Biomedical subjects

E S Wiener

Publications and source records attributed to E S Wiener.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Lessons learned from a failed multi-institutional randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In 1996, the Surgical Sections of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) and the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) received National Cancer Institute funding to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled, surgeon-directed study to evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in children with cancer. Because of lack of patient accrual, the study was closed in 1998. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and describe those factors that impacted on study failure to ensure future successful clinical trials. METHODS: One hundred forty surgeons representing the surgical membership of CCG and POG as well as 111 institutions within CCG and POG were asked to complete a questionnaire about the failed clinical trial. The questionnaire focused on study objectives, organization, and institutional review board (IRB) submission. It also examined the surgeon's ability to perform the minimal access operation, the influence of the pediatric oncologist, and the existence of preconceived biases by surgeons, oncologists, and families. Statistical analysis was performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 140 (62%) surgeons responded to the questionnaire. Only 23% of the potential protocols were submitted for IRB approval. Of responding surgeons, 39% were not actively performing MIS when the study opened. A surgeon's support of the study was directly related to when the surgeon received the protocols (P <.001) and whether the participating surgeon was actively participating in MIS (P <.016). The oncologist's knowledge and support of the study affected IRB submission and approval (P <.02) and was influenced by whether MIS was practiced at the institution (P <.05). The majority of responding surgeons believed the experimental question was relevant (P <.05). However, responding surgeons believed that a preconceived bias existed within both their local surgical and oncology communities favoring a particular surgical approach (P <.001), but this bias did not extend to the families (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The study failed because of lack of accrual for a variety of reasons: failure to submit to the institution's IRB, lack of surgical expertise with MIS procedures, and preconceived surgeon bias toward either an endoscopic or traditional open approach.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

Which patients with microscopic disease and rhabdomyosarcoma experience relapse after therapy? A report from the soft tissue sarcoma committee of the children's oncology group.

PURPOSE: To identify which patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and microscopic residual disease (group II) are likely to not respond to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred ninety-five patients with group II tumors received chemotherapy and 90% received radiation therapy on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-I to IRS-IV (1972 to 1997). Tumors were subgrouped depending on the presence of microscopic residual disease only (subgroup IIa), resected positive regional lymph nodes, (subgroup IIb), or microscopic residual disease and resected positive regional lymph nodes (subgroup IIc). RESULTS: Overall, the 5-year failure-free survival rate (FFSR) was 73%, and patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on IRS-IV fared especially well (5-year FFSR, 93%; n = 90). Five-year FFSRs differed significantly by subgroup (IIa, 75% and n = 506; IIb, 74% and n = 101; IIc, 58% and n = 88; P = .0037) and treatment (IRS-I, 68%; IRS-II, 67%; IRS-III, 75%; IRS-IV, 87%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed positive associations between primary site (favorable), histology (embryonal), subgroup IIa or IIb, treatment (IRS-III/IV), and better FFSRs. Patterns of treatment failure revealed local failure to be 8%, regional failure, 4%, and distant failure, 14%. The relapse pattern noted over the course of IRS-I to IRS-IV shows a decrease in the systemic relapse rates, particularly for patients with embryonal histology, suggesting that improvement in FFSRs is primarily a result of improved chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Group II rhabdomyosarcoma has an excellent prognosis with contemporary therapy as used in IRS-III/IV, and those less likely to respond can be identified using prognostic factors: histology, subgroup, and primary site. Patients with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma are generally cured, although patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma or undifferentiated sarcoma, particularly subgroup IIc at unfavorable sites, continue to need better therapy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Controversies in the management of paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: is staging retroperitoneal lymph node dissection necessary for adolescents with resected paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma?

