Biomedical subjects

E Szabadi

Publications and source records attributed to E Szabadi.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparison of diphenhydramine and modafinil on arousal and autonomic functions in healthy volunteers.

Arousal is regulated by the interplay between wakefulness- and sleep-promoting nuclei. Major wakefulness-promoting nuclei are the histaminergic tuberomamillary nucleus (TMN) of the hypothalamus and the noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC) of the pons, which also play a role in autonomic regulation. First generation antihistamines, such as diphenhydramine, are likely to cause sedation by blocking excitatory H1 histamine receptors in the cerebral cortex, and the anti-narcolepsy drug modafinil may promote wakefulness by activating the locus coeruleus. We compared the effects of single doses of diphenhydramine (75 mg) and modafinil (200 mg) on arousal and autonomic functions in 16 healthy male volunteers, using a placebo-controlled, balanced, double-blind design. Arousal was assessed by critical flicker fusion frequency (CFFF), visual analogue scales (VAS) and pupillary fatigue waves (Pupillographic Sleepiness Test (PST)). Autonomic functions measured included resting pupil diameter, light and darkness reflex responses, blood pressure, heart rate and salivation. Data were analysed with ANOVA, with multiple comparisons. Diphenhydramine had sedative effects as shown by reductions in CFFF, VAS alertness ratings and increases of the indices of pupillary fatigue. Modafinil had alerting effects as indicated by reductions in the measures of pupillary fatigue. Comparison of pre-post medication changes in pupil diameter showed a decrease after diphenhydramine and an increase after modafinil. Diphenhydramine reduced salivation, and modafinil increased systolic blood pressure. In conclusion, diphenhydramine and modafinil evoked opposite effects on arousal and sympathetic functions, which are likely to reflect their interaction with the central histaminergic and noradrenergic systems. Hyposalivation by diphenhydramine is likely to be due to its additional anticholinergic property.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

Effects of d-amphetamine and DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) on timing behavior: interaction between D1 and 5-HT2A receptors.

RATIONALE: The dopamine-releasing agent d-amphetamine and the 5-HT(2) receptor agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) have similar effects on free-operant timing behavior. The selective D(1) dopamine receptor antagonist 8-bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol (SKF-83566), but not the D(2) dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol, can antagonize the effect of d-amphetamine, and the selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist (+/-)2,3-dimethoxyphenyl-1-(2-(4-piperidine)-methanol (MDL-100907) can antagonize the effect of DOI. However, it is not known whether the effect of d-amphetamine can be reversed by MDL-100907 and the effect of DOI by dopamine receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to examine the interactions of d-amphetamine and DOI with MDL-100907, SKF-83566, and haloperidol on timing performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats (n = 12-15 per experiment) were trained under the free-operant psychophysical procedure to press two levers (A and B) in 50-s trials in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A in the first half, and B in the second half of the trial. Percent responding on B (%B) was recorded in successive 5-s epochs of the trials; logistic functions were fitted to the data from each rat for the derivation of timing indices [T (50) (time corresponding to %B = 50); Weber fraction]. Rats were treated systemically with d-amphetamine or DOI, alone and in combination with haloperidol, SKF-83566, or MDL-100907. RESULTS: d-Amphetamine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) reduced T (50) compared to vehicle; this effect was antagonized by SKF-83566 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) and MDL-100907 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not by haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg kg(-1)). DOI (0.25 mg kg(-1)) also reduced T (50); this effect was reversed by MDL-100907 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not by SKF-83566 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) or haloperidol (0.05 mg kg(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both 5-HT(2A) and D(1) receptors, but not D(2) receptors, are involved in d-amphetamine's effect on timing behavior in the free-operant psychophysical procedure. DOI's effect on timing is mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors, but neither D(1) nor D(2) receptors are involved in this effect.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of pramipexole and amisulpride on alertness, autonomic and endocrine functions in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: In a previous study in healthy volunteers, the anti-Parkinsonian drug pramipexole caused sedation and pupil dilatation, consistent with the stimulation of inhibitory D(2)/D(3) autoreceptors on the ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurones. The sedation may be related to the removal of the dopaminergic excitation of the locus coeruleus (via the meso-coerulear pathway), whereas the pupil dilatation may be due to the removal of the dopaminergic excitation of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus (via a putative meso-pupillomotor pathway). OBJECTIVES: We investigated the hypothesis that amisulpride, a D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist, would have effects opposite to those of pramipexole on alertness, pupillary and endocrine functions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pramipexole (0.5 mg), amisulpride (50 mg), and their combination were administered to 16 healthy males in a balanced, cross-over, double-blind design. Tests included measures of alertness (Pupillographic Sleepiness Test, critical flicker fusion frequency, visual analogue scales), pupillary functions (resting pupil diameter, light and darkness reflex responses), non-pupillary autonomic functions (heart rate, blood pressure, salivation, core temperature), and endocrine functions [blood concentrations of prolactin, growth hormone (GH) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)]. Data were analysed by ANOVA. RESULTS: Pramipexole reduced alertness and pupillary light reflex response amplitude, tended to reduce core temperature, reduced prolactin levels and increased GH levels. Amisulpride reduced pupil diameter, increased the amplitude of the light reflex response and prolactin and TSH levels. CONCLUSIONS: The opposite effects of pramipexole and amisulpride on alertness, pupillary function and pituitary hormone levels are consistent with their interactions with inhibitory D(2)/D(3) receptors on VTA neurones and in the tuberoinfundibular system.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Evidence for a role of D1 dopamine receptors in d-amphetamine's effect on timing behaviour in the free-operant psychophysical procedure.

