Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Elaine C Seaver

Publications and source records attributed to Elaine C Seaver.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Capitella sp. I homeobrain-like, the first lophotrochozoan member of a novel paired-like homeobox gene family.

The paired-like class of homeobox genes contains numerous distinct families, many of which have been implicated in a variety of developmental functions. We report the isolation and expression of a gene with high similarity to Drosophila melanogaster homeobrain from the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I. The homeobrain-like (hbnl) gene is a paired-like gene that contains a conserved homeodomain, octapeptide region, alanine stretches, and an OAR domain. Gene orthology analyses of the homeodomain from CapI-hbnl places this gene in a new family of paired-like homeodomain genes that includes D. melanogaster homeobrain (hbn) and representatives from all major bilaterian clades as well as a cnidarian gene. CapI-hbnl expression is largely restricted to subsets of cells in the brain and eyes during larval development in Capitella sp. I. The earliest expression of CapI-hbnl is in small discrete cell clusters in the cerebral ganglia. This expression persists through late larval developmental stages whereas expression is absent in postmetamorphic juveniles. Outside the brain, expression is present on the ventral side of the larva in two small cell clusters, at the brain/pharyngeal border and in the anterior-most segment. CapI-hbnl shares features of brain expression with hbn, although in contrast to hbn, which is expressed along the length of the ventral nerve cord, CapI-hbnl has a restricted anterior expression pattern. CapI-hbnl represents an important neural marker for characterization of the annelid nervous system.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

ParaHox gene expression in the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I.

Hox and ParaHox genes are transcriptional regulators vital for many aspects of embryonic development in bilaterian animals and are considered to have originated from one ancestral proto-Hox/ParaHox cluster. Hox genes are clustered in the genome of both protostomes and deuterostomes, and there is a specific relationship between the position of a gene in the cluster and the position of its expression along the animal body axis (colinearity). It is not clear whether the ParaHox genes Gsx, Xlox, and, Cdx generally exhibit a similar phenomenon since developmental expression for all three ParaHox genes within a single species has not yet been described for any protostome animal. Here we show the spatial and temporal localization for all three ParaHox genes in the polychaete Capitella sp. I, a member of one of the morphologically most diverse and understudied groups within the Metazoa, the Lophotrochozoa. Our data demonstrate that although both CapI-Xlox and CapI-Cdx are regionally expressed in the gut, the three Capitella sp. I ParaHox genes as a group do not perfectly fit predictions of temporal or spatial colinearity. Instead, there is a conservation of expression across species associated with development of particular tissues, and the relative order of initiation of ParaHox gene expression likely reflects the relative order of species-specific tissue development during ontogenesis.

Animals↗

Expression of 'segmentation' genes during larval and juvenile development in the polychaetes Capitella sp. I and H. elegans.

Polychaete annelids and arthropods are both segmented protostome invertebrates. To investigate whether the segmented body plan of these two phyla share a common molecular ground pattern, we report the developmental expression of orthologues of the arthropod segment polarity genes engrailed (en), hedgehog (hh), and wingless (wg/Wnt1) in larval and juvenile stages of the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I and en in a second polychaete, Hydroides elegans. Temporally, neither Wnt1 nor hh are detected in the segmented region of the larval body until after morphological segmentation is apparent. Expression of CapI-Wnt1 is limited to a ring of ectoderm marking the future anus during larval segmentation. CapI-hh is expressed in a ring of the hindgut internal to that of CapI-Wnt1, as well as in a subset of ventral nerve cord neurons, anterior gut tissue, and mesoderm. In both H. elegans and Capitella sp. I, en is expressed in a spatially and temporally dynamic manner in segmentally iterated structures as well as a population of cells that migrate internally from ectoderm to mesoderm, possibly representing a population of ecto-mesodermal precursors. Significantly, the expression patterns we report for wg, en, and hh orthologues in Capitella sp. I and for en in larval development of H. elegans are not comparable to the highly conserved ectodermal segment polarity pattern observed in arthropods at any life history stage, consistent with distinct origins of segmentation between annelids and arthropods.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Segmentation: mono- or polyphyletic?

Understanding the evolutionary origins of segmented body plans in the metazoa has been a long-standing fascination for scientists. Competing hypotheses explaining the presence of distinct segmented taxa range from the suggestion that all segmentation in the metazoa is homologous to the proposal that segmentation arose independently many times, even within an individual clade or species. A major new source of information regarding the extent of homology vs. homoplasy of segmentation in recent years has been an examination of the extent to which molecular mechanisms underlying the segmentation process are conserved, the rationale being that a shared history will be apparent by the presence of common molecular components of a developmental program that give rise to a segmented body plan. There has been substantial progress recently in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the segmentation process in many groups, specifically within the three overtly segmented phyla: Annelida, Arthropoda and Chordata. This review will discuss what we currently know about the segmentation process in each group and how our understanding of the development of segmented structures in distinct taxa have influenced the hypotheses explaining the presence of a segmented body plan in the metazoa.

Animals↗

Growth patterns during segmentation in the two polychaete annelids, Capitella sp. I and Hydroides elegans: comparisons at distinct life history stages.

Many animals generate new body segments sequentially from a posterior growth zone, and this is generally thought to be the case for the annelids. Most annelids, including polychaetes, have an indirect life cycle and generate their earliest segments during larval life. We have characterized the nature of the growth zone in two polychaetes, Hydroides elegans and Capitella sp. I, during both larval and juvenile stages of segment formation by examining cell division patterns with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation. Cell division patterns show commonalities between the two species, even though they have distinct body plans and life history characteristics. In both polychaetes, larval segments arise from a field of dividing cells located in lateral regions of the body, rather than from a localized posterior growth zone. Circumferential expansion of the forming segmental tissue is particularly pronounced in Capitella sp. I. Post-metamorphic segments, in contrast, originate from a classical posterior growth zone, with the exception of four posterior thoracic segments of H. elegans, which appear to arise from an area in the middle of the body, indicating plasticity of segment-generating mechanisms present in different annelid life histories. The distinct nature of larval versus juvenile growth zones in H. elegans and Capitella sp. I raises the question of the mechanistic relationship between these two growth zones. The results of this study increase our understanding of the cellular origins of segments in annelids, and serve as a basis for interpretation of molecular expression patterns associated with segment formation in polychaetes.

Animals↗