PURPOSE: Use of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PTRMS) is controversial and has changed over the past 2 decades. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) required ipsilateral RPLND (IRPLND) for all patients with PTRMS treated on IRS-III (1984-91), but changed to clinical evaluation of RPLNs using computerized tomography (CT) in IRS-IV (1991 through 1997). In IRS-IV, only those patients with identified lymph node involvement on CT required surgical evaluation of the RPLNs. Nodal radiation therapy was administered only to patients with RPLNs recognized as positive; such patients received more intensive chemotherapy as well. Thus, they compared the incidence of recognized RPLN involvement using these 2 different approaches. They then analyzed patient outcome to determine whether this change in management affected outcome. METHODS: Eligible patients with group I or II PTRMS who were treated on IRS III (n = 100) or IRS IV (n = 134) were analyzed. Failure-free survival (FFS) and survival (S) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: There was a significant change in the distribution of patients with group I versus II tumors from IRS-III to IRS-IV (group I, 68% in IRS-III versus 82% in IRS-IV). This was the result of decreased node recognition when CT was used to stage RPLNs in IRS-IV and was most notable for adolescents (>10 years of age). Overall, 3-year FFS was 92% for patients treated on IRS-III and 86% for those treated on IRS-IV (P =.10), whereas survival estimates were 96% and 92%, respectively (P =.30). Adolescents were at higher risk of RPLN relapse than were children (<10 years of age) and their FFS and survival were worse, regardless of IRS protocol. Furthermore, adolescents with recognized group II tumors experienced better 3-year FFS than those with group I tumors on IRS-IV (100% versus 68%, P =.06), most likely as a result of receiving radiotherapy and intensified chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of only CT scan evaluation of RPLN in IRS-IV led to a decrease in identification of RPLN involvement in boys who present with localized PTRMS, and a higher rate of regional relapse as compared with IRS-III. Adolescents had much higher likelihood of RPLN disease, and they fared significantly worse than did younger children on both studies. Furthermore, adolescent boys with group I tumors experienced worse FFS than those with Group II tumors on IRS-IV, probably because some patients with group II tumors were not identified by CT imaging and thus received less effective therapy. These data suggest that adolescents should have ipsilateral RPLN dissection as part of their routine staging, and those with positive lymph nodes require intensified chemotherapy as well as nodal irradiation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated sarcoma in the first two decades of life: a selective review of intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study group experience and rationale for Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study V.

PURPOSE: To review the importance of prognostic factors in developing new protocols for children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four studies conducted by the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) Group from 1972 through 1991. RESULTS: Favorable prognostic factors are: (1) undetectable distant metastases at diagnosis; (2) primary sites in the orbit and nonparameningeal head/neck and genitourinary nonbladder/prostate regions; (3) grossly complete surgical removal of localized tumor at the time of diagnosis; (4) embryonal/botryoid histology; (5) tumor size < or = 5 cm; and (6) age younger than 10 years at diagnosis. The IRS-V protocols are risk-based and refine therapy by reducing exposure to cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy (XRT) in patients at low risk while adding new, active agents such as topotecan or irinotecan to the standard therapy of vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) plus XRT for patients with unfavorable histology or advanced disease. Collection of biologic specimens from patients with newly diagnosed disease continues to identify other factors that may distinguish patients with favorable features from those who need more intensive therapy. A new protocol that takes into account their previous treatment is needed for patients with recurrent disease. This program (being planned) does not include bone marrow/stem cell reconstitution because this strategy has thus far failed to improve survival rates of patients with metastases at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Better understanding of biologic differences and new, active agents are needed to improve outcome of patients with unfavorable features at presentation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Issues in the local control of rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a heterogeneous disease consisting of several different histologies arising from a variety of anatomic sites. Approximately half of the children who die of this tumor have failure at the primary site of involvement, making local control an important component of therapy. PROCEDURE: Published literature and newly analyzed data from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) regarding local control of RMS were reviewed. Information regarding the role of various local control modalities for different primary disease sites is presented along with new directions for clinical research. RESULTS: Local control rates for RMS average 80% for group III tumors, with large variations seen for different anatomic sites. Important gains in functional outcome for certain sites such as gynecologic system and bladder/prostate have been achieved by optimizing the use of the various treatment modalities. Local control at other sites such as the chest and extremities remains a problem. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in surgical and radiotherapy techniques coupled with multiagent chemotherapy are providing improved local control with decreasing morbidity. Optimal outcome is dependent on close collaboration between surgical, radiotherapy, and pediatric oncology specialists.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2000

Preoperative staging, prognostic factors, and outcome for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: a preliminary report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV (1991-1997).

