Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eduardo Bruera

Publications and source records attributed to Eduardo Bruera.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Palliative management of fatigue at the close of life: "it feels like my body is just worn out".

Fatigue is the most common chronic symptom associated with cancer and other chronic progressive diseases. The assessment and treatment of fatigue at or near the end of life can be complex. Some of the challenges include its subjective nature, with great variability in its source, how it is expressed, and how it is perceived, requiring treatment to be based on patient report of frequency and severity; its multidimensional character; and the limited understanding of its pathophysiology. Using the case of an 82-year-old retired nurse with fatigue that could be explained by a number of concurrent conditions, including anemia, weight loss, depression and isolation, dyspnea, deconditioning, and medications, the authors illustrate the clinical approach to assess and treat fatigue at the end of life.

Aged, 80 and over↗

The impact of hypogonadism and autonomic dysfunction on fatigue, emotional function, and sexual desire in male patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether hypogonadism and autonomic dysfunction contribute substantially to cancer-related fatigue, decreased sexual desire, and depression in male patients with advanced, incurable cancer. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who had received no major antineoplastic intervention for at least 2 weeks were tested for autonomic dysfunction by using Ewing tests. Total and free testosterone levels were measured. Multivariate analyses were performed to test the relation of these factors with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) (the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy [FAACT] scale and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F] subscale), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, the Sexual Desire Inventory, and sexual function (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System subscale). Common causes for fatigue (anemia, depression, malnutrition, symptom distress, and medications) also were considered. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 47 patients (81%) had autonomic dysfunction, although it was not associated significantly with the other variables examined. Twenty-nine of 45 patients (64%) had a low level of free testosterone (hypogonadism), which was correlated with the HADS Anxiety score (P = .002), the FACT Emotional Well-Being score (P = .02), and the HADS Depression score (P = .04). Hypogonadal men also had lower scores on the FACT Functional Well-Being scale (P = .01) and the FACIT-F subscale (P = .05). Men who reported symptoms related to weight loss (FAACT scale) had significantly lower levels of free testosterone (r = 0.34; P = .02) but did not differ from the other group in actual weight loss (P = .22). The total testosterone level was not appropriate for screening of hypogonadism unless the patients had values <100 ng/ mL. Logistic regression analysis failed to reveal a distinct multivariate model of autonomic dysfunction or hypogonadism that predicted clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypogonadism is a frequent condition in patients with advanced, incurable cancer and is associated with negative mood, fatigue, and symptoms related to anorexia/cachexia.

Adult↗

Exploring joint effects of genes and the clinical efficacy of morphine for cancer pain: OPRM1 and COMT gene.

Pain is a complex human trait. It is likely that the interaction of multiple genes, each with a small individual effect, along with the effect of environmental factors, influences the clinical efficacy of opioids rather than a single gene alone. Polymorphisms in genes coding for the mu-opioid receptor (A118G) and catechol-O-methyl transferase (Val158Met) may be important modulators of opioid efficacy. We assessed joint effects of the OPRM1 and COMT genes in predicting morphine dose for cancer pain relief. We used genotype and clinical data from a pharmacokinetic study of morphine in 207 inpatients treated with stable morphine dose for at least 3 days by Palliative Medicine Specialists. Results showed significant variation in morphine dose requirement by genotype groups: carriers of COMT Val/Val and Val/Met genotype required 63% and 23%, respectively, higher morphine dose compared to carriers of Met/Met genotype (p=0.02). Carriers of OPRM1 GG genotype required 93% higher morphine dose compared to carriers of AA genotypes (p=0.012). When we explored for joint effects, we found that carriers of the OPRM1 AA and COMT Met/Met genotype required the lowest morphine dose to achieve pain relief (87 mg/24 h; 95%CI=57,116) and those with neither Met/Met nor AA genotype needed the highest morphine dose (147 mg/24 h; 95%CI=100,180). The significant joint effects for the Met/Met and AA genotypes (p<0.012) persisted, even after controlling for demographic and clinical variables in the multivariable analyses. Future studies are needed to further characterize the joint effects of multiple genes, along with demographic and clinical variables, in predicting opioid dose.

Adult↗

The impact of the palliative care mobile team on symptom assessment and medication profiles in patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center.

GOALS OF WORK: In recent years, tertiary care hospitals and cancer centers have shown great interest in forming palliative care consultation teams. Thus, these centers may be interested in the types of care that such teams give, which could help the other centers put together their own teams. However, the availability of such information is limited. The purpose of our study was therefore to describe the experience of a palliative care team at our comprehensive cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 100 consecutive patients who were referred to our palliative care mobile team between November 2004 and January 2005; we then analyzed the primary interventions of this team. RESULTS: The median patient age was 61 years; 57 patients were female. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue in 78% and pain in 62% of patients. The main interventions by the palliative team were changes in medication types (opioids, antiemetics, neuroleptics, and laxatives) and in medication doses. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care mobile teams make multiple changes in previous medications and provide almost universal counseling services to patients and families. The length of involvement with the patient and family is short; therefore, rapid stabilization and counseling are required. Our findings regarding medication changes could be helpful to tertiary care hospitals and cancer centers considering palliative care consultation teams.

