Biomedical subjects

Eduardo Eyras

Publications and source records attributed to Eduardo Eyras.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

A critical appraisal of base-resolution m6A profiling techniques.

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA, influencing RNA fate and gene regulation. Early antibody-based approaches enabled transcriptome-wide profiling but lacked resolution and quantitative accuracy. Newer approaches now achieve base-resolution m6A detection using improved crosslinking, chemical or enzymatic conversion, and single-molecule sequencing. Antibody-free methods provide quantitative stoichiometry from minimal input, while nanopore direct RNA sequencing offers real-time, single-molecule readouts across entire transcriptomes. Collectively, these methods form a versatile toolkit that integrates global mapping with precise site-level analysis, advancing knowledge of context-dependent m6A regulation in physiology and disease. This review compares their principles, strengths, and limitations to guide method selection and highlight how next-generation epitranscriptomic tools are paving the way for clinical and therapeutic applications.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Gene finding in the chicken genome.

BACKGROUND: Despite the continuous production of genome sequence for a number of organisms, reliable, comprehensive, and cost effective gene prediction remains problematic. This is particularly true for genomes for which there is not a large collection of known gene sequences, such as the recently published chicken genome. We used the chicken sequence to test comparative and homology-based gene-finding methods followed by experimental validation as an effective genome annotation method. RESULTS: We performed experimental evaluation by RT-PCR of three different computational gene finders, Ensembl, SGP2 and TWINSCAN, applied to the chicken genome. A Venn diagram was computed and each component of it was evaluated. The results showed that de novo comparative methods can identify up to about 700 chicken genes with no previous evidence of expression, and can correctly extend about 40% of homology-based predictions at the 5' end. CONCLUSIONS: De novo comparative gene prediction followed by experimental verification is effective at enhancing the annotation of the newly sequenced genomes provided by standard homology-based methods.

Animals↗