Biomedical subjects

E Zohar

Publications and source records attributed to E Zohar.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

The effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on "failed back surgery syndrome" associated chronic low back pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic benefits of repeated epidural local anesthetic administration on pain perception and straight leg raise (SLR) in patients suffering from chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study protocol. PATIENTS: 50 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients at least 18 years of age, who had previously undergone spine surgery. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were admitted to hospital for the 5-day duration of the study. Following epidural catheterization, fluoroscopy was performed to verify correct placement of the epidural catheter. On the first study day, all patients received depomedrol 80 mg, in 10-ml 1% lidocaine, epidurally. Thereafter, patients were randomized into two equal groups. In Group Bupivacaine (B) 10-ml 0.125% bupivacaine was administered. In Group Saline (S), an equal volume of saline was administered. Epidural injections were performed twice daily (09H00 and 14H00) for 4 days. Sympathetic blockade was confirmed by the presence of peripheral vasodilatation. Sensory blockade was assessed using loss of pin prick and temperature sensation. SLR as well as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS) for pain were performed prior to each injection, at 15 minutes after injection, and hourly for 2 hours thereafter. Similar parameters were measured 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 46 patients completed the study. VAS for pain was marginally lower in Group B. However, statistical significance was not demonstrated. During the hospitalization period, the SLR in both study groups significantly (0.008) improved with time. However, no difference between the groups was demonstrated. In both groups, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge, the SLR was comparable to prestudy recordings. In Group B, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after discharge, patient-generated VAS for pain were significantly (p = 0.002) higher when compared to pain scores at the time of patient discharge.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal pressure during transurethral procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of spinal versus general anesthesia on bladder compliance and intraabdominal pressure in elderly males undergoing elective transurethral resection of the prostate. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 21 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients at least 18 years of age, undergoing transurethral surgery. INTERVENTIONS: According to a computer-generated randomization schedule, patients were allocated to one of two groups. In Group Spinal (S), 10 mg of hyperbaric tetracaine was administered intrathecally. In Group General Anesthesia (GA), patients received, fentanyl intravenous (i.v. 1 to 2 micrograms/kg and propofol i.v. 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia. Thereafter, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted and, with spontaneous ventilation, anesthesia was maintained by administering isoflurane (end-tidal 0.7% to 1.2%) and 70% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen. Intraabdominal pressure and bladder compliance were recorded prior to the induction of anesthesia and immediately before the onset of the surgical procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two groups were demographically comparable. In Group S, mean bladder compliance was significantly (p = 0.003) higher and mean intraabdominal pressure significantly lower (p = 0.007) when compared to baseline preanesthetic values. In Group GA, mean intraabdominal pressure significantly (p = 0.006) decreased when compared to baseline preanesthetic recordings. Following the induction of general anesthesia, a small change in bladder compliance was noted. However, statistical significance was not reached. Data were analyzed and compared using Student's t-test (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). CONCLUSION: Both spinal and general anesthesia induced a significant decrease in intraabdominal pressure. While both techniques were associated with an increase in bladder compliance, statistical significance was demonstrated only in the spinal anesthesia treatment group.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1999

Diclofenac does not decrease renal blood flow or glomerular filtration in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

UNLABELLED: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have become increasingly popular in the treatment of perioperative pain. Due to concerns that cyclooxygenase inhibition may adversely affect renal function, these drugs are often not used in geriatric surgical patients. However, the perioperative effect of NSAIDs on renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has not been assessed. Therefore, using a prospective, controlled, double-blinded study design, we evaluated the effect of diclofenac on RBF and GFR in 20 patients (>65 yr) undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of the femur. All patients were normovolemic before the study. A standardized general anesthetic was administered. On induction of anesthesia, patients in the diclofenac group received an IV bolus of diclofenac (0.7 mg/kg) followed by a constant infusion (0.15 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) until the end of surgery. In the saline group, an equal volume of saline was administered. During four time periods (equilibration, anesthesia, surgical, recovery), GFR and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were measured by inulin and paraaminohippurate clearance, respectively. After the induction of anesthesia and throughout the surgical period, ERPF and GFR were significantly decreased compared with preoperative baseline values. However, no difference was demonstrated between the groups. These results suggest that, in geriatric surgical patients, the adjuvant administration of NSAIDs does not adversely affect renal function. IMPLICATIONS: As determined by inulin and paraaminohippurate clearance, the intraoperative administration of diclofenac does not decrease glomerular filtration rate or effective renal plasma flow in normovolemic geriatric patients. Therefore, diclofenac may be administered during the perioperative period.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

The effect of midazolam premedication on mental and psychomotor recovery in geriatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures.

UNLABELLED: To assess the effect of IV midazolam premedication on recovery of cognitive function, 90 geriatric patients (aged 65-81 yr) undergoing brief transurethral procedures were enrolled into this prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. In all cases, a standard general anesthetic was administered. Thirty minutes before operating room transfer, patients in Group 0.5 mg, Group 2 mg, and Group S received 0.5 mg of midazolam, 2 mg of midazolam, or an equal volume of saline, respectively. Before study-drug administration (baseline), at 15 min thereafter, as well as on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and at 60 min and 120 min, postoperatively, we administered a digit-symbol substitution test, a mini-mental test, a shape-sorter test, and a patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (0 = minimal and 100 = maximal) for anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination. A 4-point scale was used to assess the degree of patient sedation at 7, 15, and 30 min after study-drug administration. Using a modified Aldrete scoring system, PACU discharge was determined by the PACU staff. Patient anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination scores at baseline and at 15 min after study-drug administration were similar. When compared with saline, midazolam was associated with a significantly (P < 0.05) higher incidence of "deep" sedation. In Group 2 mg, the incidence of a low preoperative Spo2 (<94%) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher when compared with Group S. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times, as well as time to follow commands were unaffected by midazolam premedication. Postoperatively, the digit-symbol substitution test, mini-mental test, and shape-sorter test were similar among the groups. However, time to PACU discharge was significantly (P = 0.03) longer in the two midazolam treatment groups (41 +/-25 min, 60 +/- 32 min, 53 +/- 39 min for Groups S, 0.5 mg, and 2 mg, respectively). Finally, patient satisfaction was unaffected by the randomization schedule. IMPLICATIONS: IV premedicant midazolam 0.5 mg or 2 mg does not adversely affect mental and psychomotor recovery in geriatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures. However, midazolam administration significantly prolonged postanesthesia care unit discharge time. Finally, during the preoperative period, midazolam increases the incidence of a Spo2 <94% in a dose-dependent manner.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Epidural steroids for treating "failed back surgery syndrome": is fluoroscopy really necessary?