Adolescent↗

Critical issues on opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: an epidemiological study.

The aim of the study was epidemiologically to evaluate the long-term effects of opioids on pain relief, quality of life and functional capacity in long-term/chronic non-cancer pain. The study was based on data from the 2000 Danish Health and Morbidity Survey. As part of a representative National random sample of 16,684 individuals (>16 years of age), 10,066 took part in an interview and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Cancer patients were excluded. The interview and the self-administered questionnaire included questions on chronic/long-lasting pain (>6 months), health-related quality of life (SF-36), use of the health care system, functional capabilities, satisfaction with medical pain treatment and regular or continuous use of medications. Participants reporting pain were divided into opioid and non-opioid users. The analyses were adjusted for age, gender, concomitant use of anxiolytics and antidepressants and pain intensity. Pain relief, quality of life and functional capacity among opioid users were compared with non-opioid users. Opioid usage was significantly associated with reporting of moderate/severe or very severe pain, poor self-rated health, not being engaged in employment, higher use of the health care system, and a negative influence on quality of life as registered in all items in SF-36. Because of the cross-sectional nature causative relationships cannot be ascertained. However, it is remarkable that opioid treatment of long-term/chronic non-cancer pain does not seem to fulfil any of the key outcome opioid treatment goals: pain relief, improved quality of life and improved functional capacity.

Adolescent↗

Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a fatigue score of at least 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = no fatigue, 10 = worst possible fatigue) and hemoglobin level of at least 10 g/dL were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg methylphenidate or placebo every 2 hours as needed (maximum of four capsules a day), for 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary including study drug record and fatigue intensity. A research nurse telephoned patients daily to assess toxicity and fatigue level. All patients were offered open-label methylphenidate for 4 weeks. FACIT-F and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were assessed at baseline, and days 8, 15, and 36. The FACIT-F fatigue subscore on day 8 was considered the primary end point. RESULTS: Of 112 patients randomly assigned, 52 patients in the methylphenidate and 53 in the placebo group were assessable for analysis. Fatigue intensity improved significantly on day 8 in both the methylphenidate and placebo groups. However, there was no significant difference in fatigue improvement by FACIT-F (P = .31) or ESAS (P = .14) between groups. In open-label phase, fatigue intensity maintained low as compared with baseline. No significant toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Both methylphenidate and placebo resulted in significant symptom improvement. Methylphenidate was not significantly superior to placebo after 1 week of treatment. Longer study duration is justified. The role of daily telephone calls from a research nurse should be explored as a palliative care intervention.

Adult↗

Opioid switching: a systematic and critical review.

Cancer patients with pain may not respond to increasing doses of opioids because they develop adverse effects before achieving an acceptable analgesia, or the analgesic response is poor, despite a rapid dose escalation. Opioid switching may significantly improve the balance between analgesia and adverse effects. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature on opioid switching. According to available data, opioid switching results in clinical improvement in more than 50% of patients with chronic pain with poor response to one opioid. However, data are based on open studies or small case series. Reasons for switching may influence the dose of the alternative drug. Opioid conversion should not be a mere mathematical calculation, but just a part of a more comprehensive evaluation of pain, adverse effect intensity, comorbidities, and concomitant drugs. The process of reaching an optimal dose should be highly individualized, particularly when patients are switched from high doses of opioids, given the wide conversion ratios reported in literature.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Patient-based symptom scores are the standard method for assessment in palliative care. There has been limited research on the frequency of errors upon using this approach. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a reliable and valid assessment tool routinely used for symptom intensity assessment in our cancer center. OBJECTIVE: To determine if patients were scoring the symptoms on the ESAS in the way it was supposed to be scored. SETTINGS: The study was carried out at the outpatient palliative care center. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Retrospective review of 60 consecutive patient charts was done where the patient had initially scored the ESAS. The physician looked at this scoring on the ESAS and went back to the patient to do the scoring again to see if the patient had scored it in the way it was intended to be scored. The same physician did the assessment on all of the patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of agreement (weighted kappa) before versus after the physician visit; Screening performance of patient completed ESAS for mild and moderate symptom intensity. RESULTS: Complete agreement ranged from 58% (sleep) to 82% (well-being); the weighted kappa ranged from 0.49 (drowsiness) to 0.78 (well-being). There was more agreement for symptoms such as dyspnea, nausea, anxiety, and depression and less agreement for symptoms such as lack of sleep and lack of appetite. The screening performance of the initial patient self assessment showed less sensitivity for nausea, drowsiness if the intensity was mild and less sensitivity for pain, nausea, anxiety, and drowsiness if the intensity was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Vigilance needs to be maintained about the ESAS scores done by the patients particularly for symptoms of sleep, appetite, and pain. There is a likelihood of error if doctors or nurses do not routinely check the way patients have completed the assessment form. More research is needed to determine the best way to teach patients how to minimize errors in self-reporting of symptoms.

Adult↗

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety.

