who started RRT in January 2001-December 2003 were considered. Correlations between demographical (sex, age, educational level) or clinical variables (pre-RRT follow-up, comorbidity, SGA and Karnofsky) and treatment choice have been tested by univariate (chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis) and multivariate models (logistic regression), both considering all choices and dichotomising choice into "hospital" versus "out of hospital dialysis". RESULTS: Hospital dialysis was chosen by 32.6% of patients; out of hospital in 67.4% (PD 26.5%, limited-care 18.4%, home hemodialysis 4.1%, self-care 18.4%). Hospital dialysis and PD were chosen by elderly patients (median age: 67.5 and 70 years respectively) with multiple comorbidities (75% and 92.3%); no difference for age, comorbidity, Karnofsky, SGA and educational level. 6/13 PD patients needed the help of a partner. Self-care/home hemodialysis patients were younger (median age 52), had higher educational level (p = 0.014) and lower prevalence of comorbidity (63.6% vs 94.7% in the other dialysis patients, p = 0.006). In the context of a long follow-up period (3.9 years) a statistically significant difference was found comparing hospital dialysis (3.3 years) vs out of hospital dialysis (4.9 years) (p = 0.035). In a logistic regression model, only pre-RRT follow-up was correlated with dialysis "hospital vs "out of hospital" choice (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Early nephrological follow-up may enhance self and home-based dialysis care.

Adult↗