BACKGROUND: During the fourth Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) Study (IRS IV, 1991-97), a preoperative staging system was evaluated prospectively for the first time. The authors evaluated this staging system and the role of surgery in extremity RMS in contemporary multimodal therapy. METHODS: A total of 139 patients (71 girls; median age, 6 years) were entered in IRS IV with extremity-site RMS. Stage was assigned by the IRSG Preoperative Staging System. Postsurgical group was determined by tumor status after initial surgical intervention. Multivariate analysis was performed using all pretreatment factors that were significant by univariate analysis, including clinical Group (i.e., I through IV), tumor invasiveness (T1,T2), nodal status (N0,N1), and tumor size (< or > or =5 cm). Failure-free survival rates (FFS) and survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan and Meier method. RESULTS: Preoperative staging and clinical group distribution were as follows: Stage 2, n = 34; Stage 3, n = 73; Stage 4, n = 32; Group I, n = 31; Group II, n = 21; Group III, n = 54; Group IV, n = 33. Three-year FFS was 55%, and the overall survival rate was 70%. Eighty-seven patients had either unresectable, gross residual disease (Group III) or metastases (Group IV). FFS was significantly worse for these patients with advanced disease, compared with that for patients with complete resection or with only microscopic residual tumor (i.e., Group I or II; Group I, 3-year FFS, 91%; Group II, 72%; Group III, 50%; Group IV, 23%; P<.001). Lymph nodes were evaluated surgically in 76 patients with positive results in 38. Clinically, 13 additional patients had nodal disease. Both stage and group were highly predictive of outcome and were highly correlated. By multivariate analysis, none of the other variables were predictors of FFS. CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms the utility of pretreatment staging for stratification of patients with extremity RMS with widely different risks of relapse, thereby paving the way for development of risk-based therapy. Group (operative staging) remains the most important predictor of FFS, emphasizing the importance of complete gross resection at initial surgical intervention, when feasible without loss of limb function. The high incidence of nodal disease in the patients who had lymph node biopsy confirms the need for surgical evaluation of lymph nodes to ensure accurate staging in children with extremity rhabdomyosarcoma.

Child↗

PubMed2000

Benefit of intensified therapy for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: results from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV.

PURPOSE: To compare failure-free survival (FFS) and survival for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV with that of comparable patients treated on IRS-III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were retrospectively classified as low- or intermediate-risk. Low-risk patients were defined as those with primary tumors at favorable sites, completely resected or microscopic residual, or orbit/eyelid primaries with gross residual disease and tumors less than 5 cm at unfavorable sites but completely resected. Intermediate-risk patients were all other patients with local or regional tumors. RESULTS: Three-year FFS improved from 72% on IRS-III to 78% on IRS-IV for patients with intermediate-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (P =.02). Subset analysis revealed two groups that benefited most from IRS-IV therapy. FFS at 3 years for patients with resectable node-positive or unresectable (group III) embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma arising at certain favorable sites (head and neck [not orbit/eyelid or parameningeal] and genitourinary [not bladder or prostate]) improved from 72% on IRS-III to 92% on IRS-IV (P =.01). Similarly, 3-year FFS for patients with completely resected tumor or with only microscopic disease remaining (group I or II) at unfavorable sites improved from 71% on IRS-III to 86% on IRS-IV (P =.04). Only patients with unresectable embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (group III) at unfavorable sites had no improvement in outcome on IRS-IV (3-year FFS for IRS-III and IRS-IV, 72% and 75%, respectively; P =.31). CONCLUSION: IRS-IV therapy benefited certain subgroups of patients with intermediate-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. A doubling of the intensity of cyclophosphamide (or ifosfamide equivalent) dosing per cycle between IRS-III and IRS-IV is thought to be a key contributing factor for this improvement.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

