Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ego Seeman

Publications and source records attributed to Ego Seeman.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications.

The femoral neck (FN) is a cantilever with external and internal dimensions determining its size, shape, the spatial distribution of the mineralized cortical and trabecular bone tissue mass, and its strength. Geometric indices of FN strength are often derived using FN dimensions estimated in vivo from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assuming that the FN cross section approximates a circle or a square. As DXA does not measure FN depth, we examined whether circular, square, or elliptical models of FN cross sections predict FN depth, and so its external volume, shape, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and geometric indices of strength. We studied paired FN specimens from 13 Caucasian female cadavers (mean age 69 years, range 29 to 85) using DXA, micro-computed tomography (mu-CT), and direct calliper measurements. DXA accurately measured FN width (supero-inferior diameter) but models assuming a circular and a square cross section overestimated FN depth (antero-posterior diameter) and volume, and so underestimated vBMD by 15.0 +/- 5.8% (circular cross section) and by 33.2 +/- 4.6% (square cross section) (both P < 0.05). As depth was less than the width, an elliptical model with a constant depth/width ratio of 0.75 reduced the accuracy error in vBMD to 14.0 +/- 8.5% (P = 0.10). However, as FN width increased, FN depth increased relatively less. An elliptical model using a quadratic equation to mimic this changing in shape with increasing size reduced the error in vBMD to 4.4 +/- 7.7% (NS). Circular cross-section models overestimated section modulus at the mid-FN by about 51%. The elliptical models reduced the error two- to three fold. Images from micro-CT scanning show that the FN cross-sectional shape resembles an ellipse with the long axis and the maximum moment of inertia (I(max)) oriented in the supero-inferior direction, and the cortical mass concentrated inferiorly. The larger the cross section, the more elliptical the shape, and the greater the I(max) supero-inferiorly, while I(min) (in the antero-posterior direction) remains relatively constant. The shape, spatial distribution of bone, and moments of inertia are likely to be adaptations to bending moments during bipedalism. Assuming the FN cross section approximates a circle or square produces errors in FN depth, volume, vBMD, and geometric indices of bone strength. Studies are needed to determine the effects of age, sex, and race on FN size and shape in health and disease.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

A comparison of the effects of raloxifene and conjugated equine estrogen on bone and lipids in healthy postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have assessed the effects of estrogen and raloxifene hydrochloride on bone mineral density and serum lipid concentrations, there are few direct comparative data. METHODS: Randomized placebo-controlled trial for 3 years, intention-to-treat analysis. Six hundred nineteen postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy (mean age, 53.0 years) were studied in 38 centers in Europe, North America, Australasia, and South Africa. They were randomized to 60 mg/d or 150 mg/d of raloxifene, 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), or placebo. Bone density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and fasting serum lipid concentrations were assessed for 3 years. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, bone density in the lumbar spine progressively declined by 2.0% in the placebo group (P <.05), was stable in the 2 raloxifene groups, and increased 4.6% in the subjects receiving CEE (P <.001). Effects in both raloxifene groups were different from those observed in the CEE and placebo groups (P <.001). Bone density in the total hip showed similar results. Conjugated equine estrogen produced significantly greater depression of serum osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and urine C-telopeptide, compared with raloxifene. Each of the active treatments caused comparable depression of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol below placebo levels (P <.001 at most time points). Raloxifene did not affect high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, whereas CEE increased it by 13.4% compared with placebo at 3 years (P <.001). Triglyceride concentrations increased 24.6% in the CEE group at 3 years (P <.003), a significantly greater change than in the raloxifene groups, which were 4.9% and 8.0% above baseline (P < or =.002) but not different from placebo. Urinary incontinence was reported in 11 women receiving CEE, but in only 1 or 2 in each of the other groups (P < or =.01 compared with the other groups). Hernias occurred less frequently in those receiving 150 mg/d of raloxifene or CEE (P =.03 vs placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene and CEE have beneficial effects on bone density and bone turnover, although effects of CEE are more marked. Raloxifene and CEE produce different patterns of lipid responses and have distinct adverse effect profiles.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Osteoporosis and the global competition for health care resources.

