Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Vieta

Publications and source records attributed to E Vieta.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Neuropsychological and psychiatric complications in endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a clinical case report.

The clinical case report of a patient who underwent an endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of a slit ventricle syndrome is presented. After surgery the patient developed a severe complication consisting of an organic personality disorder, characterised by impulsiveness, physical heteroaggressiveness, binge eating, hypersomnia and impairment of memory, and frontal-executive functions.A frontal lobe lesion may explain some of the symptoms presented, such as the uncontrolled impulses, the aggressive behaviour, and even the binge eating. However, a longitudinal neuropsychological evaluation showed a severe deficit in immediate memory and difficulties in planning and consolidation of newly learned information, which may be best related to damage in the frontal basal structures of the brain: the fornix and its connection to the hippocampus and the mamillary bodies. Postoperative MR images confirmed the clinical hypothesis. The emergence of such a severe organic personality disorder and cognitive disturbances as a psychiatric complication of an endoscopic third ventriculostomy has not, it seems, been previously reported elsewhere. Clinicians should take these possible complications into account when recommending this so-called minimally invasive neuroendoscopic procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder: initial results from a large, multicenter surveillance study. Group for the Study of Risperidone in Affective Disorders (GSRAD).

BACKGROUND: An adequate therapy for psychotic disorders needs to be effective against mood as well as psychotic symptoms. Analyses of data from clinical trials of risperidone in schizophrenia and small open-label studies in mania suggest that risperidone may have this broad efficacy profile. We present data on a 6-week trial of risperidone for the treatment of schizoaffective disorder that was part of a larger, 6-month surveillance study of patients with affective disorders. METHOD: One hundred two patients suffering from schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV or ICD-10) entered the trial. Inclusion criteria consisted of a current DSM-IV diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; DSM-IV manic or mixed psychotic episode; and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score > 7 for a mixed episode (> 20 for a manic episode). Assessments included the YMRS, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the 4-item Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, and the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale subscale for neurologic side effects. For patients entering the study, open-label risperidone therapy was added to their existing regimens of mood-stabilizing treatments. Other antipsychotic drugs were not allowed. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients completed the 6-week trial. At week 6, the mean +/- SD dose of risperidone was 4.7+/-2.5 mg/day. The mean scores on the assessment scales at baseline and week 6 (unless otherwise stated) were as follows: YMRS, 22.7 and 4.7, an improvement of 18.0 points (p < .0001); PANSS (at baseline and week 4), 74.1 and 54.2, an improvement of 19.9 points (p < .0001); HAM-D, 14.0 and 7.4, an improvement of 6.6 points (p < .0001); CGI (at baseline and week 4), 2.6 and 1.7, an improvement of 0.9 points (p < .0001). At week 4, most patients had shown improvement in symptom severity, and 9.3% were completely symptom-free. There were no statistically significant differences between baseline and week 4 in the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms as measured by the UKU. Risperidone was well tolerated; side effects were few and generally mild. CONCLUSION: The results to date with risperidone indicate that it may have both antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing properties. Despite the limitations of the open-label design, the results indicate that risperidone is a safe and effective therapy in combination with mood-stabilizers for the treatment of patients with manic, hypomanic, and depressive symptoms of mixed episodes in schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Risperidone safety and efficacy in the treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective disorders: results from a 6-month, multicenter, open study.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of risperidone in bipolar and schizoaffective disorders. METHOD: 541 patients entered this open, multicenter, 6-month study. Patients were entered provided that they fulfilled DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, during a manic, hypomanic, mixed, or depressive episode. Risperidone was added to any previous mood-stabilizing medication that the patients were taking. Efficacy was assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were assessed using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale. RESULTS: 430 patients completed the study. Addition of risperidone produced highly significant improvements (p < .0001) on the YMRS and HAM-D at both 6 weeks and 6 months and on the CGI and the scales of the PANSS at both 4 weeks and 6 months. There was a significant reduction in UKU total and subscale scores at 6 months. The mean dose of risperidone was 3.9 mg/day. There was no single case of new-emergent tardive dyskinesia, and there was a very low incidence of exacerbation of mania within the first 6 weeks (2%). Adverse events were few and mostly mild. the most frequent being EPS and weight gain. CONCLUSION: This large study provides additional evidence that risperidone is effective and well tolerated when combined with mood stabilizers in the treatment of bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Previous concerns about exacerbation of manic symptoms were not confirmed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Clinical correlates of psychiatric comorbidity in bipolar I patients.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the clinical implications of psychiatric comorbidity in the course and outcome of bipolar I patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine bipolar I outpatients in remission [Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) < 7, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) < 9] were assessed by means of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R axis I and axis II (SCID-I and SCID-II) in order to detect all possible psychiatric comorbid diagnoses. The sample was split according to the presence of psychiatric comorbidity and the groups were compared. RESULTS: Psychiatric comorbidity was detected in 31% of the sample. A higher number of mixed features, depressive episodes and suicide attempts and a predominance of depressive onset amongst comorbid bipolar patients were the most relevant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between depression, suicidality and comorbidity in bipolar I disorder. As comorbidity had a clear relevance in the course and outcome of bipolar illness, this issue should be specifically assessed in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Doses of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol used in clinical practice: results of a prospective pharmacoepidemiologic study. EFESO Study Group. Estudio Farmacoepidemiologico en la Esquizofrenia con Olanzapina.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the doses of olanzapine (OLZ), risperidone (RIS), and haloperidol (HAL) used in clinical practice in outpatients with schizophrenia and the rates of occurrence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and other adverse events, clinical response, and use of concomitant medications. METHODS: The present study involved a subset of patients from a 6-month, open-label, prospective observational study. Data were collected by 293 psychiatrists at mental health centers and other outpatient treatment facilities in Spain. Medications and doses used, occurrence of EPS and other adverse events, and scores on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Severity Scale and Global Assessment of Function (GAF) were recorded. Clinical response was defined as a decrease of > or = 2 points on the CGI, with a final CGI score < or = 4. RESULTS: A total of 2657 patients were included in the analysis. The initial and overall mean daily doses for the 3 groups were as follows: OLZ, 12.2 and 13.0 mg, respectively; RIS, 5.2 and 5.4 mg; and HAL, 13.9 and 13.6 mg. Initial and overall median daily doses were the same in each group: OLZ, 10 mg; RIS, 6 mg; and HAL, 10 mg. A significantly lower proportion of OLZ-treated patients (36.9%) experienced EPS compared with RIS-treated (49.6%) and HAL-treated (76.0%) patients (P < or = 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of patients in the OLZ group (47.8%) experienced adverse events compared with patients in the RIS (57.2%) and HAL (79.8%) groups (P < or = 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of OLZ-treated patients (37.3%) were responders compared with RIS-treated patients (31.5%) (P < 0.05). In all 3 groups, patients who had an initial CGI score > or = 5 received significantly higher overall mean daily doses than did patients with an initial CGI score < 5 (P < 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of OLZ-treated patients (10.2%) were receiving concomitant anticholinergic medication at the end of the study (month 6) compared with RIS-treated (19.9%) and HAL-treated (44.0%) patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The mean daily doses recorded in this analysis based on data from a naturalistic setting are consistent with recommendations based on clinical trials. Compared with both RIS- and HAL-treated patients, OLZ-treated patients were less likely to experience EPS or other adverse events, and less likely to use concomitant anticholinergic medications. OLZ-treated patients were also more likely to respond to treatment than were RIS-treated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein in major depressive disorder. Relationships to severity, response to treatment and imipramine plasma levels.