What comprises appropriate therapy for children/adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma arising in the abdominal wall? A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define clinical features and determine the best therapy for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the abdominal wall. METHODS: We examined the demographic, clinical features, therapy (especially surgical), and outcome of 34 patients. Patients received combination chemotherapy after complete surgical resection (group I, n = 14; 41%); resection with microscopic residual followed by local irradiation (RT; group II, n = 8; 24%); partial resection or biopsy only plus RT with gross locoregional residual tumor (group III, n = 4; 12%); or biopsy only plus RT with metastatic disease (group IV, n = 8; 24%). Patients with group I or group II tumors had undergone partial abdominal wall resection (ie, involved muscle only with preservation of peritoneum, n = 11) or complete abdominal wall resection (n = 7). Four additional patients had groin lesions. RESULTS: Thirty-four children or adolescents with abdominal wall RMS (about 1% of all patients) were treated on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study I (IRS-I) through IRS-IV. Overall, adolescents comprised 14 of 34 eligible patients (41%), and 10 of 14 (71%) adolescents had alveolar or undifferentiated tumors versus 8 of 20 (40%) younger children (P= .07). Failure-free survival (FFS) rate and survival rate at 5 years was 65%. Treatment outcome was poorer for patients with group III-IV tumors (P = .01), adolescents (P = .09) and patients with alveolar or undifferentiated sarcomas (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Patients with localized tumors appear to fare better if they undergo complete abdominal wall resection (long-term survival rate, 100%) versus partial resection (long-term survival rate, 62% [P = .12]).

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed1999

Progress in the surgical management of vaginal rhabdomyosarcoma: a 25-year review from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: During its 25 years of experience, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) has completed four sequential prospective clinical trials to improve survival and decrease morbidity rates in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Surgical management of vaginal RMS has changed dramatically. METHODS: The records of 72 patients with localized vaginal RMS were reviewed to assess surgical therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy and their relation to outcome. RESULTS: Each successive IRSG trial resulted in decreased need for surgical resection (IRS-I, 100%; IRS-II, 70%; IRS-III, 30%; IRS-IV, 13%) and excellent disease-free survival using increasingly effective multiagent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Primary chemotherapy after initial biopsy provides excellent tumor control. Local resection may be appropriate, but removal of organs (ie, complete vaginectomy/hysterectomy) has no role except in persistent or recurrent disease. Mature, residual rhabdomyoblasts may be evidence of a chemotherapy response, and further surveillance and biopsy without surgical resection is adequate treatment.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

Does debulking improve survival rate in advanced-stage retroperitoneal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma?