Global aging superimposed on existing infectious diseases and trauma will aggravate competition for health care resources to diagnose and treat osteoporosis. Efforts to implement public health measures are needed, but the targeted approach to assessment and treatment of high-risk individuals must also be refined. Increases in the elderly population worldwide will cause a dramatic rise in osteoporotic fractures, but other age-related diseases will increase as well. Changes will be superimposed on existing public health problems (e.g., malaria, alcoholism), and these acute health care needs will take priority in some areas. Societies in most parts of the world may have to limit osteoporosis control to broad public health measures, and such efforts (e.g., calcium and vitamin D supplementation) should be supported. In these regions, clinical decision-making will generally be limited to treating patients with fractures (who presumably have already failed any public health measures in place), or in a few wealthy countries, to patients with low bone density identified by case-finding. Case-finding approaches will vary with the resources available, although unselective (mass) screening by bone densitometry is largely ineffective and unaffordable anywhere. The key to clinical decision-making on behalf of individuals will be an assessment of absolute fracture risk, and the tools needed to predict the risk of an osteoporotic fracture over the next 10 years are now being developed. These include bone density measures, but also incorporate other risk factors (e.g., fracture history, corticosteroid use), which may allow extension of fracture risk prediction to nonwhite populations and to men. Even with a universal risk prediction tool, cost-effective treatment thresholds will vary by country based on the level of fracture risk in the region and on the resources available for health care. To better compete for these resources, efforts should be made to lower the cost of osteoporosis interventions. Additionally, evidence is needed that these interventions are really effective in reducing fractures in the community.

Aging↗

Loss of regularity in the curvature of the thoracolumbar spine: a measure of structural failure.

UNLABELLED: Departure from regularity (smoothness) in the curvature of the spine was quantified and correlated with the number of fractures, deficits in height, BMD, and identified women with vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: Differences in anterior and posterior vertebral heights (VHs) form the thoracolumbar curvature needed for stability in bipedal gait. Modest differences in VHs within and between adjacent vertebrae allow the spine curve to change its trajectory gently. Large differences in VHs, as occur following a fracture, produce abrupt changes in the direction of the curve, producing a departure from regularity (i.e., irregularity or loss of smoothness). MATERIALS AND METHODS: VHs and BMD were measured using DXA in 697 Lebanese women 20-87 years of age. Regularity of the spinal curvature was measured by comparing the ratio of the anterior to the posterior VHs of one vertebra to this ratio of adjacent vertebrae. If these ratios are similar, there is a smooth transition in the trajectory of the spinal curve. Departure from this regularity (smoothness) was measured at each pair of adjacent vertebrae in each individual and expressed as the spinal curvature irregularity index (SCII) for the entire thoracolumbar spine. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In premenopausal women, the mean SCII was 8.5% (range, 4-15%); that is, regularity was 91.5%. Only 0.8% of women had a SCII >17%. In postmenopausal women, the mean SCII was 10% (range, 4-36%) and was correlated with age (r = 0.25), height (r = -0.21), BMD (r = -0.13), and the number of deformities assessed by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM; r = 0.31-0.60; all p < 0.001). About 5% of women had an SCII >17%, and this group had 3- to 9-fold more deformities (as defined by QVM) than women with SCII <17%, reduced lumbar spine BMD (-1.01 SD), and 2- to 4-fold greater height deficits (-0.5 SD) than women with deformities (by QVM). The SCII is a robust method of identifying structural failure that is easy to compute and does not require controls.

Adult↗

7: Treatment of osteoporosis: why, whom, when and how to treat. The single most important consideration is the individual's absolute risk of fracture.

All women and men with a history of fragility fractures should be considered for treatment of osteoporosis to reduce their risk of future fracture. There is high-level evidence for the anti-fracture efficacy of treatment in women with osteoporosis, particularly if there is prevalent fracture; the evidence is less compelling for women with osteopenia, with or without a fracture, and for men. The rigorously investigated drugs reported to reduce vertebral fractures are the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate, the selective oestrogen-receptor modulator raloxifene, the anabolic agent parathyroid hormone and, most recently, strontium ranelate. Only the two bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been reported to reduce hip fractures in community-dwelling women, and calcium plus vitamin D and hip protectors have been reported to reduce these fractures in elderly people in institutions. HRT is not recommended in women for fracture risk reduction alone. Evidence for the anti-fracture efficacy of calcitonin, fluoride, anabolic steroids and active vitamin D metabolites is insufficient to justify their use; lifestyle changes, while not shown to reduce fracture risk, may have a role in maintaining bone strength throughout life.

Age Factors↗

Hormone therapy and risk of non-vertebral fracture: Geelong osteoporosis study.