PURPOSE: Mood disorders are among the most important psychiatric problems in patients with cancer. However, they are frequently underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated. This may lead to difficulties with symptom control, social withdrawal, and poor quality of life. This study was conducted to evaluate the screening performance of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) for depression and anxiety, compared to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed ESAS and HADS data collected from three previous clinical trials conducted by our group. The diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety, and moderate/severe depression and/or anxiety made when patients scored 8 or more, and 11 or more in HADS questionnaire, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for ESAS were calculated. RESULTS: Of 216 patients analyzed, the median (range) score for depression was 2 (0-10) and anxiety 3 (0-10) using ESAS, and 6 (0-16) and 7 (0-19) using HADS, respectively. A cut off of 2 out of 10 or more in the ESAS gave a sensitivity of 77% and 83% with a specificity of 55% and 47% for depression and moderate/severe depression, respectively. A cutoff of 2 out of 10 or more in the ESAS gave a sensitivity of 86% and 97%, and a specificity of 56% and 43% for anxiety and moderate/severe anxiety, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the ideal cutoff point of ESAS for the screening of depression and anxiety in palliative care is 2 out of 10 or more. More research is needed to define the ideal cutoff point for screening of severe depression and anxiety.

Adult↗

Objective evaluation of physical function in patients with advanced lung cancer: a preliminary report.

PURPOSE: This prospective study was designed in order to compare the most common subjective measurements of physical function in patients with advanced lung cancer with an objective physical functional test (Simmonds Functional Assessment Tool [SFA]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients agreed to participate and complete the study before or after their outpatient medical oncology appointment. Patients underwent assessment using the Karnofsky, the Brief fatigue Inventory, The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung patients (FACT-L) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). These results were compared to the SFA tool. The SFA consists of six tasks: tying a belt, putting coins in a cup, reaching above head, standing up/sitting down, reaching forward and walking 50 feet. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients completed the study over 8 months: median Karnofsky performance status was 85 (70 to 100), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) score (0 to 10) was generally low (0.5 to 2.8). SFA scores were significantly different in patients compared to a control group. The correlation between the subscales of the SFA and the Karnofsky, the Brief Fatigue Inventory, The FACT-L and the ESAS was generally low to moderate (r values: 0.22 to 0.38). There was generally a moderate correlation between the different subjective scales (r values: 0.3 to 0.62). CONCLUSION: Adherence to the SFA tool was excellent. The low to moderate correlation between the abnormalities found in the objective SFA and the subjective fatigue tests suggest that objective evaluation of the functional capacity provides a potentially useful and independent end-point for clinical trials and therapeutic interventions. These assessment tools should be used complementary to each other to better assess the functional status of patients with advanced lung cancer. Large trials of objective functional assessment are justified.

Adult↗

Symptom control in palliative care--Part I: oncology as a paradigmatic example.

Achieving the best quality of life for patients and their families when a disease becomes progressive and no longer remains responsive to curative therapy is the primary goal of palliative care. A comprehensive care plan focusing on control of physical symptoms as well as psychological, social, and spiritual issues then becomes paramount in that context. Symptom assessment and treatment are a principle part of palliative care. This paper is the first of three in a series addressing non-pain symptoms, which are frequently encountered in the palliative care populations. The most frequent non-pain symptoms are constipation, chronic nausea and vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea, fatigue, and delirium. As symptoms are subjective, their expression varies from patient to patient, depending on the individual patient's perception and on other factors such as psychosocial issues. While symptoms are addressed individually, patients frequently have multiple coexisting symptoms. Generally told, once the intensity of a symptom has been assessed, it is necessary to assess the symptom in the context of other symptoms such as pain, appetite, fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Given that fact, adopting a multidimensional assessment allows for formulation of a more effective therapeutic strategy. More pertinently, this paper highlights the management of non-pain symptoms as an integral part of patient care and reviews the pathophysiologies, causes, assessment, and management of constipation, chronic nausea, and vomiting, each of which is common among the palliative care population.

Constipation↗

Impact of a palliative care service on in-hospital mortality in a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care services provide symptom control and psychosocial support for dying patients and their families. These services are not available in many cancer centers and tertiary hospitals. The purpose of this study was to review the impact of a palliative care program, established in 1999, on overall in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We reviewed the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center computerized database to determine the total number of deaths and discharges and the place of death for each fiscal year from 1999 to 2004. The median length of stay for patients who died in different locations within the hospital was calculated. Annual palliative care consultations for patients who subsequently died in the hospital were retrieved. The annual mortality rate for the cancer center was calculated. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rates were 3.6, 3.7, 3.6, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.7% of all discharges for the period 1999-2004 respectively (p > 0.2). The number of deaths in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) dropped from 252 in 671 (38%) in 1999 to 213 in 764 (28%) in 2004 (p < 0.0001). Involvement of the palliative care service in the care of patients dying in the hospital grew from 8 in 583 (1%) in 1999 to 264 in 764 (35%) in 2004 (p < 0.0001). The median length of hospital stay (MLOS) for patients who subsequently died in-hospital was significantly longer than that for patients who were discharged alive. CONCLUSIONS: Increased involvement by the palliative care service in the care of decedent patients was associated with a decreased MICU mortality and no change in overall hospital mortality rate or inpatient length of hospital stay.

Cancer Care Facilities↗