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND, METHODS, AND PURPOSE: The authors examined demographic and clinical features, therapy, and outcome of patients with advanced (group III or IV) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the retroperitoneum and nongenitourinary pelvis treated in the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) III (1984 to 1991, n = 41) or IV pilot (1987 to 1991, n = 53) studies to assess the role of initial debulking surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with retroperitoneal primary tumors and gross locoregional residual tumor (group III, n = 53) or metastatic disease (group IV tumors, n = 41) were treated with combination chemotherapy (ie, vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide with or without other agents plus radiation therapy, RT) after biopsy only or subtotal resection. These retroperitoneal tumors usually were invasive (T2, 76%). Most patients were younger than 10 years of age (n = 69, 73%), the male to female ratio was 1.4, and tumors usually were embryonal (n = 64, 68%). Overall 4-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 50%; survival was 60%. Survival rate was better for girls (4-year survival rate, 75% v49% for boys; P = .05) and was not significantly different for patients treated in IRS-III (66%) or IRS-IV pilot (52%). However, it was better for patients with embryonal versus alveolar or undifferentiated tumors (4-year survival rate, 70% v 42%; P = .002). In adolescents, RMS is different from that seen in children less than 10 years old; most cases are alveolar or undifferentiated (16 of 29, 55%). Surgery for most (21 of 24) patients with alveolar tumors comprised biopsy only. By contrast, of 64 patients with embryonal tumors, 39 (61%) underwent biopsy only, whereas 25 (39%) had debulking surgery. Patients whose tumors were debulked fared better than those whose tumors underwent biopsy only (4-year FFS rate, 72% v48%; P = 0.03). Patients with group IV embryonal tumors fared unexpectedly better than those with group IV alveolar or undifferentiated tumors (70% versus 42% 4-year survival rate, P < .05), and patients less than 10 years of age with group IV embryonal tumors had 4-year survival rate of 77%, indicating the importance of the biology of these tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal therapy, including multiagent chemotherapy plus RT, appears to improve survival rate in patients with advanced embryonal RMS arising in the retroperitoneum. These data suggest that debulking tumors of embryonal histology improves outcome further. This approach will be assessed in IRSG V.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Indications for radiotherapy and chemotherapy after complete resection in rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies I to III.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with complete surgical resection and multiagent chemotherapy, with or without local radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-nine patients with completely resected (ie, group I) RMS were further treated with chemotherapy (vincristine and actinomycin D +/- cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) I to III between 1972 and 1991. Eighty-three patients (19%) also received local RT as a component of initial treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients relapsed (10-year failure-free survival [FFS] 79%, overall survival 89%). Six percent of failure sites were local, 6% were regional, and 7% were distant. Poor prognostic factors were tumor size greater than 5 cm, alveolar or undifferentiated histology, primary tumor sites other than genitourinary, and treatment on IRS-I or II. For patients with embryonal RMS who were treated with RT, there was a trend for improved FFS but no difference in overall survival. On IRS-I and II, patients with alveolar or undifferentiated sarcoma who received RT compared with those who did not receive RT had greater 10-year FFS rates (73% v 44%, respectively; P =.03) and overall survival rates (82% v 52%, respectively; (P =.02). Such patients who received RT on IRS III also benefited more than those who did not receive RT (10-year FFS, 95% v 69%; P =.01; overall survival, 95% v 86%; P =.23). CONCLUSION: Patients with group I embryonal RMS have an excellent prognosis when treated with adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy without RT. Patients with alveolar RMS or undifferentiated sarcoma fare worse; however, FFS and overall survival are substantially improved when RT is added to multiagent chemotherapy (IRS-I and II). The best outcome occurred in IRS-III, when RT was used in conjunction with intensified chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1998

Thoracic sarcomas in children.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the experience of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies (IRS) II and III with thoracic sarcomas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Thoracic sarcomas in children present special problems with histologic diagnosis, total resection of tumor, and local control. Previous studies have shown high rates of local and distant relapse. METHODS: Data from evaluable patients enrolled in IRS II and IRS III were reviewed. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical differences were calculated by the log-rank test. The multivariate regression analysis of data was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients presented with thoracic sarcomas during IRS II (51 patients) and IRS III (33 patients). Of these, 76 were chest wall tumors, 3 were lung tumors, 4 were pleural tumors, and 1 arose from the heart. The average age at diagnosis was 8.5 years (range, 1 month-20.5 years). Thirty-three patients had alveolar histology, 17 had embryonal histology, and 12 had extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma, with indeterminate, undifferentiated, and pleomorphic histologies in the remaining 22 patients. Thirteen patients presented as group I (localized disease completely resected), 18 as group II (microscopic residual or nodal disease), 31 as group III (gross residual disease or biopsy only), and 22 as group IV (distant metastatic disease). Sixty patients (71%) achieved a complete response. Thirty-nine patients had a local relapse, and 22 had a distant relapse. Thirty-five patients (42%) survived with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range 0.7-11.7 years); 49 (58%) have died with an average survival of 1.1 years (range 0.3-11.7 years). Four patients (5%) died of infection or treatment complications. Progression-free survival was not significantly associated with histology, site, clinical group, or IRS study. Overall survival was significantly associated with clinical group, size, and local or distant recurrence, but not with histology or IRS study by univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis, only clinical group and local and distant recurrence showed statistical significance (p < 0.002, < 0.006, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: As expected, outcome was better for patients with totally resected or microscopically residual tumor after resection. A higher rate of recurrence in group I versus group II,although not statistically significant, suggests that identification of margin status may be difficult, and these patients may require more intensive efforts for local control. These patients continued to have a high rate of local and distant relapse, and new strategies for preventing these are under development.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Delayed resection in the management of non-orbital rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck in childhood.