RATIONALE: Temporal differentiation of operant behaviour is sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations. Studies using the fixed-interval peak procedure implicated D2 dopamine receptors in these effects. Less is known about the effects of dopaminergic manipulations on temporal differentiation in other timing schedules. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a D1 antagonist,8-bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol (SKF-83566), and a D2 antagonist, haloperidol, on performance on the free-operant psychophysical procedure, and the ability of these antagonists to reverse the effects of the catecholamine-releasing agent, d-amphetamine on performance. The antagonists' ability to reverse d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats responded on two levers (A and B) under a free-operant psychophysical schedule, in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half, and B during the second half, of 50-s trials. Logistic functions were fitted to the relative response rate data (percent responding on B [%B] vs time [t]) in each treatment condition, and quantitative timing indices [T50 (value of t corresponding to %B=50) and Weber fraction] were compared among treatments. Effects of the treatments on locomotion were measured in a separate experiment. RESULTS: SKF-83566 (0.015, 0.03, 0.06 mg kg(-1)) did not affect timing performance. Haloperidol (0.025, 0.05 mg kg(-1)) had no effect; a higher dose (0.1 mg kg(-1)) reduced T (50). d-Amphetamine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) reduced T50; this effect was antagonised by SKF-83566 but not by haloperidol. Both antagonists reduced d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that d-amphetamine's effect on performance in the free-operant psychophysical procedure is mediated by D1 rather than D2 receptors.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

PubMed2006

Diazepam-induced disruption of classically-conditioned fear-potentiation of late-latency auditory evoked potentials is prevented by flumazenil given before, but not after, CS/US pairing.

Classical fear conditioning involves pairing a neutral conditional stimulus (CS) with an aversive unconditional stimulus (US). Subsequent presentation of the CS alone induces fear responses. Acquisition of conditioned fear is thought to involve learning of the CS/US association, followed by memory consolidation. Recently we reported that the N1/P2 auditory evoked potential was enhanced by fear conditioning in humans. Diazepam 10 mg, given before CS/US pairing, prevented subsequent expression of fear potentiation when the response was elicited, 1 week later, in the presence of the CS. In this experiment, we examined whether this effect of diazepam was caused by disruption of the formation of CS/US associations or by disruption of consolidation. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil was used to block the effect of diazepam either during the association period or during subsequent consolidation. Forty-two male volunteers (18-35 years) participated in two sessions separated by 7 days. In Session One, they ingested diazepam 10 mg or placebo: 60 minutes later they received flumazenil 1 mg or saline intravenously (i.v.). Then they received 20 presentations of a light (CS), 50% of which terminated with electric shock (US). This was followed by a second infusion of flumazenil or saline. Subjects received placebo/saline/saline (Group 1), diazepam/saline/saline (Group 2), diazepam/flumazenil/saline (Group 3) and diazepam/saline/flumazenil (Group 4). In Session Two, the CS was presented without the US; 50% of CS presentations terminated with a sound pulse; an equal number of sound pulses were presented without the CS. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded at Cz. In Session Two, CS presentation enhanced the auditory N1/P2 potential in placebo-treated subjects (Group 1). This enhancement was prevented by diazepam (Group 2). Flumazenil reversed diazepam's effect on fear potentiation if it was administered before conditioning (Group 3), but not if it was administered afterwards (Group 4). The results confirm that diazepam prevents the acquisition of fear conditioning in humans, and suggest that it disrupts the formation of CS/US associations, rather than the consolidation of fear memory.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of pramipexole and modafinil on arousal, autonomic, and endocrine functions in healthy volunteers.