In this population-based study, we evaluated the association between exposure to hormone therapy (HT), bone mineral density (BMD) and the prevalence of non-vertebral fractures. The study was set in a region located in southeastern Australia where complete fracture ascertainment was determined from radiological reports. Current HT use for at least 6 months was ascertained in women with non-vertebral fractures [median age 70.9 years; inter-quartile range (IQR) 66.5-75.9 years] and randomly selected controls (median age 70.8 years; IQR 65.2-75.0 years). Current HT use was documented in 20 of 262 cases and 49 of 364 controls. The odds ratio (OR) for non-vertebral fracture associated with HT use was 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.92). HT use was associated with 2.6-7.5% higher BMD at axial and appendicular sites. HT use is associated with a halving of risk for non-vertebral fractures and higher BMD.

Aged↗

The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic structural damage and bone fragility result from reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption. In a phase 2 clinical trial, strontium ranelate, an orally active drug that dissociates bone remodeling by increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, has been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fractures and to increase bone mineral density. METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy of strontium ranelate in preventing vertebral fractures in a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 1649 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (low bone mineral density) and at least one vertebral fracture to receive 2 g of oral strontium ranelate per day or placebo for three years. We gave calcium and vitamin D supplements to both groups before and during the study. Vertebral radiographs were obtained annually, and measurements of bone mineral density were performed every six months. RESULTS: New vertebral fractures occurred in fewer patients in the strontium ranelate group than in the placebo group, with a risk reduction of 49 percent in the first year of treatment and 41 percent during the three-year study period (relative risk, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.73). Strontium ranelate increased bone mineral density at month 36 by 14.4 percent at the lumbar spine and 8.3 percent at the femoral neck (P<0.001 for both comparisons). There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with strontium ranelate leads to early and sustained reductions in the risk of vertebral fractures.

Administration, Oral↗

Seasonal periodicity of serum vitamin D and parathyroid hormone, bone resorption, and fractures: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

UNLABELLED: In this population-based study, seasonal periodicity was seen with reduced serum vitamin D, increased serum PTH, and increased bone resorption in winter. This was associated with an increased proportion of falls resulting in fracture and an increased risk of wrist and hip fractures. INTRODUCTION: In a population of women who reside in a temperate climate and do not generally receive dietary vitamin D supplementation, we investigated whether seasonal vitamin D insufficiency is associated with increased risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, population-based study set in southeastern Australia (latitude 38-39 degrees S). Participants were drawn from a well-defined community of 27,203 women >/=55 years old: 287 randomly selected from electoral rolls, 1635 with incident fractures, and 1358 presenting to a university hospital with falls. The main outcome measures were annual periodicities of ultraviolet radiation, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum C-telopeptide (CTx), BMD, falls, and fractures. RESULTS: Cyclic variations in serum 25(OH)D lagged 1 month behind ultraviolet radiation, peaking in summer and dipping in winter (p < 0.001). Periodicity of serum PTH was the inverse of serum 25(OH)D, with a phase shift delay of 1 month (p = 0.004). Peak serum CTx lagged peak serum PTH by 1-2 months. In late winter, a greater proportion of falls resulted in fracture (p < 0.001). Seasonal periodicity in 439 hip and 307 wrist fractures also followed a simple harmonic model (p = 0.078 and 0.002, respectively), peaking 1.5-3 months after the trough in 25(OH)D. CONCLUSIONS: A fall in 25(OH)D in winter is accompanied by increases in (1) PTH levels, (2) bone resorption, (3) the proportion of falls resulting in fracture, and (4) the frequency of hip and wrist fracture. Whether vitamin D supplementation in winter can reduce the population burden of fractures requires further investigation.

Accidental Falls↗

Estrogen, androgen, and the pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men.

During growth, estrogen deficiency in females may produce increased bone size as a result of removal of inhibition of periosteal apposition, while failed endosteal apposition produces thin cortices and trabeculae in the smaller bone. In males, androgen deficiency produces reduced periosteal and endosteal apposition, reduced bone size, and cortical and trabecular thickness. At completion of longitudinal growth, advancing age is associated with emergence of a negative bone balance in each basic multicellular unit (BMU) because of reduced bone formation. Bone loss occurs, but slowly because the remodeling rate is slow. In midlife, in females, estrogen deficiency increases remodeling rate, increases the volume of bone resorbed, and decreases the volume of bone formed in each of the numerous BMUs remodeling bone on its endosteal (endocortical, trabecular, intracortical) surfaces so bone loss accelerates. In males, remodeling rate remains slow and is driven largely by reduced bone formation in the BMU. Hypogonadism in 20% to 30% of elderly men contributes to bone loss. In both sexes, calcium malabsorption and secondary hyperparathyroidism may partly be sex-hormone dependent and contributes to cortical bone loss. Concurrent periosteal apposition partly offsets endosteal bone loss, but less so in women than in men. More women than men fracture because their smaller skeleton incurs greater architectural damage and adapts less by periosteal apposition. Sex hormone deficiency during growth and aging is pivotal in the pathogenesis of bone fragility.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Changes in bone mineral density explain little of the reduction in vertebral or nonvertebral fracture risk with anti-resorptive therapy.

