Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eli Peli

Publications and source records attributed to Eli Peli.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Motion perception during involuntary eye vibration.

Retinal motion caused by reflexive or voluntary eye movements is rarely misinterpreted as object motion, as if the visual system discounted the contribution of these eye movements to retinal motion. Yet, involuntary eye movements caused by mechanical eye vibration is often interpreted as object motion unless the vibration has high frequency, in which case only image blur may be noticed. In these latter conditions, however, a light flickering above the fusion limit is vividly perceived to undergo oscillatory motion over its static surround. We determined the conditions of this phenomenon, showing that the perceived frequency of illusory oscillation equals the difference between flicker frequency and the frequency of vibration of the eyes. This outcome is explained as a result of the low-pass temporal frequency characteristic of vision, which further predicts that the same effect should occur if the flickering light is vibrated and observed with static eyes. This prediction was corroborated empirically. We also determined the minimal amplitude of oscillation required to perceive motion as a function of postural stability and the presence of static references, finding an amplitude threshold of approximately 1 arcmin with postural stability in dim-light conditions, which increases to approximately 2 arcmin with postural instability in the dark.

Eye Movements↗

Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity.

Hess and Dakin reported that normally-sighted subjects using peripheral vision (beyond 10 degrees ) were unable to detect paths of alternating-phase Gabors embedded within randomly positioned Gabors, but could detect same-phase paths. This result led them to propose a "fundamental difference" between central and peripheral visual processing. While we were able to replicate many of their results, our normally-sighted observers could detect alternating-phase paths beyond 10 degrees. We found that path detection decreased monotonically as a function of eccentricity (0 degrees -30 degrees ) for both alternating-phase and same-phase stimuli. As with most visual functions the more difficult path detection condition (alternating-phase) declined slightly faster. The results for the normally-sighted observers could not be explained by poor fixation. Three people with substantial central vision loss (i.e. they can only use peripheral vision) could see both same- and alternating-phase stimuli with eccentric viewing of 13 degrees -17 degrees. Therefore central and peripheral vision appear to use similar visual mechanisms to perform the task, there being no fundamental difference.

Adult↗

Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.

Sparing or partial recovery of visual fields in hemianopic patients is frequently difficult to document. This is because when testing large field losses, the standard automated or manual visual field testing systems have limited fixation controls. Measured visual field recovery in these cases may not be real but instead may be due to an artifact such as scanning eye movement. This article illustrates a way to separate the actual visual field sparing from scanning eye movement artifact by using perimetry testing with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). During the SLO perimetry, the examiner has a direct and magnified view of the retinal fixation locus. This direct view allows for the added ability to monitor the fixation stability during target presentation. When eye movements larger than 1 degrees are noted, the examiner can repeat the trial. During static perimetry, our SLO records the retinal position of the fixation target at the end of the stimulus presentation and corrects scanning eye movements that occur during stimulus presentation. These special features enable us to identify when the apparent sparing of the visual field is due to the artifact of scanning. To demonstrate this, we selected the records of four hemianopic patients whose fields were examined by both standard perimetry and the SLO. We then compared the clinical visual fields with the SLO perimetry fields. One of the patients had a complete homonymous hemianopia on both the clinical perimetry and the SLO perimetry. A second patient was found by the SLO to have unstable fixation during testing. The SLO perimetry revealed that the apparent spared fields seen in standard perimetry were the result of eye scanning and not an actual enlargement of the visual field. Two other patients were confirmed by the SLO findings to have valid partial recovery of the visual field, one with and one without scanning eye movements. The advantages and limitations of SLO perimetry in analyzing hemianopic field sparing are discussed.

Adolescent↗

Lateral interactions: size does matter.

Usually a high-contrast, co-local mask increases contrast threshold (inhibition). Interestingly, a laterally displaced mask (flanker) can facilitate contrast detection (Vision Research 33 (1993) 993; 34 (1994) 73). When spatial scaling of these flanker effects was implied, stimulus bandwidth was confounded with spatial frequency (lambda(-1)). Under conditions where at lower spatial frequencies, the size (standard deviation, sigma) of the Gabor patch was smaller (sigma<lambda) than higher spatial frequencies (sigma=lambda), the effect appeared scale invariant. We replicated the original results for all conditions. However, when Gabor size was fixed (sigma=lambda), facilitation changed with spatial frequency (range 2--13 cycles/deg). When Gabor size was varied (sigma=0.5-2 lambda), usually the combination of larger patch sizes and lower spatial frequencies caused inhibition. We were unable to find any conditions that demonstrated spatial scaling. The size, both lambda and sigma, of both stimulus and flankers, influenced contrast threshold. Also, facilitation reduced as contrast of the flankers was reduced to detection threshold. Some facilitation was apparent with sub-threshold flankers. These results need to be reconciled with current models of lateral interactions.

Adult↗

The optical functional advantages of an intraocular low-vision telescope.