The noradrenergic locus coeruleus is a major wakefulness-promoting nucleus of the brain, which is also involved in the regulation of autonomic and endocrine functions. The activity of the locus coeruleus is believed to be tonically enhanced by a mesocoerulear dopaminergic pathway arising from the ventral tegmental area of the midbrain. Both modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting drug, and pramipexole, a D(2)/D(3)receptor agonist with sedative properties, may act on this pathway, with modafinil increasing and pramipexole decreasing locus coeruleus activity. The aim of this study was to compare the two drugs on alertness, autonomic and endocrine functions in healthy volunteers. Pramipexole (0.5mg), modafinil (200mg), and their combination were administered to 16 healthy males in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Methods included tests of alertness (pupillographic sleepiness test, critical flicker fusion frequency, visual analogue scales), autonomic functions (resting pupil diameter, light and darkness reflex responses, heart rate, blood pressure, salivation, core temperature), and endocrine functions (blood concentrations of prolactin, growth hormone, and thyroid stimulating hormone). Data were analysed by ANOVA. Pramipexole reduced alertness, caused pupil dilatation, increased heart rate, reduced prolactin and thyroid stimulating hormone, and increased growth hormone level. Modafinil caused small increases in blood pressure and core temperature, and reduced prolactin levels. The sedative effect of pramipexole and the autonomic effects of modafinil are consistent with altered activity in the mesocoerulear pathway; the pupil dilatation following pramipexole suggests reduced dopaminergic excitation of the Edinger-Westphal nucleus.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Evidence that the effect of 5-HT2 receptor stimulation on temporal differentiation is not mediated by receptors in the dorsal striatum.

5-HT2 receptor stimulation alters temporal differentiation in free-operant timing schedules. The anatomical location of the receptor population responsible for this effect is unknown. We examined the effect of a 5-HT2 receptor agonist and antagonists, injected systemically and into the dorsal striatum, a region that is believed to play a major role in interval timing. Rats were trained under the free-operant psychophysical procedure to press levers A and B in 50s trials in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A in the first half, and B in the second half of the trial. Percent responding on B (%B) was recorded in successive 5s epochs of the trials; logistic functions were fitted to the data from each rat to derive timing indices (T50: time corresponding to %B = 50; Weber fraction: [T75-T25]/2T50, where T75 and T25 are the times corresponding to %B = 75 and %B = 25). Systemic treatment with the 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonist 2,5,-dimethoxy-4-iodo-amphetamine (DOI) (0.25 mg/kg, s.c.) reduced T50; the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL-100907 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect performance, but completely blocked the effect of DOI. DOI (1 and 3 microg) injected bilaterally into the dorsal striatum did not alter T50. The effect of systemic treatment with DOI (0.25 mg/kg, s.c.) was not altered by intra-striatal injection of MDL-100907 (0.3 microg) or the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist RS-102221 (0.15 microg). The ability of systemically administered MDL-100907 to reverse DOI's effect on T50 confirms the sensitivity of temporal differentiation to 5-HT2A receptor stimulation. The failure of intra-striatal MDL-100907 to antagonize the effects of DOI suggests that 5-HT2A receptors in the dorsal striatum are unlikely to be primarily responsible for DOI's effects on timing. Furthermore, the results provide no evidence for a role of striatal 5-HT2C receptors in DOI's effect on timing.

Amphetamines↗

PubMed2005

Why patients with Alzheimer's disease may show increased sensitivity to tropicamide eye drops: role of locus coeruleus.