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of delayed resection on outcome of head and neck rms in a single institution which has experience in cranial base surgery. Since 1988, patients with primary non-orbital rms of the head and neck following treatment at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, were evaluated by the Department of Otolaryngology, Eye and Ear Hospital at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center either at the time of presentation or when response to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy was thought to have been optimized for the possibility of definitive surgery. Medical records of patients who did or did not have delayed surgery were reviewed and compared with respect to demographics, tumor stage, response to therapy, survival, and cosmetic results. Of 16 children diagnosed with non-orbital head and neck rms from 1988-1994 and treated with chemotherapy according to IRS II-IV, 3 had group I or II disease following extensive surgery at diagnosis. Thirteen had group III or IV disease. Of these, 6 patients had delayed resection and 7 did not. Delayed resection was undertaken 3-12 months (median, 4 months) from diagnosis in 4 children who had a partial response (PR) and 2 children who had stable disease (SD) with chemotherapy and/or radiation. Delayed resection converted all children to complete responses (CR), including one child with clinical SD and one with PR who were found to have no viable tumor at surgery. The overall percentages of CRs for patients with group III or IV disease (documented any time post-diagnosis) were at least as good for patients who had undergone delayed surgery as for those who had not (100% vs. 71%, p = .465). Median survivals for patients with advanced disease were 3 1/2 years and 2 years, respectively (p = .2801). Cosmetic and functional problems attributable to surgery were not severe but included facial asymmetry (n = 4), trismus (n = 1), cranial nerve deficits (n = 1), and abnormal dentition (n = 1). In locally extensive head and neck rms, cranial base surgery should be considered after initial cytoreductive therapy, since it may contribute to achievement of CR and to survival with acceptable morbidity.

Child↗

PubMed1997

Ewing's sarcoma of soft tissues in childhood: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study, 1972 to 1991.

PURPOSE: One hundred thirty of 2,792 patients (5%) registered on three Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study clinical trials (IRS-I, -II, and -III) from 1972 to 1991 had an extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma (EOE). We report here the results of multimodality therapy for this tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 130 patients were less than 21 years of age; 70 (54%) were males. Primary tumor sites were on the trunk in 41 patients, an extremity in 34, the head/neck in 23, the retroperitoneum/pelvis in 21, and other sites in 11. One hundred fourteen patients had no metastases at diagnosis. In 21 patients, the tumor was completely resected; in 30, the localized or regional tumor was grossly resected, and in 63 patients, grossly visible sarcoma was left behind. Sixteen patients (12%) had distant metastases at diagnosis. All patients were given multiagent chemotherapy and most received irradiation (XRT); none were treated with bone marrow transplantation. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients (82%) achieved a complete response. At 10 years, 62%, 61%, and 77% of the patients were alive after treatment on IRS-I, IRS-II, or IRS-III therapeutic protocols, respectively, similar to figures obtained in all IRS patients. At last follow-up evaluation, 42 patients had died of progressive tumor and one of infection. Survival at 10 years was most likely for patients with tumor that arose in the head and neck, extremities, and trunk, and for those who underwent grossly complete tumor removal before initiation of chemotherapy. For patients with localized, gross residual tumor, adding doxorubicin (DOX) to the combination of vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide (VAC), and XRT did not significantly improve survival in 39 patients (62% alive at 10 years) compared with that of 24 patients treated with VAC and XRT without DOX (65% alive at 10 years, P = .93). CONCLUSION: This series indicated that EOE in children is similar to rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in its response to multimodal treatment. No benefit was apparent from the addition of DOX to VAC chemotherapy in patients with gross residual EOE.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Infantile fibrosarcoma: complete excision is the appropriate treatment.