An implantable miniaturized telescope (IMT) for low vision has recently been developed. Surgically inserted into only one eye of patients with bilateral central visual loss, the IMT provides a nominal magnification of 3.0x and a field-of-view of 6.6 degrees (9.2 degrees for the 2.2x magnification version). Theoretical concerns have been raised regarding the ability of patients to function with a large interocular magnification difference, the impact of the monocular restriction of the field-of-view, and the impact of this design on depth perception. This article addresses these concerns regarding the design of the IMT in comparison with spectacle-mounted telescopes and combined intraocular lens/spectacle (or combined contact lens/spectacle) telescopic systems. The effective field-of-view (as determined by the combination of both the field-of-view and the field-of-fixation), the effects of head motion and the vestibular reflex, and the disruption of stereo depth perception with a monocular device are considered here. Physiological optics considerations of these issues show that the IMT may have important advantages over other designs of magnification devices for patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Depth Perception↗

Treating with spectacle lenses: a novel idea!?

A design approach to low-vision device development-vision multiplexing-was introduced recently. This approach has been applied successfully to the design of novel electronic and optical low-vision aids. This paper discusses the application of the vision-multiplexing concept to spectacle lens design to address issues of low vision and to resolve problems of color discrimination and glare in driving. Because spectacles are considered a fashion accessory as much as they are a vision aid, cosmetic considerations are critical to the design of such aids. Spectacle-borne devices that are not concealed or attractive are unlikely to be used widely. Efforts to combine the functionality of vision multiplexing with improved appearance are illustrated.

Biomedical Engineering↗

Heading perception in patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether retinis pigmentosa (RP) patients with residual visual field of < 100 degrees could perceive heading from optic flow. METHODS: Four RP patients and four age-matched normally sighted control subjects viewed displays simulating an observer walking over a ground. In experiment 1, subjects viewed either the entire display with free fixation (full-field condition) or through an aperture with a fixation point at the center (aperture condition). In experiment 2, patients viewed displays of different durations. RESULTS: RP patients' performance was comparable to that of the age-matched control subjects: heading judgment was better in the full-field condition than in the aperture condition. Increasing display duration from 0.5 s to 1 s improved patients' heading performance, but giving them more time (3 s) to gather more visual information did not consistently further improve their performance. CONCLUSIONS: RP patients use active scanning eye movements to compensate for their visual field loss in heading perception; they might be able to gather sufficient optic flow information for heading perception in about 1 s.

Eye Movements↗

Augmented-view for restricted visual field: multiple device implementations.

PURPOSE: An augmented-view device for patients with severely restricted peripheral visual fields (tunnel vision) was proposed, combining a see-through head-mounted display and a simultaneous minified view of a wide field presented as contour information. Here we create and evaluate multiple implementations of the augmented-view concept and report responses from potential users. METHODS: Several prototypes using commercial off-the-shelf devices were implemented. Then they were evaluated in real environments in daylight and at night by two retinitis pigmentosa patients. RESULTS: Effective expansion of the visual field of patients was achieved. Patients indicated their preferences for different properties, devices, and combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients found the augmented-view concept of help for their impairment, but wanted much more ergonomic design than the prototypes provided. Benefits, limitations, and possible improvements for the evaluated devices are discussed.

Equipment Design↗

Stereoacuity at distance and near.

PURPOSE: Because previous studies have reported conflicting evidence, we examined a possible difference in stereoacuity between distance and near, in particular using a random-dot display. We compared distance and near stereoacuities using identical presentation formats at the two distances. METHODS: Twelve young adults with low, stable refractive errors and apparently normal binocular vision participated. Stereoacuity was determined with a Mentor B-VAT II using Random Dot E (BVRDE) and Contour Circles (BVC) stereograms presented on a standard monitor (25 x 19.3 cm) at 518 cm (distance-habitual) and a small monitor (2.0 x 1.4 cm) at 40 cm (near-habitual). To examine whether accommodation-convergence influenced stereoacuity, testing at 40 cm was repeated with the addition of +2.50 DS lenses and base-in prisms (near-compensated) that created the same accommodation and convergence demands as for distance-habitual viewing. RESULTS: The two stereotests produced similar findings. Stereoacuity was not significantly different for distance-habitual and near-habitual viewing of the BVRDE (p = 0.43) and BVC (p = 0.79) stereotests. Near-compensated stereoacuity was worse than near-habitual (BVRDE, p = 0.005; BVC, p = 0.004) and distance-habitual (BVRDE, p = 0.05; BVC, p = 0.003) for both stereotests. Because near stereoacuity with yoked prisms (control condition) was the same as without prism (near-habitual), prism-induced optical distortions cannot account for the difference. CONCLUSIONS: Stereoacuity was not different at distance and near under normal viewing conditions. The conflict between subject knowledge of target proximity and the optically-induced relaxation of accommodation and convergence, or an inaccurate accommodative-convergence response, might have caused poor near-compensated stereoacuity.

Accommodation, Ocular↗