RATIONALE: Patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD) may show increased sensitivity to tropicamide, a muscarinic cholinoceptor antagonist. AD is associated with a severe loss of noradrenergic neurones in the locus coeruleus (LC), which can be "switched off" experimentally by the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine. The possibility arises that increased pupillary sensitivity to tropicamide in AD may be due to diminished LC activity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that clonidine may potentiate tropicamide-evoked mydriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in two experimental sessions (0.2 mg clonidine or placebo) conducted 1 week apart. In each session tropicamide (0.01% 10 microl x 2) was applied to the left eye and artificial tear (10 microl x 2) was applied to the right eye. Pupillary functions (resting pupil diameter and light and darkness reflexes), alertness and non-pupillary autonomic functions (blood pressure, heart rate, core temperature and salivary output) were measured. Data were analysed by ANOVA, with multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Tropicamide increased resting pupil diameter, velocity and amplitude of the darkness reflex response, and decreased recovery time of the light reflex response. Clonidine affected all these pupillary measures in the opposite direction with the exception of the recovery time. The mydriatic response to tropicamide was potentiated by pre-treatment with clonidine. Clonidine reduced critical flicker fusion frequency, subjective alertness, blood pressure, salivation and temperature. CONCLUSIONS: The potentiation of tropicamide-evoked pupil dilatation by clonidine may be due to the abolition of the increase in parasympathetically mediated pupil constriction due to reduced LC activity.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Effects of quipazine and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG) on temporal differentiation: evidence for the involvement of 5-HT2A but not 5-HT3 receptors in interval timing behaviour.

RATIONALE: Temporal differentiation refers to animals' ability to regulate their behaviour during an ongoing interval. Striatal dopaminergic mechanisms are purported to be involved in temporal differentiation, and recent evidence also implicates 5-hydroxytryptaminergic (5-HTergic) mechanisms, possibly mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors. There is evidence that 5-HT(3) receptors contribute to the regulation of dopamine release in the basal ganglia; however, it is not known whether 5-HT(3) receptor stimulation can influence temporal differentiation. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of a selective 5-HT(3) receptor agonist m-CPBG, a mixed 5-HT(2A/3) receptor agonist quipazine, and selective 5-HT(3) and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonists (MDL-72222 and ketanserin, respectively) on temporal differentiation in a free-operant psychophysical procedure. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were trained to respond on two levers (A and B) under a free-operant psychophysical schedule, in which sucrose reinforcement (0.6 M: , 50 microl) was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half and on B during the second half of 50-s trials. Logistic psychometric functions were fitted to the relative response rate data [percent responding on B (%B) vs time from trial onset (t)], and quantitative indices of timing performance [T (50) (value of t corresponding to %B=50), Weber fraction, and mean time of switching from A to B, S (50)] were derived. RESULTS: Quipazine (0.5, 1, and 2 mg kg(-1)) altered timing performance, dose-dependently reducing T (50) and S (50); m-CPBG (2.5, 5, and 10 mg kg(-1)) had no significant effect. The effect of quipazine was antagonized by ketanserin (2 mg kg(-1)), but not by MDL-72222 (1 mg kg(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: The present results provide no evidence for the involvement of 5-HT(3) receptors in temporal differentiation and indicate that the effect of quipazine on performance was mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptor stimulation. The results are consistent with previous evidence for the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in interval timing behaviour.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine.

RATIONALE: Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the efficacy of reinforcers. A mathematical model (Killeen PR (1994) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 17:105-172) affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. The model postulates a bitonic function relating response rate and ratio size. One parameter of the function, a, expresses the motivational effect of the reinforcer, whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of 'motor capacity'. Previously we found that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine increased a, indicating an increase in reinforcer efficacy; a similar effect was observed with the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). It has been suggested that some of clozapine's behavioural effects are mediated by agonistic action at 5-HT(1A) receptors. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. METHODS: Rats were trained under a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). In experiment 1, they received acute doses of clozapine (4 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (100 microg kg(-1)), alone and in combination with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl)ethyl]-N-2-yridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 30 microg kg(-1)). In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine (2, 4 and 8 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (25, 50 and 100 microg kg(-1)) were compared between intact rats and rats whose 5-HTergic pathways had been ablated by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). RESULTS: In both experiments, clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT increased a and delta. In experiment 1, WAY-100635 abolished the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on a and delta, but did not alter clozapine's effects on these parameters. In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT did not differ between sham-lesioned and 5,7-DHT-lesioned rats. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm previous findings on the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. 8-OH-DPAT's effects are probably mediated by post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors; clozapine's effects are mediated by a different mechanism, which does not appear to involve 5-HT(1A) receptors and which does not depend upon an intact 5-HTergic pathway.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

PubMed2005

Does modafinil activate the locus coeruleus in man? Comparison of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers.

