Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Elaine Lyon

Publications and source records attributed to Elaine Lyon.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Evaluation of electronic microarrays for genotyping factor V, factor II, and MTHFR.

BACKGROUND: Genetic risk factors associated with venous thrombosis include mutations in the factor V (Leiden), factor II (prothrombin), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genes. We evaluated a method using electronically addressable microarrays for the detection of mutations in these genes that have been associated with vascular disease. METHODS: The NanoChip Molecular Biology Workstation (Nanogen) uses electronic microarrays for mutation detection. Factor V, factor II, and MTHFR genotypes identified in the NanoChip system on 225 samples were compared with genotypes from LightCycler assays (Roche). We determined within- and between-cartridge signal and ratio variation and analyzed the effect of additional mutations at or near the detection area used for the NanoChip assays. RESULTS: Genotypes determined for all three mutations on the NanoChip platform were in complete concordance with LightCycler results. Within-cartridge signal variation as measured by the CV of fluorescence signals was <10% for each allele when present. The within-cartridge CV for heterozygous mutant/wild-type ratios was <8.5%, and between-cartridge CV was <18%. A dilution study showed that results could be obtained in this assay with 6 ng of nucleic acid per PCR, the lowest input tested. The presence of additional sequence variations near the expected mutations can produce equivocal or discrepant results. CONCLUSIONS: Mutation detection using the NanoChip Molecular Biology Workstation was accurate and reproducible for the three assays evaluated.

Electronics↗
PubMed2003

Rapid detection of aneuploidy (trisomy 21) by allele quantification combined with melting curves analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism loci.

BACKGROUND: Molecular approaches for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities will allow the development of rapid, cost-effective screening strategies. We present here a molecular alternative for the detection of aneuploidies and, more specifically, trisomy 21. METHODS: We used the quantitative value of melting curve analysis of heterozygous genetic loci to establish a relative allelic count. The two alleles of a given single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were differentiated by thermodynamic stability with a fluorescently labeled hybridization probe and were quantified by relative areas of derivative melting curves detected after fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Heterozygous SNPs provided internal controls for the assay. RESULTS: We selected six SNPs, heterozygous in at least 30% of a random population, to form a panel of informative loci in the majority of a random population. After normalization to a heterozygous control, samples segregated into three categories; nontrisomic samples had mean allele ratios of 0.96-1.09, whereas trisomic samples had mean ratios of 1.84-2.09 or 0.46-0.61, depending on which allele was duplicated. Within-run mean CVs of ratios were 6.5-27%, and between-assay mean CVs were 13-24%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of melting curve analysis of multiple SNPs is an alternative to the use of small tandem repeats for the detection of trisomies. Because of the high density of SNPs, the approach may be specifically useful for very fine mapping of the regions of chromosome 21 that are critical for Down syndrome; it is also applicable to aneuploidies other than trisomy 21 and to specimens that are not amenable to cytogenetic analysis.

Alleles↗
PubMed2003

Current challenges in cystic fibrosis screening.

CONTENT: This article gives an overview of the symptoms and mutations associated with classic and atypical cystic fibrosis (CF). Current testing methods for mutation detection in CF are discussed. OBJECTIVES: Review testing for CF, including American College of Medical Genetics and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines and recommendations regarding population screening for CF. Describe symptomatic and mutational differences between patients with classic CF and atypical CF, including monosymptomatic conditions such as congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, idiopathic pancreatitis, and chronic sinusitis. Explain the concern about predicting the phenotypic expression of the condition from the genotype. Discuss the challenges of CF testing, including the preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases. List the current methods for detecting CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations, specifying the advantages and disadvantages of each. Describe the basic patient information necessary for laboratories to provide accurate risk assessments, such as ethnicity and family history, and reasons for the test being conducted (carrier or affected status). RESULTS: The technical challenges of detecting the 25 recommended mutations are being met by commercially available reagents. Challenges remain for the preanalytic and postanalytic phases. Only with accurate patient information can laboratories provide specific risk reductions on the basis of a negative genetic test result. CONCLUSION: As health care providers become better informed about the recommendations for CF testing and laboratories continue to increase the sensitivities of their assays, patients will benefit from increased screening efficiency and accuracy. This will allow affected individuals to receive prompt and effective treatment and carriers to enjoy an expanded number of reproductive options.

Algorithms↗