BACKGROUND: Infantile fibrosarcoma and its pathological variants are unusual childhood tumors. During the past 25 years, 18 children with these lesions were seen at our institution. METHODS: These patients' records were analyzed to determine clinical and pathological findings and outcome. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 7 months. There were 16 boys and 2 girls. The sites of tumor at presentation were: Extremity, head, trunk, and pelvis. Pathological findings were: fibrosarcoma, myofibroma, and fibromatosis. Histologic characteristics varied from benign hypocellular to more cellular pleomorphism. The initial surgical procedure was a complete excision in 16. Of those patients with complete removal, 6 recurred and all had secondary reexcision. In addition to excision, 3 patients received adjunctive therapy; chemotherapy in all 3 and radiation in 2. Sixteen (89%) children survived, including 4 of 6 with recurrent tumor and 2 of 2 with incomplete initial resection. Two children ages 6 and 9 months at diagnosis died of progressive recurrent tumor at 1 month and 6 years from initial diagnosis, despite operative therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Both had paraspinal tumors that were removed completely. Pathological examination revealed spindle cell tumors infiltrating muscle. Neither clinical nor histologic findings distinguished surviving from nonsurviving patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrosarcoma occurring in infants has an excellent outcome despite histologic findings. Initial complete excision should be attempted in all children. Recurrence indicates a more aggressive variant and warrants more aggressive complete reexcision wherever possible. Adjunctive therapy probably has no benefit. The occasional death indicates the need for close follow-up.

Female↗

PubMed1996

Hernia survey of the Section on Surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The members of the Section on Surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics were surveyed to determine the practice of North American pediatric surgeons in infants with inguinal hernia (IH). Case-scenario multiple-choice-design questionnaires regarding hernias and hydroceles were sent to all members of the Surgical Section, and responses were received from 292 (50%). In healthy full-term infant boys with asymptomatic reducible IH, 82% of responders perform repair electively, no matter what the age or weight. In full-term girls with a reducible ovary, 59% perform surgery at the next available time; if the ovary is nonreducible but asymptomatic, 44% operate emergently or urgently and 42% at the next elective slot. In former preemies, the pattern of repair is as follows. (1) For those recently discharged after 2 months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with reducible IH, 65% perform the repair when convenient. (2) A general anesthetic is used in 70%; 15% use spinal anesthesia, and 11% use caudal block with sedation. (3) If the repair is done in the hospital outpatient (same-day) unit, 36% wait until 50 weeks postconception (PC) and 33% wait until 60 weeks PC. (4) if the baby's weight is at least 1,000 g. 71% perform the repair before discharge. The pain control choice after childhood IH repair is Tylenol for 30%, local infiltration biquivacaine for 30%, caudal block for 22%, regional block for 11%, and Tylenol/codeine combined for 7%. In 6-week-old full-term infants with communicating hydroceles without definite "hernia," two thirds treat as an IH with elective repair as soon as possible. With respect to contralateral exploration in infants with unilateral IH, 65% perform it in males if they are < or = 2 years of age and 84% use it in females of up to 4 years of age. This approach is not influenced by presenting side, presence of hydrocele, or history of prematurity. Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral IH is performed by only 6% of responders, 40% of whom use the open ipsilateral sac for laparoscope introduction.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1996