RATIONALE: Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting drug which is likely to activate some wakefulness-promoting and/or inhibit sleep-promoting neurones in the brain. The locus coeruleus (LC) is a wakefulness-promoting noradrenergic nucleus whose activity can be "switched off" by the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, leading to sedative and sympatholytic effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare the effects of single doses of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers. METHODS: Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in four experimental sessions (modafinil 200 mg; clonidine 0.2 mg; modafinil 200 mg + clonidine 0.2 mg; placebo) at weekly intervals, according to a balanced double-blind protocol. Arousal [pupillary "fatigue waves" (PFW), critical flicker fusion frequency, self-ratings of alertness] and autonomic functions (pupil diameter, pupillary light and darkness reflex responses, blood pressure, heart rate, salivation) were recorded. Data were analyzed with ANOVA, with multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Clonidine reduced subjective alertness, pupil diameter, the initial velocity and amplitude of the darkness reflex response, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and salivation, prolonged the recovery time of the light reflex response and increased PFW. Modafinil reduced PFW, increased pupil diameter and the initial velocity of the darkness reflex response and tended to reduce the effect of clonidine on pupil diameter and PFW. Modafinil had no effect on non-pupillary autonomic functions. CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine exerted sympatholytic and sedative effects, whereas modafinil had sympathomimetic and some alerting effects. Modafinil may activate noradrenergic neurones in the LC involved in arousal and pupillary control, without affecting extracoerulear noradrenergic neurones involved in cardiovascular and salivary regulation.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Sensitivity of late-latency auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials to threat of electric shock and the sedative drugs diazepam and diphenhydramine in human volunteers.

Late-latency auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials are sensitive to some centrally acting drugs and to certain psychological interventions. In this experiment we compared the effects of acute doses of a benzodiazepine, diazepam and an H(1) histamine receptor-blocking sedative, diphenhydramine, on auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials within the latency range 100-500 ms in a fear conditioning paradigm. Twelve healthy males (18-30 years) participated in three sessions at weekly intervals in which they received diazepam 10mg, diphenhydramine 75 mg and placebo in a balanced, double-blind, crossover protocol. One hundred and twenty min after diphenhydramine or 60 min after diazepam, they underwent an 8 min recording period in which auditory evoked potentials elicited by 40 ms, 95 dB[A], 1 kHz tones, and somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by a mildly painful electric shock (1.8 mA, 50 ms) were recorded at Cz (vertex). Each session consisted of four blocks of trials in which either the sound pulse or the shock was presented. Alternate blocks were designated SAFE or THREAT ('context' conditions); in THREAT blocks subjects were warned that shocks would be delivered via electrodes placed on the wrist (electrodes were removed during SAFE blocks). In one SAFE and one THREAT block, the sound stimuli and shocks (shocks were delivered only in the THREAT block) were preceded by a 2 s conditioned stimulus (CS: a red light) ('cue' condition). Diazepam, but not diphenhydramine, reduced the amplitude of the P2 auditory evoked potential. The THREAT context was associated with increased N1 and reduced N2 potential amplitudes. The CS had no effect on the amplitudes, but markedly reduced the latencies of the N1, P2 and N2 potentials under the THREAT condition. Diazepam reduced the amplitudes of the somatosensory potential evoked by the shock; the CS shortened the latencies of the later components of the response. Diazepam and diphenhydramine were approximately equi-sedative in the doses used in this experiment, as judged by visual analogue self-rating scales. The results indicate that the suppression of late-latency auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials by diazepam is not simply a reflection of sedation. Late-latency evoked potentials can be modified by an aversive CS, but the components that are sensitive to the CS are different from those that are sensitive to diazepam.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Effects of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor stimulation on temporal differentiation performance in the fixed-interval peak procedure.

We examined the effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) on performance on the fixed-interval peak procedure, and the sensitivity of these effects to 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor antagonists (N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide [WAY-100635] and ketanserin). Rats were trained to press a lever for food reinforcement in 50 min sessions consisting of 32 trials in which the lever was continuously available, separated by 10 s inter-trial intervals. In 16 trials, reinforcement was delivered following the first response after 30 s had elapsed since trial onset (fixed-interval 30 s). In 16 randomly interposed (peak/probe) trials, reinforcement was omitted, and the lever remained in the operant chamber for 120 s. Response rate in probe trials was plotted against time from trial onset. Time to peak response rate (t(peak)) and the Weber fraction were derived from modified Gaussian curves fitted to each rat's data. 8-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg kg(-1)) reduced t(peak) and increased the Weber fraction; the effect on t(peak) was antagonized by WAY-100635 (0.1 mg kg(-1)). DOI (0.25 mg kg(-1)) also reduced t(peak) and increased the Weber fraction; the reduction of t(peak) was antagonized by ketanserin (2 mg kg(-1)). Stimulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors alters temporal differentiation in qualitatively similar ways.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

PubMed2005

The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.