UNLABELLED: Epidural steroids are commonly administered in the treatment of "failed back surgery syndrome." Because patient response is dependent on accurate steroid placement, fluoroscopic guidance has been advocated. However, because of ever-increasing medical expenditures, the cost-benefit of routine fluoroscopy should be critically evaluated. Therefore, 50 patients were enrolled into this institutional review board-approved, prospective, controlled, single-blinded study. At a predetermined intervertebral level, the epidural space was identified using an air loss of resistance technique. Thereafter, an epidural catheter was inserted 2 cm through the epidural needle. To determine the accuracy of the clinical placement, contrast medium was administered through the epidural catheter; antero-posterior and lateral lumbar spine radiographs were then obtained. The number of attempts required to successfully locate the epidural space, the reliability of the air loss of resistance technique in indicating successful epidural penetration in failed back surgery syndrome, the ability of the clinician to accurately predict the intervertebral space at which the epidural injection was performed, and the spread of contrast medium within the epidural space were recorded. A total of 48 epidurograms were performed. The number of attempts to successfully enter the epidural space was 2 +/- 1. In 44 cases, the radiological studies confirmed the clinical impression that the epidural space had been successfully identified. In three patients, the epidural catheter was in the paravertebral tissue. One myelogram was recorded. In 25 patients, the epidural catheter did not pass through the predetermined intervertebral space. In 35 cases, the contrast medium did not reach the level of pathology. IMPLICATIONS: The clinical sign of loss of resistance is a reliable indicator of epidural space penetration in most cases of "failed back surgery syndrome." However, surface anatomy is unreliable and may result in inaccurate steroid placement. Finally, despite accurate placement, the depot-steroid solution will spread to reach the level of pathology in only 26% of cases.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Bupivacaine infiltration into the neurovascular bundle of the prostatic nerve does not improve postoperative pain or recovery following transvesical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of intraoperative bupivacaine infiltration into the neurovascular bundle of the prostatic nerve on postoperative pain and patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III patients undergoing transvesical prostatectomy. Following surgical resection of the prostate the neurovascular bundle of the prostatic nerve was infiltrated with either 10 ml. bupivacaine 0.5% or saline. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a patient generated 100 mm. visual analog scale and a patient controlled analgesia device. Additional analgesic requirements, time to ambulation, length of hospitalization and return to normal activity were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no differences in visual analog scale for pain, patient controlled analgesia demands or actual morphine delivered. Similarly, saline versus bupivacaine infiltration did not influence ambulation time (21.3 +/- 2.7 versus 25.0 +/- 11.8 hours, respectively), length of hospitalization (7.06 +/- 0.8 versus 7.11 +/- 0.6 days, respectively), return to normal activity (14.4 +/- 8.8 versus 14.2 +/- 8.2 days, respectively) or patient satisfaction. On postoperative days 1 and 2 more patients in the saline treatment group requested additional oral analgesia compared to the bupivacaine treatment group. However, no statistical difference was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Following transvesical prostatectomy, prostatic nerve blockade has no beneficial effects on postoperative pain or patient outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

The induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of spinal versus general anesthesia in elderly patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the induction and recovery profiles of three combinations of general anesthesia when used as an alternative to spinal anesthesia for elderly patients. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 100 [ASA physical status I, II, and III] patients over 60 years of age undergoing brief transurethral surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In Groups Propofol-Propofol (P-P), Propofol-Isoflurane (P-I), and Propofol-Desflurane (P-D), anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1 to 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) and propofol (1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg i.v.) and maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and either a propofol infusion (75 to 150 micrograms/kg/min) or isoflurane (end-tidal 0.7% to 1.2%) or desflurane (end-tidal 1% to 4%), respectively. After induction, a laryngeal mask airway was placed and spontaneous ventilation was maintained. In Group Spinal (S), 1.5 ml 4% lidocaine (60 mg), in an equal volume of 10% dextrose, was administered intrathecally. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Induction and recovery characteristics were compared. Induction with propofol was technically easier and significantly (medp < 0.0001) faster (4.6 +/- 1.7 min, 4.7 +/- 2.2 min, and 3.8 +/- 1.4 min for Groups P-P, P-I, and P-D, respectively) than induction of spinal anesthesia (9.3 +/- 3.4 min). During the induction period, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in Group S. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times were similar among the general anesthesia treatment groups. In Group S, patient-generated pain scores were lower (p < 0.05) and recovery room admission longer (p < 0.001). Time to return to baseline digit symbol substitution test (DSST) scores was marginally improved in Groups P-P and P-D when compared to Group P-I. Postoperative nausea, sleepiness, anxiety, and coordination were unaffected by the treatment modality. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia with propofol and desflurane facilitates shorter induction and recovery times without adversely affecting patient comfort. Therefore, this technique may be preferable to spinal anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing short transurethral surgical procedures.

Aged↗