Biomedical subjects

Elina Hemminki

Publications and source records attributed to Elina Hemminki.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether perinatal health outcomes changed during the 1990s with the increasing use of IVF. METHODS: Data were from the Finnish Medical Birth Register for periods 1991-1993 and 1998-1999. Outcomes of IVF infants and other infants were compared, both overall and separately for singleton and multiple births, by adjusting for mothers' background variables by logistic regression. RESULTS: The IVF multiple birth rate, especially the number of triplets, declined from the first (1991-1993) to the second (1998-1999) time-period. The outcomes for IVF newborns improved, especially for multiple births. After adjusting for mothers' background variables, the odds ratios for preterm birth and low birthweight decreased among singletons from 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.8] to 1.8 (CI 1.5-2.1) and from 2.4 (CI 1.9-3.1) to 1.7 (CI 1.4-2.1) respectively and more among multiples from 2.4 (CI 2.0-2.9) to 1.5 (CI 1.2-1.7) and from 1.9 (CI 1.6-2.3) to 1.1 (CI 1.0-1.3) respectively. Still, overall the outcomes for IVF infants remained poorer than those for other infants. A correlation was found between increased use of antenatal services and improved outcomes, but causality cannot be assumed. CONCLUSION: A trend of improved perinatal health of multiple IVF children was found, mainly due to a decrease in higher order multiple births.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Mode of delivery and asthma -- is there a connection?

Genetic factors cannot explain the recent rapid increase in the incidence of atopic diseases. The phenomenon has been explained by environmental factors, and there are data for and against the hypothesis that a decline in the pressure of microbial stimulation early in life could be behind the allergy epidemic. Changes have also occurred in maternity care, among them a rise in the caesarean section rate, which could diminish initial microbial exposure and thereby alter T helper 1 cell/T helper-2 cell development and affect the risk of developing atopy. In this study, we sought to establish whether mode of delivery does influence the development of atopic asthma. Finnish 1987 Medical Birth Register (n = 59,927 live births) information was linked between several national health registers to obtain information on asthma and mode of delivery in children registered. The data were adjusted for maternal age, previous deliveries, child's sex, and birth size. Atopy was evaluated in the second study (Turku Birth Cohort), which involved 219 children born by vaginal delivery (n = 106) or caesarean section (n = 113); history of atopic symptoms was established by questionnaire and a clinical examination was conducted, including skin prick testing and determination of total and allergen-specific IgE in serum. The register study showed the cumulative incidence of asthma at the age of seven to be significantly higher in children born by caesarean section (4.2%) than in those vaginally delivered (3.3%), the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for confounding variables being 1.21 (1.08-1.36), p < 0.01. In the second study, significantly more positive allergy tests were reported in questionnaires in the caesarean (22%) than in the vaginal delivery group (11%), OR 2.22 (1.06-4.64), p < 0.01, and a trend toward more positive skin prick reactions was documented at clinical examination; 41% versus 29%, OR 1.31 (0.65-2.65), p = 0.11. In conclusion, these results suggest that caesarean section delivery may be associated with an increased prevalence of atopic asthma.

Asthma↗

PubMed2002

When research knowledge is unwelcome: studying the health effects of in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVES: To illustrate the complexity of setting up evaluative research when it is perceived to threaten professional and financial interests. METHODS: A case study based on participatory observation of attempts to study the delivery and health consequences of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Two research projects were observed: one used well-baby clinic records and this project was completed; the other project aimed to use national data and record linkage to study the patterns of use of IVF, the IVF success rate, and the health effects on women and on children. This project could not be carried out as planned. The reasons for this were studied. Observations, documents and notes on discussions were analysed. RESULTS: IVF clinicians were not interested in the second project until faced with a concrete request to provide data. Tactics to avoid providing data included asking for more information on the project, transferring the request from one person to another, and arguing against the project. The arguments used and conditions set by different clinics were similar and centred around data confidentiality and authorship of the anticipated research reports. This case illustrated features that occur when health care is evaluated by non-clinicians: quarrels over mandate and ownership; and conflicts between the different research traditions of clinicians and epidemiologists. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate evaluation by outsiders, new norms are needed and outside researchers need institutional back-up. Outside evaluation may need a determined push from health care funders and a cultural change within the clinical community itself.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Incidence of breast and other cancers among Finnish women with cosmetic breast implants, 1970-1999.

Epidemiologic evidence does not point to a carcinogenic effect of silicone implants on the breast, and evidence for or against a carcinogenic effect at sites other than the breast is limited. To examine subsequent cancer risk among women with cosmetic breast implants, we conducted a cohort study of 2171 women in Finland identified from operation diaries of major hospitals and private clinics, 1970-1999. The nationwide population and health outcome registries in Finland were used to trace these women for cancer incidence through 1999. Standard statistical techniques were used to compute expected values based on general population rates. The measure of risk was taken as the ratio of observed to expected cancers, that is, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Among the 2171 women with cosmetic breast implants, 30 developed cancer against 33.7 expected (SIR = 0.9,95% CI = 0.6-1.3). There was no evidence for an increase in breast cancer risk (SIR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.2-1.0), even among those followed for more than 10 years (2 observed, 4.6 expected). Stage at breast cancer diagnosis did not differ from that expected nor did incidence of any other cancer. Although hindered by small numbers, the consistency of our results with those of other Nordic studies leads us to conclude that cosmetic breast implants are not a cause of cancer and that they do not appear to delay the detection of breast cancers.

Adult↗