In a previous experiment [Kheramin S, Body S, Mobini S, Ho M-Y, Velazquez-Martinez DN, Bradshaw CM, et al. Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis. Psychopharmacology 2002;165: 9-17], destruction of the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC) in rats altered choice between two delayed food reinforcers, enhancing preference for the larger reinforcer. Theoretical analysis based on a quantitative model of inter-temporal choice [Ho M-Y, Mobini S, Chiang T-J, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of 'impulsive choice' behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacology 1999;146:362-72] indicated that the lesion had increased the relative value of the larger of the two reinforcers due to a general reduction of absolute reinforcer value. The present experiment tested this hypothesis using a reinforcement schedule that did not entail either explicit choice or delayed reinforcement. Ten rats received quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the OPFC, and ten rats received sham lesions. The rats were trained under a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement for 60 daily sessions. Response rates in successive ratios were a bitonic (inverted-U) function of ratio size. Analysis of the data using a three-parameter equation derived from a quantitative model of ratio schedule performance [Killeen PR. Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav. Brain Sci. 1994;17:105-72] revealed that the parameter specifying hypothetical reinforcer value was significantly lower in the OPFC-lesioned group than in the sham-lesioned group, consistent with the hypothesis that destruction of the OPFC resulted in devaluation of the food reinforcer.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Effects of quipazine and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG) on the discrimination of durations: evidence for the involvement of 5-HT2A but not 5-HT3 receptors.

The ability of rats to discriminate durations of exteroceptive stimuli is disrupted by 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists; it is not known whether temporal discrimination is sensitive to stimulation of other 5-HT receptor subtypes. We examined the effect of quipazine, a 5-HT receptor agonist with nanomolar affinity for 5-HT(3) receptors and micromolar affinity for 5-HT(2A) receptors, and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG), a selective 5-HT(3) receptor agonist, on temporal discrimination. Twenty-four rats pressed levers for sucrose reinforcement under a discrete-trials psychophysical procedure. In each 50-s trial, a light was presented for t s, following which two levers (A and B) were presented. A response on A was reinforced if t < 25 s, and a response on B if t > 25 s. Logistic psychometric functions were fitted to the data, and timing parameters estimated (T(50): value of t corresponding to %B = 50; Weber fraction: [T(75)-T(25)]/2T(50), where T(75) and T(25) are values of t corresponding to %B = 75 and %B = 25). Quipazine (0.5-2 mg/kg) displaced the psychometric curve to the right and reduced its slope, reflected in increases in T50 and the Weber fraction; m-CPBG (2.5-10 mg/kg) had no effect. The effects of quipazine were reversed by the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin (2 mg/kg) but not by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist topanyl 3,5-dichlorobenzoate (MDL-72222) (1 mg/kg). The results indicate that 5-HT(2A) but not 5-HT(3) receptor stimulation disrupts temporal discrimination.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Effects of lorazepam on fear-potentiated startle responses in man.

Sudden intense sensory stimuli elicit a cascade of involuntary responses, including a short-latency skeletal muscular response ('eyeblink startle response') and longer-latency autonomic responses. These responses are enhanced when subjects anticipate an aversive event compared to periods when subjects are resting ('fear potentiation'). It has been reported previously that the anxiolytic diazepam can suppress fear-potentiation of the eyeblink startle response in human volunteers. The present experiment aimed to confirm and extend these observations by examining the effect of another benzodiazepine, lorazepam, on the eyeblink and skin conductance components of the acoustic startle, and on fear-potentiation of these responses. Eighteen male volunteers participated in three weekly sessions in which they received oral treatment with placebo, lorazepam (1 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg), according to a balanced three-period, crossover, double-blind design. Two hours after ingestion of the treatments, electromyographic responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and skin conductance responses were evoked by sound pulses during alternating periods in which the threat of an electric shock (electrodes attached to the subject's wrist) was present (THREAT) and absent (SAFE). The THREAT condition was associated with significant increase in the amplitude of the electromyographic (EMG) and skin conductance responses; there were also increases in baseline skin conductance, the number and amplitude of 'spontaneous' skin conductance fluctuations and self-rated anxiety. Lorazepam attenuated the effect of THREAT on self-rated anxiety and on the amplitude of the EMG response, but had no significant effect on fear-potentiation of the skin conductance responses. These results extend previous findings of the effect of diazepam on the fear-potentiated eyeblink startle response to lorazepam, and suggest that fear-potentiation of the later autonomic component of the startle response may be less sensitive to benzodiazepines than the fear-potentiated eyeblink response and self-rated anxiety.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Diazepam suppresses the acquisition but not the expression of 'fear-potentiation' of the acoustic startle response in man.