The structural basis for the reduction in vertebral and nonvertebral fracture risk in patients using anti-resorptive therapy is not well understood. As reduced bone mineral density (BMD) increases the risk for fracture and anti-resorptive agents increase BMD, it was commonly held that the increase in BMD explained the fracture risk reduction until several meta-analyses either failed to detect a significant association between vertebral fracture risk reduction and the incremental increase in BMD or reported that only a small proportion of the vertebral fracture risk reduction was explained by changes in BMD. Recently, it was reported that the risk of nonvertebral fractures decreased when an increase in BMD accompanied anti-resorptive treatment [J. Clin. Endrocrinol. Metab. 87 (2002) 1586]. However, a reanalysis of the data, using the same statistical methods after correcting for discrepancies in the reported BMD and person-year data, suggested that the magnitude of reductions in nonvertebral fracture risk was not associated with the magnitude of increases in BMD at the end of the first year or at completion of the studies. We infer that only a small proportion of risk reduction in vertebral and nonvertebral fractures observed with anti-resorptive drug therapy is explained by the increase in BMD. Further studies are needed to define the structural basis of the fracture risk reduction.

Bone Density↗

The varying distribution of intra- and inter-vertebral height ratios determines the prevalence of vertebral fractures.

Credible inferences regarding the burden of vertebral fractures (VFs) cannot be made without a globally accepted quantitative definition of 'fracture'. Currently, differences in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral heights (VHs) within a vertebra, or between adjacent vertebrae, are used to define 'fracture'. However, VH differences are essential for the construction of thoracolumbar curves, evolutionary adaptations that provide stability in bipedal stance and gait. As there is no reference standard to distinguish anatomical variation from fracture, approaches to defining a VF use a reference range of VH ratios derived in premenopausal women or derived by trimming, a method that iteratively removes the tails of a distribution of VH ratios to produce a normal distribution. From this, reference ranges of VH ratio means and standard deviations (SDs) are obtained and a nominal deviation of 15% or more, or 3 SD or more is regarded as a 'fracture'. We measured VHs by quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in 697 Lebanese women (age 20-89 years) to compare the prevalence of VF ascertained by published methods and a new method that uses the premenopausal range (without trimming) and requires two VH abnormalities. VF prevalence using published methods reached 60% to 70% in pre- and post-menopausal women, and in women with normal or high BMD because VH ratios were not normally distributed and cut-offs used to define VF fracture fell within the observed distribution of the data. The new method resulted in a VF prevalence of 3.3% in younger and 14% in older women, 7% (high), 10% (middle), and 20% (low) BMD tertiles consistent with the notion that the method detected VF due to bone fragility. We suggest that using a fixed trimming method to define reference range and cut-offs or applying fixed cut-offs to identify VFs in populations, where these ratios are not normally distributed, may result in the capture of anatomical variation, not structural failure. Thus, group differences in the VF prevalence may reflect differences in methodology, not bone fragility. Improved criteria to define VF are needed before credible inferences can be made regarding the burden of VFs in women and men, and between sexes, races, countries, decades, and placebo arms of clinical trials.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Efficacy of risedronate on clinical vertebral fractures within six months.

OBJECTIVE: Postmenopausal osteoporotic women with pre-existing or new incident vertebral fractures are at high risk for future fracture, so prompt treatment is warranted. Risedronate has been shown to reduce the incidence of radiographically-defined vertebral fractures by approximately two-thirds within 1 year. RESEARCH DESIGN: This study examined the effects of risedronate treatment on the time course of the reduction in the risk of clinical vertebral fractures (i.e., symptomatic fractures), on the risk of moderate-to-severe radiographic vertebral fractures, and on height. RESULTS: In 2442 postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures from the Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) studies who received either risedronate 5 mg or placebo, daily risedronate reduced the risk of clinical vertebral fractures within 6 months (RR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.63), and by 69% at 1 year (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.12, 0.78). At 1 year, risedronate also reduced the risk of moderate-to-severe radiographically-defined vertebral fractures by 71% (RR = 0.29 95% CI 0.16, 0.54). Height loss was attenuated with treatment, most notably in patients who experienced new vertebral fractures, with a median difference of 0.73 cm compared with subjects receiving placebo (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Risedronate reduces the risk of clinical vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis within 6 months of commencing treatment.