Laparoscopy through the open ipsilateral sac to evaluate presence of contralateral hernia.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral side (LECS) in children with unilateral inguinal hernia (UIH) has been criticized because of the abdominal trocar risk and costs. LECS was modified to avoid abdominal trocar insertion by using the open hernia sac for instrumentation (OHLECS). This study was performed to determine the utility, safety, and effectiveness of this technique. METHODS: During a 15-month period, 80 children with unilateral hernia underwent attempted OHLECS. All ordinarily would have undergone open contralateral exploration. The indications were UIH in boys < or = 2 years of age and girls < or = 4 years of age (n = 53) or high clinical suspicion (but not certainty) of contralateral hernia in older children with UIH (n = 27). Endotracheal intubation was not used unless otherwise indicated. Reusable 3-mm blunt trocars and 3-mm 30 degrees or 70 degrees laparoscopes were employed, with and 6 to 8 mm of insufflation pressure. No urethral catheter was used. The ipsilateral hernia sac was dissected, opened, and instrumented, and the contralateral side was evaluated for patency. Concurrent external palpation of the contralateral inguinal canal is an important diagnostic adjunct. Positive results were visible patency of processus vaginalis or bubbles or fluid and/or gas expressed from the processus by palpation. Only if the evaluation was positive was contralateral incision and repair performed. OHLECS added no more than 2 minutes of operating time. The operating room cost is similar to that of opening the contralateral side. Only reusable laparoscopic instruments are used, and less operating time, anesthetic time, suture material, and dressings are required if the contralateral side is not opened. RESULTS: In 10 patients (all < 6 months old) OHLECS was aborted because the hernia sac was smaller than 3 mm at the internal ring. OHLECS was successful in 70 (88%) patients-56 boys and 14 girls, aged 2 mo to 12 years (mean, 2.6 years). The presenting hernia was right-sided in 46 (66%) and left-sided in 24 (34%). Overall, 43 (61%) OHLECS results were negative and 27 (39%) were positive. The OHLECS results were positive for 22 (39%) boys and 5 (36%) girls. Their mean age was 1.9 years (range, 2 months to 10 years). There were no false-positives and one false-negative. There have been no complications during follow-up (mean, 1.14 years; range, 6 months to 2 years). No additional costs were incurred because nondisposable equipment was used. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral side via the open ipsilateral hernia sac is feasible, quick, safe, cost effective, and requires no additional incisions. The rate of positive findings is comparable with that of open exploration. Long-term follow-up is required to determine the ultimate effectiveness of the technique.

Child↗

PubMed1996

Extremity sarcomas: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study III.

PURPOSE: Prognostic factors for extremity sarcomas have been reported previously, after analysis of Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcomas Studies (IRS) I and II. This report reviews the experience of IRS III (1984-1992), in light of these reported factors, and the pretreatment factors used in the staging system currently being evaluated in IRS IV. The results of treatment of extremity sarcomas in IRS III are reported. METHODS: The charts of all patients entered in IRS III with an extremity-site tumor were reviewed. This group included patients with shoulder girdle and buttock sites. All patients were treated according to IRS III protocols. Survival rates were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier, and comparisons among groups of patients were made using a log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed to analyze all pretreatment factors that were significant by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 189 patients entered in IRS III with extremity sites, 88 (47%) had the most common alveolar histology. Fifty-nine patients were in group I at the time of presentation (completely resected disease), 48 in group II (microscopic residual disease), 36 in group III (gross residual disease), and 46 in group IV (metastatic disease). By univariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors affecting survival were clinical group, age at time of diagnosis, tumor size, distant metastases, nodal metastases, and local and distant recurrence. By multivariate analysis of pretreatment factors, age at time of diagnosis, nodal metastases, and distant metastases were significant prognostic factors affecting survival; tumor size approached significance. Both the clinical group system and pretreatment staging system (Lawrence/Gehan) predicted significant differences in survival between groups of patients. The lower survival rate among group II and III node-negative patients with a distal tumor (who, with more extensive surgery, could have been in group I) in comparison to group I patients with a distal lesion, approached significance. In patients without distant metastases, survival was significantly different in those patients that had negative nodes from those in whom nodes were not biopsied. CONCLUSION: This review confirms that both clinical grouping and the new pretreatment staging system used in IRS IV can predict the likelihood of survival of children with extremity sarcomas. By multivariate analysis of the elements included in the staging system, nodal metastases, distant metastases, and tumor size were useful in predicting survival. In addition, age was a significant predictor. This study confirms previous suggestions that complete excision with gross and microscopically negative margins is preferable in the treatment of children with extremity rhabdomyosarcomas.

Adolescent↗