Sudden auditory stimuli elicit a short-latency muscular response (acoustic startle response) which is enhanced during presentation of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus (CS) that has previously been paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) ('fear-potentiation'). In rodents, acute treatment with benzodiazepines blocks both the acquisition of fear-potentiation and the expression of fear-potentiation induced by prior exposure to CS/US pairing. We examined the effect of diazepam on the acquisition and expression of fear-potentiation of the acoustic startle response in man. Forty-six male volunteers (18-30 years) participated in two sessions separated by 7 days. In session 1, they were exposed to 20 2-s presentations of a light (CS), 50% of which terminated with an electric shock to the wrist (1.8 mA, 50 ms: US). Somatosensory potentials evoked by the US were recorded from the scalp at Cz, and skin conductance responses from electrodes taped to the second and fourth fingers. In session 2, the CS was presented 20 times without the US; a random 50% of CS presentations terminated with a sound pulse (40-ms 115-dB 1-kHz); an equal number of sound pulses was presented without the CS. Electromyographic responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle to the acoustic stimuli were recorded from electrodes placed on the lower eyelid, late-latency auditory evoked potentials were recorded at Cz, and skin conductance responses from electrodes taped to the second and fourth fingers. In each session, alertness was measured using visual analogue self-rating scales and critical flicker fusion frequency. Subjects received placebo or diazepam 10mg in the two sessions in a double-blind protocol: group 1 (n 12) placebo/placebo; group 2 (n 11) placebo/diazepam; group 3 (n 12) diazepam/placebo; group 4 (n 11) diazepam/diazepam. Diazepam reduced alertness as measured by visual-analogue self-rating scales and critical flicker fusion frequency. In session 1, diazepam reduced the amplitude of the somatosensory potentials and skin conductance responses evoked by the CS. In session 2, the acoustic startle response, the N1/P2 auditory evoked response and the skin conductance response evoked by the sound stimuli were enhanced in the presence of the CS. This fear-potentiation was attenuated in subjects who received diazepam in session 1, but was not affected by the treatment given in session 2. The results indicate that diazepam blocks the acquisition of fear-potentiation of startle responses in man, as in animals, but does not prevent the expression of a previously learned response.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

RATIONALE: Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the value or "efficacy" of reinforcers. A mathematical model affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. According to this model, the relation between response rate and ratio size is described by a bitonic (inverted-U) function. One parameter of the function, alpha, expresses the motivational or "activating" effect of the reinforcer (duration of activation of responding produced by the reinforcer), whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of "motor capacity". In a previous experiment we found that the "atypical" antipsychotic clozapine increased alpha, indicating an increase in the efficacy of a food reinforcer. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of four "atypical" and four "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance. METHODS: Rats responded for a sucrose reinforcer (0.6 M, 50 microl) on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). After 90 preliminary training sessions, they received acute doses of antipsychotics (doses in mg kg(-1)): atypical: clozapine (2, 4, 8, IP; n=15), quetiapine (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, SC; n=23), olanzapine (0.25, 0.5, 1, IP; n=15), ziprasidone (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, IP, n=15); conventional: haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, IP, n=15), pimozide (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, IP; n=15), raclopride (0.25, 0.5, 1, SC; n=12), cis-flupenthixol (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, SC; n=15). Values of a and delta were estimated from the response rate functions obtained under each treatment condition, and were compared between drug and vehicle-alone treatments. RESULTS: The atypical antipsychotics significantly increased alpha (indicating enhancement of reinforcer efficacy), and also increased delta (indicating reduction of motor capacity). Haloperidol, pimozide and raclopride significantly increased delta; none of the conventional antipsychotics significantly altered alpha. CONCLUSIONS: The results extend previous findings with clozapine to other atypical antipsychotics and suggest that enhancement of the efficacy of reinforcers may be a common feature of atypical antipsychotics not shared by conventional antipsychotics.

Animals↗