Body Height↗

Beta-adrenergic blockers reduce the risk of fracture partly by increasing bone mineral density: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

UNLABELLED: This population-based study documented beta-blocker use in 59/569 cases with incident fracture and 112/775 controls. OR for fracture associated with beta-blocker use was 0.68 (95%CI, 0.49-0.96). Beta-blockers were associated with higher BMD at the total hip (2.5%) and UD forearm (3.6%) after adjusting for age, anthropometry, and thiazide use. Beta-blocker use is associated with reduced fracture risk and higher BMD. INTRODUCTION: Animal data suggests that bone formation is under beta-adrenergic control and that beta-blockers stimulate bone formation and/or inhibit bone resorption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the association between beta-blocker use, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk in a population-based study in Geelong, a southeastern Australian city with a single teaching hospital and two radiological centers providing complete fracture ascertainment for the region. Beta-blocker use was documented for 569 women with radiologically confirmed incident fractures and 775 controls without incident fracture. Medication use and lifestyle factors were documented by questionnaire. RESULTS: Odds ratio for fracture associated with beta-blocker use was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49-0.96) for any fracture. Adjusting for age, weight, medications, and lifestyle factors had little effect on the odds ratio. Beta-blocker use was associated with a higher BMD at the total hip (2.5%, p = 0.03) and ultradistal forearm (3.6%, p = 0.04) after adjustment for age, anthropometry, and thiazide use. CONCLUSION: Beta-blockers are associated with a reduction in fracture risk and higher BMD.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Femoral neck fragility in women has its structural and biomechanical basis established by periosteal modeling during growth and endocortical remodeling during aging.

To gain insight into the growth- and age-related origins of bone fragility at the proximal femur, we analyzed structural and biomechanical data of the femoral neck from a study of postmenopausal women with hip fractures and their 47 premenopausal daughters. Results were expressed as standard deviations (SD) or Z-scores (mean +/- SEM) adjusted for age and weight, derived using a normal reference population of 262 premenopausal women and 370 postmenopausal women. Women with hip fractures had increased femoral neck (FN) periosteal and endocortical diameters (1.01 +/- 0.26 SD and 1.18 +/- 0.25 SD, respectively). Cortical thickness was reduced by 0.96 +/- 0.1 SD and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) was reduced by 1.2 +/- 0.1 SD). The section modulus was normal while the buckling ratio was increased by 1.59 +/- 0.17 SD). Their daughters had increased FN diameter by about one half that of their mothers (0.48 +/- 0.16 SD), while endocortical diameter was increased by only one third (0.44 +/- 0.13 SD). Cortical thickness and vBMD were not reduced, the section modulus was increased (0.48 +/- 0.13 SD) while the buckling ratio was normal. We infer that the larger femoral neck size in women with hip fractures is growth-related; the wider endocortical cavity and thinner cortex is the result of excessive age-related endocortical bone resorption producing a thin cortex in a larger bone predisposing to structural failure by local buckling. The structural basis of bone fragility has some features originating during growth and others during aging.

Adult↗

Body segment lengths and arm span in healthy men and women and patients with vertebral fractures.

We studied 112 healthy men and 261 healthy women aged 18-92 years, and 34 men and 73 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures aged 45-90 years to determine (i) whether patients with vertebral fractures have shorter stature before fracture, and (ii) whether the difference between arm span and standing or sitting height can be used to identify patients with fractures. Arm span was measured by using a calibrated extended ruler. Standing height, sitting height and leg length were measured by using a Holtain stadiometer. The results were expressed in absolute term and standard deviation (SD) or Z-scores (mean+/-SEM). Advancing age was associated with decreased sitting height (r=-0.37 to -0.41, both P<0.01) and a trend towards decreased arm span (r=-0.12 to -0.17, P=0.06 and 0.07) in healthy men and women; leg length was independent of age in both sexes (r=-0.09 to -0.12, NS). In patients with vertebral fractures, sitting height was reduced in women (Z=-0.83+/-0.14 SD, P<0.01) and men (Z=-1.37+/-0.21 SD, P<0.01) but only the women had reduced leg length (Z=-0.46+/-0.15 SD, P<0.01) and arm span (Z=-0.76+/-0.15 SD, P<0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that the predictive ability of the difference between arm span and standing or sitting height to identify patients with vertebral fractures is limited. We concluded that women, not men, with vertebral fractures may come from a population with short stature. The difference between arm span and standing or sitting height cannot be used to predict vertebral fracture risk.

Adolescent↗

Bone quality.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aging↗