BACKGROUND: Increased plasma levels of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) were reported in major depressive disorder. However, the relationship between AGP levels, severity of depression, treatment response and antidepressant levels are still unclear. METHODS: Plasma AGP levels were measured in 36 subjects with major depressive disorder before and after a 6-week treatment with imipramine and in 30 controls. Free imipramine plasma levels of depressed patients were measured at 6 weeks. Comparative analysis between depressed patients and controls, between non-responders (N = 12) and responders (N = 24), and between severely depressed patients (N = 14) and moderately depressed patients (N = 22) were made. RESULTS: Depressed patients had significantly higher mean values of AGP than control subjects. Imipramine non-responders and specially severely depressed patients had significantly greater increases of AGP levels during treatment than other depressed subgroups. There was no correlation between baseline AGP levels and severity of depression or free imipramine levels. LIMITATIONS: The most significant limitations of this study are the small sample size and the fact that all the subjects were out-patients. Results should not be generalized to in-patient populations. CONCLUSIONS: Depressed patients showed high baseline concentrations of AGP. AGP levels did not predict either free imipramine plasma levels or differential response after 6 weeks of treatment with imipramine. A greater increase of AGP during treatment was associated with severity of depression and treatment non-response. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The relationship between high plasma levels of AGP, severity of depression and lack of treatment response is clarified. The influence of imipramine levels is minimized.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Adjunctive gabapentin treatment of bipolar disorder.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of gabapentin administration to bipolar patients who had an incomplete response to other mood stabilizers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two RDC bipolar 1 and II patients were assessed by means of the SADS and entered if they gave their consent to participate. All them had suffered from frequent relapses, subsyndromal features (mostly depressive) and incomplete response to other drugs. They all received open-label increasing doses of gabapentin until clinical response. The patients were assessed through the CGI-BP and a specific questionnaire at baseline and at 12 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Six out of the 22 patients dropped out for various reasons (four because of relapse, one because of side effects and one more because of poor compliance). Eight of the 16 patients that completed the 12-week follow-up showed at least two stages of improvement in the CGI. Using the last observation-carried forward analysis, the improvement was statistically significant for the depression subscale, and apparently related to social functioning, irritability and anxiety. Only one patient dropped out because of intolerance (mild rash). The mean dose of gabapentin was 1,310 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin may be a useful drug for the add-on treatment of bipolar patients with poor response to other mood stabilizers. Gabapentin may improve depressive residual symptoms such as irritability, social withdrawal or anxiety. These results should be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar disorder: evidence of neuropsychological disturbances.

