Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Thurfjell

Publications and source records attributed to E Thurfjell.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.

Mammograms from 12,636 women aged 40-54 years were examined by one screener first as one-view screening and later as two-view screening. With one-view screening, 542 (4.3%) women were recalled and 31 breast cancers were detected. With two-view screening, 349 (2.8%) women were recalled and 32 breast cancers were detected. Mammograms from 11,343 women aged 41-75 years were independently screened by 2 experienced screeners. A total of 76 breast cancers were diagnosed by 131 surgical biopsies. Both screeners detected 56 cancers. One screener detected 14 cancers alone, and the other detected 6 cancers alone. Thus, 15% more cancers were detected because of double reading. Five experienced screeners reviewed 120 sets of mammograms from the first screening round, including 74 women with breast cancer diagnosed in the first round or later. The mean increase in sensitivity by using two views, instead of one, was 2%. The median of the increase in cancer detection because of independent double reading was 14.5% with one-view screening and 12% with two-view screening. We invited 48,517 women aged 40-74 years to mammography screening. 86% participated, of which 4.8% were recalled for further examinations, and 1.0% were referred to surgery. A total of 241 (0.58%) breast cancers were diagnosed. Only 20% of the invasive cancers had lymph node metastasis and the median size was 16 mm. A total of 43,074 women aged 40-69 years were invited to screening. The attendance rate was 87% in the first screening round and 78% in the second screening. The recall rate was 4.6% and 5.7%, respectively. The breast cancer rate was 0.48% in both screening rounds. The rate of stage II or more advanced breast cancers decreased significantly from 0.16% in the first screening round to 0.08% in the second (p = 0.007).

Adult↗

Diet and breast cancer risk. Results from a population-based, case-control study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: We describe an epidemiologic analytical study of the relationship between current diet and breast cancer risk. METHOD: The study design is a case-control analysis. Cases were recruited from a mammography screening program used within the national health care system; the control subjects were selected from subjects free of breast cancer in the same population. A total of 380 cases and 525 control subjects, frequency-matched for age, month of mammography, and county of residence, were identified. Of these, 265 cases and 432 control subjects were included in this analysis. Odds ratios for breast cancer in relation to food and nutrient intake were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Exposure in the highest quartile of beta-carotene intake gave an odds ratio of 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 1.0). No increased risk was noted with high fat intake. Breast cancer risk was associated with alcohol intake only when alcohol was analyzed in quartiles: odds ratio, 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.4) for the highest quartile of intake vs the lowest. Stratified analyses showed that a high fat intake might decrease the protective effect of beta-carotene intake. Risks did not change appreciably with adjustment for total energy intake or known breast cancer risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: As in most other studies, no strong risk factors for breast cancer have been identified in the current diet. The negative association between breast cancer risk and beta-carotene intake may be supported by a plausible mechanism, but our finding concerning alcohol should be interpreted cautiously since there was no dose-response relationship and the biological mechanism for a threshold effect at very low levels of consumption is unclear.

Adult↗

One- versus two-view mammography screening. A prospective population-based study.

In order to compare mammography screening with one versus two views, a prospective population-based study was carried out. Mammograms from 12,636 women aged 40 to 54 years were examined first as one-view screening and later as two-view screening. The initial results showed that two-view screening resulted in 349 recalls, 72 surgical biopsies, and 32 breast cancers. One-view screening resulted in 542 recalls, 61 surgical biopsies, and 29 histologically proven breast cancers. The follow-up revealed 2 additional cancers detected by one-view screening. Thus, the use of two-view screening resulted in one more cancer case being detected. The difference in breast cancer detection was not significant.

Adult↗

Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading.

Five experienced screeners independently and blindly reviewed mammograms from the first screening round of 46 healthy women, and of 74 women who had histologically proven breast cancers in the first screening round or later. The films were reviewed first as one-view screening and later as two-view screening. Fifty-one breast cancers were detected by at least one of the screeners on either one-view or two-view screening. The mean increase in sensitivity by using two views, instead of one, was 2%. The median of the proportional increase in detected cancers as the result of independent double reading was 14.5% with one-view screening and 12% with two-view screening. Two screeners using one-view screening detected about 10% more cancers than one screener using two-view screening.

Adult↗

Population-based mammography screening in clinical practice. Results from the prevalence round in Uppsala county.

The results from the prevalence round of a population-based mammography screening program in Uppsala county are presented. We invited 48,517 women aged 40 to 74 years to mammography screening. The age subgroup 40 to 54 years was examined with two-view mammograms, while women in age group 55 to 74 years were offered one-view screening. The number of attending women was 41,761 (86% of those invited), of whom 2,002 (4.8%) were recalled for further examination, and 423 (1.0%) were referred for surgical biopsy. A total of 241 (0.58%) women were diagnosed to have breast cancer. About 1/3 of the cancers were stage 2 or more advanced, but only 20% of the invasive cancers had lymph node metastasis. The median size of an invasive cancer was 16 mm. After age-adjusting the cancer rate, the results indicate that the Swedish two-county study can be duplicated in clinical practice.

Adult↗