Although cognitive dysfunctions in psychosis have classically been associated with schizophrenia, there is clinical evidence that some bipolar patients show cognitive disturbances either during acute phases or in remission periods. The authors critically review the data on cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. The main computerized databases (Medline, Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents) have been consulted crossing the terms 'cognitive deficits', 'neuropsychology', 'intellectual impairment', 'mania', 'depression' and 'bipolar disorder'. Changes in the fluency of thought and speech, learning and memory impairment, and disturbances in associational patterns and attentional processes are as fundamental to depression and mania as are changes in mood and behavior. Moreover, a significant number of bipolar patients show persistent cognitive deficits during remission from affective symptoms. However, there are several methodological pitfalls in most studies such as unclear remission criteria, diagnostic heterogeneity, small sample sizes, absence of longitudinal assessment, practice effect and poor control of the influence of pharmacological treatment. Most studies point at the presence of diffuse cognitive dysfunction during the acute phases of bipolar illness. Most of these deficits seem to remit during periods of euthymia, but some of them may persist in approximately one third of bipolar patients. Methodological limitations warrant further research in order to clear up the relationship between neuropsychological functioning and clinical, demographic and treatment variables in bipolar disorder.

Attention↗
PubMed2000

Clinical factors associated with treatment noncompliance in euthymic bipolar patients.

BACKGROUND: Noncompliance with medication is a very common feature among bipolar patients. Rates of poor compliance may reach 64% for bipolar disorders, and noncompliance is the most frequent cause of recurrence. Knowledge of the clinical factors associated with noncompliance would enhance clinical management and the design of strategies to achieve a better outcome for bipolar patients. Although most patients withdraw from medication during maintenance treatment, compliance studies in euthymic bipolar samples are scarce. METHOD: Compliance treatment and its clinical correlates were assessed at the end of 2-year follow-up in 200 patients meeting Research Diagnostic Criteria for bipolar I or bipolar II disorder by means of compliance-focused interviews, measurements of plasma concentrations of mood stabilizers, and 2 structured interviews: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis II disorders. Well-compliant patients and poorly compliant patients were compared with respect to several clinical and treatment variables. RESULTS: The rate of mildly and poorly compliant patients was close to 40%. Comorbidity with personality disorders was strongly associated with poor compliance. Poorly compliant patients had a higher number of previous hospitalizations, but reported fewer previous episodes. The type of treatment was not associated with compliance. CONCLUSION: Clinical factors, especially comorbidity with personality disorders, are more relevant for treatment compliance than other issues such as the nature of pharmacologic treatment. Compliant patients may have a better outcome in terms of number of hospitalizations, but not necessarily with respect to the number of episodes. Bipolar patients, especially those with personality disorders, should be monitored for treatment compliance.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Enhanced corticotropin response to corticotropin-releasing hormone as a predictor of mania in euthymic bipolar patients.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of corticotropin (ACTH) and cortisol response after corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation has been reported in bipolar patients. Most findings involve the pathophysiology of the depressive phase of the illness and its prediction. However, the possible predictive value of the CRH challenge test with respect to manic episodes remains unknown. METHODS: The ACTH and free cortisol response to the injection of 100 microg of synthetic human CRH and plasma cortisol-binding globulin levels were measured in 42 lithium-treated patients suffering from Research Diagnostic Criteria bipolar I disorder in remission, and 21 age- and sex-matched normal controls. A 1-year follow-up was conducted to assess any possible relationship between outcome and the hormonal response. RESULTS: Bipolar patients showed higher baseline and peak ACTH concentrations than control subjects. A higher area under ACTH concentration curve after CRH stimulation predicted manic/hypomanic relapse within 6 months by multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Bipolar patients in remission show mild abnormalities in ACTH levels before and after CRH stimulation. CRH challenge may be a potentially good predictor of manic or hypomanic relapse in remitted bipolar patients.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